logo
Don't count on the Iran-Israel ceasefire lasting. What Netanyahu really wants is a forever war

Don't count on the Iran-Israel ceasefire lasting. What Netanyahu really wants is a forever war

The Guardian29-06-2025
The war is over! Except it's not, not by a long chalk. The verbally agreed Iran-Israel ceasefire could be ripped to shreds at any moment. An aggressive theocratic regime still holds power in Tehran. The same is true of Jerusalem. In Washington, a president whose stupidity is matched only by his vanity prattles about making peace, but the angry old men in charge have learned nothing. Meanwhile, hundreds of civilians lie dead, thousands are wounded and millions have been terrorised.
The war is over! Except only the naive believe that Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister and prime warmonger, is done fighting. Even if Donald Trump is right and Iran's nuclear facilities have been 'obliterated' ('severely damaged' appears more accurate), its nuclear knowhow and elusive stockpile of enriched uranium have not. At the first sign, real or imagined, of rebuilding, Netanyahu and his cronies will surely attack again. Trump called them off last week. But this is a man who can change his mind three times before he's even had breakfast.
Who seriously believes Netanyahu will readily relinquish the dominance over Iran's airspace that his forces have established with unexpected ease? It's unlikely he will be able to resist the temptation to target Iran again, if fresh attacks are politically advantageous. Netanyahu is now reportedly weighing up the possibility of a snap election. Perhaps he hopes his Iran exploits will obscure his 7 October 2023 failures and abandonment of hostages held by Hamas.
There is a pattern here. Since March, when he unilaterally wrecked the Gaza ceasefire, Netanyahu has sought to subjugate the territory. Palestinian civilians have been gunned down in repeated Israeli army and settler atrocities around Gaza food centres and in towns in the West Bank. In places such as Rafah, Bloody Sunday takes place almost every day. In Lebanon and Syria, Israel has dropped bombs with impunity. Netanyahu's military grinder never stops. Why imagine that he will be any different with Iran?
Most people deplore 'forever wars', typified by dismal, multi-year western entanglements in Afghanistan and Iraq. Not Netanyahu. Peace is his enemy. Forever war keeps him in power, in the limelight and out of jail. Like Vladimir Putin, he sees continuing war as an opportunity to boost domestic support and outflank his opponents. Unending state violence is deadly for democracy, legality and good governance (and on this note, Americans should worry, too: Trump's presidency is on a similar trajectory, except his forever war is against the 'enemy within').
Despite Netanyahu's video appeal to the Iranian public in which he encouraged them to 'stand up' against an 'evil and oppressive regime', he cares little for their freedom. What he wants is what imperialist powers always want: a permanently weakened, divided, degraded country that poses no challenge to Israel's strategic interests and can be punished at will. By controlling Iranian skies and pursuing covert cyber-attacks, sabotage and assassinations, Israel could ensure an enfeebled Iran is held in check indefinitely – or so Netanyahu may calculate.
The war is over … except it's not in Tehran, either. Rattled by talk of regime change and Israel's killing of prominent allies, the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has emerged from his bunker to wage another war, on his own people. Hundreds have been arrested in a security crackdown. Alleged spies have been executed. In order to survive, the mullahs may now do what they have never done before: secretly race to build a nuclear weapon, or buy one off the shelf from North Korea.
In truth, Iran's loathsome regime didn't even come close to falling. If anything, Israel's bombs rallied public support and patriotic sentiment. Iran was attacked on the basis of a lie (neither US intelligence nor the UN backed Netanyahu's claim that it was weaponising) and European governments failed to condemn the bombing. These facts will only deepen distrust of the west. Iran wants relief from US sanctions, and may agree to discuss this, but not its future nuclear activities. It is suspending cooperation with International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors. Rejecting Israeli containment, Tehran may in time resume asymmetrical conflict and revive regional proxy wars.
The war isn't over for Trump either (though, beguiled by delusions of a Nobel peace prize, he may think it is). He has demonstrated, as in Ukraine and Gaza, that his impulsive, unthinking, uninformed interventions only make the world more dangerous. He's made it harder for the US to walk away if war flares up again. His sneak attack on Iran, reminiscent of Pearl Harbor, breached the UN charter and will help rogue states justify illegal aggression. By continuing to aid and abet Netanyahu, an alleged war criminal, Trump is opening himself up to prosecution by the international criminal court.
Trump has trashed multilateral diplomacy, sidelined and insulted European allies, relied on rookie envoys and rejected expert advice. His manifest untrustworthiness and monstrous egotism are all additional reasons why the US cannot be counted on. War across the Middle East is barely on hold. Trump took a shot at instant glory – and missed.
The utter futility and pointlessness of this war is breathtaking. It achieved almost nothing positive. It caused misery, destruction and insecurity. Only rarely does brute force advance peaceful ends. Typically it inflames existing problems – and that's what happened here. When will these angry old men get it? Probably never, unless and until democrats summon the courage to defy them.
Simon Tisdall is a Guardian columnist
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US examines equity stake in chip makers for CHIPS Act cash grants, sources say
US examines equity stake in chip makers for CHIPS Act cash grants, sources say

