Inside the Life of a Pearson Airport Chauffeur: What You Don't See Behind the Wheel
When travelers step into a sleek black SUV or Lincoln at Pearson International Airport, they often see only the polished surface—smiling chauffeur, climate control, soft leather seats, and a smooth ride. But behind every Toronto Airport Taxi & Limo Service vehicle is a person navigating far more than just Toronto's 401.
This is the story of the people behind the wheel. The ones who don't just drive—they manage lives, calm anxieties, represent Canada's welcome mat, and sometimes play therapist, navigator, and airport concierge all in one.
3:00 AM Wake-Ups and Airport Rituals
For many Pearson chauffeurs, the day starts before sunrise. Airport departures begin as early as 5:30 AM, which means chauffeurs for Toronto Airport Taxi & Limo Service are often out of the garage by 3:45 AM, prepped and polished.
The morning ritual is sacred:
Vehicle inspection: tire pressure, wiper fluid, and brake checks.
Interior detailing: every vehicle is vacuumed and sanitized between rides.
Route planning: even with GPS, seasoned drivers know that Toronto traffic and Pearson construction zones need human intuition.
And of course, the suit. Presentation isn't optional; it's expected. Whether they're picking up a film director, a family from Dubai, or a returning student, these chauffeurs are the first face of Canada.
The Quiet Professionals
The best chauffeurs are the quiet professionals. They understand discretion. They don't overshare or ask unnecessary questions. But they're listening—to cues from travelers, to flight delays via the Toronto Pearson app, to real-time dispatch updates through WhatsApp.
Toronto Airport Taxi & Limo Service chauffeurs are trained to recognize:
When a client wants peace and silence.
When a family needs reassurance after a long flight.
When a corporate exec wants the quickest route to downtown and no small talk.
They are trained in hospitality, not just driving.
Not All Heroes Wear Capes—Some Wear Black Suits and Drive Sprinters
Sprinter chauffeurs are in a league of their own. These are the road warriors managing everything from ski equipment to diplomatic delegations. A Sprinter driver might:
Help load 14 bags into a rear compartment like a Tetris master.
Handle cross-border immigration questions with confidence.
Guide an entire wedding party to multiple stops before even reaching the hotel.
Their tools include patience, punctuality, and Bluetooth headsets synced with dispatch so they never miss a beat.
Real-Time Problem Solving
Pearson is an unpredictable place. Flights are late. Customs lines are long. Sometimes baggage claim can take 45 minutes—and a lesser service might cancel your ride. But Toronto Airport Taxi & Limo Service drivers wait, track, adjust.
In one 48-hour period, a single chauffeur may:
Navigate an embassy pickup downtown, rerouted last minute to Union Station.
Handle a double-booked trip where one car breaks down, and backup is dispatched within 10 minutes.
Assist an elderly passenger with mobility issues all the way from carousel to car.
Family-Friendly Doesn't Mean Less Professional
Chauffeurs trained to handle families bring a different set of skills:
Installing child car seats properly.
Knowing where strollers and diaper bags fit without being asked.
Offering bottled water and checking interior temperatures before pick-up.
Toronto Airport Taxi & Limo Service doesn't just assign random drivers. Parents are matched with chauffeurs who understand family stress—and how to reduce it.
The Dispatch Backbone: Always Connected
Every driver has a live connection with dispatch via mobile CRM tools. They receive:
Live ETA updates
Flight changes
Customer notes (like 'VIP guest' or 'requires assistance')
In case of emergency or re-routing, drivers get backup within minutes. There's no freelance scrambling. It's a system designed for travelers who expect results.
Stories from the Front Seat
Ask a chauffeur about their most memorable ride, and you'll hear stories like:
Driving an exhausted refugee family to their first Canadian home, watching the kids press their faces to the glass as they passed downtown Toronto.
Picking up a Bollywood celebrity for TIFF, blending professionalism and silence.
Comforting a nervous first-time flyer during a long, late-night ride.
Behind the wheel are people who take immense pride in being part of someone's journey—even if just for 45 minutes.
What It Takes to Join Toronto Airport Taxi & Limo Service
Chauffeurs go through a rigorous vetting and onboarding process:
Background checks and driving abstracts
Multi-stage interviews
Route training for YYZ, downtown Toronto, and cross-border destinations
Customer service simulations
Only those who pass all checkpoints make it into the professional fleet. And even then, quality is monitored through reviews, GPS logs, and feedback.
