AutoDrive Previews an Eyes-Off Utopia as Seen by Stellantis
Stellantis previews SAE Level 3 system dubbed STLA AutoDrive, which will permit eyes-off, hands-off automated driving under some circumstances, and at speeds of up to 37 mph.
The system, which the automaker says is ready for deployment, is only permitted in certain US states now and is not guaranteed to appear soon in Jeep, Dodge, Ram, or other Stellantis models.
STLA AutoDrive is set to join a number of similar systems from Mercedes-Benz, Honda, BMW, and a few others—just one of which is offered stateside.
Stellantis has revealed its SAE Level 3 driver-assistance system, dubbed STLA AutoDrive, joining a small club of automakers and autonomous tech developers with an eyes-off, hands-off system.
And the automaker says it is ready for deployment in its vehicles.
SAE Level 3 systems differ from more limited SAE Level 2 systems in that they do not require drivers to keep their eyes on the road, allowing them to watch movies on a tablet, text, or read behind the wheel—everything short of taking a nap.
This distinguishes them from Tesla's Autopilot and FSD, which are Level 2 systems and require driver attention to the road at all times.
"Ideal for commuters in dense urban areas, STLA AutoDrive will allow drivers to temporarily engage in non-driving tasks such as watching a movie, catching up on emails, reading a book, or simply looking out the window, reclaiming valuable time," the automaker says.
Only a handful of automakers have fielded such systems, including Honda, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz—the latter being the only one to offer it in the US (albeit in just two states for now that permit them—California and parts of Nevada).
State-by-state legislation currently does not permit an automaker to offer a Level 3 system in all 50 states.
As with other SAE Level 3 systems, there are a few limitations at the moment: AutoDrive will work at speeds of up to 37 mph, but it can do so even at night and even in light rain.
This makes it more of a traffic-jam assistance feature in practice, unless your entire commute happens in 25- or 35-mph zones.
The system will also permit Level 3 operation in off-road settings in some models, Stellantis notes, hinting at Jeep's future receipt of AutoDrive, but hasn't committed to anything explicitly.
"Helping drivers make the best use of their time is a priority," said Ned Curic, Stellantis Chief Engineering and Technology Officer. "By handling routine driving tasks, STLA AutoDrive will enhance the driving experience, making time behind the wheel more efficient and enjoyable."
The automaker says the system decides when and where it is safe and suitable for activation, and notifies the driver. Once the driver presses a physical button, STLA AutoDrive takes over, controlling speed, steering functions, and braking.
The technology suite includes an automated sensor-cleaning system, which should keep dirt and water off important surfaces on the vehicle's exterior.
The system will still operate in SAE Level 2 mode at higher speeds for now, such as on the freeway, requiring driver attention to the road and hands on the wheel.
But over time, Stellantis says the vehicle speeds appropriate for SAE Level 3 will potentially be revised upward, reaching 59 mph by its estimates as a next step in its development.
"The system is also cloud-connected, enabling continuous enhancements through over-the-air updates and real-time data integration for optimized performance," the automaker said.
This will permit its use on the freeway, at least in the jurisdictions that allow Level 3 systems.
Crucially, Stellantis does not say whether the system will recognize and react to traffic lights and stop signs, and the video demo only contemplates some kind of utopia without the usual buffet of suburban horrors and annoyances, or even intersections or roundabouts.
So despite saying that AutoDrive is "ideal for commuters in dense urban areas," the automaker's demo video does not really show any of those settings, or offer details about its operation in complex environments.
And there are still a few caveats and unknowns when it comes to the actual commercial rollout of this technology.
For starters, Stellantis hasn't mentioned whether any of its US models will receive the SAE Level 3 systems or in what timeframe, only hinting at its future availability in the new Wagoneer S EV.
Additionally, Stellantis hasn't mentioned just where it intends to offer this system, given the fragmented regulatory landscape of Level 3, raising the possibility that it could debut in Europe first and then perhaps make its way to the US.
Stellantis' comments regarding the system were not market-specific. The automaker hasn't explicitly committed to offering this system in the US, only mentioning "a smooth rollout as commercial strategies align with market demand."
The target price of such a system, whether as a one-time purchase or a subscription, remains unmentioned as well, though this is certainly an issue to be determined once everything else is in place, including the regulatory landscape.
Ultimately, the floodgates of Level 3 will only open in the US when a single federal standard is implemented, so for now Stellantis joins a group of automakers with SAE Level 3 but without a strong business case for the US market.
