logo
It Looks Like a School Bathroom Smoke Detector. A Teen Hacker Showed It Could Be an Audio Bug

It Looks Like a School Bathroom Smoke Detector. A Teen Hacker Showed It Could Be an Audio Bug

WIRED2 days ago
By Andy Greenberg and Joseph Cox Aug 8, 2025 9:00 AM A pair of hackers found that a vape detector often found in high school bathrooms contained microphones—and security weaknesses that could allow someone to turn it into a secret listening device. Photo-Illustration: Wired Staff;A couple of years ago, a curious, then-16-year-old hacker named Reynaldo Vasquez-Garcia was on his laptop at his Portland-area high school, seeing what computer systems he could connect to via the Wi-Fi—'using the school network as a lab,' as he puts it—when he spotted a handful of mysterious devices with the identifier 'IPVideo Corporation.'
After a closer look and some googling, Garcia figured out that a company by that name was a subsidiary of Motorola, and the devices he'd found in his school seemed to be something called the Halo 3C, a 'smart' smoke and vape detection gadget. 'They look just like smoke detectors, but they have a whole bunch of features like sensors and stuff,' Garcia says.
This article was created in partnership with 404 Media, a journalist-owned publication covering how technology impacts humans. For more stories like this, sign up here.
As he read more, he was intrigued to learn that the Halo 3C goes beyond detecting smoke and vaping—including a distinct feature for discerning THC vaping in particular. It also has a microphone for listening out for 'aggression,' gunshots, and keywords such as someone calling for help, a feature that to Vasquez-Garcia immediately raised concerns of more intrusive surveillance.
Now, after months of reverse engineering and security testing, Vasquez-Garcia and a fellow hacker he's partnered with who goes by the pseudonym 'Nyx,' have shown that it's possible to hack one of those Halo 3C gadgets—which they've taken to calling by the nickname 'snitch puck'—and take full control of it.
At the Defcon hacker conference today, they plan to show that by exploiting just a few relatively simple security vulnerabilities, any hacker on the same network could have hijacked a Halo 3C to turn it into a real-time audio eavesdropping bug, disabled its detection capabilities, created fake alerts for vaping or gunshots, or even played whatever sound or audio they chose out of the device's speaker. Motorola said it has since developed a firmware update to address those security flaws that will automatically push to cloud-connected devices by Friday.
Manyof the hackers' tricks are on display in a video demo below, which the Vasquez-Garcia and Nyx made ahead of their Defcon presentation:
The Halo 3C's vulnerabilities would have potentially allowed a teen hacker on a school network to take control of a Halo 3C for epic mischief or abuse. The sensor's capabilities also ignite fears that school administrators or even police could have done the same to eavesdrop on unsuspecting students in a school bathroom. Schools are increasingly subject to all sorts of surveillance technology, from AI-powered weapons detectors, to 'face analytics' cameras, to keystroke loggers on student computers.
One concern of the researchers is that technology like the Halo 3C could be turned against a student speaking about seeking an abortion, for instance. In marketing material, Motorola says the Halo 3C sensor 'is ideal for observing health and safety in privacy-concern areas, such as restrooms and changing facilities, where video and audio recording is not permitted.' (Motorola said that the sensor is programmed with wake words, such as 'Help, 911,' and does not record or stream audio.)
'To the credit of the company, the microphones sound great,' says Nyx. 'From up on the ceiling, you could totally listen to what somebody was saying, and we've made this happen.'
Motorola told the hackers in an email that it has worked on a new firmware update that should fix the vulnerabilities. But the hackers argue that doesn't, and can't, address the underlying concern: that a gadget loaded with hidden microphones is installed in schools around the country. Motorola also advertises its Halo sensors for use in public housing—including inside residents' homes—according to marketing material.
'The unfortunate reality is there's a microphone connected to a computer that's connected to the network,' says Nyx. 'And there's no software patching that will make that not possible to use as a listening device.'