Why Chauffeurs Matter to the Toronto Brand
Think about it—your first impression of Toronto may not be CN Tower or a downtown hotel lobby. It might be the man or woman behind the wheel of your airport limo. And that person, their demeanor, their attention to detail, their knowledge of the city—that is what makes Toronto Airport Taxi & Limo Service so respected.
You're not just in a car. You're in the care of someone who's committed to representing Canada at its best.
Book Your Ride with Confidence
If you're flying in or out of Pearson and want a true VIP experience from someone who knows what they're doing—book with the people behind Toronto's most respected name in ground transportation.
Address: 3 Lockwood Rd, Brampton, ON L6Y 4S6
Phone: (647) 689-6088
Email: admin@torontotaxilimo.ca
Book Now: www.torontotaxilimo.ca
TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Motor Trend
5 hours ago
- Motor Trend
The $35K Chevy Equinox EV Nails the Basics. Is It Better Than a Loaded Ford Mustang Mach-E?
Let's address one thing right off the bat: If you're a budget-constrained shopper looking for a new electric car that's perfectly pleasant to drive and will help save on gas and maintenance, you could do worse than the $34,995 2025 Chevrolet Equinox EV LT. In other words, this Equinox is popular for a reason. However, things get more interesting if you're looking for the best value and can afford a couple hundred dollars more per month. Is the Equinox's larger brother, the Blazer EV (or its Honda Prologue cousin) worth considering? Or the Tesla Model Y? And how about the updated-for-2025 Ford Mustang Mach-E? Yes, how about that Mustang Mach-E. While GM has launched an onslaught of electric SUVs for its Cadillac, Chevy, and GMC brands, Ford quietly refined its lone electric SUV, the Mustang Mach-E, since 2021. Prices for the latter start at about $42,000, but unlike the Equinox, few buy the base versions of the Mach-E. Instead, many shoppers step a trim up to the Mustang Mach-E Premium for its creature comforts, its available dual-motor all-wheel-drive performance, and a 300-mile EPA range rating from Ford's optional extended-range battery. But is the Mustang Mach-E—or any of the similarly priced SUVs from GM, Tesla, Honda, Hyundai, Kia, or others—worth the price premium over the lowly Equinox EV LT if you have more cash to spend but are reluctant to part with it without good reason? Spec Showdown With truly 'cheap' EVs from Ford or Slate still some time away, and the Nissan Leaf bound to get a price increase for 2026, the 2025 Chevrolet Equinox EV LT is effectively the entry-level electric car in our market at $34,995. You get a lot of vehicle for your money. Under the hood, the Equinox EV features a single permanent-magnet motor that produces 220 hp and 243 lb-ft of torque. It's paired with an 85-kWh battery pack good for a peak charge rate of 150 kW on a 350-kW charger (more on that later) and up to 11.5 kW at home. The Feds say the front-wheel-drive Equinox EV LT can clear 319 miles on a full charge (in fact, every Equinox EV is EPA-rated for at least 300 miles of range, even AWD models). Inside, you get room for five, the same fancy-looking 17.7-inch Google OS infotainment system from more expensive Equinoxes, and not much else beyond the essentials like single-zone A/C and the active safety equipment necessary to top industry crash tests. Standout features available on other Equinox EVs, like GM's award-winning Super Cruise hands-free driving aid aren't available on the LT. Neither are Android Auto and Apple CarPlay, which GM doesn't offer on most of its cars. Many base compact electric SUVs don't stack up particularly well to the Equinox EV LT. The starter Mustang Mach-E Select, for instance, largely matches the Chevy in creature comforts and sports a more powerful but less efficient rear-mounted permanent-magnet motor good for 264 hp and 387 lb-ft of torque. But it uses a smaller 73-kWh battery pack, giving it just 260 miles of EPA-estimated range. Stepping up to the Mustang Mach-E Premium ($44,490 to start) unlocks the ability to upgrade to Ford's larger 88.0-kWh battery pack (a $4,250 extra), giving single-motor Mach-Es up to 320 miles of range. Once you've already justified the range upgrade, it's easy to see how Mustang Mach-E owners might justify spending another $3,250 to add another permanent-magnet motor up front, giving the fastback EV a healthy 365 hp and 500 lb-ft of torque while still clearing 300 miles in EPA testing. It easily snowballs from there. In addition to the long list of standard features that come on all Mach-E Premiums (exterior and interior trim upgrades, heated and cooled front power seats, heated steering, a B&O audio system, and a phone-mirroring-friendly infotainment system), our Mustang Mach-E test SUV came with Ford's latest BlueCruise 1.5 hands-free Level 2 driver assist system ($2,495) and a handful of style upgrades, bringing its as-tested price to $58,670. Chevy vs. Ford: