Unhinged reason Democrat-run cities riddled with crime are now PAYING the meth addicts blighting their streets
Addiction treatment facilities in cities including San Francisco and Portland, Maine, have been implementing contingency management (CM) techniques to keep patients clean and on the path to recovery.
Contingency management is a decades-old strategy that positively enforces sobriety by rewarding negative drug tests with prizes such as vouchers, gift cards and debit card cash valued.
The longer someone is able to stay on the straight and narrow, the heftier the pay - though maximum payouts vary from clinic to clinic.
The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), which is funded by taxpayers, allows patients to be awarded up to $750 each year through its vouchers.
Other programs, such as ones in Pennsylvania 's Allegheny County, reward participants up to $1,000 annually.
Treatment plans generally span anywhere from eight weeks to a year in duration and are most commonly used for treating stimulant addictions.
While experts have praised the method as an effective way to combat drug dependencies, it has sparked fierce criticism for its transactional nature - with skeptics saying unhealthy habits re-emerge once the money stops coming.
Researcher and clinicians have slammed the practice as 'bribery' and called it 'unethical to pay people for what they should be doing anyway,' according to the National Library of Medicine (NLM).
But for Jamie Mains, who is addicted to meth, CM programs have helped completely turn her life around.
'I was getting paid not to use and that was nice and that was the beginning,' Mains, of Portland, Maine, told The New York Times.
'But now I feel like being sober is payment enough, not waking up sick is payment enough, being trusted is payment enough.'
Mains had been binge-drinking since she was nine-years-old and her mother shot her up with heroin when she was just 12. She had been battling addiction ever since.
While she traded her fentanyl cravings for meth, she had no luck becoming totally sober until entering a CM program last year.
The program had just launched at Portland's Spurwink clinic, and Mains enrolled because the 'money was a good enough reason to try.'
Sixteen months later, Mains is totally sober. She told the NY Times that even when her step-mother started smoking crack in her car while they were on their way to a relative's funeral, she had no urge to cave.
'Most people recoil at paying people to do the right thing,' Dr. Sally Satel, a medical director of a methadone clinic in Washington DC and a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute told the NY Times.
'But we've got plenty of data that shows this works. So I think we just have to bite the utilitarian bullet.'
Over the past few years, Maine has seen a surge in meth addicts. From 2018 to 2024, the number of meth overdoses skyrocketed from seven percent to 37 percent, according to Maine's director of opioid response.
California, Montana, Washington and West Virginia have sought out Medicaid coverage for CM programs, according to the Legislative Analysis and Public Policy Association (LAPPA).
Most insurance plans do not cover CM treatments.
The recovery method first caught traction in 2011, when the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) launched an initiative to broaden patient access to CM.
From 2011 to 2016, the method was implemented in 116 out of the 129 VA programs in collaboration with the Center of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education (CESATE).
More than 8,000 veterans have been treated through these programs.
Beyond the VA, California has been spearheading efforts to implement CM programs.
Last year, Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom proposed using hundreds of thousands of tax payer dollars to implement such programs throughout the Golden State.
According to California's Department of Health Care Services website, 23 out of the state's 58 counties participate in the incentive programs.
One of those counties, San Francisco - which has one of the worst overdose rates in the nation - proposed a 'Cash Not Drugs' program last year.
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors approved the measure in order to combat the city's raging drug problem.
Under this program, people could receive up to $100 a week for steering clear of illicit substances, CBS reported.
Under the Biden administration, increased federal support and allowed more states to apply for Medicaid grants to fund the patient rewards.
Before raising the maximum SAMHSA voucher limit to $750, it was just $75.
But proponents of CM are worried for its future, as Donald Trump's health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy - a recovered heroin addict himself - may not be on board with expanding or sustaining these programs.
