Apple girds for more trade war pain, trims buyback
SAN FRANCISCO - Apple on Thursday trimmed its share buyback program by $10 billion, with CEO Tim Cook telling analysts that tariffs could add about $900 million in costs this quarter as the iPhone maker shifts its vast supply chain to minimize the impact of President Donald Trump's trade war.
Cook also said Apple's planned $500 billion in spending to expand its U.S. footprint would involve both capital outlays and increased operational expenses as it builds out server and chip factories with its manufacturing partners. In addition, he outlined how Apple has started to build up a stockpile of products so that the majority of its devices sold in the U.S. this quarter will not come from China.
Taken together, analysts said the moves showed one of the most profitable companies in the history of business battening its hatches as it moves into uncharted waters.
"We were expecting to see more buybacks. Knowing the company, this indicates that Tim Cook is hoarding cash for difficult times," said Thomas Monteiro, senior analyst at Investing.com. "While that's not exactly a problem in itself, it certainly suggests that the company is not as certain about its near-term future as it was in previous quarters."
Apple shares were down 4.3% after the company released quarterly results. So far, the trade war has not been a problem for Apple's sales, with Cook saying the company did not see consumers rushing to stock up on Apple items.
The Cupertino, California-based company said sales and profit for the fiscal second quarter ended March 29 were $95.36 billion and $1.65 per share, respectively, compared with analyst estimates of $94.68 billion and $1.63 per share, according to LSEG data. Sales of iPhones were $46.84 billion, compared with estimates of $46.17 billion, according to LSEG data.
For the current fiscal third quarter, Apple executives said the company expects low-to-mid single-digit revenue growth, which is in line with analyst expectations of 4.28% growth to $89.45 billion, according to LSEG data.
But Apple predicted a hit to gross margins, which it said will be 45.5% to 46.5% in its fiscal third quarter, which is below analyst estimates of 46.58%, according to LSEG data.
Cook said that for the quarter ending in June, "assuming the current global tariff rates, policies and applications do not change for the balance of the quarter and no new tariffs are added, we estimate the impact to add $900 million to our cost.".
He said the majority of iPhones sold in the U.S. in the current quarter will come from India, and that most iPads, Macs and Apple Watches will come from Vietnam. Cook said that the vast majority of Apple products for markets outside the U.S. will continue to come from China.
"We have a complex supply chain. There's always risk in the supply chain," he said. "What we learned some time ago was that having everything in one location had too much risk with it."
Cook also signalled that Apple's efforts to spend more in the U.S. will come with real costs to Apple's balance sheet. He said the company already sources 19 billion chips from a dozen U.S. states and will be expanding its own facilities.
"As we expand facilities in the different states - from Michigan to Texas to California and Arizona and Nevada and Iowa and Oregon and North Carolina and Washington - there will be (capital expenditures) involved in that," Cook said.
For Apple's second quarter, sales in its services business were $26.65 billion, compared with estimates of $26.69 billion, according to LSEG data. Apple said sales in its Greater China segment fell to $16 billion, better than analyst expectations of $15.9 billion, according to data from Visible Alpha.
In Apple's accessories and wearables segment, which includes products such as AirPods, revenue was $7.52 billion, compared with estimates of $7.85 billion, according to LSEG.
Sales of iPads and Macs were $6.40 billion and $7.95 billion, respectively, compared with analyst expectations of $6.07 billion and $7.92 billion. Cook said that entry-level iPads performed the best during the quarter.
Apple also said it will increase its cash dividend by 4% to 26 cents per share and that its board has authorized an additional $100 billion for its stock buyback program, down $10 billion from the same time last year. (Reporting by Stephen Nellis in San Francisco and Akash Sriram in Bengaluru; Editing by Kenneth Li and Matthew Lewis)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Etihad
5 hours ago
- Al Etihad
Apple under pressure to shine after AI stumble
8 June 2025 09:19 SAN FRANCISCO (AFP)Pressure is on Apple to show it hasn't lost its magic despite broken promises to ramp up iPhones with generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) as rivals race ahead with the will showcase plans for its coveted devices and the software powering them at its annual Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) kicking off Monday in Silicon event comes a year after the tech titan said a suite of AI features it dubbed Apple Intelligence was heading for iPhones, including an improvement of its much criticised Siri voice Apple delayed the rollout of the Siri upgrade, with hopes that it will be available in time for the next iPhone release, expected in the fall."Apple advertised a lot of features as if they were going to be available, and it just didn't happen," noted Emarketer senior analyst Gadjo Sevilla."I don't think there is going to be that much of a celebratory tone at WWDC," the analyst told AFP. "It could be more of a way for Apple to recover some credibility by showing where they're headed."Industry insiders will be watching to see whether Apple addresses the AI stumble or focuses on less splashy announcements, including a rumoured overhaul of its operating systems for its line of devices."The bottom line is Apple seemed to underestimate the AI shift, then over-promised features, and is now racing to catch up," Gene Munster and Brian Baker of Deepwater Asset Management wrote in a WWDC preview also include talk that Apple may add GenAI partnerships with Google or Perplexity to an OpenAI alliance announced a year its lineup with AI is only one of Apple's who build apps and tools to run on the company's products, may be keen for Apple to loosen its tight control of access to iPhones.A lawsuit by Fortnite maker Epic Games ended with Apple being ordered to allow outside payment systems to be used at the US App Store, but developers may want more, analysts have to the WWDC buildup is that the legendary designer behind the iPhone, Jony Ive, has joined with ChatGPT maker OpenAI to create a potential rival device for engaging with while unlikely to come up at WWDC, Apple has to deal with tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump in his trade war with China, a key market for sales growth as well as the place where most iPhones are made. Trump has also threatened to hit Apple with tariffs if iPhone production wasn't moved to the US, which analysts say is impossible given the costs and capabilities.
