logo
BT's £1m leadership guru fell asleep in meetings

BT's £1m leadership guru fell asleep in meetings

Telegraph04-03-2025

BT spent more than £1m to bring in a leadership guru for its senior managers who repeatedly fell asleep in meetings owing to medication he was taking.
Dan Spiwack, the chief executive of US-based JMW Consultants, was brought in by Allison Kirkby, BT's chief executive, on a nine-month, £1.3m contract shortly after she took charge early last year.
Alongside colleagues he ran a leadership event for senior executives and then attended their committee meetings for months afterwards, with the aim of providing feedback on their interactions. However, multiple sources said Mr Spiwack repeatedly fell asleep in the meetings and missed significant decisions.
One source said: 'It was ridiculous and became a running joke among some people and their teams. He was openly asleep.'
A spokesman for JMW said Mr Spiwack had fallen asleep as a result of heart medication which had made him drowsy and had stopped taking it when this became clear.
While Mr Spiwack's drowsiness was not related to the length of the meetings, BT is notorious among even its own staff for its culture of lengthy discussions and PowerPoint presentations.
Executive committee meetings can last up to nine hours, with each attendee handed papers running up to 500 pages. By contrast, Amazon is famous for the succinct six-page memos which are read by everyone at the start of every meeting.
It is understood that Ms Kirkby appointed JMW on the recommendation of BT's human resources department following an open procurement process. The contract was not renewed.
One its website, JMW says it has an 'unapologetic focus on the human element in organisational and operational success' and that the 'the mindset and behaviour of leaders, aligned across and within divisions, is the most powerful multiplier of impact'.
Slow-moving culture
Ms Kirkby is the latest chief executive of BT, a former state monopoly, to attempt to shift its slow-moving culture. She is seeking to increase collaboration between departments and break down long-standing barriers to growth. Several of the company's senior leadership have been replaced or are in the process of moving on.
She is now under pressure to deliver change from number one shareholder Bharti Global, the Indian conglomerate controlled by billionaire Sunil Mittal. Ms Kirkby is continuing a programme of significant job cuts; by November BT had cut 16,000 roles in two years.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Vishay Intertechnology joins Wales Tech Week 2025 partners
Vishay Intertechnology joins Wales Tech Week 2025 partners

South Wales Argus

time2 hours ago

  • South Wales Argus

Vishay Intertechnology joins Wales Tech Week 2025 partners

Vishay Intertechnology, a US-based firm with operations in Newport, has been announced as a gold partner for the event, which will take place at the International Convention Centre (ICC) Wales from November 24 to 26. The company, which employs 23,000 people worldwide, manufactures semiconductors in multiple countries and acquired its Newport site—now the UK's largest semiconductor manufacturing facility—in March 2024. Avril Lewis, managing director of Technology Connected, organisers of Wales Tech Week, said: "Compound semiconductors play a vital role in the world around us and we're delighted that a world-leading company such as Vishay Intertechnology has partnered with Wales Tech Week to help showcase some of the cutting-edge work that they do, in what is such an important industry. "Their recently announced investment shows the confidence that they have in the manufacturing potential of Wales, and it's great to see the South Wales semiconductor cluster continuing to grow and attract international interest and recognition." Vishay recently announced a £250 million investment in the Newport facility to expand production of silicon carbide semiconductors. These advanced components are crucial to electric vehicle (EV) technology. The company says they enable faster battery charging, more efficient energy delivery to motors, and longer driving ranges for EVs. The investment is expected to directly support more than 500 high-value jobs in Wales and create further opportunities throughout the supply chain. Roy Shoshani, executive vice president and chief operating officer – semiconductors and chief technical officer at Vishay Intertechnology, said: "When Vishay acquired Newport Wafer Fab last year, we wanted to take advantage of the global growth opportunity in compound semiconductors. "We knew we would benefit from Wales's track record in innovation, its highly skilled and committed workforce, and the spirit of collaboration within the South Wales Compound Semiconductor Cluster. "As gold sponsors of Wales Tech Week 2025, we're excited to showcase Wales's expertise in semiconductors on the world stage." Vishay is also working with further and higher education providers to promote careers in the semiconductor industry.