Reuters

time11 minutes ago

  • Reuters

US examines equity stake in chip makers for CHIPS Act cash grants, sources say

WASHINGTON/SAN FRANCISCO, Aug 19 (Reuters) - U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is looking into the government taking equity stakes in Intel (INTC.O), opens new tab as well as other chip companies in exchange for grants under the CHIPS Act that was meant to spur factory-building around the country, two sources said. As part of a plan to revive U.S. manufacturing - a key Trump agenda - Lutnick said earlier on Tuesday the U.S. government wants an equity stake in Intel in exchange for cash grants approved by the administration of former President Joe Biden. Now Lutnick wants to expand that plan to other companies, according to a White House official and a person familiar with the situation. The Trump administration has recently made unusual deals with U.S. companies, including allowing AI chip giant Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab to sell its H20 chips to China in exchange for the U.S. government receiving 15% of those sales. The Pentagon is slated to become the largest shareholder in a small mining company to boost output of rare earth magnets. The government's intervention in corporate matters has worried critics who say President Donald Trump's actions create new categories of corporate risk and that a bad bet could mean a hit to taxpayer funds. Much of the funding under the CHIPS Act has not yet been dispersed for companies such as Micron (MU.O), opens new tab, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co ( opens new tab, Samsung ( opens new tab and Intel. TSMC and Intel declined comment. Micron, Samsung and the White House did not respond to requests for comment on whether Lutnick is considering more stakes. Speaking to reporters in Taipei on Wednesday and asked whether the U.S. government could take a stake in TSMC, Taiwan Economy Minister Kuo Jyh-huei said his ministry had just heard about it and "needs some time to discuss." The two sources told Reuters on Tuesday that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is also involved in the CHIPS Act discussions, but that Lutnick is driving the process. The Commerce Department oversees the $52.7 billion CHIPS Act money. Lutnick has been pushing the equity idea, the sources said, adding that Trump likes the idea. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed earlier that Lutnick was working on a deal with Intel to take a 10% government stake. "The president wants to put America's needs first, both from a national security and economic perspective, and it's a creative idea that has never been done before," she told reporters. Speaking on CNBC, Lutnick said the U.S. wants a return on its "investment". "We'll get equity in return for that ... instead of just giving grants away," he said. President Donald Trump has previously said he wanted to kill the CHIPS Act program. Lutnick's comments suggested any stake would be non-voting, meaning it would not enable the U.S. government to tell the company how to run its business. His comments came a day after SoftBank Group (9984.T), opens new tab agreed to invest $2 billion in Intel, which has struggled to compete after years of management blunders. "The Biden administration literally was giving Intel money for free and giving TSMC money for free, and all these companies just giving the money for free, and Donald Trump turned it into saying, 'Hey, we want equity for the money. If we're going to give you the money, we want a piece of the action for the American taxpayer'," Lutnick said.

PETER VAN ONSELEN: Tony Burke's childish and VERY rehearsed attack on Israel's Netanyahu will have consequences for Australia
PETER VAN ONSELEN: Tony Burke's childish and VERY rehearsed attack on Israel's Netanyahu will have consequences for Australia

Daily Mail​

time11 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

PETER VAN ONSELEN: Tony Burke's childish and VERY rehearsed attack on Israel's Netanyahu will have consequences for Australia

