
After years of tough rules on liquids and footwear, US air travel may be on the cusp of a new era
That's why Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem sent ripples through the traveling public when she said earlier this week that changes might be afoot when it comes to the TSA's current liquid limits.
'The liquids, I'm questioning. So that may be the next big announcement, is what size your liquids need to be,' Noem told a conference in Washington.
Will travelers be able to carry bigger bottles? Multiple 1-quart bags of liquids? Those details haven't been rolled out. But coming on top of her announcement earlier this month that travelers could keep their shoes on at TSA checkpoints, it seems a much different security experience for American air travelers might be emerging.
Airline travel changed dramatically after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks. Before that, airlines were responsible for security and would often contract it out to private firms, said Henry Harteveldt, an airline industry analyst with Atmosphere Research Group. Travelers often didn't need to show their ID at security checkpoints — and people without boarding passes, such as family members or friends, could go to the gate in some locations.
'It was much more casual. And clearly it was ineffective, because 9/11 occurred,' Hartevelt said.
That's when the Department of Homeland Security and the Transportation Security Administration were born, with the mandate of preventing more terrorist attacks.
The liquid limits, however, didn't kick in until 2006, after authorities foiled a plot that used liquid explosives smuggled aboard carry-on luggage. The TSA then very briefly banned all liquids in carry-on luggage. That ban lasted about six weeks, but strained airlines' baggage systems as more and more travelers turned to checked bags to pack toiletries.
At the time the 3.4-ounce limit was implemented, the FBI and other laboratories had found that tiny amounts of substances small enough to fit into a quart-size bag couldn't blow up an airliner.
When the ban was eventually lifted in September 2006, consumers and businesses alike had to learn how to adapt to the 3-1-1 rule — leading to more demand for smaller, travel size bottles of anything from shampoo to toothpaste, as well as clear, 'TSA approved' toiletry bags that are still seen on store shelves today.
The rule was also adopted in many countries around the world starting later that year.
Keith Jeffries, a former TSA director at Los Angeles International Airport and now vice president of K2 Security Screening Group, says whatever comes next needs to be clear for passengers. And he knows whereof he speaks.
Jeffries was working for TSA in Albuquerque, New Mexico, when the liquids rules came down overnight. Signage had to be changed to let passengers know of the new regulations. Barrels overflowing with toothpaste, shaving cream and shampoo had to be emptied every half hour. Jeffries remembers seeing a pair of shoes sitting in one of the barrels.
When he asked why, a TSA staffer said there was gel in the soles. 'I said, 'Please tell me I don't have a passenger back there walking in the sterile area barefoot. And he says, 'No, sir, they still have their socks on,'' he said. 'That's how chaotic it was.'
Any move to simplify the screening process and cut down on the time it takes for passengers to navigate checkpoints would be a welcome change for everyone, Harteveldt says. Because it isn't just about convenience; those lines before the security checkpoints are the most at risk to a potential threat.
The fact that the TSA felt confident enough to change its shoe policy earlier this month may not save too much time from an individual traveler's perspective, Harteveldt notes — but marks a 'big step forward' toward cutting down the average length of the security process when you think about the number of people going through U.S. airports each day. Relaxing current liquid restrictions could aid that effort.
Still, questions remain. 'What we don't know is what the secretary is going to announce about liquids,' Harteveldt said. 'Will they remove the liquid ban altogether — and can we go back to bringing full-sized of toiletries and other items with us? Will they allow people to bring more than one bag of toiletries and liquids? And importantly, will they relax the limit on (the) quart-size bag itself?''
It's also possible that the changes the TSA makes, whatever they are, only start at a handful of airports that have the technology to do so. Over the years, airports worldwide have adopted some aspects of security screenings faster or differently than others.
But travelers could be confused if they're able to bring a full-size bottle of shampoo or lotion when flying out of one airport, for example, but not on their return trip home.
'The devil is going to be in the details,' Harteveldt said. 'That's why the rollout plan will be absolutely critical.'
