UK to boost 'homegrown talent' in new AI skills drive
LONDON - UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Monday pledged to boost "homegrown talent for the AI age" by teaming up with tech giants to train 7.5 million workers in artificial intelligence skills.
Speaking at the start of London's Tech Week, with a line-up of speakers including Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, Starmer said: "In this global race, we can be an AI maker and not an AI taker."
Starmer was due to have a one-on-one conversation with the chief of the star Silicon Valley semiconductor firm whose chips are critical for artificial intelligence applications and research.
Ahead of the event bringing together industry giants, Starmer announced a government-industry partnership to train 7.5 million workers in AI skills, including in using chatbots and large language models to boost productivity.
Tech firms including Nvidia, Google, Microsoft and Amazon committed to make training materials freely available to businesses over the next five years.
Google EMEA region President Debbie Weinstein called it a "crucial initiative" essential for developing AI skills, unlocking AI-powered growth "and cementing the UK's position as an AI leader".
In his opening speech, Starmer said Britain must build "the digital infrastructure that we need to make sure AI improves our public services".
The UK has a "responsibility" to "harness this unprecedented opportunity and to use it to improve the lives of working people", Starmer added.
"We are going to build more homes, more labs, more data centres, and we're going to do it much, much more quickly."
- Economic growth -
His government has pledged to fire up the UK's flagging economy, including with "pro-growth" AI regulations to attract tech investment and turn Britain into an "AI superpower".
"We are putting the power of AI into the hands of the next generation so they can shape the future, not be shaped by it," Starmer said in a press release before the event.
The British leader unveiled £187 million ($253 million) in funding to help develop tech abilities including training for one million secondary school students, as part of its "TechFirst" programme.
He called it a "step change in how we train homegrown talent for the AI age".
The investment will "embed AI right through our education system", he said, announcing nearly £150 million in undergraduate and PhD research scholarships in AI and tech.
Starmer also announced a "commitment from Nvidia to partner on a new AI talent pipeline", including through expanding a Nvidia lab in Bristol, southwest England.
The UK's AI sector is valued at £72 billion, employing over 64,000 people, and is projected to exceed £800 billion by 2035.
It was growing 30 times faster than the rest of the economy, according to government figures from 2023 an "incredible" rate, according to Starmer.
Other speakers at the tech conference include the CEO of Mistral AI, Arthur Mensch, the UK's Science Secretary Peter Kyle and Markus Villig, founder of ride-hailing app Bolt.
By Akshata Kapoor
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
9 hours ago
- The Citizen
Uber to launch self-driving taxis in London in 2026
Trials will begin with safety drivers for emergencies before fully autonomous Uber taxis hit the London streets. Ride-hailing firm Uber will launch self-driving taxis in London next year when England trials new driverless services, the firm and the UK government said on Tuesday. Under the Uber pilot scheme, services will initially have a human in the driver's seat who can take control of the vehicle in an emergency, but the trials will eventually transition to being fully driverless. The government announcement will see companies including Uber allowed to trial commercial driverless services without a human presence for the first time in the UK. They will include taxis and 'bus-like' services. Making autonomy 'safe and reliable' Uber CEO Andrew Macdonald described London's roads as 'one of the world's busiest and most complex urban environments'. 'Our vision is to make autonomy a safe and reliable option for riders everywhere, and this trial in London brings that future closer to reality,' he said. Members of the public will be able to book the transport via an app from spring 2026, ahead of a potential wider rollout when new legislation — the Automated Vehicles Act — becomes law from the second half of 2027, the Department for Transport added. Job opportunities The technology could create 38,000 jobs, add £42 billion ($57 billion) to the UK economy by 2025, and make roads safer, it said. ALSO READ: Uber stresses safety as 'top priority' amid concerns over driver profiles for sale [VIDEO] 'The future of transport is arriving. Self-driving cars could bring jobs, investment, and the opportunity for the UK to be among the world-leaders in new technology,' Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said. 