China Solar Lobby Sees Fewer Installations After Record Year
(Bloomberg) -- China's solar industry expects installations to drop in 2025 after an unprecedented surge in additions last year left power grids racing to keep up.
The Trump Administration Takes Aim at Transportation Research
Shelters Await Billions in Federal Money for Homelessness Providers
NYC's Congestion Pricing Pulls In $48.6 Million in First Month
New York's Congestion Pricing Plan Faces Another Legal Showdown
NYC to Shut Migrant Center in Former Hotel as Crisis Eases
The China Photovoltaic Industry Association expects 215 to 255 gigawatts of additions in 2025, Chairman Wang Bohua said at the group's annual conference in Beijing on Thursday.
The world's second-largest economy added 277 gigawatts of solar last year, shattering the previous year's record of 217 gigawatts. The surge came amid a tough year for the industry in China, where a supply glut has caused huge losses for leading manufacturers.
The influx of panels that only generate when the sun is shining has put pressure on grids to increase investments in power lines, energy storage and digital tools to help make sure the power is used. The government also announced new power market rules that go into effect June 1, which will create a new challenge for wind and solar by leaving market forces to determine the rates generators are paid for power.
A rush of solar installations is expected in the second quarter this year, as developers seek to take advantage of the older price policy before the new market-based scheme takes is implemented, S&P Global solar analyst Hu Dan said Wednesday.
The CPIA's Bohua said the new rules, as well as stricter policies and connection issues for distributed solar generation from rooftops, have left the industry in 'wait-and-see mood, thereby increasing the uncertainty around expected installations in 2025.'
On the Wire
China's growth target is usually the single most important indicator of how macro policy will be set in the year ahead. At the 2025 National People's Congress, the inflation objective will be just as telling, according to Bloomberg Economics.
China is extracting lithium as a byproduct of producing alumina, highlighting the country's push to maximize domestic supplies of the battery material.
China's plunging coal price is closing the window for imports. Mining shares dropped after Citigroup downgraded their ratings to reflect slower demand and lower prices.
This Week's Diary
(All times Beijing unless noted.)
Thursday, Feb. 27:
China solar association's annual meeting in Beijing, day 2
U.N.'s climate change panel meets in Hangzhou, day 4
CSIA's weekly solar wafer price assessment
EARNINGS: HKEX
Friday, Feb. 28:
U.N.'s climate change panel meets in Hangzhou, day 5
China's weekly iron ore port stockpiles
Shanghai exchange weekly commodities inventory, ~15:30
EARNINGS: Xinyi Solar
Saturday, March 1
China's official PMIs for February, 09:30
(Updates with comments from the CPIA's chairman in sixth paragraph)
Trump's SALT Tax Promise Hinges on an Obscure Loophole
Warner Bros. Movie Heads Are Burning Cash, and Their Boss Is Losing Patience
Walmart Wants to Be Something for Everyone in a Divided America
China Learned to Embrace What the US Forgot: The Virtues of Creative Destruction
Meet Seven of America's Top Personal Finance Influencers
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
27 minutes ago
- CNBC
China and U.S. trade officials to hold talks in London
U.S. President Donald Trump's top trade officials are meeting their Chinese counterparts in London on Monday for talks aimed at resolving an ongoing trade dispute between the world's two largest economies. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer are representing the U.S. China's foreign ministry said on Saturday that Vice Premier He Lifeng, Beijing's lead trade negotiator, will be in the U.K. between June 8-13, and that a meeting of the "China-U.S. economic and trade consultation mechanism" would take place. The talks come after Trump last week said that he had held a lengthy phone call with Chinese President Xi Jinping as both look to avert a full-blown trade war. Diplomatic efforts by both sides have ramped up after weeks of heightened trade tension and uncertainty after Trump announced sweeping import tariffs on China and other trading partners in April. Beijing retaliated, and a tit-for-tat escalation in duties ensued before both sides agreed in Geneva in May to temporarily slash duties and facilitate talks. At the time, the U.S. tariff on Chinese imports was cut from 145% to 30% , while China's levies on U.S. imports were lowered from 125% to 10%. China and the U.S. have since repeatedly accused each other of violating the Geneva agreement, with Washington saying Beijing was slow to approve the export of additional critical minerals to the U.S., while China criticized the U.S. imposing new restrictions on Chinese student visas and additional export restrictions on chips. U.S. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on Sunday said that the London talks would focus on moving forward with the Geneva agreement, noting the two sides' strategic interests in each other's markets.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Saudi Arabia's IPO Boom Faces Multiple Challenges
Saudi Arabian firms have raised about $3 billion from new share sales this year, making it one of the world's hottest IPO markets. But a series of recent setbacks is threatening to take the sheen off that boom, Bloomberg's Laura Gardner Cuesta reports on Horizons Middle East & Africa.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Endless Flip-Flops Reveal His Recklessness
