
After years of tough rules on liquids and footwear, US air travel may be on the cusp of a new era
That's why Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem sent ripples through the traveling public when she said earlier this week that changes might be afoot when it comes to the TSA's current liquid limits.
'The liquids, I'm questioning. So that may be the next big announcement, is what size your liquids need to be,' Noem told a conference in Washington.
Will travelers be able to carry bigger bottles? Multiple 1-quart bags of liquids? Those details haven't been rolled out. But coming on top of her announcement earlier this month that travelers could keep their shoes on at TSA checkpoints, it seems a much different security experience for American air travelers might be emerging.
Airline travel changed dramatically after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks. Before that, airlines were responsible for security and would often contract it out to private firms, said Henry Harteveldt, an airline industry analyst with Atmosphere Research Group. Travelers often didn't need to show their ID at security checkpoints — and people without boarding passes, such as family members or friends, could go to the gate in some locations.
'It was much more casual. And clearly it was ineffective, because 9/11 occurred,' Hartevelt said.
That's when the Department of Homeland Security and the Transportation Security Administration were born, with the mandate of preventing more terrorist attacks.
The liquid limits, however, didn't kick in until 2006, after authorities foiled a plot that used liquid explosives smuggled aboard carry-on luggage. The TSA then very briefly banned all liquids in carry-on luggage. That ban lasted about six weeks, but strained airlines' baggage systems as more and more travelers turned to checked bags to pack toiletries.
At the time the 3.4-ounce limit was implemented, the FBI and other laboratories had found that tiny amounts of substances small enough to fit into a quart-size bag couldn't blow up an airliner.
When the ban was eventually lifted in September 2006, consumers and businesses alike had to learn how to adapt to the 3-1-1 rule — leading to more demand for smaller, travel size bottles of anything from shampoo to toothpaste, as well as clear, 'TSA approved' toiletry bags that are still seen on store shelves today.
The rule was also adopted in many countries around the world starting later that year.
Keith Jeffries, a former TSA director at Los Angeles International Airport and now vice president of K2 Security Screening Group, says whatever comes next needs to be clear for passengers. And he knows whereof he speaks.
Jeffries was working for TSA in Albuquerque, New Mexico, when the liquids rules came down overnight. Signage had to be changed to let passengers know of the new regulations. Barrels overflowing with toothpaste, shaving cream and shampoo had to be emptied every half hour. Jeffries remembers seeing a pair of shoes sitting in one of the barrels.
When he asked why, a TSA staffer said there was gel in the soles. 'I said, 'Please tell me I don't have a passenger back there walking in the sterile area barefoot. And he says, 'No, sir, they still have their socks on,'' he said. 'That's how chaotic it was.'
Any move to simplify the screening process and cut down on the time it takes for passengers to navigate checkpoints would be a welcome change for everyone, Harteveldt says. Because it isn't just about convenience; those lines before the security checkpoints are the most at risk to a potential threat.
The fact that the TSA felt confident enough to change its shoe policy earlier this month may not save too much time from an individual traveler's perspective, Harteveldt notes — but marks a 'big step forward' toward cutting down the average length of the security process when you think about the number of people going through U.S. airports each day. Relaxing current liquid restrictions could aid that effort.
Still, questions remain. 'What we don't know is what the secretary is going to announce about liquids,' Harteveldt said. 'Will they remove the liquid ban altogether — and can we go back to bringing full-sized of toiletries and other items with us? Will they allow people to bring more than one bag of toiletries and liquids? And importantly, will they relax the limit on (the) quart-size bag itself?''
It's also possible that the changes the TSA makes, whatever they are, only start at a handful of airports that have the technology to do so. Over the years, airports worldwide have adopted some aspects of security screenings faster or differently than others.
But travelers could be confused if they're able to bring a full-size bottle of shampoo or lotion when flying out of one airport, for example, but not on their return trip home.
'The devil is going to be in the details,' Harteveldt said. 'That's why the rollout plan will be absolutely critical.'
Harveldt says a more streamlined process could make travelers less stressed, but others — including flight attendants and pilots who are in the skies more frequently — may object and question whether airport security is being compromised. Still, Harveldt says he doesn't believe the TSA would make this change if the agency 'didn't feel it was authentically, truly safe.'
If shoe regulations disappear and liquid restrictions are eased, the effects could ripple into the TSA PreCheck program, in which passengers submit information like their fingerprints and the agency prescreens them for any red flags. By giving the agency this information, the traveler then gets some benefits not available to other travelers — a special line to go through and the ability to keep their computers in their bags and their shoes on, for example.
But if those benefits become more widely available to all passengers, will fewer people sign up for PreCheck?
'What is the impact on now both shoes and liquids going to have on TSA PreCheck enrollment? That is the million-dollar question,' Jeffries said. 'And if I was still with TSA, I would be watching that closely over the next 12 to 18 months.'