'We can't afford to take a back seat on AI…. That's why we're bringing timelines forward today,' added Technology Secretary Peter Kyle. The wider rollout will also allow the sale and use of self-driving, private cars. Driverless vehicle trials have been underway in the UK since January 2015, with British companies Wayve and Oxa 'spearheading significant breakthroughs in the technology', the ministry said. 'These early pilots will help build public trust and unlock new jobs, services, and markets,' said Wayve CEO Alex Kendall. Safety in self-driving According to the government the forthcoming legislation will require self-driving vehicles to 'achieve a level of safety at least as high as competent and careful human drivers'. 'By having faster reaction times than humans, and by being trained on large numbers of driving scenarios, including learning from real-world incidents, self-driving vehicles can help reduce deaths and injuries,' it said. Driverless taxis with limited capacity are already on the roads in the United States and China, most notably in the central Chinese city of Wuhan where a fleet of over 500 can be hailed by app in designated areas. NOW READ: Plug-in Jaecoo J7 and Omoda C9's shock goes further than power
Eyewitness News
11 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
South African law is failing gig workers
Gig work using digital platforms has exploded over the past decade. South Africa has been fertile ground for Uber, Checkers 60Sixty and Takealot. Sustained unemployment alongside high levels of urbanisation and wealth inequality has created a large population of people desperate for work. They have access to phones and the internet and they can provide middle- and upper-class households with cheap labour. But legislation falls short in protecting these workers. The number of workers in the gig economy is uncertain. A 2020 estimate puts it at 30,000 full-time workers, but growing about 10% a year. Most gig workers in the country are in e-hailing services, such as Uber and Bolt. These have a combined 60,000 drivers on their system but not all the registered drivers are actually working for these companies at present and many drivers would be registered on both systems. These services promote themselves as opportunities for independence, allowing drivers to set their own hours or earn additional income as a 'side hustle'. But it also leaves them vulnerable to exploitation and with little recourse to legal remedies. In South African law, gig workers are classified as 'independent contractors'. Operating companies, such as Uber, Bolt and Pingo (responsible for administering 60Sixty drivers), benefit by keeping workers in a permanent state of uncertainty. There is little downside for these companies to onboard as many drivers as possible, and leaving the drivers to compete for limited work. Gig workers are responsible for their own expenses. For drivers, this means covering the cost of fuel, maintenance and insurance. This eats into their already meagre monthly earnings, resulting in many gig workers earning well below the minimum monthly wage. Platform work drives down wages. Globally, in comparison to their employed counterparts, independent gig workers earn 64% less for doing the same job, according to the International Labour Organisation. Under current legislation, gig workers are also not entitled to paid leave or sick leave; they receive no medical aid or retirement fund contributions; and they can be dismissed arbitrarily without recourse to the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) or labour courts. Most digital platforms reserve the right to deactivate a user's account for reasons that would not qualify as fair dismissal under South African labour law. UBER SA VS NUPSAW AND OTHERS In 2016, seven Uber drivers approached the CCMA to argue they were unfairly dismissed when Uber deactivated their accounts. Although the drivers were categorised as independent contractors, union NUPSAW argued that the nature of the agreement between them and Uber SA was more like that of full-time employees. Applying the 'realities of relationship' test, the CCMA found in the drivers' favour. It held that the relationship between Uber SA and the drivers was closer to a full-time employment relationship than to an independent contractor one. Had the decision remained, this would have fundamentally changed the way platform services operated in South Africa. However, the decision was appealed to the Labour Court, which found fundamental issues with the CCMA's decision. The biggest of which was the CCMA's refusal to attach Uber BV (Uber SA's parent company) to the proceedings. In its argument, Uber SA held that if there was any contractual relationship, it existed between the drivers and Uber BV, not Uber SA. Uber SA was simply responsible for onboarding and driver training, whereas Uber BV managed drivers on the Uber app and issued payments. As they were not party to the proceedings in the Labour Court, it refrained from answering whether there was an employment relationship between Uber BV and the drivers. For their legal