
Pendragon pub plan decision upheld after appeal by applicant
At a meeting of Blaenau Gwent County Borough Council's Planning committee on Thursday, June 5 councillors were told of the successful appeal defence by development management team manager Steph Hopkin.
She told councillors of the result as part of a number of updates that are a regular agenda item at committee meeting covering on ongoing appeals and Developments of National Significance.
Mrs Hopkins said: 'On the Penndragon in Oak Street in Abertillery since we wrote of the report the decision has come through following the hearing on April 1.
'I can confirm the case was dismissed and the application for costs was refused.'
Mrs Hopkins told councillors a report on the appeal out would be presented at the next committee meeting.
Concern at how lorries will access proposed solar farm through narrow lane
Town council unanimously opposes controversial depot expansion plans
In September 2023, Thomas Lewis of the Highmore Group lodged a planning application with Blaenau Gwent County Borough Council to convert the former Pendragon pub on Oak Street from a vacant care facility back into a public house with rooms for let.
In November 2023 planning officers rejected the proposal, and they judged it to be 'contrary' to policies in the county's Local Development Plan (LDP).
Council planners said that approving the application: 'would generate a level of increased noise and disruption detrimental to the amenity of neighbouring residential properties.'
The building had been a pub until it's closure in 2014 and had at one stage been the home of Abertillery rugby club.
In 2015 a planning application to change its use to a 'mixed use support facility' was granted permission by the authority.
But the care facility closed in 2020 during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Mr Highmore's lodged his appeal with PEDW last year and a hearing into the issues was held on April 1.
Welsh Government appointed planning inspector Ian Stevens then visited the site on April 2.
Mr Stevens said: 'At the hearing I heard from residents living close by of past issues when the building was a public house, including alcohol-related incidents of noisy and anti-social behaviour outside the premises including late at night, which caused disturbance to residents nearby.
'I appreciate that I do not have any historical records before me of formal
complaints made to relevant bodies.
'However, the residents' anecdotal descriptions are compelling and point to the intimate relationship between the appeal property and adjacent dwellings.'
Mr Steven ssaid that it was suggested at the hearing that these issues could be addressed through the approved premises licence.
But he explained that that a premises licence and planning application are not assessed in the same way.
He was also referred to the other nearby pubs for comparison.
But the flaw in doing this is that a 'direct comparison' cannot be formed because of the different circumstances around each of them.
Mr Stevens said: 'I have found that the effects of development on future occupants in the letting rooms could be managed through internal acoustic treatment.
'However, the comings and goings of patrons including the use of external areas so close to residential properties would, through increased noise and disturbance compared with its existing lawful use, cause unreasonable harm to living conditions of nearby occupiers.'
Due to this he believed the proposal is contrary to policy in the Local Development Plan.
Mr Stevens said: 'For the reasons given and having regard to all other matters raised, I conclude that the appeal should be dismissed.'
He also dismissed the appeal for costs.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


North Wales Chronicle
2 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Government's £445m for railways in Wales branded ‘peanuts' by Tories
The investment in Welsh rail announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves in her spending review on Wednesday will be spent on new stations and upgraded railway lines, and delivered through both direct funding and additional money for the Welsh Government. However, Ms Davies branded the sum 'paltry' and said the Government was 'short-changing' Wales. The Conservative frontbencher asked Wales Secretary Jo Stevens: 'Does the minister prefer peanuts, cashew nuts, or simply scraps for Wales? 'The fabled two Labour governments in lockstep is simply a myth for voters. 'Changing rail classifications and short-changing Welsh communities is a true reality. 'Is the minister concerned by today's reported peanuts, because when did she become aware of just over £400 million, the paltry settlement to come to Wales? 'How will it be split to Welsh Government? How does she think it compares to our Government's £740 million on rail alone?' Responding, Ms Stevens said: 'Her party was in government for 14 years when Wales got 1% of the rail enhancement budget, when it has 11% of the whole UK network. 'Her party are responsible for the historic underfunding of the Welsh rail and we'll hear from the Chancellor this afternoon about what this Government is going to do about it.' Liz Saville-Roberts, Plaid Cymru's leader in Westminster, also accused the Government of reclassifying the Oxford-Cambridge line as an England and Wales project, rather than England only. She said: 'The Secretary of State for Wales joined Plaid Cymru in condemning the Conservatives for denying Wales £4.6 billion in rail funding. 'Now she's in government, she's waxing lyrical about 10% of that, and content with moving the goalpost to deny Wales a further £300 million by recently classifying the Oxford-Cambridge line as benefiting Wales. I don't know how they make this up. 'Does she oppose this new injustice? Or was she ignored? Or is it her mission to see Wales short-changed?' Ms Stevens reiterated her previous response to this accusation that the Government had only been correcting a publishing error and that the Oxford-Cambridge line was always considered an England and Wales development. She said: 'I listened very carefully to the question, and I'm sure she would not wish to unintentionally mislead the House. 'This was an error on the Oxford-Cambridge line. This was an error by the Conservative government in the 2021 spending review. 'And as she knows, heavy rail infrastructure is reserved, not devolved. Like every heavy rail project in England, Barnet consequentials do not apply. 'The UK Government fund from which East West Rail is being funded is also directing funding projects in Wales, like the redevelopment of Wales's busiest station, Cardiff central, improvements to level crossings in north Wales and upgrading the South Wales Relief Link.'


