logo
EU races to shield Airbus and German carmakers as US tariffs loom, Ferrari left out: Report

EU races to shield Airbus and German carmakers as US tariffs loom, Ferrari left out: Report

Time of India08-07-2025
The European Union is scrambling to secure a trade deal with the US before 1 August to shield core industries from steep tariffs. Airbus stands to benefit most, while German carmakers like BMW and Mercedes could get a break through local US production. However, Italy's Ferrari faces higher costs with no exemption in sight. With billions in exports on the line, EU leaders are under pressure to strike a fair deal or risk retaliation.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Airbus takes centre stage
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Back to 1979? US open to old deal
Winners and losers in the car sector
Tough talk and final stretch
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The European Union is closing in on a temporary trade pact with the United States , hoping to dodge sweeping tariffs that could hit from August. Talks have zeroed in on shielding Airbus , big German car brands and Europe's prized spirits sector, as reported by BloombergNegotiators say a draft deal could let commercial aircraft dodge fresh duties, which would be a huge win for Airbus. Carmakers with US factories, like BMW and Mercedes, also look set for relief. Ferrari, though, might not be so lucky.US President Donald Trump said he is probably two days off from sending the European Union a letter disclosing the tariff rate on their exports to the U.S.Trump said during a Cabinet meeting at the White House that the EU had been treating the U.S. very nicely recently in trade talks.Protecting Airbus is top of Brussels' list. The aircraft giant is more than just a jet maker. Its sprawling network of plants in France, Germany, China, Canada and Alabama makes it a symbol of European industrial clout.John Strickland, aviation analyst at JLS Consulting, explained why it matters. 'It's absolutely the banner-waver for European aircraft manufacturing,' he said. If tariffs push up prices, he warned, that 'would potentially have a significant dampening effect on demand and therefore the whole financial success of Airbus.'The EU's industry chief Stephane Sejourne made it clear last month that Airbus must not face 'unfair competition' from US rival Boeing , which only builds planes domestically. 'If we don't rebalance we would leave some leading sectors unprotected, so there's an economic interest in acting like this,' Sejourne told Bloomberg.Hopes for a breakthrough rose last month when US Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy suggested rolling back to the old 1979 aviation deal that scrapped tariffs on planes and parts. 'We should take aviation off the negotiating table, by going back to 1979, and that only helps us take some tools away from our trading partners where it might be beneficial to us,' Duffy told reporters at the Paris Air Show.But the clock is ticking. Without an agreement, tariffs on EU exports to the US could spike from 10% to 50% overnight. EU estimates put affected exports at 380 billion euros, about 70% of the bloc's shipments to America.German brands stand to gain the most from possible carve-outs. The US wants European carmakers to shift more production to its soil to dodge the worst tariffs. BMW, Mercedes and Volkswagen are ready. Ferrari and Porsche, not so much.Porsche and Ferrari ship all their cars from Europe. They do not have plants in the US, so they would face higher costs. Volkswagen's Audi brand is still weighing its options. It might start building cars in America, but a site has not been picked yet.Even so, the pressure is real. Audi's Q5 SUV is a top seller in the US but comes from Mexico. Sales tumbled 29% last quarter. Mercedes will move production of its popular GLC SUV to Alabama by 2027 to avoid future shocks.Germany's finance minister Lars Klingbeil underlined the stakes this week. 'We want an agreement with the Americans,' he told lawmakers in Berlin. 'But the deal must be fair and if we do not succeed in reaching a fair deal with the US, then the EU will have to take countermeasures to protect our economy.'Europe's economy chief Valdis Dombrovskis added urgency in Brussels. 'The faster we can reach the agreement, the better, because that would remove uncertainty surrounding these tariff questions and indeed we see that it is weighing on the economy and also on investment decisions of the companies,' he said.For now, talks continue under Trump's extension of the deadline from 9 July to 1 August. EU diplomats say exemptions could still cover spirits and cosmetics alongside aircraft and cars. Steel is proving tougher. Washington's 25% steel tariff still stands with no sign of budging.With US and EU trade worth billions, neither side can afford a collapse. The EU has already slashed its 2024 growth forecast from 1.5% to 1.1% because of the trade fight. If the deal falls through, tariffs could double or more, stoking fresh economic pain on both sides of the Atlantic.Brussels and Washington now have weeks, not months, to find common ground. The stakes are clear. Some European companies will win. Some may lose. But everyone is waiting for that signature on the dotted line.(With inputs from TOI, Bloomberg)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Not found suitable: Reality of Dalit, Adivasi and OBCs in Indian universities
Not found suitable: Reality of Dalit, Adivasi and OBCs in Indian universities