Motorola pitches the Halo 3C as an 'all-in-one intelligent security device' in its marketing material. Its notifications 'enable security teams at schools, hospitals, retail stores and more to respond to potentially critical events faster, helping to establish a safer environment,' it says.
After Vasquez-Garcia got curious about the Halo 3C two years ago, he and Nyx—an older hacker he met at his local hackerspace—bought one on eBay and took it apart. Their physical teardown revealed the Halo 3C is essentially a Raspberry Pi micro computer with a bunch of sensors attached, including one for temperature or humidity, an accelerometer, and others for air quality that detect different gases. One feature jumped out: a couple of microphones.
'Seeing this device is getting put into buildings and having microphones in it,' says Nyx, 'it's kind of a huge red flag.'
A disassembled Halo 3C smoke and vape detector found to include microphones. Courtesy of Reynaldo Vasquez-Garcia and Nyx
To hack the Halo 3C, they found that if they could connect to one over the network it was installed on, they could brute-force guess its password with virtually no rate limitations due to a flaw in how it tried to throttle those guesses. 'It's trivially possible to guess passwords as quickly as the thing can respond to you,' says Nyx. That meant they could guess roughly 3,000 passwords a minute, and crack any insufficiently complex password relatively quickly.
Once they had administrator access to a Halo 3C, they found they could update its firmware to whatever they chose: Despite its security measures that attempted to require those firmware updates to be encrypted with a certain cryptographic key, that key was in fact included in firmware updates available on the Halo's website. 'They're handing you a locked box where the key is taped to the underside,' Nyx says. 'As long as you know to look down there, you can open it up.'
A Motorola Solutions spokesperson said in a statement: 'Motorola Solutions designs, develops and deploys our products to prioritize data security and protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of data. A firmware update is available, and we are working with our customers and channel partners to deploy the update together with our additional recommendations and industry best practices for security.'
Marketing material available online says the Halo 3C uses a 'Dynamic Vape Detection algorithm' which can sense nicotine, THC, and when someone is trying to mask their vaping with aerosols. Halo can also 'alert security teams to motion after hours' and includes a 'spoken keyword feature.'
'The HALO Smart Sensor can detect specific spoken keywords that immediately alert security to a potential issue. Pre-defined keywords like 'help' are particularly valuable in environments such as schools, where bullying is a concern, or for teachers in need of assistance, as well as nurses and hospital patients,' the marketing material adds. Another section says the sensors can be used to detect 'bullying or aggression' in schools.
The marketing material also says Halo sensors have been used in public housing units in New York. 'The sensors helped SSHA [the Saratoga Springs Housing Authority] reduce risks, enforce nonsmoking rules, and protect vulnerable residents, with plans for further installations across the housing authority,' it says.
Nyx argues that the notion of requiring public housing residents to keep a hackable device that can become an audio eavesdropping tool in their apartment may represent the most disturbing application of the Halo 3C. 'That kind of took it up a notch as far as how egregious this entire product line is,' Nyx says. 'Most people have an expectation that their home isn't bugged, right?'
As sensors like the Halo 3C proliferate across schools and even homes, Vasquez-Garcia says the biggest takeaway from his and Nyx's findings ought to be that putting microphones and internet connections into every device in our lives as simple as a smoke detector is a decision that carries real risk. 'If people remember one thing from this, it should be: Don't blindly trust every internet of things device just because it claims to be for safety,' Vasquez-Garcia says. 'The real issue is trust. The more we accept devices that say 'not recording' at face value, the more we normalize surveillance without really knowing what's inside or bothering to question it.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why new IPOs are crushing it out of the block
Why new IPOs are crushing it out of the block