Arabian Post
17 hours ago
- Arabian Post
PumpFun's Revenue Redistribution Plan Sparks Debate Amid $4bn Valuation
PumpFun, a Solana-based memecoin launchpad, has announced plans to distribute protocol revenue to $PUMP token holders through a buyback mechanism. This move marks a significant shift from the typical speculative nature of memecoins, aiming to provide tangible value to its community. However, the platform's ambitious $4 billion valuation and a targeted $1 billion raise have raised questions about the feasibility and sustainability of its revenue model. Since its inception in January 2024, PumpFun has facilitated the creation of over 6 million memecoins, positioning itself as a central player in the Solana ecosystem's resurgence following the FTX collapse. The platform's user-friendly interface allows individuals to launch tokens with minimal effort, contributing to a surge in activity that saw Solana's Total Value Locked surpass $5 billion by mid-2025. The proposed buyback strategy involves using a portion of the platform's revenue to repurchase $PUMP tokens from the open market, thereby reducing supply and potentially increasing token value. This approach is intended to reward long-term holders and align the interests of the community with the platform's growth. However, the lack of clarity regarding the specific revenue streams and the proportion allocated for buybacks has led to skepticism among investors and analysts. ADVERTISEMENT PumpFun's revenue primarily stems from a 1% swap fee on all token trades and a 1.5 SOL fee when a token 'graduates' by reaching a market cap of $90,000. While these mechanisms have generated substantial income—estimated at over $380 million—the sustainability of such revenue in the volatile memecoin market remains uncertain. The platform's reliance on continuous user engagement and token creation raises concerns about the long-term viability of its financial model. The announcement of the $1 billion raise at a $4 billion valuation has further intensified scrutiny. Critics argue that the valuation may be inflated, given the speculative nature of the memecoin market and the platform's nascent stage. Comparisons have been drawn to other DeFi projects that have faced challenges in maintaining high valuations without robust and diversified revenue streams. Community members have expressed mixed reactions to the buyback plan. Some view it as a positive step towards creating a more sustainable and value-driven ecosystem, while others question the timing and transparency of the initiative. The absence of detailed information about the buyback schedule, funding sources, and governance mechanisms has fueled debates about the platform's commitment to accountability and investor protection. PumpFun's leadership, including founders Noah Tweedale, Alon Cohen, and Dylan Kerler, has yet to provide comprehensive details addressing these concerns. The platform's history of rapid growth and controversial features, such as the now-suspended livestreaming service that allowed for unmoderated content, adds to the apprehension surrounding its governance and operational practices. The broader context of the DeFi and memecoin markets also plays a role in shaping perceptions of PumpFun's strategy. The memecoin sector has experienced explosive growth, with market capitalizations reaching unprecedented levels. However, this growth has often been accompanied by high volatility, regulatory scrutiny, and instances of market manipulation, leading to caution among institutional investors and regulators.
Gulf Today
18 hours ago
- Gulf Today
How badly could Donald Trump hurt Elon Musk?