Aukus will cost Australia $368bn. What if there was a better, cheaper defence strategy?
Aukus will cost Australia $368bn. What if there was a better, cheaper defence strategy?

The Guardian

time4 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Aukus will cost Australia $368bn. What if there was a better, cheaper defence strategy?

As Australia's nuclear submarine-led defence strategy threatens to fray, strategists say it's time to evaluate whether the military and economic case of the tripartite deal still stacks up. The defence tie-up with the US and UK, called Aukus, is estimated to cost up to $368bn over 30 years, although the deal could become even more costly should Donald Trump renegotiate terms to meet his 'America first' agenda. The current deal, struck in 2021, includes the purchase of three American-made nuclear-powered submarines, the construction of five Australian-made ones, as well as sustaining the vessels and associated infrastructure. Such a price tag naturally comes with an opportunity cost paid by other parts of the defence force and leaves less money to address societal priorities, such as investing in regional diplomacy and accelerating the renewable energy transition. This choice is often described as one between 'guns and butter', referring to the trade-off between spending on defence and social programs. Luke Gosling, Labor's special envoy for defence and veterans' affairs, last year described Aukus as 'Australia's very own moonshot' – neatly capturing both the risks and the potential benefits. Sam Roggeveen, director of the Lowy Institute's international security program, says there are cheaper ways to replicate submarine capabilities, which are ultimately designed to sink ships and destroy other submarines. These include investing in airborne capabilities, more missiles, maritime patrol aircraft and naval mines, he says. 'If you imagine a world without Aukus, it does suddenly free up a massive portion of the defence budget,' says Roggeveen. 'That would relieve a lot of pressure, and would actually be a good thing for Australia.' Roggeveen coined the term 'echidna strategy' to argue for an alternative, and cheaper, defence policy for Australia that does not include nuclear-powered submarines. Like the quill-covered mammal, the strategy is designed to build defensive capabilities that make an attack unpalatable for an adversary. The strategy is meant to radiate strength but not aggression. 'The uncertainty that Aukus introduces is that we are buying submarines that actually have the capabilities to fire Tomahawk cruise missiles on to an enemy land mass,' says Roggeveen. 'That is an offensive capability that's ultimately destabilising. We should be focusing on defensive capabilities only.' Those advocating for a more defensive approach, including Albert Palazzo from the University of New South Wales, point out that it is more costly to capture ground than it is to hold it. The argument has been bolstered by Ukraine's ability to stall the advance of a larger adversary, aided by its use of relatively cheap underwater and airborne drones. On the question of alternative uses for the submarine money, the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments recently asked teams in Washington and Canberra to consider how Australia might rebalance its defence force structure over the next decade. In the experiment, four out of the six teams – including all three Australian teams – opted to cancel the nuclear submarine deal, citing concerns about British industrial capacity, complexities of the program and the delivery timetable. Total defence funding is forecast to nearly double in dollar terms over the next decade, from $56bn in this financial year to $100.4bn in 2033-34. The increase in defence spending as a share of the economy is less pronounced, but still marked: from 2% now to 2.4% over the same period. Saul Eslake, an independent economist, says higher defence spending is coming at a time of substantially higher demands on the public purse across a range of areas, from aged care, to disability services and childcare. Eslake says government spending is now 1.5 to 2 percentage points higher than the average through the decades leading up to the pandemic, the equivalent of $55-70bn a year in today's dollars. At some point, Australians will need to grapple with how to pay for this extra spending, or to find areas where programs can be cut. 'The consensus across the political divide, and whether the public wants it or not, is that there will be more spending on defence,' Eslake says. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email While expert opinion divides over whether nuclear-powered submarines are the best strategic option for Australia's long-term defence strategy, there's a separate question over whether the submarines will be delivered. There is a substantial risk associated with a project that spans three countries over three decades and involves huge sums of money. The Aukus costing recognises some of this: of the $368bn estimated cost over 30 years, $123bn is classed as 'contingency'. In other words, an extra 50% has been added to the cost estimate to try to account for the risk of cost blowouts, which is more than 10 times the usual contingency on big projects. Australia may find it needs to draw on that contingency sooner than expected should terms be renegotiated with Trump in the US's favour. As part of the agreement, Australia has already committed billions of dollars to help build up the manufacturing capacity of the US and UK. The financial cost of the nuclear-powered submarine program is so high that Marcus Hellyer, from Strategic Analysis Australia, has described it as the country's 'fourth service', sitting alongside the navy, army and air force. Hellyer says many of the risks linked to the deal, including questions over US submarine production capability and whether Australia will have enough nuclear-qualified submariners, still remain almost four years after the agreement was struck. 'There are serious risks around this and the risk picture is not a particularly comfortable one at the moment,' he says. Hellyer says the heavy investment in traditional assets, including submarines, leaves Australia with a limited ability to invest in emerging defence technologies. 'We don't have a lot of flexibility because so much of our investment budget is tied up,' he says. 'Unfortunately, it's tied up in things that won't be delivered for a decade or more.'