Yahoo

time4 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why new IPOs are crushing it out of the block

"This company is not aspirational — it's operational." Firefly Aerospace (FLY) CEO Jason Kim said this to me on Yahoo Finance as his company was going through its rite of passage at the Nasdaq on Thursday. It felt so electric in the room, I asked Firefly's employees to clap us in at the top of the interview (video above). The stock opened at $70 a share and closed the session at $60.35 — up 34% from its IPO price of $45. The company's market cap at the end of its first trading day stood at $8.48 billion. Just last week, Firefly said it had planned to sell 16.2 million shares at a range of $35 to $39. A new regulatory filing on Monday came with a much higher range of $41 to $43. The company ended up raising $868 million from the IPO after selling 19.3 million shares at $45. I think Kim's comment perfectly captures why recent IPOs have been embraced enthusiastically by investors. The early-stage companies coming to market are more mature. The businesses are more complete. The leaders are more well-rounded. (Kim told me off camera he is very ready for his first earnings call.) Firefly may still be early stage with no profits, but it's not just hot air with no substance. It's not a SPAC with a suspect leader — hearkening back to the flops from 2020. Kim is an Air Force veteran who spent considerable time working at Boeing's satellite business. His company is part of NASA's Commercial Lunar Payload Services program. Its lunar lander Blue Ghost successfully touched down on the surface of the moon in March. The company's new Eclipse reusable rocket is expected to launch sometime in 2026, joining the already proven Alpha rocket in the portfolio. In its prospectus, Firefly boasted $1.1 billion in backlog and lists partnerships with Elon Musk's SpaceX ( Jeff Bezos's Blue Origin, NASA, Northrop Grumman (NOC), and Space Force. Another recent IPO that is more operational than inspirational? Figma (FIG) shares were priced at $33 for its market debut on July 31 and ended the day at $115.50. The company makes software that allows people to collaborate on slide decks and digital whiteboards, among other bells and whistles. The company has more than 13 million monthly users. Its prospectus calls out that 1,000 clients are paying it north of $100,000 a year to use the product. Key customers include Google (GOOG) and Microsoft (MSFT). Sales are growing in double digits, and the company has an operating profit. Then there's Chime, which priced its IPO at $27 and ended its first trading day on June 12 at $37.11. The company reported better-than-expected earnings this past week, though the stock now trades around $30. CFO Matt Newcomb said the team has had conversations with investors, and they recognize the fintech's business model and progress. "I think as it relates to stock price, not uncommon for new companies to see some volatility out of the gate," he told me on Opening Bid. The same operational, not aspirational vibe could be felt at Circle (CRCL), which kicked off the strong market responses for IPOs earlier this year. CEO Jeremy Allaire is a widely respected blockchain industry veteran. It's good to see the healthy IPO activity, and sources tell me more could be on the way in September. Note that 59 US IPOs cumulatively raised $15.02 billion in the second quarter, up 33.8% sequentially, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence data. "The shadow backlog and pace of new IPOs are building, coupled with investor demand, that sets the stage for a great second half," S&P said. Brian Sozzi is Yahoo Finance's Executive Editor and a member of Yahoo Finance's editorial leadership team. Follow Sozzi on X @BrianSozzi, Instagram, and LinkedIn. Tips on stories? Email Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Sign in to access your portfolio

Trump Media Awarded CEO Devin Nunes $5.9 Million in Stock, Despite $20 Million Loss
Trump Media Awarded CEO Devin Nunes $5.9 Million in Stock, Despite $20 Million Loss

Forbes

time6 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Trump Media Awarded CEO Devin Nunes $5.9 Million in Stock, Despite $20 Million Loss

