logo
Late attempt to shield physicians who recommend medical cannabis in Nebraska fails

Late attempt to shield physicians who recommend medical cannabis in Nebraska fails

Yahoo22-05-2025

Dominic Gillen of Bellevue, center, explains his family's support for medical cannabis, including for his 23-year-old son, Will, at a public forum in Lincoln on May 5, 2025. From left, State Sens. Rick Holdcroft of Bellevue, Jane Raybould of Lincoln, Tom Brandt of Plymouth, John Cavanaugh of Omaha, George Dungan of Lincoln, Myron Dorn of Adams, Danielle Conrad of Lincoln, Jana Hughes of Seward, Margo Juarez of Omaha and Merv Riepe of Ralston. State Sens. Ben Hansen of Blair, Machaela Cavanaugh of Omaha and Terrell McKinney of Omaha attended earlier forums. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)
LINCOLN — A late legislative attempt Wednesday to give additional protections to health care practitioners who recommend medical cannabis to Nebraska patients fell well short of moving forward a day after a broader medical cannabis regulatory bill stalled.
State Sen. John Cavanaugh of Omaha sought to add those physician liability protections Wednesday to a broader Health and Human Services Committee bill: Legislative Bill 376. The measure seeks to slash various reporting requirements and make other changes primarily in the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services.
Cavanaugh said his effort was a 'solution' that would be a 'small but meaningful step' for some of the families who showed up Tuesday for LB 677, the medical cannabis regulatory bill from State Sen. Ben Hansen of Blair. LB 677 failed 23-22, falling 10 votes short of overcoming an all-day filibuster.
'Give these families some hope, some opportunity to get access to what the voters approved at over 70%,' Cavanaugh told his colleagues. 'Vote to give doctors some small protection if they follow their conscience and their training.'
'Absolute failure': Medical cannabis regulatory bill stalls in Nebraska Legislature
Under the ballot measures approved in November, a patient can possess up to 5 ounces of medical cannabis for any condition with a health care practitioner's recommendation.
However, DHHS has not issued guidance and many advocates have reported that in-state physicians have refused to issue any medical cannabis recommendations. Until medical dispensaries are licensed, which is required under the voter-approved law by Oct. 1, cannabis can't legally be purchased in Nebraska.
Part of Cavanaugh's push also comes as Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers has acknowledged the possibility of investigating the licenses of physicians who recommend cannabis and continued to challenge the voter-approved laws.
Under Cavanaugh's amendment, in language identical to the medical provider protections in LB 677, a health care practitioner could not be arrested, prosecuted or disciplined solely for providing a written recommendation or for stating in their professional opinion that a patient is likely to benefit from using cannabis to treat or alleviate a medical condition.
The Nebraska Medical Association had voiced support for the protections.
State Sen. Bob Andersen of north-central Sarpy County, who staunchly opposed LB 677, argued that Cavanaugh's amendment was not 'germane,' or related, to LB 376. Speaker John Arch of La Vista, a former HHS Committee chair who was presiding over the Legislature at the time, agreed.
Cavanaugh moved to overrule the chair, which fell short 15-30, so the proposal didn't reach an overarching vote. The motion needed at least 24 votes because three senators had left the Capitol.
Hansen, a former HHS Committee chair, said there was no 'boogeyman' in the amendment.
But State Sen. Brian Hardin of Gering, current chair of the HHS Committee, called the attempt a 'cheap parlor trick' that could get LB 376 vetoed. Gov. Jim Pillen has said LB 677 wasn't needed.
'Fascinating process of playing chess where they're trying to deep-six the committee bill from HHS with an unwelcome amendment,' Hardin said.
State Sens. Bob Hallstrom of Syracuse and Mike Moser of Columbus also disagreed that the amendment was in the 'natural and logical sequence' to the subject matter of LB 376,' as Cavanaugh argued under legislative rules. Cavanaugh also pointed to a section in the bill that discussed civil and criminal protections for certain physicians or hospital staff.