Duke and Duchess of Sussex hire new agency in PR staff shake-up
Duke and Duchess of Sussex hire new agency in PR staff shake-up

South Wales Guardian

time5 hours ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Duke and Duchess of Sussex hire new agency in PR staff shake-up

Harry and Meghan have turned to US-based Method Communications to promote their business and philanthropic endeavours after several members of their team reportedly departed. Kyle Boulia, their Los Angeles-based deputy press secretary, and Charlie Gipson, who had been serving as the couple's European communications director, are among those who are said to have left the couple, the Mail Online reports. Meredith Maines, the chief communications officer to Harry and Meghan, is overseeing the revamp which she said will swell the ranks of the Sussex PR machine from two members of staff to 'an agency support staff of eight'. She said: 'As the duke and duchess's business and philanthropic interests grow, I have made the strategic decision to move toward a more traditional communications structure of specialist agency support, as previously reported in Forbes and PR Week several weeks ago. 'Transitioning from a team of two to an agency support staff of eight, operating across five different time zones, will give international media and stakeholders better access, and critically, faster response times to inquiries.' The couple's business portfolio include Meghan's lifestyle brand As Ever, launched in April this year; their media production company, Archewell Productions; and a multi-project deal with Netflix. Harry, 40, and Meghan, 43, announced they were stepping back as working members of the royal family on January 8 2020. The couple have since been at the centre of tensions with other royals, with the duke becoming estranged from his father, the King, and his brother, the Prince of Wales. In a recent television interview, Harry said he 'would love a reconciliation' with the royal family, claiming Charles will not speak to him and expressing concern that he does not know 'how much longer my father has'. In that same BBC interview, Harry complained his loss of a legal challenge over his UK security was a 'stitch-up', adding that he felt 'let down'. Harry and Meghan were told following their departure from the royal family that they would not be able to retain the full-time police protection granted to the royals. The Sussexes would instead receive a 'bespoke' security service, whereby they would be required to give 30 days' notice of any plans to travel to the UK, with each visit being assessed for threat levels and whether protection is needed. Last month, Harry lost his Court of Appeal challenge over his security arrangements while in the UK and said, in the TV interview following the decision, he 'can't see a world in which I would be bringing my wife and children back to the UK'. Earlier this month, the duchess posted a video of herself twerking in a bid to bring on labour while pregnant with Princess Lilibet. In the clip, a heavily pregnant Meghan is shown dancing in a hospital room to the Starrkeisha song Baby Momma, alongside the Duke of Sussex. Meghan posted on her Instagram to celebrate Lili's fourth birthday on Wednesday, writing: 'Four years ago today, this also happened. 'Both of our children were a week past their due dates … so when spicy food, all that walking, and acupuncture didn't work – there was only one thing left to do!' The candid video, which runs for more than a minute, also features Harry, who is seen dancing in and out of the frame. The couple were also noticeably absent from the Trooping the Colour parade on Saturday. It is the third year in a row the Sussexes were not present at the event.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store