logo
Fake EV Parts are Flooding the Market

Fake EV Parts are Flooding the Market

Yahoo17 hours ago

Fake EV Parts are Flooding the Market originally appeared on Autoblog.
In 2025, the second-hand electric vehicle (EV) market is booming—and so is a shadow industry of questionable and even deadly replacement parts. Online marketplaces like eBay have seen continuing increases in listings for 'OEM Compatible' EV battery modules, many priced well below manufacturer-direct offerings. Electrifying.com notes a 58.5% increase in used battery electric car sales in Q1 2025 versus the previous year.
But as any experienced mechanic will tell you, today's garage is increasingly a battleground between authentic engineering and a flood of dubious imports. And what you don't want is a dubious import that causes a fire so hot that even the fire department can't put out.
Let's say the owner of an out-of-warranty Tesla Model Y, hoping to save money, takes their car to an independent garage. The shop sources a replacement battery module online, advertised as 'authentic.' After installation, the vehicle runs fine—until a 'check battery' warning appears within 50 miles. The issue? Counterfeit EV battery modules—often assembled with mismatched cells and unstable firmware—are prone to early failures and 'check battery' warnings within a short distance after installation.
Counterfeit battery modules and ECUs (Electronic Control Units) are a growing concern in the aftermarket repair ecosystem. Genuine Tesla battery modules, for instance, a Model 3 battery pack can cost $20-28,000. On platforms like eBay and Alibaba, however, 'OEM Compatible' modules have been seen for $1,200–$1,500, appealing to cost-conscious garages and DIY-ers alike. While some listings may involve refurbished OEM parts, many are knock-offs assembled with unvetted lithium-ion cells. Low-cost counterfeit batteries often use substandard cells lacking safety features (such as CID, a device that prevent those 1,000° C thermal runaway fires), poor assembly quality, and no assured firmware integrity.
Independent garages, many of which operate on thin margins, are particularly vulnerable. Tempted by low prices and fast availability, some install these modules without realizing the hidden risks: shorted cells, BMS (battery management system) errors, or safety-critical software bugs. The consequences are predictable—failed repairs, unhappy customers, dangerous results, and reputational damage. Some garages now invest in battery module diagnostic tools and electronic authentication systems, but these technologies often cost upwards of a thousand dollars and require upskilling staff to use effectively. The authentication systems alone often require subscriptions or specialized hardware costing thousands. So, many garages just don't.
This crisis persists largely because regulation has yet to catch up with the pace of EV adoption. Right-to-repair laws in many U.S. states remain narrow in scope, and proprietary software remains tightly controlled by OEMs. Tesla, for example, encrypts most of its BMS and drivetrain software, blocking third-party access without official licensing, and VIN-locks its part so you can only use new Tesla parts. Contravening both warranty and anti-trust laws, this imbalance limits the ability of independent garages to source and verify authentic parts, creating fertile ground for black-market sellers.
As EVs age and warranties expire, the temptation to cut corners will grow. Without urgent action to expand parts access, enforce marketplace accountability, and educate consumers, counterfeit components will increasingly undermine EV safety and reliability at scale.
Until then, the best advice remains timeless: if a part's price seems too good to be true, it probably is. In the whirlwind world of EV repairs, authenticity should not be a luxury. It's a prerequisite for safety, performance, and peace of mind. Make sure your mechanic can guarantee authentic parts; stay involved.
The very best way to counter counterfeiters, of course, is make sure brands don't do things like VIN-lock parts, or void warranties for using spare parts. Brands need to get on board, free up control, to push the counterfeiters out of business.
Fake EV Parts are Flooding the Market first appeared on Autoblog on Jun 13, 2025
This story was originally reported by Autoblog on Jun 13, 2025, where it first appeared.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tesla stock's up 75% in a year! Time to buy?
Tesla stock's up 75% in a year! Time to buy?

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Tesla stock's up 75% in a year! Time to buy?