If the amendment was worthy, Hallstrom and Moser said, senators needed more time.
'I think this is crazy,' Moser said of the amendment, lambasting that it came around 8 p.m.
Last-minute amendments, particularly late at night in legislative sessions, are not unusual.
State Sen. Megan Hunt of Omaha said she thought the amendment was germane and that her opinion was just as valuable as that of Hallstrom or Moser.
Hunt said the 'gag' is that germaneness is whatever the majority says it is. She pointed to the 2023 merger of bills to restrict abortion and health care for transgender youths, which State Sen. Wendy DeBoer of Omaha also mentioned. The Nebraska Supreme Court later affirmed the combined 2023 bill as having been germane.
DeBoer said she understood Wednesday's hesitation and asked Cavanaugh why he chose a last-second approach and hadn't warned Hardin or others before filing his amendment. He responded that LB 677 stalled late Tuesday and that he came up with the idea Wednesday.
DeBoer said that if lawmakers followed past practice on determining germaneness, the amendment was likely germane. But she acknowledged 'it's kind of crappy to do it last minute like this, no offense.'
DeBoer was one of seven senators who voted for LB 677 but on Wednesday voted to uphold Arch's ruling against Cavanaugh's amendment. The others were progressive State Sen. Danielle Conrad of Lincoln and conservative State Sens. Stan Clouse of Kearney, Myron Dorn of Adams, Rick Holdcroft of Bellevue and Jana Hughes of Seward.
The two senators voting to overrule Arch's ruling and who did not vote for LB 677 were State Sen. Carolyn Bosn of Lincoln, who was 'present, not voting' as she continued discussing concerns with Hansen, and State Sen. Ashlei Spivey of Omaha, who missed the final vote but had supported the bill.
Bosn, a former prosecutor who chairs the Judiciary Committee, and whom Pillen first appointed to the Legislature in 2023 before she was elected in November, told the Nebraska Examiner that she was convinced by Cavanaugh's argument that LB 376 opened up many sections of law.
Had Cavanaugh's amendment come up for a vote, Bosn confirmed she would have voted for it. Bosn said it made sense and is within legislative responsibility if physicians are reluctant to act. Bosn, Cavanaugh and Hansen said it was also a question the Legislature would have to grapple with soon because the regulatory commission can't shield physicians through regulations.
In his final plea to senators, Cavanaugh uttered a popular phrase that the 'hottest places in hell are reserved for those, when in times of moral crisis, preserve their neutrality.'
'Don't relegate yourself to the hottest places in Hell,' Cavanaugh said. 'Do the right thing for these families.'
Cavanaugh and Hansen said the medical cannabis fight continues in whatever way possible, either in the final seven days of the 2025 session, the regulatory process or in 2026.
Hansen pointed to a phrase on the north side of the State Capitol that he said was crucial as regulations moved forward: 'The salvation of the state is watchfulness in the citizen.'
Speaker John Arch of La Vista ruled that liability protections for physicians who recommend medical cannabis was not 'germane' to Legislative Bill 376. A vote to overrule Arch failed 15-30. It needed 24 votes.
Vote to overrule the chair: Carolyn Bosn, Eliot Bostar*, Tom Brandt*, John Cavanaugh*, Machaela Cavanaugh*, George Dungan*, John Fredrickson*, Dunixi Guereca*, Ben Hansen*, Megan Hunt*, Margo Juarez*, Dan Quick*, Jane Raybould*, Ashlei Spivey, Dave Wordekemper*
Vote to sustain the chair: Bob Andersen, John Arch, Beau Ballard, Rob Clements, Stan Clouse*, Danielle Conrad*, Wendy DeBoer*, Barry DeKay, Myron Dorn*, Rob Dover, Bob Hallstrom, Brian Hardin, Rick Holdcroft*, Jana Hughes*, Teresa Ibach, Mike Jacobson, Kathleen Kauth, Loren Lippincott, Dan Lonowski, Dan McKeon, Glen Meyer*, Mike Moser, Dave Murman, Merv Riepe, Rita Sanders, Tony Sorrentino, Tanya Storer, Jared Storm, Paul Strommen, Brad von Gillern
Present, not voting: Victor Rountree*
Excused, not voting: Christy Armendariz, Terrell McKinney*, Jason Prokop*
*Voted for a regulatory framework for medical cannabis in Hansen's Legislative Bill 677 on Tuesday (23-22)
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says Elon Musk could face ‘serious consequences' if he backs Democrats
Trump says Elon Musk could face ‘serious consequences' if he backs Democrats

