Community Housing Aotearoa Says Unlocking Housing Affordability Is A Key To Reducing Homelessness
Unlocking affordability is a key to providing secure, affordable, long-term rental homes that support people to thrive. It is also a necessary step towards reducing the number of people and children in emergency housing and addressing New Zealands …
'Focussing on community and tenant outcomes is key to ensuring government investment improves lives so we are heartened to hear Hon. Nicola Willis announce the new $190 million Social Investment Fund to support people in need.' said Paul Gilberd, Chief Executive, Community Housing Aotearoa.
'We acknowledge the three groups included in today's announcement and the awhina, support and services they provide to their communities: He Piringa Whare and Te Tihi o Ruahine alliance, AUTISM New Zealand and Ka Puta Ka Ora Emerge Aotearoa's Youth Services.
We are also encouraged by the Minister of Finance's statement that she wants to see less people in Emergency housing as a key measure of a desired outcome. We believe this can be achieved by providing access to more affordable, adequate rental housing.
Unlocking affordability is a key to providing secure, affordable, long-term rental homes that support people to thrive. It is also a necessary step towards reducing the number of people and children in emergency housing and addressing New Zealand's high and rising levels of homelessness.
Community housing providers already offer a range of affordable housing options to match community needs. As a sector, we focus on achieving long-term, sustainable outcomes for residents and communities. As such, we're more than a landlord. We have a duty to ensure our homes are managed and protected for the long-term and wider social good and achieve our vision of ensuring all New Zealanders well-housed for generations to come.'
About Community Housing Aotearoa
Community Housing Aotearoa (CHA) is a peak body for the community housing sector. To achieve our vision of 'all New Zealanders well-housed', we have a strategic focus on supporting a responsive housing system underpinned by Te Tiriti o Waitangi and the Right to a Decent Home.
Our member organisations provide homes for nearly 30,000 people nationally across 26,000 homes, and our partner members include developers, consultants and local councils. Community Housing Organisations are primarily not for dividend entities that develop, own and/or manage social and affordable housing stock, with a variety of tenure offerings.
CHA is a proud Tangata Tiriti organisation and works closely with national Māori housing advocate Te Matapihi, which also represents iwi-based and Māori community housing organisations.
We believe all New Zealanders have the right to a decent home. A home that is affordable, secure, habitable, is near schools, transport and services and is culturally adequate.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
24 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
NZ debt nears $1 trillion as growth moderates, savings fall
At the current rate of growth, we'll hit that landmark inside the next three years. The rate of growth has moderated in the past two years as the Government has sought to curb borrowing, and the housing market, which accounts for the largest chunk of our debt, has been flat. Businesses have also been hunkering down, afraid to invest and expand, and farmers are getting good returns but using them to address high debt levels. But while the rate at which we're borrowing has eased, so too has the rate at which we are saving and growing wealth. The easiest path out of debt is wealth creation, shrinking our net debt and our debt-to-GDP ratio. So going backwards on that front is a cause for concern. The big, ugly numbers In the year to May 31, we hit a total of $872.6 billion in gross debt. That figure is up from $827.3b last year, a rise of 5.4%. It represents an average of $163,717 in raw debt for every Kiwi in the country. The rate of growth is relatively subdued by the standards of previous years. In the first New Zealand Herald Nation of Debt feature, in 2016, the total gross debt figure was $492.5b. We have seen total debt rise 77% since then. That represents an average annual increase of 6.65%. Given we are still coming down from a period of high interest rates, it was not surprising that borrowing growth was subdued, said Reserve Bank adviser for financial stability assessment and strategy, Charles Lilly. 'We're still in a relatively contractionary phase,' he said. 'We want to see stability. We don't want credit debt off the scale and people taking too much risk.' On the downside, a lack of borrowing growth was more of an issue with the financial system if the banks were not willing to lend, he said. 'I think banks are still willing to lend; it's mainly from the demand side, they just don't have customers coming through the door.' Crown debt also continues to rise, despite the Government's efforts to curb spending. Core Crown borrowing (the baseline we've used since 2016) was $238.8b in the year to May 31, 2025. That's up from $215b in the year to May 30, 2024 – an increase of 11%. It follows an increase of 11% for the previous year. While the coalition Government hasn't been able to stop Crown debt rising in double digits, it has at least reduced the annual rate of increase. It was 27% and 17% respectively in the years to May 2022 and May 2023. Crown debt is always a hot political topic. Wellington business editor Jenée Tibshraeny will take a deep dive into the state of the Government books tomorrow in part two of this series. The other side of the ledger Of course, the nominal figures still look scary. So does your mortgage if you don't weigh it against the value of your house. It is important to compare the gross debt figure to our saving rates and assets to add more context. Unfortunately, the