Io Dodds, The Independent Even for Elon Musk, this is — to use the precise technical term — bonkers. Barely one week after leaving the Trump administration with every semblance of amity, the world's richest person is going scorched earth against the leader of the world's richest nation. Insults and threats. Calls for impeachment. Sinister references to Jeffrey Epstein. Somehow, Kanye West is also involved. It's like the messiest online influencer drama you've ever seen, except the parties are two of the most powerful people on Earth. But when it comes down to brass tacks, what exactly does Musk stand to lose in this titanic celebrity divorce? If Trump were to follow through on all his threats, and use every available weapon against Musk's business empire, how badly could it hurt him? The short answer is: pretty badly. In fact, with some admittedly quick and dirty math, we can put a price tag on some of it. SpaceX and the $68bn black hole. Elon Musk's estimated $388bn fortune — already $26.6bn smaller than it was before this frank exchange of thermonuclear warheads — depends on the success of two companies which are both intertwined with the US political system. One is Tesla, which makes electric vehicles; the other is SpaceX, which builds rockets, spacecraft, and satellites. X, formerly Twitter, can be left aside for now; having bought the social network 2022 for $44bn, Musk is still struggling to recoup his investment and has almost certainly lost money overall. Let's start with Space Exploration Technologies Corp., aka SpaceX. Not many people can afford to rent a rocket, so a lot of its business comes from government contracts, and U.S. government contracts most of all. As of writing, according to federal data, the Texas-based company has been paid or promised just under $21bn by Uncle Sam since 2008. The total potential value of all SpaceX's existing contracts, however, is much higher: $89.2bn. If Trump cancelled every contract tomorrow, that would mean a theoretical maximum of $68bn in lost potential income. For context, that's more than four times SpaceX's entire forecasted revenue for 2025, and nearly 15 times its revenue from 2022. Of course, there's no way to know if those maximum payments would ever actually have been made. So we could also get a rough sense of what SpaceX stands to lose by looking at the actual cash it received from federal coffers every year. In 2022 that was $2.8bn; in 2023, $3.1bn; and in 2024, $3.8bn. On the plus side for Musk, the US government is so dependent on SpaceX that some critics have called it a monopoly in the making. SpaceX ferries our astronauts to and from the International Space Station, is heavily involved in Nasa's moon landing program, and manages an increasing share of government satellite communications as well. Still, that does not guarantee safety. Would you really, in all soberness, bet against Donald Trump doing something that hurts the country merely to punish his personal enemies? In fact, as Talking Points Memo editor-in-chief Josh Marshall argues, SpaceX's critical role might actually put it in greater danger, because it leaves the feds with few options except "expropriation or nationalisation". Tesla in regulators' crosshairs?Like SpaceX, Tesla has benefited greatly from taxpayer money, mostly in the form of emission trading payments from non-electric carmakers and tax credits or consumers buying electric vehicles. An analysis by The Washington Post put Tesla's total income from emission credits since 2007 at $11.4bn as of this February. Its gain from tax credits, which allow more people to buy its cars at higher prices, has been estimated at $3.4bn. Those emission credit schemes are run by US states, not by the federal government. Nevertheless, Trump and the Republican Party have tried to undermine such schemes by contesting states' ability to set their own emissions rules. The wider impact is difficult to calculate. In contrast to SpaceX, Tesla sells to ordinary people, who tend to have their own opinions independent of government. In reputational terms, splitting noisily with Trump could reverse some of its recent sales losses; on the other hand, it might just make Tesla hated on both sides of politics. The biggest risk may be regulatory. At the time of Trump's second inauguration, Tesla was being investigated by numerous federal agencies including the Justice Department, the National Labor Relations Board, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration — which by itself had six pending probes. During his time at DOGE, Democrats feared Musk could use his power to influence or cancel these cases. But Trump's unabashed willingness to wield state power to punish those who displease him while rewarding loyalists cuts both ways. Live by the chainsaw, die by the chainsaw. How much that costs Tesla would depend on how far Trump is willing to go, and on the outcome of any ensuing court battle. But when U.S. stock exchanges closed on Thursday its share price had crashed by nearly 12 percent, wiping $122bn off its market value. Potential deportation — or worseSo far we've only addressed Elon Musk's finances. Yet there are other, more personal ways that Trump could hurt him if the former reality TV star truly isn't here to make friends. For example, Trump's old advisor Stephen Bannon — who has previously branded Musk a "parasitic illegal immigrant" — urged the administration to investigate Musk's immigration history, and potentially deport him. Unlike some of the feverish allegations that emanate from the extended Trump-o-sphere, this one actually has some substance. An investigation by The Washington Post last year alleged that Musk had worked illegally in the US while launching his Silicon Valley career in the mid-90s. Musk has denied this, and in any case he has been a US citizen since 2002. Still, legal experts have said his citizenship could technically be revoked if he were proven to have lied to immigration authorities. And while those laws have only rarely been enforced in the past 25 years, some Trump aides and allies have said they want that to change. Nor is that anywhere close to the only alleged skeleton in Musk's closet. What is his relationship with ecstasy, Adderall, ketamine, or magic mushrooms? Has he ever been in regular contact with Vladimir Putin? Did his colleagues at DOGE rigorously follow information security laws when extracting sensitive data from federal systems? What happened to all that data after it was obtained? At least we can probably can rule out plain old assassination by government special forces. Although, to be fair, that is literally something that Trump and his lawyers have argued should be protected by presidential immunity.
