logo
A mega tsunami could strike the US with little warning: Understanding Cascadia, the danger zones, and how to get ready

A mega tsunami could strike the US with little warning: Understanding Cascadia, the danger zones, and how to get ready

Time of India03-06-2025
Waiting. Biding its time. The Cascadia Subduction Zone, a sleeping giant beneath the Pacific Northwest, has remained eerily quiet for over 300 years. But when it finally awakens, it won't just be a powerful earthquake that hits the coastline.
A towering tsunami, land collapse, and flooding on a historic scale may soon follow.
What is the Cascadia Subduction Zone?
The Cascadia Subduction Zone is a massive fault line running from northern California through Oregon and Washington, and all the way to British Columbia. It's where the oceanic Juan de Fuca Plate is slowly slipping beneath the North American Plate. But the plates don't glide smoothly — they get stuck. That strain builds for centuries until it finally breaks loose in a massive earthquake.
The last major quake hit on January 26, 1700. Based on geological records, it likely had a magnitude between 8.7 and 9.2. That kind of power could strike again. According to the US National Seismic Hazard Model, there's now a 15% chance of a magnitude 8.0 or greater event within the next 50 years.
Areas at risk
When the rupture finally happens, it won't just cause violent shaking and a deadly tsunami. According to a new study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, coastal land across 24 estuaries from southern Washington to northern California could suddenly sink by up to 2.67 meters (8.76 feet).
As per reports, these high risk areas include Washington, Oregon, Northern California, Alaska and Hawaii.
"We talk about climate-driven sea level rise, which is occurring at three to four millimetres a year, and that does eventually add up," said Prof Tina Dura, the study's lead author, in an interview with
BBC Science Focus
. "But here we'll have two metres of sea level rise in minutes. Why aren't we talking about that more?"
That sinking, or subsidence, would permanently change the coastline.
Flood zones would dramatically expand — by as much as 300 km² (115 square miles) today. Areas from southern Washington to northern California could see permanent land drops, especially in low lying estuaries. This sinking land would make flooding worse and more widespread- even long after the tsunami has receded.
The Long-term fallout
Beyond the quake and tsunami, recovery efforts would be hampered by the new geography. Roads and emergency services may end up underwater.
Saltwater could poison farmland. Wetlands that once helped block storm surges could vanish.
A 2022 FEMA planning exercise estimated 5,800 deaths from the quake and another 8,000 from the tsunami. Over 618,000 buildings, including more than 2,000 schools and 100 key facilities, could be damaged or destroyed. The total projected economic impact? $134 billion.
Infrastructure now at risk includes:
5 airports
18 emergency facilities (schools, hospitals, fire stations)
8 wastewater treatment plants
1 electric substation
57 contaminant sources (gas stations, chemical plants, etc.)
Aftershocks that never stop
The study warns that even if the quake struck decades from now, its effects could be magnified by climate change.
By 2100, global sea levels are expected to rise another 60 cm (2 feet). In Cascadia, rising land has masked some of that rise — but when the quake hits and the land sinks, the sea will seem to rise instantly.
The study also estimates that if the quake happens in 2100, floodplains could triple compared to today, expanding by up to 370 km² (145 sq miles).
How can people prepare themselves?
There are no easy answers. Cascadia is a unique problem faced by seismologists as it is so quiet. No one can predict the exact date or time it can wreak havoc. In case of an emergency, there are a few things that residents near the coast need to remember to ensure their safety
Identifying and relocating vulnerable infrastructure
Educating the public on risks
Prepare an emergency kit, as the infrastructure will be destroyed
Practice and update your emergency plan every 6 months.
Write down emergency numbers; give copies to all family members.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lack of exercise or a high-calorie diet -- What causes obesity? Major new study offers surprising insight
Lack of exercise or a high-calorie diet -- What causes obesity? Major new study offers surprising insight

Time of India

time17-07-2025

  • Time of India

Lack of exercise or a high-calorie diet -- What causes obesity? Major new study offers surprising insight

