Israel weighs Hamas offer of 60-day Gaza truce and hostage release
By Maayan Lubell and Nidal al-Mughrabi
Israel is studying Hamas' response to a proposal for a 60-day ceasefire and release of half the hostages still held in Gaza, two Israeli officials said on Tuesday, although one source reiterated that all Israeli captives must be freed for the war to end.
Efforts to pause the fighting gained new momentum over the past week after Israel announced plans for a new offensive to seize control of Gaza City at the heart of the Palestinian enclave.
Mediators Egypt and Qatar have been pushing proposals to restart indirect talks between the sides on a U.S.-backed ceasefire plan.
The proposals include the release of 200 Palestinian convicts jailed in Israel and an unspecified number of imprisoned women and minors, in return for 10 living and 18 deceased hostages from Gaza, according to a Hamas official.
Two Egyptian security sources confirmed the details, and added that Hamas has requested the release of hundreds of Gaza detainees as well.
Israel says a total of 50 hostages remain in Gaza, 20 of them still alive.
"Israel's policy is consistent and has not changed. Israel demands the release of all 50 hostages in accordance with the principles established by the cabinet for ending the war. We are in the final decisive stage of Hamas and will not leave any hostage behind," an Israeli political source said.
The comment, while adamant, fell short of an outright rejection of the proposal on the table.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was expected to convene discussions about the ceasefire proposal soon, the two Israeli officials said. A response was expected in the coming two days, said a Palestinian source close to the talks.
Before Hamas responded on Monday to the proposal, Netanyahu had ruled out any deal that excluded the return of all the hostages.
Qatar's Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Majed Al Ansari said the 60-day truce deal would include "a pathway to a comprehensive agreement to end the war."
The proposal includes a partial withdrawal of Israeli forces, which presently control 75% of Gaza and the entry of more humanitarian aid into the enclave, where a population of 2.2 million people is increasingly facing famine.
Israel had previously agreed to the outline, advanced by U.S. special Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, but negotiations faltered over some of its details. The last round of talks ended in deadlock in late July.
While Israel's political echelon weighed a response, Defense Minister Israel Katz met commanders late on Tuesday. Public broadcaster Kan's military correspondent Itay Blumental said on X the meeting was to approve plans to capture Gaza City.
The post cited four stages to the plans: building humanitarian infrastructure in the southern Gaza Strip, evacuation of Gaza City, encirclement of Gaza City and maneuvering into Gaza City.
Thousands of people fearing an imminent Israeli ground offensive are estimated to have fled the area in the past few days for points to the west and south in the shattered territory.
On the ground, there were no signs of a ceasefire nearing as Israeli gunfire, tank shelling and airstrikes killed at least 20 Palestinians on Tuesday, according to Gaza health officials.
At a shelter in Khan Younis, in the south of the enclave, displaced people had mixed feelings over whether a deal would be reached this time.
"I expect - every time the (Israeli) occupation would be obstinate, reject and receive proposals with negative responses - I expect the same for this proposal as well," said Abdallah Al-Khawaja.
Women sat by wood fires cooking meals for their families, while men filled plastic gallons with water; many hoped Israel would approve the proposal.
"What I say and expect as a member of the Palestinian people living in the Gaza Strip, one of the bereaved and displaced, is that I expect a positive response (from Israel)," said Awad Labde.
ISRAELI PROTESTERS DEMAND DEAL
In Israel, the threatened offensive prompted tens of thousands of Israelis on Sunday to hold some of the largest protests since the war began, urging a deal to end the fighting and free the remaining hostages held in Gaza.
Netanyahu faces domestic political pressure from his far-right government partners who object to a truce with Hamas. Ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir have demanded to keep the war going until Hamas' defeat, and annex Gaza.
Groups representing Israeli families of those held hostage have demanded their return to Israel and an end to the war.
Hamas official Izzat El-Reshiq said that the truce proposal it has agreed to is an interim accord that would pave the way for negotiations on ending the war.
A source close to the talks said that, unlike previous rounds, Hamas accepted the proposal with no further demands.
But prospects for agreeing an end to the war appear remote, with gaps remaining on the terms. Israel is demanding the group lay down its arms and its leaders leave Gaza, conditions which Hamas has so far publicly rejected.
The war began when Hamas-led fighters stormed into Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages. Israel's offensive has since killed more than 62,000 Palestinians, according to local health officials who do not distinguish between fighters and non-combatants. The Israeli assault has plunged Gaza into a humanitarian crisis and displaced most of its population.
© Thomson Reuters 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nikkei Asia
6 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
Xi Jinping visits Tibet amid Dalai Lama succession tensions
People take photos in front of a portrait of Chinese President Xi Jinping during a government-organized tour in Lhasa, in the Tibet Autonomous Region, in March. The president arrived in the region on Aug. 20, state media reported. © Reuters CK TAN August 20, 2025 19:40 JST TOKYO -- Chinese President Xi Jinping on Wednesday arrived in Lhasa to mark the 60th anniversary of the founding of the Tibet Autonomous Region, according to state media outlet Xinhua.
