&w=3840&q=100)
Why are men taller than women? Genes hold the answer
On average, men usually have five inches more in height than women. But why? Scientists have now found an answer to this pertinent question. A gene called SHOX, associated with height, is partially responsible read more
SHOX gene is one of the factors behind men being taller than women. Representational Image/Pixabay
Men are generally taller than women. The two sexes have an average height difference of about five inches.
While this is a known fact, a question worth asking is: Why are men taller than women? Scientists have found an answer, which partially explains this: genes.
But how? Let's understand.
How the study was conducted
A new study published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences on Monday (May 19) involved the genetic data of nearly one million (10 lakh) people.
Researchers studied data from three biobanks – two in the United States and one in the United Kingdom.
Of the roughly one million people whose information was in the biobanks, the scientists found 1,225 people had missing or extra X or Y chromosomes, as per a New York Times (NYT) report.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
While men have one X and one Y chromosome, women have two X chromosomes.
The gene behind height difference
Scientists have found that a gene called SHOX is responsible for the difference in male and female heights.
Also called short stature homeobox-containing gene, it is linked to height. SHOX is present on both the X chromosome and the Y chromosome.
After studying the genetic data of more than 1,000 people who had either missing or extra X or Y chromosomes, researchers discovered that an additional Y chromosome gave a greater height boost than an extra X.
Men, on average, are about five inches taller than women. Representational Image/Pixabay
Matthew Oetjens, a genetics researcher at Geisinger College of Health Sciences in Danville, Pennsylvania, explained that the SHOX gene is placed near the end of the sex chromosomes, as per NYT.
In women, most genes on one of the two X chromosomes are inactive. However, the genes are active at the very tip of the X. The SHOX gene's closeness to the tip ensures that it remains active.
In males, both X and Y chromosomes are fully active and so is the SHOX gene.
This means that the SHOX gene will provide more height to men than women. Researchers say this gene makes up for roughly a quarter of the average height difference between men and women.
Eric Schadt, a professor in the department of genetics and genomic science at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York City, told NYT that the study was 'definitely cool'.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'It is a great use of these biobanks to uncover what is still somewhat of a mystery,' he said. 'Even though the effect is modest, it does explain 20 per cent or so of the height difference.'
ALSO READ: A tall tale: Why are Dutch people the tallest on the planet?
Other recent studies on human height
Another study, published in January, found that men have grown and increased in weight twice as fast as women over the past century, further raising the differences between the two sexes.
Being tall is not always a good thing. Representational Image/Pixabay
Researchers also previously found that women are more interested in taller men than men are in shorter women. However, being taller is not always a good thing.
Taller people are at greater risk of developing certain types of cancer. This could be because these people have more cells that can accumulate mutations, leading to the potentially fatal disease.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
17 hours ago
- Mint
Want even tinier chips? Use a particle accelerator
Semiconductor chips are among the smallest and most detailed objects humans can manufacture. Shrinking the scale and upping the complexity is a fight against the limits of physics, and optical lithography—etching nanometre-scale patterns onto silicon with short-wavelength light—is its most extreme frontier. ASML , a Dutch firm that builds such lithography tools, takes an almost sci-fi approach by blasting molten tin droplets with lasers in a vacuum to produce extreme ultraviolet (EUV) light with a wavelength of just 13.5nm. Now, some researchers hope to generate more powerful EUV beams with a particle accelerator that propels electrons to nearly the speed of light. The need for this radical proposal stems from a fundamental limitation of current EUV sources: they struggle to generate enough power to reliably etch circuits onto silicon. In a lithography tool such as ASML's, the EUV beam bounces off nearly a dozen mirrors before it hits the silicon. EUV light is so easily absorbed, though, that even in a vacuum-sealed chamber with ultra-specialised mirrors, each reflection saps 30% of the light's energy. By the time the photons reach the wafer, less than 2% of the original EUV energy remains. Without enough power, reliability and precision plummet. One way to boost energy is to bombard the wafer with multiple doses of EUV light, a trick that slows down the chip-manufacturing process. The other approach is to increase the power of the photons. ASML's latest rig uses a light source that