logo
City council declares Boston a 'sanctuary city' for transgender community

City council declares Boston a 'sanctuary city' for transgender community

Yahoo13-03-2025
City councilors voted 12-1 Wednesday to make Boston a sanctuary city for members of the transgender community.
Councilor-at-Large Julia Mejia and District 9 Councilor Liz Breadon called on Boston to adopt the measure supporting transgender people, pointing to what they see as harmful rhetoric coming from President Donald Trump and the White House.
'Boston is not going to back down,' Mejia said Wednesday. 'We're seeing attacks on our trans loved ones, and here on the local level, a lot of folks are feeling helpless.'
Breadon, the first openly gay woman elected to the city's council, said the country is facing "unprecedented times" where "many of our neighbors are feeling unsafe and insecure for various reasons."
"This resolution addresses a particular concern that we need to elevate and raise up," she said at Wednesday's council meeting. "During the election and since, there's been an incredible escalation in anti-trans rhetoric and violence that has caused incredible stress and anxiety to our LGBTQI+ community, and especially to our trans brothers and sisters."
The resolution states, in part, that Boston has "a specific commitment to protecting transgender and gender-diverse individuals. Taxpayer-funded agencies shall not comply with federal efforts to strip resources that safeguard their rights. Boston will not cooperate with federal or state policies that harm transgender and gender-diverse people and remains committed to ensuring their access to healthcare, housing, education, and employment without fear or discrimination."
Mejia and Breadon acknowledged that the resolution is symbolic and nonbinding, but Mejia said the measure is a critical first step and an "opportunity to set the groundwork for the legislation."
City Councilor Ed Flynn was the only member of the body to vote against the measure.
'I would like to learn more about what this resolution does,' Flynn said, according to The Boston Herald. 'I don't want to be disrespectful to anybody, but it's just something I would like to have before I vote.'
Sam Whiting of the Massachusetts Family Institute, a group that describes itself as recognizing 'the male and female sexes as a real and enduring part of a person's created nature, not an imaginary social construct,' pushed back on the councilors' framing of the Trump administration's actions regarding transgender people.
'We think it misrepresents the executive orders, and we do support these orders and the efforts to protect children from the harms of gender ideology,' Whiting told NBC 10 Boston.
Boston's declaration that it's a "sanctuary city for transgender persons" and other members of the LGBTQ community follows similar actions in the Massachusetts cities of Worcester and Cambridge.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S. trans woman challenges Dutch asylum rejection
U.S. trans woman challenges Dutch asylum rejection

NBC News

time5 hours ago

  • NBC News

U.S. trans woman challenges Dutch asylum rejection

AMSTERDAM — A 28-year-old transgender woman from the U.S. began a legal challenge on Wednesday to the rejection of her asylum application in the Netherlands where she had sought political asylum saying she no longer felt safe in the United States. Veronica Clifford-Carlos, a visual artist from California, came to the Netherlands — the first country to legalize same-sex marriage and known for its strong protections of LGBTQ rights — because the Trump administration's policies towards transgender people made her feel unsafe, her lawyer's office said. The case, the first of its kind in the Netherlands, will be heard in a court in Amsterdam starting Wednesday, with a ruling expected in four to six weeks. Since taking office in January, President Donald Trump has issued executive orders limiting transgender rights, banned transgender people from serving in the armed forces, and rescinded anti-discrimination policies for LGBTQ people. Dutch advocacy group LGBT Asylum Support, which backs the lawsuit, is currently assisting around 20 U.S. trans individuals with pending asylum claims. According to data from the Immigration and Naturalisation Service (IND), 29 Americans applied for asylum in the Netherlands during the first half of this year. In previous years there were between nine and 18 applicants per year, an IND spokesperson said. 'The IND generally states that discrimination by authorities and fellow citizens can be considered an act of persecution if it is so severe that victims can no longer function socially and societally,' LGBT Asylum Support said in a statement. 'But the IND maintains that there are no grounds for exceptional treatment of transgender and queer refugees from the U.S.'