South Wales Guardian
4 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Government's £445m for railways in Wales branded ‘peanuts' by Tories
The investment in Welsh rail announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves in her spending review on Wednesday will be spent on new stations and upgraded railway lines, and delivered through both direct funding and additional money for the Welsh Government. However, Ms Davies branded the sum 'paltry' and said the Government was 'short-changing' Wales. The Conservative frontbencher asked Wales Secretary Jo Stevens: 'Does the minister prefer peanuts, cashew nuts, or simply scraps for Wales? 'The fabled two Labour governments in lockstep is simply a myth for voters. 'Changing rail classifications and short-changing Welsh communities is a true reality. 'Is the minister concerned by today's reported peanuts, because when did she become aware of just over £400 million, the paltry settlement to come to Wales? 'How will it be split to Welsh Government? How does she think it compares to our Government's £740 million on rail alone?' Responding, Ms Stevens said: 'Her party was in government for 14 years when Wales got 1% of the rail enhancement budget, when it has 11% of the whole UK network. 'Her party are responsible for the historic underfunding of the Welsh rail and we'll hear from the Chancellor this afternoon about what this Government is going to do about it.' Liz Saville-Roberts, Plaid Cymru's leader in Westminster, also accused the Government of reclassifying the Oxford-Cambridge line as an England and Wales project, rather than England only. She said: 'The Secretary of State for Wales joined Plaid Cymru in condemning the Conservatives for denying Wales £4.6 billion in rail funding. 'Now she's in government, she's waxing lyrical about 10% of that, and content with moving the goalpost to deny Wales a further £300 million by recently classifying the Oxford-Cambridge line as benefiting Wales. I don't know how they make this up. 'Does she oppose this new injustice? Or was she ignored? Or is it her mission to see Wales short-changed?' Ms Stevens reiterated her previous response to this accusation that the Government had only been correcting a publishing error and that the Oxford-Cambridge line was always considered an England and Wales development. She said: 'I listened very carefully to the question, and I'm sure she would not wish to unintentionally mislead the House. 'This was an error on the Oxford-Cambridge line. This was an error by the Conservative government in the 2021 spending review. 'And as she knows, heavy rail infrastructure is reserved, not devolved. Like every heavy rail project in England, Barnet consequentials do not apply. 'The UK Government fund from which East West Rail is being funded is also directing funding projects in Wales, like the redevelopment of Wales's busiest station, Cardiff central, improvements to level crossings in north Wales and upgrading the South Wales Relief Link.'

Rhyl Journal
4 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Government's £445m for railways in Wales branded ‘peanuts' by Tories
The investment in Welsh rail announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves in her spending review on Wednesday will be spent on new stations and upgraded railway lines, and delivered through both direct funding and additional money for the Welsh Government. However, Ms Davies branded the sum 'paltry' and said the Government was 'short-changing' Wales. The Conservative frontbencher asked Wales Secretary Jo Stevens: 'Does the minister prefer peanuts, cashew nuts, or simply scraps for Wales? 'The fabled two Labour governments in lockstep is simply a myth for voters. 'Changing rail classifications and short-changing Welsh communities is a true reality. 'Is the minister concerned by today's reported peanuts, because when did she become aware of just over £400 million, the paltry settlement to come to Wales? 'How will it be split to Welsh Government? How does she think it compares to our Government's £740 million on rail alone?' Responding, Ms Stevens said: 'Her party was in government for 14 years when Wales got 1% of the rail enhancement budget, when it has 11% of the whole UK network. 'Her party are responsible for the historic underfunding of the Welsh rail and we'll hear from the Chancellor this afternoon about what this Government is going to do about it.' Liz Saville-Roberts, Plaid Cymru's leader in Westminster, also accused the Government of reclassifying the Oxford-Cambridge line as an England and Wales project, rather than England only. She said: 'The Secretary of State for Wales joined Plaid Cymru in condemning the Conservatives for denying Wales £4.6 billion in rail funding. 'Now she's in government, she's waxing lyrical about 10% of that, and content with moving the goalpost to deny Wales a further £300 million by recently classifying the Oxford-Cambridge line as benefiting Wales. I don't know how they make this up. 'Does she oppose this new injustice? Or was she ignored? Or is it her mission to see Wales short-changed?' Ms Stevens reiterated her previous response to this accusation that the Government had only been correcting a publishing error and that the Oxford-Cambridge line was always considered an England and Wales development. She said: 'I listened very carefully to the question, and I'm sure she would not wish to unintentionally mislead the House. 'This was an error on the Oxford-Cambridge line. This was an error by the Conservative government in the 2021 spending review. 'And as she knows, heavy rail infrastructure is reserved, not devolved. Like every heavy rail project in England, Barnet consequentials do not apply. 'The UK Government fund from which East West Rail is being funded is also directing funding projects in Wales, like the redevelopment of Wales's busiest station, Cardiff central, improvements to level crossings in north Wales and upgrading the South Wales Relief Link.'