Maduro's party sweeps Venezuela mayoral vote as opposition boycotts
The ruling United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV) won 285 of 335 mayoralties, according to Maduro's own projections, which he celebrated with supporters early Monday in Caracas's Bolivar Square.
"Victory, popular victory!" Maduro shouted. "Democracy and peace, the unity of the people, have triumphed."
The country's electoral authority, accused of loyalty to Maduro, put turnout at 44 percent.
That represents just over six million voters, although polling stations in several cities showed low turnout throughout the day.
In one year, Maduro has won the presidency, absolute control of parliament, 23 of 24 governorships and now municipal power.
Opposition leader Maria Corina Machado, whose candidate lost to Maduro in the presidential election last year, said on X: "What happened between July 28, 2024, and today?"
"That day, 70 percent of the country voted for EDMUNDO GONZALEZ, and today, 90 percent said NO to MADURO," referring to what she said was the abstention rate.
A dissident wing of Machado's movement participated in the elections and, according to Maduro, won 50 mayoralties.
"The new opposition," the president declared, while the opposition leader branded them Maduro collaborators.
Maduro plans to lead a demonstration Monday to celebrate the anniversary of his victory, which the United States and a dozen other countries did not recognise.
"Maduro is NOT the President of Venezuela and his regime is NOT the legitimate government," US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on X Sunday, calling the president the leader of a "narco-terror" organisation.
This month, Washington and Caracas negotiated a prisoner swap that saw the release of 10 Americans and US residents imprisoned in Venezuela for 252 Venezuelan migrants detained in a notorious prison in El Salvador.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
U.S. employers slash hiring as Trump advances a punishing trade agenda
U.S. hiring is slowing sharply as President Donald Trump's erratic and radical trade policies paralyse businesses and raise doubts about the outlook for the world's largest economy. U.S. employers added just 73,000 jobs last month, the Labor Department reported Friday, well short of the 1,15,000 expected. Worse, revisions shaved a stunning 2,58,000 jobs off May and June payrolls. And the unemployment rate ticked higher to 4.2% as Americans dropped out of the labour force and the ranks of the unemployed rose by 2,21,000. 'A notable deterioration in US labour market conditions appears to be underway,'' said Scott Anderson, chief U.S. economist at BMO Capital Markets. 'We have been forecasting this since the tariff and trade war erupted this spring, and more restrictive immigration restrictions were put in place. Overall, this report highlights the risk of a harder landing for the labour market.'' Economists have been warning that the rift with every US trading partner will begin to appear this summer, and the Friday jobs report appeared to sound the bell. 'We're finally in the eye of the hurricane,' said Daniel Zhao, chief economist at Glassdoor. 'After months of warning signs, the July jobs report confirms that the slowdown isn't just approaching—it's here.' US markets recoiled at the jobs report, and the Dow tumbled more than 600 points on Friday. But President Donald Trump responded to the weak report by calling for the firing of Erika McEntarfer, the director of the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics, which compiles the jobs numbers. 'I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY,' Mr. Trump said on Truth Social. 'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified.' Mr. Trump questioned the big revisions, but they are a standard part of the monthly jobs report. The Labor Department revises its numbers as more data comes in. Particularly since COVID-19, businesses have taken longer to respond to the government's survey on hiring. As more data has come in later than in the past, the potential for large revisions has increased. Revelations in the new data raise questions about the health of the job market and the economy as Mr. Trump pushes forward an unorthodox overhaul of American trade policy. Mr. Trump has discarded decades of U.S. efforts to lower trade barriers globally, instead imposing hefty import taxes — tariffs — on products from almost every country on earth. Trump believes the levies will bring manufacturing back to America and raise money to pay for the massive tax cuts he signed into law on July 4. Tariffs lead to price rise Mainstream economists warned that the cost of the tariffs will be passed along to Americans, both businesses and households. That has begun. Walmart, Procter&Gamble, Ford, Best Buy, Adidas, Nike, Mattel, Shein, Temu, Stanley, Black&Decker, have all hiked prices due to U.S. tariffs. Economists at Goldman Sachs estimate that overseas exporters have absorbed just one-fifth of the rising costs from tariffs, while Americans and US businesses have picked up the lion's share of the tab. Mr. Trump has sowed uncertainty in the erratic way he's rolled the tariffs out — announcing, then suspending them, then coming up with new ones. Overnight, Mr. Trump signed an executive order that set new tariffs on a wide swath of U.S. trading partners that go into effect on August 7, and that comes after a flurry of unexpected tariff-related actions this week. 'There was a clear, significant, immediate tariff effect on the labour market and employment growth essentially stalled, as we were dealing with so much uncertainty about the outlook for the economy and for tariffs,' said Blerina Uruci, chief U.S. economist for the brokerage T. Rowe Price. Still, Uruci said the data suggests we could be past the worst, as hiring actually did pick up a bit in July from May and June's depressed levels. 