Indian Express

time7 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Not found suitable: Reality of Dalit, Adivasi and OBCs in Indian universities

Various bodies governing academic institutions have established systems to ensure transparency and accountability in recruitment, promotions, and related academic activities. The teaching experience, papers published in refereed journals, research projects, and other accomplishments are the blueprints on which academic careers are built. All these 'academic' activities are not value-neutral and must be read through a socio-political prism. Often, the media highlights caste-based discrimination during recruitments/promotions. Still, nothing changes. Last week, while responding to a question from Rajya Sabha MP Manoj Jha, the Centre informed the RS that 80 per cent of the posts sanctioned in central universities for professors under the OBC category and nearly 83 per cent in the Scheduled Tribe (ST) category are currently vacant. However, there is no centralised data on 'not found suitable' (NFS). It was recently reported that the University of Delhi snubbed a scientist belonging to the SC community as NFS to be promoted as professor. Similar instances could also be found during direct recruitments for reserved positions. The Registrar of Rajasthan Central University, in a notification dated May 29, provided a list of selected candidates for teaching positions. More than 50 per cent of positions were declared 'NFS' — 11 among them belong to SC/ST/OBC and EWS (two positions) categories at various levels. The data provided fails to mention the number of women candidates from these communities who have been declared NFS. The data compiled on higher education reveals that increasing numbers of SC/ST and OBC candidates are accessing higher education institutions. So, it is not the lack of 'qualified' and eligible candidates that keeps these seats vacant. According to German philosopher Jürgen Habermas, universities carry the seeds of the reproduction of social life-worlds and hence, constant vigilance is required to unleash its transformative potential. Similarly, sociologist Pierre Bourdieu emphasised that education plays a key role in maintaining the status quo , thereby perpetuating existing social inequalities. This is apparent in the deeply hierarchical Indian society. In public institutions, due to constitutional provisions, reservation has become mandatory, but a line needs to be drawn when it comes to teaching appointments/promotions. Only through promotions will the candidates from the marginalised communities be able to become associate professors, professors, deans and heads of the departments. This is the only way to ensure their active participation in decision-making bodies. However, 'casteplaining' prevalent in academia doesn't let this happen. Recently, Bangalore University was in the news as Dalit faculty alleged that despite having served in administrative roles for several years, alongside their teaching responsibilities, they are being 'sidelined' in appointments to statutory positions and are being given only 'supervisory' roles without adequate authority or recognition. Academia involves not only the attainment of relevant knowledge but also the grasping of soft skills such as mannerisms, clothing, diction, etc. This cultural capital, or the lack of it, becomes difficult to navigate during the selection process. Women candidates lose out if their speech or body language is seen as aggressive. Such candidates seem to disturb the equanimity of the department. I was part of an interview panel to select assistant professors for a private university. A Dalit woman candidate had a good grasp of the subject matter but lacked a polished English accent. The head of the panel observed that she would not be able to 'manage' the class as her speaking skills were limited. The class had students from management and commerce backgrounds from affluent families. Hence, even after recruitment, many were asked to perform more administrative duties than classroom teaching. Another bone of contention during the selection process is the quality of publications, which are subjective in nature. The publishing field is an exclusive zone, and very few students have the wherewithal to publish in 'reputed'/'impact factor' journals. Support of the research supervisor/mentors/peer group is vital in getting published, as one needs the right academic network to get labelled a good scholar. For the past few years, UGC has published the Care List of journals, and only those publications have been given weightage. Many journals that dealt with caste, gender, marginality, exclusion, etc., were removed from the list. Often, dubious and predatory journals had a higher 'impact factor' than scholarly ones such as the Economic and Political Weekly. Many were forced to pay to get the required scores. Even after the applications are screened by a duly constituted committee, the interview panel can refuse to recognise the publications commenting on their quality, language and content. What has seldom been acknowledged in the recruitment process are the ideological affiliations of the institutions/candidates. This is also a major reason for candidates being declared NFS. In the majority of the selection committees, experts constitute a small pool, belonging to the dominant communities, while exercising their caste and gender privileges. In DU colleges, the same set of experts is called to conduct the interviews, which raises questions of impartiality and fairness of the selection process. In DU and JNU, many teachers who protested against the institution were denied promotions for many years, citing flimsy reasons. The situation in regional and state universities is even worse. Journalist and author Isabel Wilkerson succinctly observed that when an 'accident of birth' aligns with what is most valued in a given caste system — being able-bodied, male, white, or other such traits — it becomes their moral duty to develop empathy for those who must endure the indignities they have been spared. It calls for a radical kind of empathy. This implies that as a society, we need to relearn a new consciousness, to understand another's experience from their perspective, not as we imagine. Only through such engagements can we rebuild institutions based on equality and fraternity, and the objective of social justice be attained. The writer is professor in Political Science, Department of Political Science, University of Delhi. He is the author of Caste Discrimination and Exclusion in Indian Universities: A Critical Reflection (Routledge)

Gold and silver rates to see more correction; is it the right time to buy gold and silver?
Gold and silver rates to see more correction; is it the right time to buy gold and silver?