The Department of Health and Human Services did not respond to the NY Times' question specifically about CM,
Instead this agency issued the following statement: 'HHS must return to common-sense public health approaches focused on prevention, treatment, and long-term recovery.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
I spent four nights a week drinking until I blacked out – before snorting cocaine to sober up. I told myself it was OK... but this is how I finally ditched the booze: BRYONY GORDON
When I was making my first shaky, shame-filled steps to sobriety over a decade ago, I really wish there had been someone as brilliantly brave as Ulrika Jonsson out there, speaking openly about what it is like to be a mother with a drinking problem. Because listening to the TV presenter talk (pictured) about her decision to get sober, I was taken straight back to those awful last days of my drinking, when I looked at my lovely home and my gorgeous child and thought: 'What the hell is wrong with me? Why can't I stop drinking?'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Body of passenger who died on flight from Istanbul to San Francisco goes missing
A passenger who died on a Turkish Airlines flight en route from Istanbul to San Francisco was offloaded during an emergency stop in Chicago, but their body is now reportedly unaccounted for, SFGATE reports. Turkish Airlines Flight 79 departed Istanbul on July 13, and while flying over Greenland, a passenger suffered a severe medical emergency. Although the crew initially planned to divert to Iceland, the passenger's condition worsened, and they died before the plane diverted to Chicago. 'Consequently, the decision was made to continue toward North America rather than divert outside US airspace,' Aviation A2Z told SFGATE. 'Upon entering the airspace over the United States, the crew opted to land at Chicago O'Hare, a major international hub capable of handling emergency landings with adequate medical support and facilities.' Although the passenger's body should fall under the jurisdiction of the Cook County Medical Examiner's Office, a spokesperson told SFGATE there is no record of the deceased or any matching case. Today, its unclear where the remains are. The Turkish Airlines station manager in San Francisco confirmed that remaining passengers were rerouted to their destination, but the whereabouts of the deceased passenger's remains are unknown. The airline has neither confirmed the passenger's identity nor disclosed the cause of death, beyond noting it stemmed from a medical emergency. The Independent has contacted representatives for Turkish Airlines, Chicago O'Hare International Airport, and the Cook County Medical Examiner's Office for comment. A 2021 study found that the mortality rate on a plane is about .21 per million passengers, according to The most common causes of death include pulmonary embolisms, cardiac arrests and respiratory issues.
The Independent
12 hours ago
- The Independent
The US fertility rate reached a new low in 2024, CDC data shows
The fertility rate in the U.S. dropped to an all-time low in 2024 with less than 1.6 kids per woman, new federal data released Thursday shows. The U.S. was once among only a few developed countries with a rate that ensured each generation had enough children to replace itself — about 2.1 kids per woman. But it has been sliding in America for close to two decades as more women are waiting longer to have children or never taking that step at all. The new statistic is on par with fertility rates in western European countries, according to World Bank data. Alarmed by recent drops, the Trump administration has taken steps to increase falling birth rates, like issuing an executive order meant to expand access to and reduce costs of in vitro fertilization and backing the idea of 'baby bonuses' that might encourage more couples to have kids. But there's no reason to be alarmed, according to Leslie Root, a University of Colorado Boulder researcher focused on fertility and population policy. 'We're seeing this as part of an ongoing process of fertility delay. We know that the U.S. population is still growing, and we still have a natural increase — more births than deaths,' she said. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released the statistic for the total fertility rate with updated birth data for 2024. In the early 1960s, the U.S. total fertility rate was around 3.5, but plummeted to 1.7 by 1976 after the Baby Boom ended. It gradually rose to 2.1 in 2007 before falling again, aside from a 2014 uptick. The rate in 2023 was 1.621, and inched down in 2024 to 1.599, according to the CDC 's National Center for Health Statistics. Birth rates are generally declining for women in most age groups — and that doesn't seem likely to change in the near future, said Karen Guzzo, director of the Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina. People are marrying later and also worried about their ability to have the money, health insurance and other resources needed to raise children in a stable environment. 'Worry is not a good moment to have kids,' and that's why birth rates in most age groups are not improving, she said. Asked about birth-promoting measures outlined by the Trump administration, Guzzo said they don't tackle larger needs like parental leave and affordable child care. 'The things that they are doing are really symbolic and not likely to budge things for real Americans,' she said. Increase in births in new data The CDC's new report, which is based on a more complete review of birth certificates than provisional data released earlier this year, also showed a 1% increase in births — about 33,000 more — last year compared to the prior year. That brought the yearly national total to just over 3.6 million babies born. But this is different: The provisional data indicated birth rate increases last year for women in their late 20s and 30s. However, the new report found birth rate declines for women in their 20s and early 30s, and no change for women in their late 30s. What happened? CDC officials said it was due to recalculations stemming from a change in the U.S. Census population estimates used to compute the birth rate. That's plausible, Root said. As the total population of women of childbearing age grew due to immigration, it offset small increases in births to women in those age groups, she said. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
