Struggle veterans in Endumeni call on municipalities to respect constitutional rights
The joint engagement also served as a platform for raising urgent concerns around governance, service delivery and constitutional rights.
Addressing the gathering, local struggle veteran Mzwakhe Sithebe said:
'The exorbitant billing by Umzinyathi, along with misleading estimates, continues to frustrate residents. There is a serious lack of public participation within both Umzinyathi and Endumeni municipalities. This is unacceptable.'
Sithebe expressed full support for the community's pending legal action against the municipality for its failure to provide water.
'An increasing number of areas in Endumeni are experiencing dry taps. This is a clear violation of Sections 24 and 27 of the Constitution. The constitutional mandate is not being honoured.'
He added that the 'renewed ANC is not inward-looking but responsive to people's needs', stressing that members are committed to building a party that remains a servant of the people.
Other key concerns raised during the meeting included:
The slow progress on land restitution, which members said must be prioritised to build a responsive state;
Allegations of nepotism in municipal appointments, with preference reportedly given to relatives of officials;
Councillors failing to hold regular constituency meetings;
The absence of genuine public participation in local government despite it being a cornerstone of democracy outlined in the Freedom Charter and Section 152 of the Constitution.
Sithebe concluded:
'The call that 'the people shall govern' must be more than just words. Our municipalities must reflect the will and needs of our communities.'
HAVE YOUR SAY: Like our Facebook page, follow us on Twitter and Instagram or email us at [email protected]. Add us on WhatsApp 071 277 1394.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
8 hours ago
- IOL News
Minister Kubayi asserts no executive interference in NPA prosecutions
Justice and Constitutional Development Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi says she has given full support to the National Prosecuting Authority's need for financial and operational independence. Image: Jairus Mmutle / GCIS Justice and Constitutional Development Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi has reaffirmed the independence of the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA), asserting that her ministerial oversight does not extend to influence over prosecutorial decisions. 'The Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development exercises final responsibility over the NPA. This role is administrative and policy-oriented and does not extend to involvement in or interference with specific prosecutorial decisions,' Kubayi said. She made the statement when she was responding to parliamentary questions posed by EFF MP Rebecca Mohlala. Mohlala posed the parliamentary questions following the recent allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner, Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. She wanted to know the measures that were in place to guarantee prosecutorial decisions in politically sensitive cases were free from executive interference and undue political influence. In her reply, Kubayi said the Constitution safeguards the NPA's prosecutorial independence. 'It explicitly states that the NPA must exercise its functions without fear, favour or prejudice, which is reinforced by Section 32 of the National Prosecuting Authority Act, 1998 (Act No. 32 of 1998).' She added that the NPA was accountable to Parliament, including for its decisions regarding the institution of prosecutions. The Constitution also provided safeguards against executive interference as it provided that 'national legislation must ensure that the prosecuting authority exercises its functions without fear, favour or prejudice'. 'The NPA is therefore guided by constitutional and legislative provisions that guarantee its independence,' Kubayi said. The minister stated that she did not possess investigative powers and could not initiate or conduct investigations. However, she confirmed that the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) in KwaZulu-Natal has received an enquiry from the SAPS and has dedicated prosecutors to deal with allegations of defeating the administration of justice regarding the disbandment of the Political Killings Task Team. 'The DPP will report to the National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP).' Kubayi added that matters referred to the Investigating Directorate Against Corruption (IDAC) were assessed to determine whether or not fell within the IDAC's mandate before a decision was made to investigate. She said there were prescripts that guided the investigations and legal processes that IDAC must follow. 'There are sufficient checks and balances to ensure that there is no interference internal or otherwise. To date there has not been any interference in the matters that IDAC has been dealing with.' Regarding high profile cases, Kubayi said National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP) Shamila Batohi issued directives which require prosecutors in the prosecution of sensitive or contentious nature to inform the DPP concerned in writing about the nature and details of such matters, and the DPP was expected to similarly inform Batohi. The NPA applied the same legal standards and prosecutorial guidelines to all politically sensitive cases. 'Decisions are made based on the sufficiency of evidence, public interest, and the prospects of a successful prosecution. The NPA remains committed to upholding the rule of law and ensuring accountability, irrespective of the status or affiliation of those involved,' Kubayi said. Asked about measures to restore the independence, credibility and public trust in the NPA, Kubayi said addressing the NPA's operational and financial independence has been a long-outstanding issue. She also said since Batohi came to office, addressing aspects of the NPA's operational and financial independence has featured as one of the key strategic initiatives, including the NPA to obtain its own Accounting Officer in order to safeguard its financial independence.