status to change, another matter would need to be brought to court, which would likely result in a years-long fight ending at the Constitutional Court. LESSONS FROM ABROAD While local attempts to address the challenges faced by gig workers have been unsuccessful, movements in other countries have changed the legal status of gig workers for the better. Unlike South Africa, the UK recognises three distinct categories of workers: employees, independent contractors, and dependent contractors. In Uber BV and Others v Aslam and Others, Uber drivers in London won a substantial victory. The courts ruled that drivers are classified as dependent contractors any time they are logged on the app. The Supreme Court found that Uber falsely misrepresented the employment relationship to shield itself from responsibility for its drivers. As a result, drivers are entitled to paid leave as well as protection from arbitrary dismissals. France has taken steps to strengthen the rights of gig workers. In 2021, the French Parliament passed a bill forcing employment platforms to cover the insurance for accidents at work. It also entitled gig workers to form unions and engage in collective bargaining. Short of determined, legislative intervention to address these challenges, the task will fall on the drivers themselves to fight in court. Workers, who are already exploited, will face a legal battle against billion-dollar multinational corporations. While they may have the moral and legal standing for such a fight, they are unlikely to have the resources. Nick Fabré is a writer at the People's Legal Centre. Views expressed are not necessarily those of GroundUp. This article first appeared on GroundUp. Read the original article here.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
What's next for the Madleen aid vessel and its crew detained by Israeli forces?
An image grab from footage released by Freedom Flotilla Coalition on June 9, 2025 shows activists on board the Gaza-bound aid boat Madleen, with their hands in the air, as they are being intercepted by the Israeli forces in international waters before reaching the blockaded Palestinian territory. Drones sprayed the vessel with an unidentified white substance, which crew members described as a paint-like substance that burned their eyes. Israeli soldiers then ordered the activists to discard their phones and were subsequently detained. The vessel was redirected to Ashdod, where the activists remain in Israeli custody. The Madleen was roughly 100 nautical miles (approximately 185km) from Gaza in international waters when Israeli forces intercepted and boarded it. It was forced to reroute to the Israeli port city of Ashdod, but the interception left the global community with many questions about the future of the ship and its detained crew. After an interception at sea , the aid vessel bound for Gaza, Madleen, part of the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, was seized by Israeli naval forces in the early hours of Monday morning as it approached Gaza. What happens next? Israeli officials have stated that they plan to deport the activists to their home countries. It's worth noting that no clear timeline has been provided, and the activists' legal teams are preparing to challenge the detention and possible deportation orders. The ship remains docked in Ashdod, and its humanitarian cargo has reportedly not been delivered to Gaza. Activists and lawyers are now demanding immediate access to their clients and calling for international observers to ensure their rights are not violated during detention and potential deportation. What does the law say? A legal statement from South African Lawyers for Justice, released shortly after the incident, asserts the detention and interception were both unlawful and dangerous: "What happened to the Madleen is a direct violation of international maritime law. This was a peaceful, civilian vessel, carrying humanitarian aid, sailing in international waters, under a British flag. That flag matters. It binds the UK to obligations under international law to protect its vessels from unlawful foreign interference. That responsibility does not end at convenience. "The UN and member states cannot look away. They must act—because this was not just an attack on a ship, but on the principles that are supposed to protect civilians in times of war. "The International Court of Justice has already ruled that Israel must not hinder humanitarian aid into Gaza. The ICJ has made it clear: the siege, the blockade, is unlawful. And yet here we are—watching Israel stop a civilian aid boat by force. Watching as drones pour paint from the sky and armed speedboats surround people carrying food and medicine. This is not security. This is siege warfare. Israel is once again using starvation as a weapon of war. "The Madleen was calm. It was lawful. It was peaceful. If even that is treated as a threat, we should be asking—what is Israel so afraid the world might see in Gaza? If governments will not act, we must."