'I'm not overly pessimistic on the US economy based on this morning's data,' she said, though she does think that hiring will remain muted in the coming months as the number of available workers remains limited due to reduced immigration and an ageing population. 'Because of immigration policy, labour supply growth has nearly ground to a halt,' said Guy Berger, senior fellow at the Burning Glass Institute, which studies employment trends. 'So we're going to have very weak employment growth. And we look like southern Europe or Japan.' Still, with fewer workers available, the economy doesn't need to generate many jobs to soak up the unemployed. That could keep the unemployment rate from climbing much, Berger added. Mr. Trump has sold the tariff hikes as a way to boost American manufacturing, but factories cut 11,000 jobs last month after shedding 15,000 in June and 11,000 in May. The federal government, where employment has been targeted by the Trump administration, lost 12,000 jobs. Jobs in administration and support fell by nearly 20,000. Healthcare companies added 55,400 jobs last month – accounting for 76% of the jobs added in July and offering another sign that recent job gains have been narrowly concentrated. The department originally reported that state and local governments had added 64,000 education jobs in June. The revisions on Friday slashed those jobs to less than 10,000. Those revisions also revealed that the US economy has generated an average of just 85,000 jobs a month this year, barely half last year's average of 168,000 and well below an average of 400,000 from 2021-2023 as the economy rebounded from COVID-19 lockups. The weak jobs data makes it more likely that Trump will get one thing that he most fervently desires: A cut in short-term interest rates by the Federal Reserve, which often — though not always — can lead to lower rates for mortgages, car loans, and credit cards. Fed Chair Jerome Powell and other Fed officials have repeatedly pointed to a healthy job market as a reason that they could take time to evaluate how Trump's tariffs were affecting inflation and the broader economy. Now that the assessment has been undercut, it will put more pressure on the Fed to reduce borrowing costs. Wall Street investors sharply raised their expectations for a rate cut at the Fed's next meeting in September after the report was released. On Wednesday, the Fed left its key rate unchanged for the fifth consecutive meeting and Powell signalled little urgency to reduce rates anytime soon. He said the 'labour market is solid' with 'historically low unemployment.' But he also acknowledged there is a 'downside risk' to employment stemming from the slow pace of hiring that was evident even before Friday's weaker numbers. The current situation is a sharp reversal from the hiring boom of just three years ago, when desperate employers were handing out signing bonuses and introducing perks such as Fridays off, fertility benefits and even pet insurance to recruit and keep workers. The rate of people quitting their jobs — a sign they're confident they can land something better — has fallen from the record heights of 2021 and 2022 and is now weaker than before the pandemic. Drees Homes, a homebuilder based outside Cincinnati in Fort Mitchell, Kentucky, has hired about 50 people over the past year, bringing its workforce to around 950. Pamela Rader, Drees' vice president for human resources, it's 'gotten a little bit easier'' to find workers. A couple of years ago, Rader said jobseekers were focused on getting more pay. Now, she said, they emphasise stable employment, a better work-life balance, and prospects for advancement
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Corporation for Public Broadcasting to shut down in 2026 after loss of federal funding
The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), a cornerstone of American public media for nearly six decades, will officially shut down early next year, 2026, following a decisive funding rollback by the US Congress. The CPB announced on Friday that it would begin winding down operations immediately, with most staff positions eliminated by the end of September. A small team will remain until January 2026 to manage the final distribution of funds and settle outstanding obligations. Founded in 1967 under President Lyndon B. Johnson's 'Great Society' initiative, the CPB has long served as a lifeline for National Public Radio (NPR), the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), and hundreds of local affiliates across the United States. Its mission was to ensure that educational, cultural, and emergency programming reached even the most remote corners of the country. 'Public media has been one of the most trusted institutions in American life,' said CPB President and CEO Patricia Harrison in a statement. 'We are deeply grateful to our partners across the system for their resilience, leadership, and unwavering dedication to serving the American people.' The shutdown follows a politically divisive vote in Congress last month, which saw lawmakers rescind over $500 million in annual CPB funding. The measure passed narrowly along party lines, with Republicans citing longstanding concerns about perceived liberal bias in publicly funded media. Despite years of unsuccessful attempts to defund the CPB, this latest clawback proved fatal. The abrupt loss of federal support plunged the organisation into a financial crisis it could not withstand. Harrison said the closure comes 'despite extraordinary efforts' by millions of Americans who contacted their elected officials to preserve public media funding. While iconic institutions such as NPR, PBS, and beloved programmes like Sesame Street and All Things Considered are expected to continue, the withdrawal of CPB support will have far-reaching effects. PBS and NPR receive only a fraction of their funding directly from the CPB, but hundreds of local stations—especially in rural and underserved communities—depend heavily on these funds. Experts warn that many of these stations may now face closure, depriving local audiences of news, cultural programming, and essential emergency alerts. 