Eyewitness News
8 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
National Dialogue will go ahead as planned, says Ramaphosa
JOHANNESBURG - The African National Congress (ANC) is calling for an urgent resolution to disputes surrounding the upcoming National Dialogue after several legacy foundations withdrew from the preparatory task team. The party said the concerns, ranging from transparency and financial oversight to the need for a truly citizen-led process, must be addressed to preserve the dialogue's integrity and credibility. It has urged the foundations, including those of former presidents Thabo Mbeki and Kgalema Motlanthe, to reconsider their withdrawal, calling their experience "invaluable" to the success of the process. In a statement, the ANC said the National Dialogue must be rooted in inclusive participation, guided by the spirit of the constitution and liberation values. President Cyril Ramaphosa, speaking in Vereeniging, also weighed in, insisting that the event would go ahead as planned. He said that funds had been released, a venue secured, and an operation centre was already functioning with thousands of invites sent to community leaders, business, labour and government representatives. The ruling party added that it was ready to support improvements to the dialogue framework, including proper financial governance, transparent decision-making and clear accountability structures. It called on all stakeholders, including government, to work with urgency and humility to rebuild public trust, saying the initiative must rise above administrative shortcomings and focus on the collective good.
IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
Ungenaphi? Where to from here?
For us, it has to address inequality, poverty and historic injustices while doing so. It must recognise that corruption and failing service delivery are not side issues, says the writer. What use is talking about carbon credits when people don't have clean water? How do we talk about renewable energy when people are still freezing in informal settlements? And honestly? The world's a mess. From Palestine to Gaza, Sudan to Somalia, Ukraine to China and from and from and from. We just did not get it right. AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL scientist the preface of my write is centred around environmental concerns and climate change. However, as broad and overwhelming as those may seem, they can also feel disconnected from the everyday struggles we face in South Africa. For us, it has to address inequality, poverty and historic injustices while doing so. It must recognise that corruption and failing service delivery are not side issues. This means it tackles the lack of basic services such as water, sanitation and healthcare. And it does this while recognising that corruption undermines any chance of a just transition, because public funds are meant to serve communities and meet people's most basic needs. Capitalism and many other "ism's" has flipped us all right over haven't they? South Africa exists as a developing country forwarding the African continent in policy and discourse pursuing a deep, just transition. But what does that even mean when you're living here? It can not only be about pursuing renewable energy with all the technical aspects around wind, solar and hydropower. So a deep transition isn't just a buzz word. It can't be. And it's not just for supporting green technology. It is there to address the root causes and work from bottom up with the people. Because how can you green the economy while communities burn down to keep warm? And we've seen it - people freezing in winter because of poor housing infrastructure. Families illegally connecting electricity just to cook, then turning to gas or fires, which lead to blazes that destroy entire settlements. People losing all they have. People losing their lives. Those injured hoping for some sort of relief at a local clinic or hospital, praying for staff that would be available to assist them upon arrival or to even access medicine that could be provided to numb out the fact that they just lost everything, never mind the physical wounds they carry. My words fail me when I think of our healthcare system. I, personally, am terribly afraid to step foot in government hospitals, the stories heard are always painful to the ears. But we have a Constitution, don't we? It says: 'Everyone has the right to have access to adequate housing.' 'Everyone has the right to sufficient food and water.' 'Everyone has the right to an environment that is not harmful to their health or well-being.' Yet we still have people living without safe homes. Without clean water. Without access to a clinic unless they take three taxis and pray there's staff. So we ask again: Ungenaphi? Where to from here? When I did my honours, I looked at small-scale fisheries - and the gap between what's written in policy and what actually happens on the ground is wild. And this is not just one policy. The gap is everywhere. It's no surprise young people feel frustrated. We see through the big talk. We have been disillusioned. As a young person living in this country, I say a deep just transition isn't just a buzzword. It's not a checklist. It's a call to completely reimagine how we serve people - and who gets left behind when we don't. It starts from the bottom up, not from boardroom deals. It starts with holding municipalities accountable. It starts with us demanding what we're owed - not as favours, but as rights. We're not asking for miracles. We're asking for the basics. We're asking for what's already been promised. 'The people shall govern.' The Constitution isn't just a document - it's a promise. We have the tools. Now we need courage.