Trump Media, which lost $20 million last quarter while expanding into new products, including crypto, awarded CEO Devin Nunes $5.9 million in stock on Wednesday, with the shares set to vest over three years, according to an SEC filing. President Donald Trump talks with Trump Media CEO Devin Nunes at the Republican National Convention in July 2024. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images) CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images Trump Media & Technology Group (NASDAQ: DJT)—the parent company of Truth Social and the Truth+ streaming platform and holder of about $2 billion worth of bitcoin—awarded Nunes 348,000 restricted stock units on Wednesday under its 2024 equity incentive plan. The stock will vest in equal annual installments through May 2028, contingent on Nunes remaining with the company. Based on Friday's closing price of $17, Nunes' new stock is worth about $5.9 million, bringing the value of his total stake in Trump Media—1.4 million shares and restricted stock units—to approximately $24.4 million. Last week, Trump Media disclosed a second-quarter net loss of $20 million on $883,300 in revenue—about what a mall-based Chick-fil-A typically brings in—though the company highlighted recent achievements including holding $3.1 billion in financial assets (mostly bitcoin it purchased with the proceeds of a private placement), launching a subscription service for Truth+ and filing registration statements with the SEC to launch a crypto-focused ETF. The company also issued 142,000 restricted stock units each—worth $2.4 million—to CFO Phillip Juhan, CTO Vladimir Novachki and General Counsel Scott Glabe. Company spokesperson Shannon Devine declined to specify what criteria Nunes met to receive the restricted stock units, but touted the firm's 'uncancellable social media platform,' bitcoin holdings and first quarter of positive operating cash flow. The company didn't say, and its SEC filings and press releases do not appear to offer a clear rationale. Under Trump Media's 2024 equity incentive plan, a board committee has broad discretion to grant bonuses based on 33 possible criteria, including financial performance, stock price targets and corporate transactions. Key Background Before joining Trump Media, Nunes was a 10-term Republican congressman and chair of the House Intelligence Committee from rural California, earning $174,000 annually. Trump tapped him to be CEO and a director of the company in December 2021. While his business experience appears to be limited to his family's dairy farm, Trump Media pitched Nunes to investors as a leader with 'familiarity with public scrutiny and media savvy.' In recent months, the company has launched an iPad app for Truth Social, entered public beta for an AI search engine, raised $2.3 billion from a private placement to fund a bitcoin treasury, filed to launch a crypto ETF and rolled out its Truth+ streaming platform globally. $47 million: That's the total compensation Trump Media awarded to Nunes in 2024—including salary, bonuses and stock—though much of the equity won't vest until 2027. News Peg On Monday, a new special-purpose acquisition company—New America Acquisition I Corp., which is targeting firms with a role in domestic manufacturing—named Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump to its advisory board. According to SEC filings, Don Jr. received 2 million founder shares in the company, while Eric received 3 million. Trump Media, where Don Jr. serves on the board and acts as trustee for his father's 115 million shares, also went public via a SPAC—a merger with Digital World Acquisition Corp. that took 29 months to consummate. Separately, Nunes and Eric Swider, another Trump Media board member who led Digital World, launched another SPAC in March, aiming to acquire a firm in the cryptocurrency and blockchain, data security, and dual-use technology sectors. Tangent Last week, a federal judge dismissed a defamation lawsuit Nunes filed against NBCUniversal over a 2021 comment by MSNBC host Rachel Maddow about his communications with a suspected Russian agent. Forbes Valuation Forbes estimates Donald Trump's net worth at $5.1 billion. In November 2023, Trump Media sued 20 media outlets, including Forbes, for reporting that included calculations of its financial results while still a private company. The defendants have moved to dismiss the claims, but the case is ongoing. Further Viewing Trump Media Board Member Who Led SPAC Merger Sells Nearly All His Shares (Forbes) Truth Social Hosted Party At Trump's Mar-A-Lago (Forbes) When It Comes To Truth Social, Republicans In Congress Aren't Buying What Trump's Selling (Forbes) The Tech Mogul Behind Trump's Truth Social Used To Own Porn Domains (Forbes) 'We'd Call That Corruption': How Trump Used The Presidency To Expand His Global Empire (Forbes)

Sex is getting scrubbed from the internet, but a billionaire can sell you AI nudes
Sex is getting scrubbed from the internet, but a billionaire can sell you AI nudes

The Verge

time6 minutes ago

  • The Verge

Sex is getting scrubbed from the internet, but a billionaire can sell you AI nudes