Should Level 3 systems with eyes-off, hands-off flexibility be permitted in all US states, or should this tech be treated with greater caution? Please comment below.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Motorcyclist seriously hurt in collision with car
A 58-year-old man has been seriously injured after the motorcycle he was riding collided with a car in Leeds. Police said the incident took place on Brown Lane West, Holbeck at about 09:20 BST on 3 June. A grey Mercedes E250 EMG Sport collided with the red Honda CBF 125 motorbike, leaving the rider with leg injuries. The car involved remained at the scene and the driver has been helping with the investigation, West Yorkshire Police said. Anyone who has information or footage of the crash is being urged to contact them. Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North. West Yorkshire Police
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Is Lewis Hamilton really in free fall?
'Lewis is in free fall, isn't he?' That was a message I'd received this week from a friend, who is a staunch Hamilton supporter. The timing was interesting, as moments before, an email had dropped containing the comments from former F1 driver-turned-pundit Johnny Herbert, who is rapidly becoming Mr Rent-A-Quote on all manner of subjects, with his remarks freely available to use as a source for stories (in exchange for plugging betting websites). Advertisement In essence, Herbert's point was that Lewis Hamilton had lost his way with Ferrari and that the Italian team would be better to throw all its weight behind Charles Leclerc, who at 13 years younger, should be considered the team's future. It is a fair assessment, and came after Hamilton had finished sixth, courtesy of Max Verstappen's penalty in the Spanish GP; otherwise, it would have been seventh, while Leclerc had taken another podium finish. Charles Leclerc, Ferrari, Lewis Hamilton, Ferrari Charles Leclerc, Ferrari, Lewis Hamilton, Ferrari Clive Rose / Getty Images Clive Rose / Getty Images After the race in Barcelona, Hamilton had labelled it: 'the worst he had ever experienced'. That is some unwelcome accolade, given it was his 365th F1 race. With each race, it is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore the growing frustration he is experiencing as he adjusts to the new surroundings following his switch from Mercedes in the winter. Advertisement Hamilton's commitment cannot be questioned. He is spending time at Ferrari's Maranello factory and staying well into the night during F1 GP weekends, digging into the data in the hope of finding elements that, as yet, have been missing. Those missing elements remain unknown to the sender of the text message, or indeed perhaps Herbert too, but those working close to him can see his determined work in a relentless quest for an uptick in performance and results. Lewis Hamilton, Ferrari SF-25 Lewis Hamilton, Ferrari SF-25 Andrej Isakovic / AFP via Getty Images Andrej Isakovic / AFP via Getty Images However, those halcyon days and his well-choreographed unveiling in the winter begin now seem a distant memory, and there is a foreboding sense that the dreams of winning an eighth F1 World Championship are nothing more than that. Advertisement The win in the sprint race in China, as was the happiness he expressed in the post-race media sessions at Imola, have both proved to be false dawns, and even, as is the case with the person who sent the message, the most passionate Hamilton fan must now be fearing the worst. Perhaps we should not be surprised. Like Hamilton, fellow F1 world champions Alain Prost, Fernando Alonso, and Sebastian Vettel all arrived at F1's most famous team with the hope that it would herald another title — only for that not to prove the case. So why is it not working for Hamilton? The situation is complicated, and there is not one single factor that is obvious. At the start of the season, Ferrari's problems stemmed from set-up, with ride height being a factor. Indeed, Hamilton was disqualified from the Chinese GP due to a worn plank as his car was set up too low to the ground. Advertisement Then there is Hamilton's fondness for an F1 car that is set up to be stiff - again compromised by the softer rear suspension set up, which has prevented him from getting it dialled in. Furthermore, the upgrades were slow to arrive in the early part of the season as Mercedes and Red Bull both benefitted from new parts. Poor strategy has been a frequent problem for Ferrari, and this has not been helped by Hamilton being required to forge a new relationship with his race engineer - and dealing with the language barrier. The significance of the cultural shift that comes with moving from a UK team to one based in Italy cannot also be underestimated. It was always going to take time for Hamilton to adjust, but to take Herbert's point, at 40, time in F1 is not something Hamilton has an abundance of. Lewis Hamilton, Ferrari Lewis Hamilton, Ferrari Peter Fox / Getty Images Peter Fox / Getty Images Advertisement It looks bleak, and perhaps to the outsider, looks like Hamilton is in free fall. His demeanour and comments in Barcelona are backed up by miserable race results, which means he's placed sixth in the drivers' championship — some 23 points behind his team-mate. Plus, history tells us that Ferrari does not usually offer a happy ending to the careers of F1 world champions. However, Hamilton's switch to Ferrari was never about this season, but for preparation for the new regulations that come in 2026, in the hope of one roll of the dice for the record-breaking eighth world title his glittering career deserves. Even the most fervent of Hamilton fans are having to dig deep, and some, like Herbert, are starting to question if it will happen. Is this really the beginning of the end, which will see him turfed out of the back door of a sport he has dominated? I absolutely hope not, but the reality is, we don't know. To read more articles visit our website.

Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Carlos Tavares Has One Regret During His Time as Dodge, Jeep, RAM CEO
About a week ago, the multinational automotive collective Stellantis closed a chapter in its tumultuous history as it named Antonio Filosa as its new CEO following an extensive search. The search, which considered candidates within and outside Stellantis, was initiated shortly after Carlos Tavares suddenly departed the company in December 2024, despite his promise not to renew his CEO contract after it was slated to end in early 2026. In a new interview with Bloomberg at his home near Lisbon, in his native Portugal, Tavares revealed that his departure from Stellantis was a personal choice rather than a result of conflict within the company. He said the decision stemmed from a thoughtful reflection sparked by a "very mature" conversation with chairman John Elkann, which greatly influenced his path. "I have nothing against anybody," Tavares told the financial publication. "Even those who made my life more difficult when I was the CEO of Stellantis. At one point in time, there is a crossroads, and somebody decides that it's time to part ways. That's fine." During his time as the former helm of Stellantis, Tavares oversaw some very controversial decisions that not everyone at the company was on board with, which included swapping metal parts for plastic ones on some of its more off-road-oriented vehicles. In a December 2024 CNBC report, several former and current Stellantis executives and other U.S.-based employees described Tavares as a selfish leader who would sacrifice the business to squeeze out every last cent. In his past tenure at Renault under the notorious Carlos Ghosn, he gained a reputation as a brash businessperson who was unafraid to shake up C-suites, but one Stellantis-affiliated individual characterized Tavares as jaded and said that the pressure to cut costs felt like having a pistol "to your head." In the same report, another Stellantis figurehead said that he was chiefly behind the decision to kill off the Hemi V8, noting that others in the company "wanted to keep [Hemi]," but were shot down due to Tavares' ambitious climate targets. Tavares admitted to Bloomberg he could have done "tons of things" differently. However, one regret that he brought up was failing to bring US dealers on board with his agenda, which focused heavily on cost-cutting and dropping key models. Despite calling it a regret, he still sees some silver lining in retrospect. "The dealers in the U.S. did not want to support what we were trying to do, which is my responsibility," he said. "Many things could have been done differently, but that doesn't matter. The company is profitable." In his interview with Bloomberg, Tavares called his replacement, Antonio Filosa, "a logical, credible choice," considering his experience in the Americas. However, he desperately has to repair the tattered relationship with its dealers that faltered under his tenure. In a January 2025 dealership sentiment survey from Kerrigan Advisors, 72% of dealers surveyed said that they had no trust in the Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep-Ram brands, which Stellantis owns. According to the survey, just 2% of dealers said they had high trust in Stellantis, and 26% said they had moderate trust. The level of distrust increased dramatically from the results recorded just one year prior. In 2023, just 39% of dealers said they had no trust in Stellantis, which reflects a 33% jump in distrust year over year. The survey was conducted around the same time the U.S. Stellantis National Dealer Council blamed then-CEO Carlos Tavares front and center for what it called the "rapid degradation" of brands like Dodge, Ram, and Jeep, in a letter dated September 10. "The market share of your brands has been slashed nearly in half, Stellantis' stock price is tumbling, plants are closing, layoffs are rampant, and key executives are fleeing the company," the dealers wrote. "Investor lawsuits, supplier lawsuits, strikes–the fallout is mounting. Your own distribution network, your dealer body, has been left in an anemic and diminished state." Following a prior back-and-forth between the dealer council and Stellantis, Stellantis US Dealer Council chairman Kevin Farrish noted in a December statement to AutoNews that Stellantis has been rebuilding trust. He said Stellantis Chairman John Elkann held a video call with Dealer Council leaders under Elkann's leadership the day after Tavares exited the company. This won't be the last time we hear from Carlos Tavares regarding Stellantis. To this day, Carlos Ghosn still adds his input on issues regarding Nissan. It is still difficult to tell which direction Stellantis will take regarding its products and company direction. However, we can hope that things will only improve from here. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.