Range and Charging Results With range such a primary concern for EV drivers, we'll start our Equinox EV LT and Mustang Mach-E Premium comparison test by answering the big worry on EV shoppers' minds: The Feds say both can clear 300 miles on a charge, but can they really do so when it's time for a road trip? Our 70-mph real-world Road-Trip Range test is designed to answer that question. We begin with each battery at 100 percent and run them at a steady 70 mph down the highway until we hit 5 percent to see how far we can travel. The 319-mile-rated Equinox EV ended up traveling 262 miles, while the 300-mile rated Mustang Mach-E covered 252 miles, both perfectly average results for the segment. Our fast-charging test results, on the other hand, are barely average for the segment. Both manufacturers claim an unimpressive 150-kW peak charge rate for their EVs (the Hyundai Ioniq 5, for example, can hit 257 kW), but due to the voltage of the Chevy's battery pack it can only hit that rate when hooked up to a 350-kW charger. Thus, the Equinox adds only 94 miles of range in 15 minutes, 157 miles in 30 minutes, and needs a leisurely 48 minutes to go from 5 to 80 percent charge—the point at which most EV drivers continue with their journeys. The Mustang Mach-E isn't much better, adding 95 miles in 15 minutes, 158 in 30, and needing 43 minutes to reach 80 percent. The Ioniq 5, on the other hand, achieves that threshold in just 24 minutes. Both vehicles recharge easily overnight from the average household Level 2 charger, and both can recharge from Tesla-style NACS chargers with an adapter. With neither offering a particularly noteworthy charging experience, the Mustang Mach-E gets the slight edge here by virtue of being able to charge just as quickly on 150-kW chargers as it can on 350-kW (and quicker) chargers, but it is notable that the cheaper Chevy doesn't offer a worse charging experience than the Ford—that certainly wasn't always the case with EVs. You're correct if you set your eyes on these two vehicles and think the Mustang Mach-E just looks sportier. In nearly every acceleration and handling test we performed (though notably not in our 60–0-mph braking test), the Ford outperformed the Chevy. You can see the full breakdown in the chart below. The Ford certainly feels sportier in the real world, too. Its dual-motor all-wheel-drive system has enough power to throw you back in your seat and allow the Mach-E to keep up with V-8-powered Mustang GTs (and, more practically, accelerate to pass slower traffic) without hesitation. Its steering is direct and has satisfying weight to it too, which, combined with its firm yet comfortable ride, makes the Mach-E genuinely fun to drive. 'The Mach-E has a ton of character and athleticism, which isn't easy to pull off with EVs,' senior features editor Kristen Lee said. The Mach-E's BlueCruise 1.5 system also works wonderfully; it clearly signals to the driver when you can and can't take your hands off the wheel, can automatically change lanes, and just drives in a predictable, humanlike manner. That's not to say the Mach-E lacks flaws. Some editors wished for more adjustability from the Mach-E's one-pedal drive mode, and better feel from the mushy brake pedal with the system turned off. We also clocked wind and tire noise in the cabin at freeway speeds—mostly because the Chevrolet is so serenely quiet. Whereas the Mustang Mach-E has a sporty edge, the Chevrolet Equinox EV drives a lot like the conventional gas-powered compact SUVs you're used to. It accelerates smoothly off the line, though it lacks the Ford's pep. If you get greedy with the gas pedal—like, say, if you're attempting to keep up with someone in a Mach-E—you'll quickly feel the steering wheel tug at you as the Equinox EV's traction control system tries to fight it. This torque-steer tendency somewhat ruins the otherwise relaxed steering feel on windier roads, but more annoying is its tendency to rear its head when making 90-degree left or right turns at intersections. Equinox EV owners will learn to live with this trait, but it makes us question why GM didn't fit the motor in the rear instead. Aside from torque-steer issues, the Equinox is otherwise perfectly pleasant to drive. Its one-pedal-brake mode has multiple settings allowing owners to fine-tune the system to their liking (we were perfectly happy with the default setup), while those who prefer a more gaslike experience will find natural brake pedal feel with plenty of stopping power. The Chevy's ride is also compliant, soaking up bumps and ruts without transferring the forces of those impacts into the cabin. Chevy's basic lane keep assist and radar cruise control is no match for Ford's BlueCruise system; it's a shame GM's class-leading Super Cruise system isn't available until you step up into the Equinox EV LT2. Cabin Vibes We're used to the interiors of base-model cars being outfitted with hard plastics, small screens, and button blanks, but the Equinox EV