Yosemite National Park ranger reportedly fired after draping massive trans pride flag across El Capitan
Yosemite National Park ranger reportedly fired after draping massive trans pride flag across El Capitan

Fox News

time6 hours ago

  • Fox News

Yosemite National Park ranger reportedly fired after draping massive trans pride flag across El Capitan

The National Park Service reportedly fired a trans Yosemite National Park ranger who hung a transgender pride flag across the park's El Capitan rock formation in California earlier this year. 35-year-old Shannon "SJ" Joslin wrote an Instagram post on Monday claiming to have been fired from the park "for practicing my First Amendment right" after hanging the 55-foot by 35-foot flag across Yosemite's iconic rock destination in May. Joslin, who is non-binary and uses they/them pronouns, claimed to have raised the flag while off-duty and as a private citizen. "I was fired by the temporary Deputy Superintendent for 'failing to demonstrate acceptable conduct' in my capacity as a Wildlife Biologist for the park. No part of hanging the flag was done on work time. NOTHING about it had anything to do with my work," Joslin wrote. Joslin flew the flag for about two hours before taking it down and added that after decades of the practice "no one" had ever been punished for hanging a flag across El Capitan prior to last week. "I want my rights and I want my career back," Joslin demanded. In a statement to NBC News, Rachel Pawlitz, a spokesperson for the National Park Service, said that the Department of Justice was pursuing "administrative action" against several Yosemite National Park employees and "possible criminal charges" against several park visitors for allegedly violating laws regarding demonstrations. She did not specify the details of these criminal investigations. "However, we want to emphasize that we take the protection of the park's resources and the experience of our visitors very seriously, and will not tolerate violations of laws and regulations that impact those resources and experiences," Pawlitz said. Fox News Digital reached out to Yosemite National Park and National Park Services for further comment. Joslin partnered with a coalition known as Trans Is Natural to hang the flag in protest of the Trump administration pushing back on transgender and LGBTQ ideology. "Raising this flag in the heart of El Capitan is a celebration of our community standing in solidarity with each other and all targeted groups," Joslin said in a statement to NBC at the time. "Trans existence is not up for debate. We are social workers, public servants, parents, and neighbors. Being trans is a natural, beautiful part of human and biological diversity. We can only make progress when we embrace diversity, not erase it." Shortly after the demonstration, the park's acting superintendent, Ray McPadden, signed a directive banning "any banner, flag, or sign larger than fifteen square feet…or a series or combination of banners, flags, or signs that total more than fifteen square feet" from being displayed without a permit. In February, park staffers hung the U.S. flag upside-down on the side of El Capitan to protest layoffs by President Donald Trump. According to one Yosemite worker, this was done in response to the Trump administration firing 1,000 newly hired National Park Service employees.

Texas university's drag show ban blocked by appeals court
Texas university's drag show ban blocked by appeals court

USA Today

time8 hours ago

  • USA Today

Texas university's drag show ban blocked by appeals court

An appeals court has temporarily blocked a West Texas university's ban on drag shows, citing the First Amendment. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in an Aug. 18 ruling said a district court erred in rejecting a request for a preliminary injunction that would prevent West Texas A&M University, near Amarillo, Texas, from enforcing its ban while a lawsuit works its way through the courts. Spectrum WT, a LGBTQ student group at the school, was organizing a March 2023 drag show to raise funds for The Trevor Project, a suicide prevention organization that serves LGBTQ youth. University President Walter Wendler canceled the show days before the performance, saying a 'harmless drag show' was 'not possible,' in a university-wide letter Wendler also posted on his website. Wendler wrote that the fundraiser was for a 'noble cause' but that drag shows 'stereotype women in cartoon-like extremes for the amusement of others and discriminate against womanhood.' He also compared drag performances to blackface performances, saying he would similarly not support such events on campus 'even if told the performance is a form of free speech or intended as humor." The plaintiffs, represented by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), sued Wendler and other school officials and requested a preliminary injunction to prevent the school from stopping such performances while litigation continued. A district court denied that request in September 2023. But the appeals court disagreed in a 2-1 decision and granted the preliminary injunction, saying the plaintiffs showed a 'substantial threat of irreparable harm to their First Amendment rights absent an injunction against President Wendler.' Judge James C. Ho dissented, saying that 'like blackface performances, drag shows violate the university's fundamental mission to ensure a welcoming educational environment for all.' 'Tellingly – and quite understandably – the majority does not contend that West Texas A&M would be required to allow a student group to put on a blackface performance,' Ho wrote. 'The result should not be different here just because drag shows find favor in certain circles.' FIRE applauded the decision, which it said 'restored the First Amendment' at the school. 'This is a victory not just for Spectrum WT, but for any public university students at risk of being silenced by campus censors,' FIRE Supervising Senior Attorney JT Morris said. A West Texas A&M spokesperson said the university does not comment on pending litigation. BrieAnna Frank is a First Amendment reporter at USA TODAY. Reach her at bjfrank@ USA TODAY's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store