In the fascinating new reality of the internet, teen girls can't learn about periods on Reddit and indie artists can't sell smutty games on but a military contractor will make you nonconsensual deepfakes of Taylor Swift taking her top off for $30 a month. Early Tuesday, Elon Musk's xAI launched a new image and video generator called Grok Imagine with a 'spicy' mode whose output ranges from suggestive gestures to nudity. Because Grok Imagine also has no perceptible guardrails against creating images of real people, that means you can essentially generate softcore pornography of anyone who's famous enough for Grok to recreate (although, pragmatically, it appears to mainly produce seriously NSFW output for women). Musk bragged that more than 34 million images were generated within a day of launching operations. But the real coup is demonstrating that xAI can ignore pressure to keep adult content off its services while helping users create something that's widely reviled, thanks to legal gaps and political leverage that no other company has. xAI's video feature — which debuted around the same time as a romantic chatbot companion named Valentine — seems from one angle strikingly weird, because it's being released during a period where sex (down to the word itself) is being pushed to the margins of the internet. Late last month, the UK started enforcing age-gating rules that required X and other services to block sexual or otherwise 'harmful' content for users under 18. Around the same time, an activist group called Collective Shout successfully pressured Steam and to crack down on adult games and other media, leading in particular to mass-delist any NSFW uploads. Deepfake porn of real people is a form of nonconsensual intimate imagery, which is illegal to intentionally publish in the US under the Take It Down Act, signed by President Donald Trump earlier this year. In a statement published Thursday, the Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN) called Grok's feature 'part of a growing problem of image-based sexual abuse' and quipped that Grok clearly 'didn't get the memo' about the new law. But according to Mary Anne Franks, a professor at George Washington University Law School and president of the nonprofit Cyber Civil Rights Initiative (CCRI), there's 'little danger of Grok facing any kind of liability' under the Take It Down Act. 'The criminal provision requires 'publication,' which, while unfortunately not defined in the statute, suggests making content available to more than one person,' Franks says. 'If Grok only makes the videos viewable to the person who uses the tool, that wouldn't seem to suffice.' Regulators have failed to enforce laws against big companies even when they apply Grok also likely isn't required to remove the images under the Take It Down Act's takedown provision — despite that rule being so worryingly broad that it threatens most social media services. 'I don't think Grok — or at least this particular Grok tool — even qualifies as a 'covered platform,' because the definition of covered platform requires that it 'primarily provides a forum for user-generated content,'' she says. 'AI-generated content often involves user inputs, but the actual content is, as the term indicates, generated by AI.' The takedown provision is also designed to work through people flagging content, and Grok doesn't publicly post the images where other users can see them — it just makes them incredibly easy to create (and almost inevitably post to social media) at a large scale. Franks and the CCRI called out the limited definition of a 'covered platform' as a problem for other reasons months ago. It's one of several ways the Take It Down Act fails to serve people impacted by nonconsensual intimate imagery while posing a risk to web platforms acting in good faith. It might not even stop Grok from posting lewd AI-modified images of real people publicly, Franks told Spitfire News in June, in part because there are open questions about whether Grok is a 'person' impacted by the law. These kinds of failures are a running theme in internet regulation that's ostensibly supposed to crack down on harmful or inappropriate content; the UK's mandate, for instance, has made it harder to run independent forums while still being fairly easy for kids to get around. Compounding this problem, particularly in the US, regulatory agencies have failed to impose meaningful consequences for all kinds of rulebreaking by powerful companies, including Musk's many businesses. Trump has given Musk-owned companies an almost total pass for bad conduct, and even after formally leaving his powerful position at the Department of Government Efficiency, Musk likely maintains tremendous leverage over regulatory agencies like the FTC. (xAI just got a contract of up to $200 million with the Department of Defense.) So even if xAI were violating the Take It Down Act, it probably wouldn't face investigation. Beyond the government, there are layers of gatekeepers that dictate what is acceptable on platforms, and they often take a dim view of sex. Apple, for instance, has pushed Discord, Reddit, Tumblr, and other platforms to censor NSFW material with varying levels of success. Steam and reevaluated adult content under threat of losing relationships with payment processors and banks, which have previously put the screws on platforms like OnlyFans and Pornhub. In some cases, like Pornhub's, this pressure is the result of platforms allowing unambiguously harmful and illegal uploads. But Apple and payment processors don't appear to maintain hard-line, evenly enforced policies. Their enforcement seems to depend significantly on public pressure balanced against how much power the target has, and despite his falling out with Trump, virtually nobody in business has more political power than Musk. Apple and Musk have repeatedly clashed over Apple's policies, and Apple has mostly held firm on things like its fee structure, but it's apparently backed down on smaller issues, including returning its advertisements to X after pulling them from the Nazi-infested platform. Apple has banned smaller apps for making AI-generated nudes of real people. Will it exert that kind of pressure on Grok, whose video service launched exclusively on iOS? Apple didn't respond to a request for comment, but don't hold your breath. Grok's new feature is harmful for people who can now easily have nonconsensual nudes made of them on a major AI service, but it also demonstrates how hollow the promise of a 'safer' internet is proving. Small-time platforms face pressure to remove consensually recorded or entirely fictional media made by human beings, while a company run by a billionaire can make money off something that's in some circumstances outright illegal. If you're online in 2025, nothing is about sex, including sex — which, per usual, is about power. Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Adi Robertson Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All AI Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Analysis Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Report Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Speech Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All xAI

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store