operates at 500 watts, nearly twice the power of its previous machines. To speed up production or to shrink feature sizes even further, the light source must get stronger. ASML currently has a road map to develop a one kilowatt light source. A more radical solution is to use a free-electron laser (FEL), where electrons travelling near the speed of light are manipulated to emit EUV radiation. The FEL process begins with a powerful electron gun that injects a beam of the particles into a miniature racetrack. The electrons then pass through a linear accelerator, which propels them to nearly the speed of light. Once accelerated, they enter a roughly 200-metre-long structure called an undulator, where a series of magnets generate a field whose polarity flips periodically. This wiggles the electrons, causing them to emit a beam of EUV photons with a specific wavelength. Nicholas Kelez, the boss of xLight, a Silicon Valley startup developing FEL-based lithography, described the technology as a more powerful and tuneable 'new light bulb" that he believes can be swapped into existing optical lithography machines. xLight expects to deliver the first commercial system within four years. Another research group, at the High Energy Accelerator Research Organisation (KEK) in Japan, has already demonstrated the ability to generate light at 20 micrometres (millionths of a metre)—far longer than the 13.5nm wavelengths ASML is capable of but a step towards refining the process. Chinese researchers are also exploring FEL technology in their quest to develop an independent EUV machine. Generating light using a FEL has some advantages over using lasers. The first is power: a lithography machine based on a FEL-based light source can be around six times more energy-efficient than a laser-plasma tool. Dispensing with molten-tin droplets also reduces the risk of contamination. Tuning such a machine for smaller wavelengths is also, at least theoretically, much easier: all that needs doing is tweaking the settings on the electron gun and the undulator. It would also be cheaper. A single FEL system can be repurposed to provide light for multiple lithography machines, allowing its operator to distribute the fixed costs across multiple chip-etching tools. Nakamura Norio from KEK estimates that the construction cost is around half that of a laser-based EUV tool and the running costs are around a fifteenth. For now, all this is theoretical. Whereas ASML's EUV machines are proving themselves in high-volume manufacturing, FEL-based lithography is still in the experimental phase. But in the high-stakes world of chipmaking, any edge is worth chasing. Curious about the world? To enjoy our mind-expanding science coverage, sign up to Simply Science, our weekly subscriber-only newsletter.
The Hindu
3 days ago
- The Hindu
Science for All: Phytoplankton overfed on iron pollution are depleting nutrients faster
A new study has unearthed strong observational evidence that industrial pollution is altering nutrient cycles and ecosystem boundaries in the ocean. According to the researchers, from across institutions in the U.S., iron released due to human activities enhances spring phytoplankton blooms as well as speeds up the rate at which nutrients are consumed. The changes may work in synergy with climate-driven ocean warming and stratification, speeding up the transition to nutrient-poor conditions across broader swaths of the ocean, they added. The team published its findings in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences on June 2. The authors conducted four oceanographic expeditions between 2016 and 2019 to measure dissolved iron and its isotopic composition. They also used satellite observations and gene expression analyses to understand the biological responses to the element's presence. The team collected data during three springtime cruises in 2016, 2017, and 2019 and one autumnal cruise in 2018 to track seasonal changes in iron chemistry. Team members measured the amount of dissolved iron in the water and its isotopic composition using trace-metal clean techniques and mass spectrometry. They also analysed metatranscriptomic data from phytoplankton samples to look for the expression of genes associated with iron stress — bio-physiological changes induced by exposure to the element. Satellite data were used to assess long-term changes in phytoplankton distribution and productivity. The team focused especially on chlorophyll-a levels, for which they used data 'produced by the Ocean Color Climate Change Initiative' of the European Space Agency, according to the paper. The Initiative 'integrates observations across multiple ocean colour platforms to form a continuous 26-year record'. This way, the team reported that about 39% of surface ocean iron during spring comes from atmospheric pollution, particularly in emissions from East Asia. They found this 'anthropogenic iron' has a distinct isotopic signature that makes it traceable in seawater. Its input peaked during spring, when westerly winds have been known to carry aerosols across the Pacific Ocean. The predictably higher iron concentration in spring appeared to make the phytoplankton more productive, especially that north of the Transition Zone Chlorophyll Front (TZCF) — the boundary