'Without federal support, public radio and TV in vast areas of the country are at risk of going dark,' warned one media analyst. 'This affects not only entertainment and education but also disaster response and community cohesion.' The impact may be particularly severe for children's programming. Shows like Daniel Tiger's Neighborhood and digital educational games had already suffered from reduced Department of Education grants earlier this year. The end of CPB funding could further shrink access, particularly in areas without strong internet infrastructure. Access to trusted educational content has long been a hallmark of public broadcasting, offering a vital resource to families unable to afford private alternatives. The CPB's final months were fraught with tension. In April, the organisation sued US President Donald Trump for allegedly attempting to remove board members unlawfully. It also resisted an executive order seeking to cut NPR and PBS funding—arguing it was not a federal agency under presidential control. In the end, however, it was Congress that struck the decisive blow. In the wake of the funding crisis, public media organisations are rallying donor support. Foundations, philanthropists, and local community members have stepped in to plug the gap, but experts caution that donations alone cannot replace half a billion dollars in annual funding. 'There must be a broader rethink of how public broadcasting is funded and sustained,' said Katherine Maher, CEO of NPR. 'This is the loss of a major institution and decades of knowledge and expertise.' PBS, meanwhile, pledged to maintain its public service mission 'for years to come,' even as its operational landscape shifts dramatically. As of this autumn, the CPB will begin laying off most of its workforce. The remaining employees will focus on closing out operations, managing royalty rights, and overseeing the final dispersal of federal funds. The shutdown of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting represents not only the end of a historic American institution but also a significant shift in the future of media access and public trust.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Docus that hint at Hillary role in plan to tie Trump to Russia false?
The Trump-era special counsel who scoured the Russia investigation for wrongdoing gathered evidence that undermines a theory pushed by some Republicans that Hillary Clinton 's campaign conspired to frame Donald Trump for colluding with Moscow in the 2016 election, information declassified on Thursday shows. The information, a 29-page annex to the special counsel's 2023 report, reveals that a foundational document for that theory was most likely stitched together by Russian spies. The document is a purported email from July 27, 2016, that said Hillary had approved a campaign proposal to tie Trump to Russia to distract from the scandal over her use of a private email server. The release of the annex adds new details to the public's understanding of a complex trove of 2016 Russian intelligence reports analysing purported emails that Russian hackers stole from Americans. It also shows how the special counsel, John Durham, went to great lengths to try to prove that several of the emails were real, only to ultimately conclude otherwise. The release of the annex was no exception. John Ratcliffe, the CIA director, said in a statement that the materials proved that suspicions of Russian collusion stemmed from "a coordinated plan to prevent and destroy Donald Trump's presidency." Kash Patel, the FBI director, declared on social media that the annex revealed "evidence that the Clinton campaign plotted to frame President Trump and fabricate the Russia collusion hoax." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Salt Spring: Unsold Furniture Liquidation 2024 (Prices May Surprise You) Unsold Furniture | Search Ads Learn More Undo In reality, the annex shows the opposite, indicating that a key piece of supposed evidence for the claim that Hillary approved a plan to tie Trump to Russia is not credible: Durham concluded that the email from July 27, 2016, and a related one dated two days earlier were probably manufactured. Before the 2020 election, Ratcliffe, as director of national intelligence in Trump's first term, had declassified and released the crux of the July 27 email, even though he acknowledged doubts about its credibility. Officials did "not know the accuracy of this allegation or the extent to which the Russian intelligence analysis may reflect exaggeration or fabrication," he said. Among some Trump supporters, the message became known as the "Clinton Plan intelligence," as Durham put it in his final report. In his report, Durham used the US govt's knowledge of the supposed plan, via the Russian memos, to criticise FBI officials involved in the Russia investigation for not being more sceptical when they later received a copy of the Steele dossier and used it to obtain a wiretap order. Durham's report also mentioned that Clinton and others in the campaign dismissed the allegation as ridiculous. But Durham banished to the annex concrete details he had found that bolstered her campaign's rebuttal, burying until now the conclusion that the email he called the "Clinton Plan intelligence" was Russian disinformation. Durham was never able to prove any Clinton campaign conspiracy to frame Trump by spreading information that it knew to be false, but he used court filings to insinuate such suspicions. He brought charges of false statements against two people involved in efforts to scrutinize possible ties between Trump and Russia, which ended in acquittals.