Harveldt says a more streamlined process could make travelers less stressed, but others — including flight attendants and pilots who are in the skies more frequently — may object and question whether airport security is being compromised. Still, Harveldt says he doesn't believe the TSA would make this change if the agency 'didn't feel it was authentically, truly safe.'
If shoe regulations disappear and liquid restrictions are eased, the effects could ripple into the TSA PreCheck program, in which passengers submit information like their fingerprints and the agency prescreens them for any red flags. By giving the agency this information, the traveler then gets some benefits not available to other travelers — a special line to go through and the ability to keep their computers in their bags and their shoes on, for example.
But if those benefits become more widely available to all passengers, will fewer people sign up for PreCheck?
'What is the impact on now both shoes and liquids going to have on TSA PreCheck enrollment? That is the million-dollar question,' Jeffries said. 'And if I was still with TSA, I would be watching that closely over the next 12 to 18 months.'
While the prospect of increasing the current liquid limit could be a welcome change for many U.S. travelers, some experts say that the tech isn't available in enough airports yet. Current X-ray machines used at most airports today have a difficult time distinguishing between different types of liquids, says Jeffrey Price, a professor of aviation at Metropolitan State University of Denver.
That's key, he explains, in determining whether something is harmless or potentially explosive.
While newer computed tomography scanners are better and have begun making their way to airports, Price said in commentary published last week that it could take 'another decade or more' before the newer machines are deployed at all U.S. airports.
'This is an issue that needs to be studied much more carefully than the policy to leave your shoes on,' he said in an email Thursday.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
3 hours ago
- CBS News
As more Coloradans want to live in Mexico, consulate warns of scams
As more Coloradans consider relocating to Mexico, the Mexican Consulate in Denver is warning about scam artists and intermediaries offering to sell appointments for visas. In the last year, the Consulate reports a 15% increase in applications for residency in Mexico. A Westminster couple shared their experience applying for a visa in hopes of educating others. "How exciting!" exclaimed Amy Lodes, as she and her husband Randy worked with a consular employee to process paperwork to obtain temporary residency in Mexico. Just weeks into retirement, the Lodes are chasing a dream that began on a beach in the state of Quintana Roo, Mexico. "This started percolating years ago when we were on vacations and we'd go on beach walks," said Randy Lodes. Amy Lodes chimed in, "Houses (were) for sale on the beach, and we were like 'What would it be like to live here?'" The Lodes gathered up birth and marriage certificates and put together financial records to prove they have adequate income. They did their research and knew to go straight to the Mexican Consulate in Denver to apply for temporary residency. Others, however, have shelled out hundreds of dollars unnecessarily. Miguel Barradas Cerón is the Consul for Legal Affairs at the Mexican Consulate, and said, "Do not pay for appointments, do not pay for any kind of intermediaries. If you have any questions regarding your visa process, you can come to us; we can solve your questions face-to-face here at the consulate. You can email us." Once approved for a visa, the fee is $54, which is paid at the Consulate. The Lodes look forward to having their retirement savings go further. Amy Lodes said, "We're going to pay approximately $1,000 a month, American money, for our condo in Mexico." She and Randy Lodes continued, "It has a rooftop patio, so we have an amazing amount of living space, with a plunge pool, you can see the ocean and the palms." They look forward to a slower pace, warm weather year-round, and making new friends. "I've always said 'my toes need to be in the sand every single day, '" Amy Lodes noted. Doing their research and following the visa application instructions to the letter has been worth it, they say. "Congratulations!", the Lodes were told. "Yay, thank you! We're so excited!" added Amy Lodes. It's not necessary to get a visa for travel to Mexico for stays lasting less than six months. To learn more about applying for temporary or permanent residency in Mexico, visit the consulate's website.