latest Stats NZ figures (for the year to March) showed New Zealanders' household net wealth has fallen. Household net worth, the value of all assets owned by households less the value of their liabilities, fell $25.4b to $2.42 trillion in the March 2025 quarter. That is still almost three times the total gross debt figure. But in the year ended March 2025, household net worth fell $23.1b (0.9%), after a rise of $61.2b (2.5%) in the year ended March 2024. We're currently headed in the wrong direction. Most of that fall will be related to house prices, although some of it can be attributed to lower savings rates. Stats NZ's household saving data shows how much households are saving out of their current income (ie current income less current consumption). The data shows savings fell $392 million to minus $1.6b in the March 2025 quarter. Sector by sector Housing It should come as no surprise that the nation's mortgage debt accounts for the bulk of what we owe. Housing debt shot up during the big housing booms in the middle of the last decade and again during the first blush of Covid as stimulus money and low interest rates bolstered property prices. In the year to May 2016, the annual rate of increase for total housing debt was 9.2%, in 2021 it was 11.5%. If we look back further, it topped 16% in 2004. So this year's increase of 4.7% looks modest in comparison. It represents a slight increase on the even more modest 3.3% rise in the year to May 2024. That lift in mortgage debt may reflect the slight uptick in prices late last year and early this year (albeit something of a false start for those waiting on a full-blown housing market recovery). But the level of borrowing has also been lifted by record numbers of first-home buyers coming into the market, and fewer investors, said the RBNZ's Lilly. The former typically need to borrow more from the bank than the latter. If the housing market picks up later this year, as many pundits expect, then we'll likely see the rate of increase in mortgage borrowing follow, he says. Mortgage debt, most of which we owe to Australian banks, is a feature of the New Zealand economy that tends to worry international credit agencies more than our Crown debt. It has been a concern for the Reserve Bank in the past. 'In the current environment, subdued is definitely the theme,' Lilly said. Business Business borrowing barely lifted in the past year – and that is not good news for the economy. At $136.5b in the year to May 31, it was up just 0.6%. Businesses typically borrow to invest in new equipment that will improve productivity or to expand, taking on staff, to grab more market share. None of that stuff has been a feature of the past year. In fact, the opposite has been the case. Many businesses are struggling to survive. Those that desperately need cash to stay in business aren't going to get it from a bank. The struggle for many retail businesses is also highlighted in the relatively anaemic growth in personal consumer lending. At $14.5b, it is up 1.1% in the year to May 31. NZ Herald retail reporter Tom Raynel will take a closer look at the consumer borrowing trends later this week as part of the Nation of Debt series. For larger businesses, issues such as global uncertainty and tariffs would be limiting the appetite to borrow and take risks, Lilly said. It was also the case that the commercial property sector remained very weak, he said. Agriculture Unlike the struggling urban business sector, farmers have been benefiting from strong international export prices in the past year. Numerous commentators have suggested increased spending in the agricultural sector should buoy the regional economies and eventually flow through to the cities. The borrowing data for the past year offers some clues as to why that may take longer than many expect. Total agricultural debt is down 1% for the year to May 31, to $62.8b. Farmers appeared to be using their increased earnings to pay down debt in the first instance, Lilly said. This wasn't a bad thing; it is only a few years ago that the Reserve Bank was highlighting dairy debt as a significant risk to New Zealand's financial stability, he said. By the numbers That big, ugly number in our graphic is New Zealand's total gross debt. It combines the latest Reserve Bank figures for private debt with Treasury numbers for Crown debt and Local Government Funding Agency data on council debt, and IRD's data on student loans. The Reserve Bank figures include housing debt, consumer debt, business debt and agricultural debt to June 30. These are updated monthly by the central bank as part of its brief to monitor and maintain financial stability. The Crown debt figure is taken from the Treasury's Interim Financial Statements (11 months to May 31) and is the figure for core Crown borrowings. This is different from the net core Crown debt figure often used by politicians when discussing debt-to-GDP ratios. We use this (on Treasury's advice) as it is a gross debt figure but excludes debt held by state-owned enterprises, which would have been covered in the Reserve Bank statistics. The debt figure supplied by the Local Government Funding Agency is gross debt for the year to June 30, 2024. It captures all core council activities (Watercare, Auckland Transport, etc) but excludes some commercial activities (eg Christchurch City Council's Orion lines company, Port of Lyttelton, Christchurch Airport) as these would also be included in RBNZ data. Student loan debt is from the IRD statistics to March 2025. COMING UP IN THIS SERIES Tomorrow: Gov't debt: Are higher taxes inevitable? Wednesday: Consumer debt: What are Kiwis borrowing for? Thursday: Student debt: How big? How bad? Liam Dann is Business Editor at Large for the New Zealand Herald. He is a senior writer and columnist, as well as presenting and producing videos and podcasts. He joined the Herald in 2003.