While the prospect of increasing the current liquid limit could be a welcome change for many U.S. travelers, some experts say that the tech isn't available in enough airports yet. Current X-ray machines used at most airports today have a difficult time distinguishing between different types of liquids, says Jeffrey Price, a professor of aviation at Metropolitan State University of Denver.
That's key, he explains, in determining whether something is harmless or potentially explosive.
While newer computed tomography scanners are better and have begun making their way to airports, Price said in commentary published last week that it could take 'another decade or more' before the newer machines are deployed at all U.S. airports.
'This is an issue that needs to be studied much more carefully than the policy to leave your shoes on,' he said in an email Thursday.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Map Shows Countries That Are Part of US Visa Waiver Program
United States Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem said Monday that Argentina was likely to rejoin the Visa Waiver Program (VWP), allowing visa-free travel to the U.S. Noem said that part of the reason for the move was a rise in Argentinian tourism to the U.S. in the past year, along with low visa overstays. Adding a country to the VWP takes time and requires it to meet strict security requirements, but getting on the list means a far easier process for nationals visiting the U.S., including avoiding a new $250 "visa integrity fee" being introduced by the Trump administration. The VWP allows visitors to the U.S., including those traveling for business, to spend up to 90 days in the country without needing to apply for a visitor visa, with some caveats. There are currently 41 nations on the list, with Chile the only other South American country as of July 2025. Nationals from these countries have to apply for a what is known as an ESTA, through the Electronic System for Travel Authorization, ahead of traveling, and must be approved by the U.S. Department of State through this. An ESTA currently costs $21 per application, but this will rise to $40 from October 1, 2025, following the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. While that cost may affect some travelers, it will still be less than for those from other countries applying for a B visitor visa, which costs $185. That will soon have the $250 visa integrity fee added on top. For VWP applicants, there are certain criteria that must be met. The State Department will not approve ESTAs for those who: Have traveled to or been present in Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, or Yemen since March 1, 2011Have traveled to or been present in Cuba since January 12, 2021Are also nationals of Cuba, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Iran, Iraq, Sudan, or Syria. The VWP is also not applicable to those coming to the U.S. to study for credit, for employment, to work as foreign press or other media, or to live as a permanent resident. All of these require different immigration pathways. As for Argentina-which was part of the VWP until 2002 when economic instability and concerns around illegal immigration were raised during the Bush administration-it will have to comply with the American rules in order to rejoin. According to the State Department, a country has to share enhanced law enforcement and security-related data with the U.S., issue e-passports, have a low visitor-visa refusal rate, timely reporting of passport issues, and be able to prove it maintains high counter-terrorism, law enforcement, and border controls. In the Department of Homeland Security's press release on the intention to get Argentina back on the VWP, Noem said Argentina now had the lowest visa overstay rate in Latin America. U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, in a press release: "Argentina now has the lowest visa overstay rate in all of Latin America and 25 percent more Argentines traveled to the U.S. in the first four months of this year compared to last year-the biggest jump of any of the top 20 international arrivals. That is why we are now taking steps to allow Argentina back into the Visa Waiver Program. "This statement of intent I signed alongside Minister Werthein and Minister Bullrich highlights our strong partnership with Argentina and our mutual desire to promote lawful travel while deterring threats. This kind of diplomatic leadership, spearheaded by President Trump, will help increase the safety of both countries." Republican Florida Representative Maria Salazar, on X: "This marks a powerful step toward restoring trust, deepening U.S.-Argentina ties, and bringing Argentina back onto the world stage. Under [Javier Milei], Argentina is emerging as a regional model of economic freedom, transparency, and strong democratic values." Argentina will have to be vetted further by the U.S. government before it can rejoin the VWP. Related Articles Green-Card Changes Threaten Pastors' Ability To Remain in USTrump Admin Reveals Planned Changes to US Citizenship Test, H-1B VisasTrump Admin Identifies Gang Immigration 'Loophole'US Denies Visas to Venezuelan Little League Baseball Team 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.