LT's cabin is a refreshing change from the status quo. Sure, its black-on-black interior might look outfitted for a Metallica concert, and yes, the plastic steering wheel feels like it came from an arcade, but the large infotainment system, fancy-looking front HVAC vents, soft-touch door handles, and high-quality switchgear do yeoman's work to add real value to the cabin, ensuring it doesn't feel cheap. Although it doesn't have Apple CarPlay, we found the Google-based infotainment system is pretty easy to use. Logging into our Google accounts let us sync our Google Maps, and the Equinox had a 'halfway decent solution,' as Buyer's Guide director Zach Gale put it, for reading text messages in the form of a little display that pops up and reads your texts to you. The system, which is canted slightly toward the driver, was notably a bit difficult for passengers to operate, especially if they wanted to adjust the volume knob that's a reach even for the driver in the top-left portion of the center stack. In back, the rear door openings are on the slightly smaller side, but once you're inside you find plenty of space for adults, bottle holders in the doors, and rear HVAC vents—but little else in the way of creature comforts (to be fair, what more do you need at $34,000?). The cargo space is notably smaller than the Ford's, though it makes up for it with a higher roofline and a large underfloor cargo space. Notably the Chevy doesn't have a front trunk like the Ford. The Mustang Mach-E's aggressive-looking roofline and raked rear glass might lead you to think it's small inside, but Ford did a great job at making its EV space efficient, with more overall cargo room than the Chevy and a back seat that's friendly to taller adults. While the Ford's rear door openings seem wider than the Chevy's, the push-button electronic door handles are needlessly annoying. Interior space dimensions can be found in the chart below, but both SUVs feel equally roomy. As you expect given the price gap between the Ford and Chevy, there's a larger emphasis on both interior style and creature comforts in the Mustang Mach-E. The Ford's interior is finished in a lovely mix of materials, with cloth, textured carbon-esque plastics, faux leather, red stitching, and metallic trim. The redesigned-for-2025 center console features more storage options than the Equinox (something we didn't realize we were missing until we got into the Ford), with cubbies and slots for all of life's necessities and wireless phone charging that isn't available on the Chevy unless you step up to the LT2 trim. We generally like Ford's infotainment system and its snappy responses, intuitive layout, and real Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, though some MT editors said they couldn't get used to the way the Mach-E's large central knob also controls HVAC or heated-seat functions if you tap a button to engage those features first. Which Electric SUV Is the Better Value? The Ford is more fun to drive, has a nicer interior, and charges slightly quicker, but it can't go as far on a charge as the Chevy and costs $23,675 more as equipped (or about $430 more per month over a 60-month loan). The Equinox EV, meanwhile, has a comfortable ride, spacious cabin, and doesn't leave you wanting for much beyond Apple CarPlay, smoother power delivery, and quicker charging from more DC fast chargers. But is it worth spending extra if you can afford it on a more expensive electric SUV like the 2025 Mustang Mach-E Premium eAWD extended range? Yes, in our view. Speaking as consumers, we prefer the Ford's more space-efficient interior layout, better infotainment experience, BlueCruise system, and the fact we can pull up to any DC fast-charging tower and consistently get the same charge speed (even though it's slower than many of the Mach-E's and Equinox's competitors). As enthusiasts, we also find the Mustang's extra power, rearward power bias, and better handling to be worth the price difference. We really like the Chevy Equinox EV LT and won't hesitate to recommend it to price-sensitive buyers because it offers exceptional bang for your buck. But for those who can afford to spend a bit more, it's worth doing so. 2nd Place: 2025 Chevrolet Equinox EV LT Pros So affordable Easy to drive Great one-pedal brake mode Cons Lots of torque steer Fast-charging speeds need improvement Lacks phone mirroring Verdict: An absolute bargain that price-conscious shippers shouldn't skip—it really is that good. 1st Place: 2025 Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium eAWD Extended Range Pros Sporty to drive Lovely interior More consistent charging performance Cons Fast-charging speeds could also use improvement Noisier than the Chevy Not as efficient, either Verdict: The Mustang Mach-E is more expensive than the Equinox EV, but you certainly get more for your money.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
BMBL vs. META: Which Social Connection Stock Offers Better Upside?