The Mainichi
7 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Israel approves settlement project that could divide West Bank
TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) -- Israel gave final approval for a controversial settlement project in the occupied West Bank that would effectively cut the territory in two, and that Palestinians and rights groups say could destroy plans for a future Palestinian state. Settlement development in E1, an open tract of land east of Jerusalem, has been under consideration for more than two decades, but was frozen due to U.S. pressure during previous administrations. On Wednesday, the project received final approval from the Planning and Building Committee after the last petitions against it were rejected on Aug. 6. If the process moves quickly, infrastructure work could begin in the next few months and construction of homes could start in around a year. The plan includes around 3,500 apartments to expand the settlement of Maale Adumim, far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said during a press conference at the site last Thursday. Smotrich cast the approval as a riposte to western countries that announced their plans to recognize a Palestinian state in recent weeks. "This reality finally buries the idea of a Palestinian state, because there is nothing to recognize and no one to recognize," Smotrich told reporters. "Anyone in the world who tries today to recognize a Palestinian state will receive an answer from us on the ground." The location of E1 is significant because it is one of the last geographical links between Ramallah, in the northern West Bank, and Bethlehem in the southern West Bank. The two cities are 22 kilometers (14 miles) apart by air, but Palestinians traveling between them must take a wide detour and pass through multiple Israeli checkpoints, adding hours to the journey. The hope for final status negotiations for a Palestinian state was to have the region eventually serve as a direct link between the cities. Peace Now, an organization that tracks settlement expansion in the West Bank, called the E1 project "deadly for the future of Israel and for any chance of achieving a peaceful two-state solution" which is "guaranteeing many more years of bloodshed." Israel's plans to expand settlements are part of an increasingly difficult reality for Palestinians in the occupied West Bank as the world's attention focuses on the war in Gaza. There have been marked increases in attacks by settlers on Palestinians, evictions from Palestinian towns, and checkpoints that choke freedom of movement, as well as several Palestinian attacks on Israelis. More than 700,000 Israelis now live in the occupied West Bank and east Jerusalem, territories captured by Israel in 1967 and sought by the Palestinians for a future state. The international community overwhelmingly considers Israeli settlement construction in these areas to be illegal and an obstacle to peace. Israel's government is dominated by religious and ultranationalist politicians with close ties to the settlement movement. Smotrich, previously a firebrand settler leader and now finance minister, has been granted Cabinet-level authority over settlement policies and vowed to double the settler population in the West Bank. Israel has annexed east Jerusalem and claims it as part of its capital, which is not internationally recognized. It says the West Bank is disputed territory whose fate should be determined through negotiations. Israel withdrew from 21 settlements Gaza in 2005.
Asahi Shimbun
11 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
EDITORIAL: U.S. must offer specific measures for a lasting peace in Ukraine
U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte amid negotiations to end the Russian war in Ukraine, at the White House in Washington, D.C., on Aug. 18. (REUTERS) Major concerns remain although the worst-case scenario of having the United States force unfavorable conditions on Ukraine, which was invaded by Russia, was avoided. U.S. President Donald Trump met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and clearly stated that Washington would be engaged in guaranteeing Ukraine's security. Shock ran through Europe three days earlier when Trump gave Russian President Vladimir Putin a red carpet welcome during their meeting in Alaska. The meeting between Trump and Zelensky expanded into a highly unusual session, with the participation of not only the European Union and NATO, but also the leaders of Britain, Germany, France, Italy and Finland. The unity demonstrated by Europe may have slightly moved Trump away from his inclination toward Russia. But there remain many questions about Trump's true intentions. He temporarily left the meeting with the European leaders in order to call Putin. In front of reporters, Trump seemed to stand up for Putin, saying that the Russian president also wanted to end the war. If Trump intends to pressure Ukraine into making some compromise, there will be a need for the United States to provide specific measures it would use to guarantee Ukraine's security. Washington should come up with a peace proposal that respects Ukraine since it was invaded. There was a report that, in his meeting with Trump, Putin proposed a written promise that Russia would not invade Ukraine in the future. But Russia unilaterally annexed the Crimea after violating the Budapest Memorandum in which Ukraine abandoned its nuclear arsenal on condition its security would be guaranteed. Eight years later, Russia began its invasion into other parts of Ukraine. Russia cannot be trusted to guarantee Ukraine's security. Russia is also said to be seeking the ceding of two eastern Ukrainian regions, including Donetsk. But Ukraine is still clinging to about 30 percent of the Donetsk region and has built up a solid military base. If that region is ceded, Ukraine's defense line will be weakened, making it more difficult to prevent another Russian invasion. A majority of Ukrainians are opposed to ceding their territory. The invader should not be provided any fruits for their actions nor should any room be left to allow for another barbaric act in the future. The invasion of Ukraine is not simply a regional conflict. If the ignoring of international law by Russia, a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council, is allowed, the rule of law that the international community has been seeking could crumble. This is the moment of truth. Europe is seeking to expand the framework of support for Ukraine. According to NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, about 30 nations, including Japan, plan to attend a meeting. As a neighbor of Russia in the Far East and with its own territorial dispute, Japan cannot consider the Ukrainian invasion as someone else's problem. --The Asahi Shimbun, Aug. 20