Couch potatoes have always had bad press. But turns out, the over-the-top foodies are equally guilty – if not more. Obesity, now a global public health crisis, has long been blamed on sedentary lifestyles and high‑calorie diets. In 2025, global obesity rates are projected to continue rising, with estimates suggesting that one in five adults worldwide will have obesity. This trend indicates that countries are significantly off track to meet the World Health Organization's (WHO) 2025 targets to halt the rise of obesity. What's more? The World Obesity Federation's 2025 Atlas highlights that many countries lack sufficient policies and plans to address the escalating obesity crisis. Amidst that, a major new study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences sheds surprising light on the root causes. Is it the sedentary lifestyle alone? Or is the high-calorie diet to be blamed for it? Read on to know more. The study The new study, led by Dr. Herman Pontzer at Duke University, has flipped traditional ideas about the origins of obesity on their head, highlighting that our diets might hold more weight, literally and figuratively, than the amount of physical activity we engage in. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Victoria Principal Is Almost 75, See Her Now Reportingly Undo Published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), the research challenges the long-held belief that individuals in developed countries like the United States of America lead relatively inactive lifestyles and consequently burn fewer calories. Surprisingly, it reveals that calorie-burning rates among people in developed nations are comparable to those of individuals in less industrialized regions, including farmers, herders, and hunter-gatherers who enjoy more active routines. More specifically – the researchers calculated total energy expenditures for 4,213 men and women from 34 countries or cultural groups, and found they were similar, regardless of whether someone was an American office worker or a hunter-gatherer. This groundbreaking research work, examining the energy expenditure and metabolic rates of those individuals from diverse nations, proposes that inactivity might not be a significant contributor to obesity in the US or beyond. Instead, the study emphasizes that dietary choices play a much larger role than the decrease in energy expenditure associated with economic progress. As per the study, what people eat 'plays a far greater role than reduced expenditure in the elevated prevalence of obesity associated with economic development.' The experts' take Herman Pontzer, a professor and senior author of the study, shared with the Washington Post that these findings are pivotal in helping health officials pinpoint the true causes of obesity, paving the way for more effective treatments. Alongside more than 80 co-authors, Pontzer collected data from laboratories worldwide utilizing doubly labeled water in metabolism studies, a method that precisely measures energy expenditure. Contrary to the notion that increasing exercise would lower obesity rates, the study reveals that 'increased energy intake has been roughly 10 times more important than declining total energy expenditure in driving the modern obesity crisis,' according to the authors. In simpler terms, populations grappling with higher obesity rates are consuming excessive amounts of food, often the wrong types, as Pontzer explained. Barry Popkin, a professor at the Gillings School of Global Public Health at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a recognized obesity expert, told the Post, 'This study confirms what I've been saying, which is that diet is the key culprit in our current [obesity] epidemic.' He added that 'this is a well-done study,' a sentiment echoed by other professionals in the field. Dariush Mozaffarian, director of the Food is Medicine Institute at Tufts University in Boston, stated, 'It's clear from this important new research and other studies that changes to our food, not our activity, are the dominant drivers of obesity.' What's ahead, then? As the study reveals, obesity's roots are multifaceted. The latest evidence confirms that while you can't outrun a bad diet, you can transform your health by choosing what and how much you eat. It is now a proven fact that proper diet plays a tad bit more important role in managing weight and keeping obesity in check than a laid-back lifestyle. Should we go back to our couches then, instead of picking up the dumbbells? That doesn't sound wise. This landmark study rather revolutionizes our understanding of obesity: metabolic adaptation buffers against exercise-driven calorie deficits, while poor diet remains the primary villain. To tackle the obesity epidemic, public health must realign – from 'move more' to 'eat smart.' Coupling smart eating habits with regular exercise provides the best defense. In fact, Pontzer stressed that these findings do not diminish the importance of exercise for our overall health. 'We know that exercise is essential for health. This study doesn't change that,' he affirmed. However, he advocated that to tackle obesity effectively, 'public health efforts need to focus on diet,' particularly concerning ultra-processed foods, as Pontzer highlighted. Exercise during pregnancy may save kids from health problems as adults, says study

How fast your brain is aging? This simple daily habit might hold the answer
How fast your brain is aging? This simple daily habit might hold the answer