Mint

time10 minutes ago

  • Mint

Gold and silver rates to see more correction; is it the right time to buy gold and silver?

Gold prices held steady on Monday as improved risk appetite—following a trade agreement between the United States and the European Union—limited further gains. Investors also remained cautious ahead of the upcoming U.S. Federal Reserve policy meeting later this week. As of 0736 GMT, spot gold remained unchanged at $3,336.75 per ounce, after briefly hitting its lowest level since July 17 earlier in the session. Back home, MCX Gold August 5 contracts saw a slight uptick of 0.07 per cent, trading at ₹ 97,890 per 10 grams, while MCX Silver September 5 contracts inched up by 0.05 per cent to ₹ 1,13,107 per kg around 9:15 AM. ' Gold prices fell to their lowest in nearly two weeks, as a framework trade agreement between the US and EU reduced appetite for safe-haven assets. U.S. struck a framework trade agreement with EU, imposing a 15% import tariff on most EU goods - half threatened rate - and averting a bigger trade war between the two allies that account for almost a third of global trade. Agreement mirrors key parts of the framework accord reached by the U.S. with Japan, but like that deal, it leaves many questions open, including tariff rates on spirits, a highly charged topic for many on both sides of the Atlantic,' said Manav Modi, Senior Analyst, Commodity Research at Motilal Oswal Financial services Ltd. Gold declined by 0.21% last week, settling at 97,819 after reaching a high of 100,555. In the spot market, it touched a peak of $3,438 before retreating by 0.40% to close at $3,326. Renewed optimism around tariffs weighed on both gold and silver prices. Silver hit a fresh all-time high of 116,641 during the week but witnessed a sharp correction, ending at 113,052. According to Anuj Gupta, Director, Ya Wealth Research & Advisory, gold and silver price are likely to witness further corrections in short-term amid ongoing Trump's tariff row. ' We are expecting further corrections in gold and silver may be seen. Gold is strong at $3280 and then $3220 levels. Resistance at $3360 and than $3450 levels. For next week gold may test $3280 to $3250 levels. Silver support at $37 and then $36 levels. Strong Resistance at $40,' Gupta said. Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, not Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.

Copper Rises to Start Pivotal Week Ahead of US Tariffs Deadline
Copper Rises to Start Pivotal Week Ahead of US Tariffs Deadline

Mint

time10 minutes ago

  • Mint

Copper Rises to Start Pivotal Week Ahead of US Tariffs Deadline

Copper rose to kick off a critical week that includes a Federal Reserve meeting, a swathe of key economic data and the prospect of final details on imminent US tariffs on the industrial metal. The metal rose with other risk assets after the European Union and the US reached a deal that avoids a more catastrophic rupture between two major economies. The agreement comes ahead of a US-China meeting in Stockholm that's expected to extend a trade truce for 90 more days. Further important developments lie ahead this week. The Fed isn't expect to cut rates at the conclusion of its policy meeting on Wednesday, but its commentary will be scrutinized for clues on what comes next. There's also a deluge of US data from the latest on economic growth to jobs. But for copper, the most anticipated development should be the launch of US tariffs, the details of which are still unclear just days ahead of their start date. President Donald Trump's administration has said 50% levies on copper imports will start from this Friday, but hasn't so far confirmed important aspects of the duties. It's not clear which products will be covered, whether supplies from all nations will be hit equally, or how metal already on its way to US shores will be treated. Global traders have shipped massive amounts of copper to America to get ahead of tariffs, and Trump's announcement of an Aug. 1 deadline earlier this month triggered a last-minute scramble. Prices in the US are now much higher than those on the London Metal Exchange, but they don't fully reflect a 50% universal tariff rate on all exchange-traded copper. The premium now stands at about 31%. Copper rose 0.4% to $9,804 a ton on the LME as of 9:22 a.m. in London. Aluminum dropped 0.3% while zinc fell 0.7% and nickel was down 0.9% This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store