Fast Company
4 hours ago
- Fast Company
From Lincoln's dream to an $85 billion merger, the transcontinental railroad is back
Between 1863 and 1869, the first transcontinental line, known as the Pacific Railroad was built in the United States. The line ran from Omaha, Nebraska to Sacramento, California, and carried passengers and goods alike. It was built mostly by the Central Pacific Railroad Company of California and Union Pacific, and marked a turning point in the Industrial Revolution and America's economy when it came to shipping goods from the west coast. Now Union Pacific looks to expand upon history. Pending approval by the Surface Transportation Board (STB), it says it hopes to acquire Norfolk Southern through a 'stock and cash transaction' by 2027, and create the 'Union Pacific Transcontinental Railroad'. Which according to a press release, will involve Norfolk Southern shareholders receiving 'one Union Pacific common share, and $88.82 in cash for each share of Norfolk Southern.' Both combining to represent a $320 value per share, based on Union Pacific's July 16, 2025, closing stock price. Ultimately, allowing them to 'buy' Norfolk Southern for $85 billion. Norfolk Southern shareholders would represent 27% of ownership in the combined company. If the merger is not approved, the agreement reflects a $2.5 billion termination fee. Their end goal is to connect the west and east coasts across 43 states and link around 100 shipment ports throughout North America. They say it would be the first transcontinental railroad in America, but in reality, it would just be the first line to carry freight (not passengers), without needing to transfer shipments between rail lines. 'This combination is transformational, enhancing the best freight transportation system in the world – it's a win for the American economy, it's a win for our customers, and it's a win for our people,' Union Pacific CEO, Jim Vena said in a statement. 'It builds on President Abraham Lincoln's vision of a transcontinental railroad from nearly 165 years ago and advances our Safety, Service and Operational Excellence Strategy.' Who does a transcontinental railroad benefit? Currently, there are seven class 1 freight railroads operating in the U.S. including BNSF Railway Co., Canadian National Railway (Grand Trunk Corporation), Canadian Pacific (Soo Line Corporation), CSX Transportation, Kansas City Southern Railway Co., Norfolk Southern, and Union Pacific Railroad. Echoing the sentiment of the Trump administration's 'America First' strategy, the statement announcing the merger says this venture would 'transform the U.S. supply chain, unleash the industrial strength of American manufacturing, and create new sources of economic growth and workforce opportunity that preserves union jobs.' Additionally, Union Pacific claims the merging of routes would improve transit times, enhance rail competition—-specifically against the Canadian lines that operate in the states—and move more freight via train for a lower consumer and manufacturer cost. The company cites the pros of rail shipping over highway truckers as 'more cost effective on a per-ton mile basis, faster due to a lack of traffic concerns, and more environmentally fuel efficient.' On the flipside, the cons of rail include it being less cost efficient for smaller shipments, and the shipping mode's inability to reach specific locations all the time, and those truckers are likely to have something to say about any transportation that moves from truck to rail. Linking America's coasts According to the Federal Railroad Administration, 52% of rail freight consists of 'bulk' commodities. These widely include agriculture, energy products, hazardous materials and chemicals, automobiles, food, and other various materials. The other 48% consist of consumer goods and miscellaneous items like clothes, electronics, and produce—most of which are considered 'intermodal', meaning they are small enough to be transferred for the 'last mile' of shipment via plane, truck, or other transportation mode. And per Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern, these goods equal around 1.5 billion tons currently moved via freight railroads every year. What happens next? The STB will review the agreement after the companies file their application to merge—something they say they plan to do within the next six months. A merging of this capacity will likely raise questions regarding rail regulations and ethics behind competition in America, as more and more freight rail mergers have taken place over the past few years.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Perfect Place To Toss Your In-Flight Meal Scraps Without Bothering The Attendants
When you hop on a plane, you give up almost all your control. It's not just because you're thousands of feet in the air, unable to touch the ground. If you're not in the aisle seat, for example, you have to bother the person beside you when you need to get up to go to the bathroom. Plus, if the flight is at full capacity, you might not be able to choose which overhead bin your bags go in. It's especially a problem if you're a serial snacker, since you can't throw your trash away without bothering the flight attendant. It's enough to make you self-conscious, and perhaps end up on a first-name basis with your flight attendant. What you can do instead is use the sick bag, which you find in the pocket on the back of the seat in front of you (where you find travel-related magazines and extra info on safety). The sick bag is perfect for candy wrappers, plastic condiment packets, tetra packs, foil wraps, used gum, and even messier stuff such as mango peel. After all, it can handle someone's lunch when the airplane's turbulence is tough; there's a big chance it can store drippy foods, too. Maximizing sick bags is one of the smartest in-flight food and beverage hacks that can easily turn you into a travel pro. With a little more imagination, you can use them for other purposes, too. Read more: A Guide To All The 3-Star Michelin Restaurants In The United States The Sick Bag Is Surprisingly Versatile Packing a snack is a smart choice -- it's one of the tips you should know to save money on food when traveling. A bag of nuts is a TSA-approved option; with its pleasant crunch, you can eat them when you're bored, which happens a lot on the plane. But it can also be messy to eat, so use a sick bag as a placemat and just shove the crumbs inside after for a spotless space your flight attendant would thank you for. There are also similar snacks, such as sunflower seeds, which are messier because you only eat the kernel. You can throw the shell into the sick bag, too, as well as the other debris, but make sure you know how to eat sunflower seeds without ruining your teeth. Aside from being a trash bag, you can use it for storage for any leftover food. Perhaps you ordered an in-flight meal but you're too full to make your way all the way through dessert. Rather than having it thrown out, store it in a sick bag for later; your future self might thank you for it. Otherwise, the sick bag can double as a wipe before and after eating to ensure your tray table isn't dirty: Just spray alcohol and wipe it down. While it might not be the perfect rug, it still helps you tidy up a bit. Read the original article on Chowhound. Solve the daily Crossword