There is rarely a shortage of news – or opinions – when it comes to electric vehicle maker Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA). But while there has been a fair bit of doom and gloom around lately when it comes to the firm, Tesla stock is now 75% higher than it was a year ago. The long-term performance has been even more impressive. Every pound put into Tesla stock five years ago is now worth over a fiver (ignoring exchange rate movements during that period). So, could this be one to tuck away in my portfolio today and hope for more money-spinning magic in future? At the right price, my answer would be an unambiguous yes. Vehicles are a huge business and likely to stay that way. Over time, I expect electric cars and trucks to form a growing part of that market. Tesla is well-positioned here: it has a vertically integrated manufacturing model already operating at scale, a strong brand, proprietary technology, and large base of existing customers. However, this market is different to how it was a few years ago. Tesla has lost its pre-eminence, as Chinese rivals including BYD expand at pace both in their home market and overseas. Tesla's first-quarter sales were sharply lower than last year. That could reflect some production lines being out of action for part of the period as well as adverse publicity related to Tesla's chief executive's political involvement. But a key factor behind the fall – and one I see as a long-term risk – is a more competitive marketplace. That risks eating into profit margins across the industry. I also see opportunities for Tesla beyond making and selling cars. One is its planned launch of self-driving taxi fleets. Another is the robotics business. On top of that, it already has a sizeable power storage business that is growing very fast. Given the rise in its stock price over the past year, Tesla is currently sitting on a nice round market capitalization of $1trn. That is a lot of money. Never mind whether the stock can move higher in future, is it even worth its current price? I do not think so. The Tesla stock price-to-earnings ratio now sits at a dizzying 176. Ford, by contrast, is on 8 and General Motors on 7. Tesla's valuation seems to build in huge expectations for future performance. But as I discussed above, recent signs about the company's business performance have been alarming, not encouraging. While power storage is doing well, the core car business has been in reverse. Meanwhile, its competitive environment is becoming more challenging by the month and I do not see that changing. To me, the current Tesla stock price looks unjustifiably high. So, I shall not be investing. The post Tesla stock's up 75% in a year! Time to buy? appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool C Ruane has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Tesla. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Sign in to access your portfolio

Trump's Bill Would End EV Subsidies: Could That Bankrupt Lucid Group?
Trump's Bill Would End EV Subsidies: Could That Bankrupt Lucid Group?

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's Bill Would End EV Subsidies: Could That Bankrupt Lucid Group?

Lucid Group has limited capital and is burning through its cash rapidly. Eliminating EV tax credits could affect Lucid's competitiveness. 10 stocks we like better than Lucid Group › Lucid Group (NASDAQ: LCID) is growing its electric vehicle (EV) sales rapidly right now. In 2025, analysts expect its revenues to jump by 73%, and in 2026, they anticipate an even faster growth rate approaching 100%. There's just one problem: Included in Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" is a provision that would eliminate the federal tax credits for electric vehicles. That would effectively raise the prices of EVs by $4,000 to $7,500 -- a huge potential blow to demand. When you look at the numbers, things could quickly get ugly for Lucid. But there's also some reason for hope. Lucid's sales growth over the next couple of years will primarily be driven by its recently introduced Gravity SUV. Previously, the company only offered its Air sedan, which ranged in price between $70,000 and around $100,000 depending on the configuration. SUVs, however, are much more popular than sedans in the U.S. right now. Long term, however, it will be critical for Lucid to develop some mass-market vehicles, which are typically priced under $50,000. Tesla's two mass-market models -- the Model 3 and Model Y -- currently account for more than 90% of its unit sales. Such vehicles bring scale to sales growth, but also to operational leverage, which is immensely beneficial to profitability. If the U.S. eliminates federal EV tax incentives, having more affordable vehicles in its lineup will be crucial to Lucid's growth and stability. While the company has previously teased plans to launch several new mass-market models in 2026, details about those potential EVs have been scarce. Plus, it takes billions of dollars to get a new EV model to market. With less than $2 billion in cash on its books, Lucid will likely need to tap the credit and equity markets again before these vehicles launch. Over the past 12 months, it booked a net loss of $3.8 billion. This all puts Lucid in a tight spot. It needs to get mass-market vehicles on the road to boost sales, scale, and profitability. But it will need more capital to do that, and if Trump and the Republicans in control of Congress end the federal EV tax credit, that could lead investors to pull back from the space, limiting Lucid's ability to easily raise capital. That would not be a good position for an early stage, capital-intensive business to find itself in. But could the elimination of EV tax credits actually end up helping Lucid in the long term? There's a case to be made that ending the EV tax credit could eventually benefit Lucid. Demand for EVs would likely take a hit over the short term as the real costs to consumers rise, but if Lucid can get its affordable models to market on schedule, that could mitigate some of the impact. Meanwhile, competitors that fail to introduce mass-market EVs could struggle to maintain market share, giving Lucid more room to grow. I'm skeptical of this optimistic view. Lucid is far behind competitors like Rivian and Tesla in terms of both financing and the ability to launch additional affordable vehicles. The recent departure of its longtime CEO may put even more strain on its ability to raise capital. In terms of publicly traded EV companies, Lucid arguably has the most to lose due to its diminutive size and limited lineup. Will Trump's bill cause Lucid to go bankrupt? Not immediately. But the company has been relatively quiet about its plans for new mass-market EVs, and it could be years before its production scales meaningfully. That leaves it with a limited lineup of high-priced vehicles -- not an ideal situation when achieving scale will require it to provide affordable options. Before you buy stock in Lucid Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Lucid Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $655,255!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $888,780!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 999% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 174% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Ryan Vanzo has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Trump's Bill Would End EV Subsidies: Could That Bankrupt Lucid Group? was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store