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump says Elon Musk could face ‘serious consequences' if he backs Democrats

US President Donald Trump said he has no desire to repair his relationship with Elon Musk, and warned that his former ally and campaign benefactor could face 'serious consequences' if he tries to help Democrats in upcoming elections. Mr Trump told NBC's Kristen Welker in a phone interview that he has no plans to make up with tech entrepreneur Mr Musk. Asked specifically if he thought his relationship with the mega-billionaire chief executive of Tesla and SpaceX was over, Mr Trump responded: 'I would assume so, yeah.' 'I'm too busy doing other things,' Mr Trump continued. Alarming — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 7, 2025 'You know, I won an election in a landslide. I gave him (Mr Musk) a lot of breaks, long before this happened, I gave him breaks in my first administration, and saved his life in my first administration, I have no intention of speaking to him.' The US President also issued a warning amid speculation that Mr Musk could back Democratic legislators and candidates in the 2026 mid-term elections. 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Mr Trump told NBC, though he declined to share what those consequences would be. Mr Musk's businesses have many lucrative federal contracts. The US President's latest comments suggest Mr Musk is moving from close ally to a potential new target for Mr Trump, who has aggressively wielded the powers of his office to crack down on critics and punish perceived enemies. As a major government contractor, Mr Musk's businesses could be particularly vulnerable to retribution. Mr Trump has already threatened to cut Mr Musk's contracts, calling it an easy way to save money. The dramatic rupture between the President and the world's richest man began this week with Mr Musk's public criticism of Mr Trump's 'big beautiful bill' pending on Capitol Hill. Mr Musk has warned that the bill will increase the federal deficit and called it a 'disgusting abomination'. Mr Trump criticised Mr Musk in the Oval Office, and before long, he and Mr Musk began trading bitterly personal attacks on social media, sending the White House and Republican congressional leaders scrambling to assess the fallout. As the back-and-forth intensified, Mr Musk suggested Mr Trump should be impeached and claimed without evidence that the government was concealing information about the President's association with infamous paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Mr Musk appeared by Saturday morning to have deleted his posts about Epstein. In an interview, US vice president JD Vance tried to downplay the feud. He said Mr Musk was making a 'huge mistake' going after Mr Trump, but called him an 'emotional guy' who was becoming frustrated. 'I hope that eventually Elon comes back into the fold. Maybe that's not possible now because he's gone so nuclear,' Mr Vance said. Mr Vance called Mr Musk an 'incredible entrepreneur,' and said that Mr Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which sought to cut US government spending and laid off or pushed out thousands of workers, was 'really good'. Mr Vance made the comments in an interview with 'manosphere' comedian Theo Von, who last month joked about snorting drugs off a mixed-race baby and the sexuality of men in the US Navy when he opened for Mr Trump at a military base in Qatar. The Vance interview was taped on Thursday as Musk's posts were unfurling on X, the social media network the billionaire owns. During the interview, Mr Von showed the vice president Mr Musk's claim that Mr Trump's administration has not released all the records related to Epstein because Mr Trump is mentioned in them. Vice President Vance on what it's like to be Trump's VP: 'It is my job, obviously, to provide the President honest counsel…he talks to everybody. I think it's why he's in touch with normal people.' — Vice President JD Vance (@VP) June 7, 2025 Mr Vance responded to that, saying: 'Absolutely not. Donald Trump didn't do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein.' 'This stuff is just not helpful,' Mr Vance said in response to another post shared by Mr Musk calling for Mr Trump to be impeached and replaced with Mr Vance. 'It's totally insane. The President is doing a good job.' Vance also defended the bill that has drawn Mr Musk's ire, and said its central goal was not to cut spending but to extend the 2017 tax cuts approved in Mr Trump's first term. The bill would slash spending and taxes but also leave some 10.9 million more people without health insurance and spike deficits by 2.4 trillion dollars (£1.77 trillion) over the decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. 'It's a good bill,' Mr Vance said. 'It's not a perfect bill.'