In the evolving landscape of social connectivity platforms, Bumble BMBL and Meta Platforms META stand as two distinctive players addressing the fundamental human need for connection. Bumble, the dating and social networking platform founded in 2014, operates through its flagship app alongside Badoo and Bumble For Friends, serving approximately four million paying users globally. Meta Platforms, the social media giant formerly known as Facebook, commands an impressive 3.48 billion daily active users across its family of apps, including Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Messenger, and the rapidly growing Threads operating in different segments of the social connection ecosystem, both companies face a critical juncture in 2025. Bumble is undergoing a comprehensive strategic reset under returning founder-CEO Whitney Wolfe Herd, implementing a 30% workforce reduction and pivoting toward AI-driven quality improvements. Meanwhile, Meta Platforms is aggressively investing in artificial intelligence and its next-generation Llama 4 models, with capital expenditures expected to reach $66-$72 billion in 2025. The timing makes this comparison particularly relevant as investors evaluate which social connection stock offers superior growth delve deep and closely compare the fundamentals of the two stocks to determine which one is a better investment now. The Case for BMBL Bumble's investment thesis centers on its ongoing transformation and potential for operational improvement. The company recently appointed Kevin Cook as CFO in August 2025, bringing more than 30 years of financial management experience from companies like Cloudera and Barracuda Networks. This leadership change, combined with founder Whitney Wolfe Herd's return as CEO, signals a renewed focus on strategic execution. The company has identified $40 million in annual cost savings through restructuring efforts, removing $100 million from its cost base while streamlining operations. Despite facing headwinds with second-quarter revenues declining 8% year over year to $248 million, Bumble maintained adjusted EBITDA margins of 38%, demonstrating resilient profitability during its company's strategic pivot from quantity to quality represents both opportunity and challenge. Bumble is rebuilding its technology stack with AI-first principles, integrating trust and safety features, including phone and ID verification systems. Management has categorized users into three segments — Approve, Improve, and Remove — focusing on enhancing experiences for high-quality members. Full-price payers increased quarter over quarter, now representing 80% of total payers compared to 70% in the first quarter. The company plans significant product launches in August 2025 and February 2026, emphasizing innovative features that could differentiate it in the competitive dating app landscape. However, Bumble faces considerable challenges, including declining paying users, with third-quarter 2025 guidance projecting revenues between $240 million and $248 million, representing a 9-12% year-over-year decrease. Competition from Match Group's portfolio remains intense, and the company must prove that its turnaround strategy can reignite sustainable growth. Bumble Inc. Price and Consensus Bumble Inc. price-consensus-chart | Bumble Inc. Quote The Case for META Meta Platforms presents a compelling growth story powered by robust advertising revenues and transformative AI investments. The company delivered exceptional second-quarter results with revenues of $47.52 billion, up 22% year over year, dramatically exceeding analyst expectations of $44.80 billion. Earnings per share reached $7.14 while net income surged 36% to $18.34 billion. This performance strength extends into the third quarter of 2025, with guidance projecting revenues between $47.5 billion and $50.5 billion, representing 17-24% growth. Meta Platforms' advertising business, generating 98% of total revenues, continues demonstrating remarkable resilience with ad revenues reaching $46.6 billion, benefiting from AI-driven improvements that increased ad conversions by 5% on Instagram and 3% on Platforms' strategic positioning in AI represents a significant competitive advantage, backed by substantial investment, with 2025 capital expenditures expected between $66 billion and $72 billion. The company established Meta Superintelligence Labs and is advancing its Llama 4 model series, with Scout and Maverick variants already released and the powerful Behemoth model still in training. Meta AI is on track to become the world's most used AI assistant, already reaching nearly 600 million monthly active users. The Threads platform continues gaining momentum with 350 million monthly active users. Additionally, Meta's Ray-Ban smart glasses are gaining traction, contributing to Reality Labs' $370 million in second-quarter revenues. While Reality Labs posted a $4.53 billion operating loss, the company's core business strength easily absorbs these strategic investments while maintaining impressive 43% operating margins. Meta Platforms, Inc. Price and Consensus Meta Platforms, Inc. price-consensus-chart | Meta Platforms, Inc. Quote Valuation and Price Performance Comparison The valuation divergence between these stocks reflects their different growth trajectories. Bumble trades at a significant discount of 21.75 P/E ratio. Despite the discounted valuation, investor sentiment remains cautious with a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) rating. Meta Platforms commands a premium valuation justified by superior growth metrics. The stock trades at approximately 25.98 P/E. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. BMBL vs. META: P/E F12M Ratio Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Year to date, META shares have gained approximately 25.6%, significantly outperforming broader indices. The company's quarterly dividend of 52 cents per share and $50 billion buyback authorization further enhance shareholder returns. Bumble shares have declined 22.6% in the same time frame. BMBL Underperforms META YTD Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Conclusion While Bumble trades at an attractive discount and shows potential for operational improvement under new leadership, Meta Platforms holds superior upside potential. Meta Platforms' dominant market position, exceptional 22% revenue growth, and leadership in AI development through Llama 4 models create multiple growth catalysts. The company's advertising business remains remarkably resilient, generating strong cash flows, funding aggressive AI investments while maintaining 43% operating margins. META's diversified platform ecosystem provides multiple expansion avenues. Despite premium valuation, META's proven execution, technological advantages, and financial strength position it for sustained outperformance. Investors should actively track META stock for attractive entry points while adopting a wait-and-see approach with Bumble until clearer evidence emerges of successful turnaround execution. Meta Platforms stock carries a Zacks Rank #3 at present. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Bumble Inc. (BMBL) : Free Stock Analysis Report Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Amid deep cuts, USDA spent thousands on 31-foot Trump banners
At a time when the U.S. Department of Agriculture was slashing aid to schools and food banks in the name of fiscal responsibility, newly confirmed Secretary Brooke Rollins elected to spend thousands of dollars to purchase massive banners of President Donald Trump, one of which now hangs outside her department's headquarters in Washington, DC, according to documents obtained by Salon. In May, visitors to the nation's capital noticed two, 31-foot additions to the USDA's building on Independence Avenue, ostensibly intended to mark its 163rd anniversary: a banner featuring President Abraham Lincoln, who signed the bill creating the department, and another featuring Trump, both featuring the tagline: 'Growing America Since 1862.' Rollins, who cofounded the America First Policy Institute with Education Secretary Linda McMahon, was confirmed as Agriculture secretary in a 72-28 vote this past February. In a post on X, she noted the installation of the banners, which was captured by a USDA staff photographer: '163 years after Lincoln founded @USDA, President Trump's bold vision is ushering in a Golden Age for our farmers.' The banners were printed and installed by a Maryland-based contractor, Timsco Graphics, at a cost of $16,400, per a work order that Salon received in response to a Freedom of Information Act request. While only two banners are presently hanging outside the USDA building, the order, signed by USDA procurement officer Holly Votruba, describes the contracted work as being for the hanging of '3 large banners on the Whitten Building in conjunction with the Secretary's priority.'In a previously issued statement, a department spokesperson said the banners were intended to mark historical occasions. 'USDA has much to remember in the coming months,' the spokesperson told the fact-checking website Snopes, citing the 163rd anniversary of the department's founding, Flag Day — which coincided with Trump's birthday and military parade — and July 4th. 'USDA is the only federal agency located on the National Mall. The banners on the building's facade observe these moments in American history and acknowledge the vision and leadership of USDA's founder, Abraham Lincoln, and the best advocate of America's farmers and ranchers, President Trump.' (Keith Prichard/LinkedIn) A LinkedIn post from Timsco Graphics CEO Keith Prichard shows a banner featuring President Donald Trump and USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins. Only two of the three banners purchased by USDA are publicly displayed, however. A third banner also featured Trump — and just behind his left shoulder, Rollins herself. That banner appears to have been the one originally slated to go up alongside Lincoln, per a May 13 LinkedIn post from Timsco Graphics CEO Keith Prichard. 'Timsco Graphics crew working late tonight getting it done! Second banner going up soon!' Prichard wrote. His post was accompanied by three photos: one of the Lincoln banner, already hanging; a broader shot of the Whitten Building, with the annotation 'one more' and an outline of where the second banner would be placed; and a third showing the Lincoln banner and the Trump-Rollins banner beside each other on the floor of a warehouse. It is not clear why that banner was not installed, nor where it is today. USDA did not respond to requests for comment. The post Amid deep cuts, USDA spent thousands on 31-foot Trump banners appeared first on