THERE'S NO ESCAPING the pattern in this run of recent headlines: 'Trump reverses plan to close more than 30 mine safety offices' 'Here are the 22 times he's changed his mind on tariffs' 'Trump reverses USDA office closures' 'Reversing on layoffs, National Weather Service adding staff' Plus, this whole set: 'Trump turns sharply on Musk'; 'Trump threatens to cut Musk's government contracts'; 'Trump, White House aides signal a possible détente with Musk'; 'Trump tells CNN he's 'not even thinking about' Musk and won't speak to him 'for a while'; 'Trump wants to get rid of the Tesla he bought to show support for Elon Musk.' That was all in less than a week, and telescoped to just 48 hours for the Trump-Musk blowup-détente-never-mind cycle. This is the bris you never wanted to attend, the circumcision you would never be able to unsee. And don't blame me for that metaphor, blame John Oliver. In late April, the Last Week Tonight host worked himself into a hilarious (and entirely warranted) frenzy over Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s mass destruction of the Department of Health and Human Services. Asked about various program cuts on CBS, RFK Jr.'s answered with variations on 'I didn't know that, that's something that we'll look at.' After the fact. Because weighing programs and people on the merits beforehand 'takes too long and you lose political momentum,' the nation's top public health official said. Oliver's take: 'The health secretary should not be learning what he just did like some guy at a bachelor party being told what happened the night before. 'Do you not remember, bro? You spoke French well, then you pissed on a grave, fucked a bike rack, and cut $750,000 of research money for kid diabetes! You went wild!'' A photo of a mohel about to circumcise a baby boy then shows up onscreen. 'The rules for restructuring HHS should be the same as the ones for a bris!' Oliver almost shouts, his arms pumping, his voice rising, his eyes practically popping out of his head. 'It is crucially important to know exactly what you are cutting! Speed is just not the most important thing!' Or, as any seamstress or carpenter would tell you, measure twice, cut once. Join now EVEN BEFORE MUSK BRANDISHED a chainsaw, moved fast and broke much of the government, no one paying even an iota of attention would have expected Trump to be a model (mohel?) of careful consistency. Still, the speed and significance of the reversals has been shocking, and they appear to be standard operating procedure. In other words, we can expect them to continue until Trump exits the White House, whenever that is. One of the first and worst moments came when the Department of Energy discovered it had fired hundreds at the agency that oversees the nuclear weapons stockpile. Oops. And then had trouble finding them to hire them back. Oops again. Cancel foreign student visas? Require in-person Social Security visits? Fire a thousand National Park Service workers? Close more than thirty mine safety offices? Offload seven thousand Internal Revenue Service workers, hobbling its ability to collect taxes? Never mind times five. Court orders played a role in some of these reversals, but many others arose from delusional thinking (about phone fraud running rampant at Social Security, though there was hardly any) or magical thinking (as in, who needs nuclear stockpile safety overseers, or rangers at national parks that fuel local economies, or the people who know how to make sure taxes owed are taxes paid). The breaking point for me was an NPR story (yes, the NPR that's currently on Trump's chopping block) about the National Weather Service. Who knew we needed to know the weather? Not the DOGE crew. Who knew America has a hurricane season? Possibly not the nation's disaster aid chief. Who assumed AI would save the day, not realizing that AI can't function without the data produced by the federal government and its actual human employees? Apparently not Musk's tech bros. Who knew that Americans might want or need weather information outside of business hours? And really, who could have predicted that the NWS would now be hiring to fill in gaps left when five hundred people were fired? Or that many of the applicants will probably be fired probationary employees reapplying for their old jobs? That's what a union official told NPR. I've gotten this far without mentioning TACO, the Trump Always Chickens Out acronym that Financial Times columnist Robert Armstrong coined to describe investment strategy amid Trump's constant tariff flip-flops. Trump hates the phrase, but if the flip-flop fits. . . And it does. Very well. Share TO LONGTIME POLITICAL OBSERVERS, by which I mean those of us so old we remember pre-MAGA times, it seems strange that the constant flip-flops have not ruined, scarred, or even dented Trump. Nothing has, and nothing probably will, as we've seen all too often. In this case, maybe it's because everyone already knows he's so deeply flawed, or because his decisions are so terrible that flipping in a different direction is all to the good. Especially if you're a savvy financial player who buys low every time a Trump-made disaster strikes. Because, TACO. My context here is the 2004 John Kerry presidential campaign, which I covered as a reporter on his bus and plane. Maybe it was a simpler time, or maybe Republicans were simply ruthless in driving home a message, but one unfortunate turn of phrase turned Kerry—a combat veteran—into a 'flip-flopper' who didn't support the troops. It was truly a doozy of a sentence, the classic 'I voted for the $87 billion before I voted against it.' 'I had one of those inarticulate moments,' Kerry said. He tried to explain. He wanted the expenditure funded at least in part by rolling back some of George W. Bush's tax cuts. But the phrase conveyed weakness and dithering, and Team Bush made sure it stuck. They even sold Kerry flip-flops at the Republican convention that year. The National Museum of American History owns a pair as part of its collection: It's a safe bet that those anti-Kerry flip-flop shoes will survive the coming cultural culling as Trump tries to remake the Smithsonian museums in the image of MAGA and himself. It's also a safe bet that the museum won't be adding Trump flip-flops in future years. It would be too exhausting to create souvenir flip-flops for every Trump flip-flop—and you'd need an entire museum to house them all. Share this article with a friend or family member, or post it to social media: Share