Australia's Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke relishes a fight, but his decision to inject himself so forcefully into a diplomatic dispute with Israel raises more questions than it answers. Yes, Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu overstepped the mark by launching a personal attack on Anthony Albanese via Twitter. It was undignified, inflammatory and beneath the office he holds. It was just another example that in the Donald Trump-era anything goes. But Burke's response, while headline-grabbing, risks being remembered more as a domestic political performance than serious diplomacy. 'Strength is not measured by how many people you can blow up or how many children you can leave hungry', Burke thundered, using a line he'd undoubtedly workshopped as performative. It was designed for maximum cut-through, delivered with the moral certainty that plays well to his base. Yet it jarred. While Burke sounded like the school kid who tells the teacher 'he started it', you'd think a senior politician would realise two wrongs don't make his comments right. Foreign policy demands careful calibration, not flourishes that risk inflaming an already combustible situation. If Netanyahu's late-night Twitter spray was reckless, Burke's punchy one-liner was childish at best. The sequence of events matters. Australia denied a visa to far-right Israeli MP Simcha Rothman on the grounds that his rhetoric about Palestinian children crossed a line into hate speech. Israel retaliated by suspending visas for Australian officials engaging with the Palestinian Authority. Then Netanyahu escalated the dispute even further, branding Albo weak. That was the moment where a quiet, measured rebuttal would have carried the most weight internationally and at home, other than amongst the activists, who Burke was seeking applause from. Defenders of Burke will argue he was standing up for his boss, reframing the idea of strength as moral principle rather than brute force. But this misreads the demands of the situation. Australia's interests aren't advanced by rhetorical duels that feed into Netanyahu's narrative of being under siege from foreign critics. Nor does Australia look more statesmanlike when a senior minister resorts to slogans that, while emotionally charged, do little to advance policy coherence. There is also the question of consistency. Burke justified Rothman's exclusion as a matter of values, essential to maintaining domestic social cohesion. Yet his own framing, invoking images of children being blown up or left hungry, itself inflames domestic divisions. When the rhetoric of a senior Labor minister starts to mirror the polarising tone he condemns, the line between principles and politics is blurred. That does not mean Netanyahu should escape criticism. His decision to take a swipe at Albo on social media was pathetic, a sure sign that he's feeling the pressure. It reduced a legitimate disagreement into a personal slanging match, guaranteeing that the issue would escalate. Especially with the likes of Burke the one time university debater eager to try out a workshopped undergraduate retort floating around. Netanyahu reinforced the perception that Israel's government has grown defensive and erratic. But Burke's contribution did little to steady the ship. In fact, it ensured the story became less about the merits of Australia's visa decision and more about the war of words between childish politicians on opposite sides of the world. The government could have projected firmness without theatrics. Instead, it chose a line that will linger, but not necessarily in the way Burke intended.

Paul Weller sues former accountants after being dropped over Gaza statements
Paul Weller sues former accountants after being dropped over Gaza statements

South Wales Argus

time41 minutes ago

  • South Wales Argus

Paul Weller sues former accountants after being dropped over Gaza statements

The former frontman of The Jam has filed a discrimination claim against Harris and Trotter after the firm ended their professional relationship after more than 30 years. In a pre-action letter seen by the PA news agency, lawyers for Weller say the singer-songwriter was told in March that the accountants and tax advisers would no longer work with the 67-year-old or his companies. According to the letter, a WhatsApp message from a partner at the firm included: 'It's well known what your political views are in relation to Israel, the Palestinians and Gaza, but we as a firm are offended at the assertions that Israel is committing any type of genocide. 'Everyone is entitled to their own views, but you are alleging such anti-Israel views that we as a firm with Jewish roots and many Jewish partners are not prepared to work with someone who holds these views.' Lawyers for Weller claim that by ending their services, the firm unlawfully discriminated against the singer's protected philosophical beliefs including that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza and that Palestine should be recognised as a nation state. Paul Weller said the situation in Gaza is a humanitarian catastrophe (Ian West/PA) Weller said: 'I've always spoken out against injustice, whether it's apartheid, ethnic cleansing, or genocide. What's happening to the Palestinian people in Gaza is a humanitarian catastrophe. 'I believe they have the right to self-determination, dignity, and protection under international law, and I believe Israel is committing genocide against them. That must be called out. 'Silencing those who speak this truth is not just censorship – it's complicity. 'I'm taking legal action not just for myself, but to help ensure that others are not similarly punished for expressing their beliefs about the rights of the Palestinian people.' Weller will donate any damages he receives to humanitarian relief efforts in Gaza, the legal letter also states. Cormac McDonough, a lawyer at Hodge Jones and Allen, representing Weller, said that his case 'reflects a wider pattern of attempts to silence artists and public figures who speak out in support of Palestinian rights'. Mr McDonough added: 'Within the music industry especially, we are seeing increasing efforts to marginalise those who express solidarity with the people of Gaza.' Harris and Trotter have been contacted for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store