Otago Daily Times
an hour ago
- Otago Daily Times
Mad as hell and not taking it any more
The government's Retirement Villages Act review must put people before profits, Brian Peat writes. The review of the Retirement Villages Act 2003 has turned into a slow-motion farce. Every extra month without reform is another month residents remain trapped in unfair contracts — waiting far too long for their own money, paying fees after they have left, and battling disputes in systems stacked in favour of operators. Let us call it for what it is: the government is dragging its heels. Hiding behind phrases like "careful consideration" and "getting it right" is nothing more than political cover for doing nothing while older New Zealanders suffer. This is not a theoretical policy exercise. This is about real people, many in their 80s and 90s, who do not have the luxury of waiting years for fairness and protection. The government has all the evidence it needs to act. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Development has years of reports detailing systemic unfairness. Residents have spoken out repeatedly. International models, for example New South Wales, show that fairer rules including repayment timeframes can be introduced without bankrupting the sector. The worst injustice is "the elephant in the room" — exit payments. Residents' capital is routinely held for months, even years, after they leave. The answer is simple. Require operators to lodge sufficient funds in a government agent trust account, just as landlords must under the Residential Tenancies Act. That would force repayment within a set timeframe and end the industry's excuse that "there's no money until a new resident moves in." That excuse sounds eerily like a Ponzi scheme, especially when one of the "big six" operators openly boasts in its annual report of holding $2.8 billion of interest-free funds from residents. The Retirement Villages Association (RVA) calls this a "resident-funded model". If that is true, why don't residents share in the profits? We all know the answer. The RVA continues to refuse to make any concessions, or even enter into meaningful discussions with the Retirement Village Residents Association (RVResidents) on the urgent issue of a mandated timeframe for repayment of capital. This stance disregards the overwhelming feedback from thousands of residents and their families and, effectively, prolongs financial hardship for many older New Zealanders who cannot afford to wait months, or even years, for what is rightfully theirs. The operators love to boast that "95% of residents are happy". No-one disputes that but happiness does not make an unfair law fair. The Act is broken, and it must be fixed. The government must commit to: — A hard, enforceable deadline for exit payments — no more than 3 to 4 months — Operators, not residents, paying for the repairs and maintenance of operator-owned chattels — An end to ongoing fees after departure — Contracts written in plain English, so residents know exactly what they are signing — A genuinely independent dispute resolution system with real teeth and real consequences I have visited and presented in more than 400 villages across New Zealand. I have heard the stories first-hand. Residents are tired of being told they are "just grumpy old radicals" for daring to demand fairness. RVResidents is no longer a lone voice. We have the backing of Consumer NZ, Grey Power, Citizens Advice, Age Concern, the Law Society, Community Law, Positive Ageing and major superannuation groups. These organisations represent hundreds of thousands of New Zealanders. The message is clear: reforming the Retirement Villages Act is not just a residents' issue — it is a national issue of fairness, dignity and consumer protection. Ignoring this call is ignoring a powerful cross-section of New Zealand society. We are done with hollow promises. We are done with endless process. And we are especially done with ministers claiming to "care about older New Zealanders" while siding with corporate operators. This review will not be judged by the weight of its final report. It will be judged by how quickly it delivers concrete protections. Every day without change is a deliberate political choice. Right now, the choice this government is making is to protect operators over people. The clock has run out and so has our patience. The government's choice is clear: side with the people who built this country, or side with those exploiting them. — Brian Peat is a Dunedin village resident and president of the Retirement Village Residents Association.
Scoop
5 hours ago
- Scoop
Govt Gets It Wrong With Cancelled Ferries
The cost of cancelling the iRex ferries shows the wastefulness and short-term thinking of the Coalition Government. 'We could have had new ferries by next year and millions of dollars left over to spend on critical infrastructure if it weren't for this irresponsible Government,' says the Green Party's spokesperson for Transport, Julie Anne Genter. 'This decision to cancel the contract for new ferries has cost us $671 million. This is a missed opportunity and a massive mark against this Government's credibility. 'For context, that amount of money could have funded the electrification of the main rail line from Waikanae to Palmerston North, or built thousands of much-needed homes. 'New Zealanders should have been taking those new ferries this and next year - instead we've had the Aratere taken out of commission, and more trucks on the road as a result of retiring our only rail-enabled ferry. 'The Hyundai order for two new rail-enabled ferries for $550m was one of the best deals the country ever signed up to. This Coalition Government tore it up and will likely be forced into signing a deal that leaves us worse off in the short and long term. 'The Government must stop cutting corners and commit to funding a transport network that works for people and planet,' says Julie Anne Genter.