Economic Times

time16-07-2025

  • Economic Times

How fast your brain is aging? This simple daily habit might hold the answer

Synopsis A long-term study reported by Psychology Today reveals that walking speed at age 45 can be a strong predictor of brain health and aging. Slower walkers showed smaller brain volume, thinner cortexes, and cognitive decline. While causation isn't confirmed, the findings suggest that walking may not just reflect brain health—it could actively help preserve it. iStock Research tracking individuals over 40 years found that slower midlife walking speeds are linked to faster brain aging and reduced cognitive abilities. Supporting studies show that regular walking can increase brain size, particularly the memory-related hippocampus. (Image: iStock) When we think about aging, it's easy to assume it's all about the number of candles on the birthday cake. But modern research tells a very different story. As Psychology Today reports, scientists are now looking beyond chronological age and focusing on how the body and brain functionally age. And one surprising indicator may be hiding in plain sight—how fast you walk. In a groundbreaking 2019 study published in JAMA Network Open, researchers tracked more than 900 individuals over a 40-year period, from childhood through midlife. What they found was astonishing: the speed at which a person walks at age 45 is strongly linked to the health and size of their brain. The study revealed that slower walkers, those moving at an average of just 2.71 mph, had smaller brain volumes, thinner cortexes, more white matter hyperintensities (which are associated with cognitive decline), and reduced cortical surface area. On the other hand, the fastest group, walking at about 3.91 mph, showed healthier brain structures and better cognitive outcomes. Even more remarkably, walking speed at 45 was correlated with changes in brain function that traced all the way back to childhood. The researchers noted that cognitive decline from childhood to midlife was more pronounced in the slower walkers, suggesting that the roots of this aging marker could be traced to early development. These findings may be unsettling, but they also provide a powerful tool: a simple test—how fast you walk—can be a revealing measure of how quickly your brain is aging. But is slow walking a cause or a consequence of poor brain health? The jury is still out. Researchers agree that correlation doesn't imply causation. It's possible that certain patterns in the brain lead to slower movement. However, there's also growing evidence that movement—specifically walking—can actually improve brain health. In a randomized trial published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 60 older adults were assigned either to a walking or stretching group for a year. At the end of the study, the walking group had increased the size of their hippocampus—the brain's memory hub—by 2 percent, while the stretching group experienced shrinkage. Similarly, in a smaller study involving diabetic participants, those who walked regularly demonstrated notable cognitive benefits compared to those who didn't. These findings reinforce a much broader body of research connecting physical activity to neuroplasticity, immune function, metabolism, and overall brain vitality.

100-Ft ‘Doomsday' Tsunami Could ‘Wipe Out' Part Of US ‘Any Moment'
100-Ft ‘Doomsday' Tsunami Could ‘Wipe Out' Part Of US ‘Any Moment'

News18

time12-07-2025

  • News18

100-Ft ‘Doomsday' Tsunami Could ‘Wipe Out' Part Of US ‘Any Moment'

Last Updated: The Cascadia Subduction Zone has stayed calm for 300 years. When it finally breaks, it could trigger a huge earthquake followed by a tsunami with waves as high as 100 feet. While the world focuses on AI threats and the looming possibility of World War III, Mother Nature has issued a stark reminder of her own power. Scientists have long warned of impending natural disasters, and a new study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) adds to those concerns. The research suggests that the United States could soon face one of the most catastrophic natural disasters in its history. What Is The Threat? The Cascadia Subduction Zone has stayed calm for 300 years. When it finally breaks, it could trigger a huge earthquake followed by a tsunami with waves as high as 100 feet. The disaster could bring severe damage and threaten many lives from northern California in the US to British Columbia in Canada. According to a new study, this could cause sudden and serious changes. Scientists found that during a major earthquake, the land could sink by 0.5 to 2 meters within minutes. Along with the sinking, rising sea levels could lead to a much bigger risk of flooding. The study warns that by the year 2100, the number of people, buildings and roads at risk of flooding could more than triple. Researchers say this growing danger needs more attention, planning, and action to reduce damage in the future. What Scientists Are Warning The World About Now 'This is going to be a very catastrophic event for the US, for sure. It's a dual threat. The tsunami is going to come in, and it's going to be devastating. But with tsunamis, we also know that some places are going to be very hard hit, while other places are probably not going to feel as severe effects because of the way the coast is configured. But those areas can still be in the zone of subsidence," Dura added. Rising Waters And Sinking Land The study reveals that while many coastal areas are gradually sinking each year, parts of Washington, Oregon and Northern California are experiencing the opposite, land uplift due to deep underground movements. In cities like Astoria, Port Orford, and Crescent City, the land is rising faster than sea levels, causing water levels to remain stable or even decline slightly. However, in areas such as Yaquina Bay and Coos Bay, the land is rising more slowly, leading to a noticeable increase in sea levels. One exception is Humboldt Bay in Northern California, where the land is sinking. Scientists warn that by around 2030, sea levels will rise faster than the land can keep up. By 2050, water levels may rise to 10 to 30 centimetres, and by 2100, sea levels might increase by 40 to 90 centimetres if carbon emissions stay high. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store