The Hill
5 hours ago
- The Hill
U.S. drops to lowest ranking yet on index of most powerful passports
The U.S. has dropped to its lowest ranking yet on the index that tracks the most powerful passports among countries, according to a new quarterly report released this week. The Henley Passport Index, which was formed by London-based consulting firm Henley & Partners, revealed in a Tuesday update that the U.S. has gone down by one spot in the world rankings, and now has the 10th most powerful passport worldwide. The report is compiled using data from the International Air Transport Association. The U.S. was first on the list in 2014. The U.S. passport allows Americans to enter 182 countries without a visa. Tied with the U.S. are Lithuania and Iceland. 'The consolidation we're seeing at the top underscores that access is earned — and must be maintained — through active and strategic diplomacy. Nations that proactively negotiate visa waivers and nurture reciprocal agreements continue to rise, while the opposite applies to those that are less engaged in such efforts,' said Christian H. Kaelinm, the inventor of the passport index concept. Singapore is still in first place, allowing its citizens visa-free access to 193 destination spots. South Korea and Japan share second place, granting 190 visa-free destinations to their citizens. Seven European Union (EU) countries — Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, and Spain — are in the third spot. Seven other EU nations — Austria, Belgium, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal and Sweden — are in fourth place, while Greece, Switzerland and New Zealand are tied in fifth place, according to the report. Afghanistan is at the bottom of the list with allowing visa-free access to 25 destinations. 'While international passport rankings may vary based on methodology, our focus remains on facilitating secure, efficient, and reciprocal travel for American citizens and foreign nationals alike,' a State Department spokesperson said in a statement to CBS News.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump to land in Scotland on Friday for start of five-day private trip
Donald Trump will land in Scotland later on Friday as he begins his five-day private trip to the country. The US president is expected to arrive at Prestwick Airport in the evening, before heading over to his Turnberry golf course in South Ayrshire. He is then expected to head over to his Menie golf course in Aberdeenshire before opening up a new course dedicated to his Scottish mother, who grew up on the Isle of Lewis. He will leave the country at some point on Tuesday. His presence will result in a significant operation from Police Scotland and thousands of officers, who are expected to deal with mass protests around his golf courses and major Scottish cities. Mr Trump will be greeted by Scottish Secretary Ian Murray when he lands, with the minister pledging to give the American leader a 'warm welcome'. He will meet with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer during his stay when the pair will discuss the UK-US trade deal. The US president will also meet with First Minister John Swinney. The SNP leader previously said he would have the opportunity to raise various issues with Mr Trump, including tariffs, Gaza and Ukraine. Speaking ahead of his arrival, Mr Swinney said the global attention the visit will receive provides Scotland with an opportunity to respectfully demonstrate the principles of freedom and justice for all, while also promoting Scotland's tourism sector and economic investment potential. He said: 'Scotland shares a strong friendship with the United States that goes back centuries. 'That partnership remains steadfast through economic, cultural and ancestral links – including of course, with the President himself. 'As we welcome the President of the United States, Scotland will be showcased on the world stage. 'This provides Scotland with a platform to make its voice heard on the issues that matter, including war and peace, justice and democracy. 'It also includes the millions of Americans – many of them potential future tourists or investors in Scotland – who will watch their elected President as he visits our country. 'As First Minister it is my responsibility to advance our interests, raise global and humanitarian issues of significant importance, including the unimaginable suffering we are witnessing in Gaza, and ensure Scotland's voice is heard at the highest levels of government across the world. 'That is exactly what I will do when I meet with President Trump during his time in Scotland.' The SNP leader said Scotland is a 'proud democratic nation' that 'stands firm on the principles of equality and freedom for all, and a society that stands up for a fair and just world'. Ahead of protests expected around Scotland, he said people had a right to 'peaceful demonstration', adding that 'everyone has the democratic right to protect and express their views in a peaceful, and democratic manner'. 'That is right and proper,' he added. 'I am confident the vast majority of people protesting will do Scotland proud and demonstrate as they should – peacefully and lawfully. 'I am also confident that Scotland's police service can handle the challenge of keeping all our communities safe and, as they must, in maintaining the appropriate security any US President requires. 'This weekend is a landmark moment in our relationship with the United States, and I am certain it will be remembered for Scotland showing the world the very best of itself.'