Trump says he has no desire to fix his relationship with Musk, even after the former 'first buddy' deletes his X posts
Trump says he has no desire to fix his relationship with Musk, even after the former 'first buddy' deletes his X posts

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump says he has no desire to fix his relationship with Musk, even after the former 'first buddy' deletes his X posts

President Donald Trump says he has no desire to repair his relationship with Elon Musk. He also said Musk would face "serious consequences" if he funds Democrats. Meanwhile, Musk deleted some of his most incendiary X posts on Saturday. It seems Elon Musk won't be President Donald Trump's "first buddy" again anytime soon. Trump told NBC News on Saturday that he has no plans to repair his relationship with Musk after it imploded this week. When asked if their relationship is done, Trump said, simply, "I would assume so, yeah." Trump said he doesn't intend to speak with Musk and said the tech billionaire was "disrespectful to the office of the President." "I think it's a very bad thing, because he's very disrespectful. You could not disrespect the office of the President," Trump said. The epic and very public fallout began after Musk criticized Trump's tax bill, which the president calls his "One Big Beautiful Bill." During Thursday's dramatic exchange, which took place mostly on the social media networks each billionaire owns, Trump threatened to terminate Musk's government contracts and subsidies. Musk shot back that Trump was in the so-called "Epstein files" in a now-deleted post. In the NBC interview on Saturday, Trump warned Musk against funding Democratic candidates running against GOP members voting in favor of the bill, saying there will be "serious consequences." "If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that," Trump said. "He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that." Last month, Musk said he would spend "a lot less" on political campaigns in the future. He spent hundreds of millions in support of Trump in 2024. "If I see a reason to do political spending in the future, I will do it," Musk said at the Qatar Economic Forum last month. "I do not currently see a reason." Trump's remarks on Saturday came after Musk deleted some X posts from his account. He deleted the post referencing the Epstein files and a video he re-posted that appeared to show Trump partying with Epstein in the 1990s. Musk also deleted an X post in which he called a Trump comment an "obvious lie" and another post saying SpaceX would decommission its Dragon spacecraft "immediately." White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Business Insider that passing the tax bill is the president's priority. "President Trump and the entire Administration will continue the important mission of cutting waste, fraud, and abuse from our federal government on behalf of taxpayers, and the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill is critical to helping accomplish that mission," Leavitt said in a statement. Representatives for Musk did not respond to a request for comment from BI. The repercussions from Musk and Trump's dispute were swift, affecting the price of Tesla stock and Dogecoin. A senior White House official told BI that Trump is now considering selling his Tesla. On Saturday, Vice President JD Vance said it was a "huge mistake" for Musk to "go after the president" during the newest episode of "This Past Weekend w/ Theo Von." "I'm not saying he has to agree with the bill or agree with everything that I'm saying," Vance said. "I just think it's a huge mistake for the world's wealthiest man, I think one of the most transformational entrepreneurs ever — that's Elon — to be at this war with the world's most powerful man." During the interview, Vance said he thinks everything will be fine between the pair if Musk "chills out a little bit." "Hopefully Elon figures it out and comes back into the fold," Vance said, adding that Trump had been a "little frustrated" with Musk's recent criticisms. "But I think he's been very restrained because the president doesn't think that he needs to be in a blood feud with Elon Musk, and I actually think if Elon chilled out a little bit, everything would be fine," Vance said. Musk responded to Vance's comment on X on Saturday, writing, simply, "Cool." Read the original article on Business Insider

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store