between nutrient-rich and nutrient-poor waters. The greater access to iron enhanced the growth of the phytoplankton, which consumed more nitrates. The team wrote in its paper, 'Over the past 25 years, increasing anthropogenic iron input appears to have stimulated springtime phytoplankton growth, ultimately leading to faster depletion of … nitrate. Thus, large-scale iron pollution may be increasing the prevalence of nitrogen limitation,' expanding the size of the nutrient-poor part of the ocean. The retreat of an ecosystem boundary can have severe ecological and socioeconomic consequences. Phytoplankton are at the base of marine food chains, so a change in their distribution will affect zooplankton, fish, and larger predators like seabirds and whales. Species that can't migrate or adapt fast enough may decline or go extinct. Equally, as productive regions retreat, unproductive areas will expand and the ocean will be able to take up less biological carbon, undermining an important natural buffer against climate change. From the Science pages Question Corner Why do volcanoes erupt? Find out here Flora and fauna
Time of India
3 days ago
- Time of India
A mega tsunami could strike the US with little warning: Understanding Cascadia, the danger zones, and how to get ready
Waiting. Biding its time. The Cascadia Subduction Zone, a sleeping giant beneath the Pacific Northwest, has remained eerily quiet for over 300 years. But when it finally awakens, it won't just be a powerful earthquake that hits the coastline. A towering tsunami, land collapse, and flooding on a historic scale may soon follow. What is the Cascadia Subduction Zone? The Cascadia Subduction Zone is a massive fault line running from northern California through Oregon and Washington, and all the way to British Columbia. It's where the oceanic Juan de Fuca Plate is slowly slipping beneath the North American Plate. But the plates don't glide smoothly — they get stuck. That strain builds for centuries until it finally breaks loose in a massive earthquake. The last major quake hit on January 26, 1700. Based on geological records, it likely had a magnitude between 8.7 and 9.2. That kind of power could strike again. According to the US National Seismic Hazard Model, there's now a 15% chance of a magnitude 8.0 or greater event within the next 50 years. Areas at risk When the rupture finally happens, it won't just cause violent shaking and a deadly tsunami. According to a new study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, coastal land across 24 estuaries from southern Washington to northern California could suddenly sink by up to 2.67 meters (8.76 feet). As per reports, these high risk areas include Washington, Oregon, Northern California, Alaska and Hawaii. "We talk about climate-driven sea level rise, which is occurring at three to four millimetres a year, and that does eventually add up," said Prof Tina Dura, the study's lead author, in an interview with BBC Science Focus . "But here we'll have two metres of sea level rise in minutes. Why aren't we talking about that more?" That sinking, or subsidence, would permanently change the coastline. Flood zones would dramatically expand — by as much as 300 km² (115 square miles) today. Areas from southern Washington to northern California could see permanent land drops, especially in low lying estuaries. This sinking land would make flooding worse and more widespread- even long after the tsunami has receded. The Long-term fallout Beyond the quake and tsunami, recovery efforts would be hampered by the new geography. Roads and emergency services may end up underwater. Saltwater could poison farmland. Wetlands that once helped block storm surges could vanish. A 2022 FEMA planning exercise estimated 5,800 deaths from the quake and another 8,000 from the tsunami. Over 618,000 buildings, including more than 2,000 schools and 100 key facilities, could be damaged or destroyed. The total projected economic impact? $134 billion. Infrastructure now at risk includes: 5 airports 18 emergency facilities (schools, hospitals, fire stations) 8 wastewater treatment plants 1 electric substation 57 contaminant sources (gas stations, chemical plants, etc.) Aftershocks that never stop The study warns that even if the quake struck decades from now, its effects could be magnified by climate change. By 2100, global sea levels are expected to rise another 60 cm (2 feet). In Cascadia, rising land has masked some of that rise — but when the quake hits and the land sinks, the sea will seem to rise instantly. The study also estimates that if the quake happens in 2100, floodplains could triple compared to today, expanding by up to 370 km² (145 sq miles). How can people prepare themselves? There are no easy answers. Cascadia is a unique problem faced by seismologists as it is so quiet. No one can predict the exact date or time it can wreak havoc. In case of an emergency, there are a few things that residents near the coast need to remember to ensure their safety Identifying and relocating vulnerable infrastructure Educating the public on risks Prepare an emergency kit, as the infrastructure will be destroyed Practice and update your emergency plan every 6 months. Write down emergency numbers; give copies to all family members.
