logo
US Economy Faces Tariff Turmoil: Growth Slows, Prices Soar!

US Economy Faces Tariff Turmoil: Growth Slows, Prices Soar!

The global economy is teetering on the edge, and the US is at the heart of the storm.
According to a recent OECD Economic Outlook , President Donald Trump's aggressive tariff policies are set to choke US economic growth to a mere 1.6% in 2025, down from 2.8% last year, while pushing inflation towards 3.9% by year-end.
These sweeping import duties, now at a staggering 15.4%, the highest since 1938, are rippling across global markets, hitting consumers and businesses hard. From retail giants to small manufacturers, the fallout is reshaping strategies and squeezing wallets.
But what does this mean for the average shopper, and how can businesses navigate this turbulent landscape? Brace for Higher Prices Now
The OECD report paints a grim picture: tariffs are driving up costs for US importers, who pass these onto consumers.
Retailers like Walmart face a tough choice, absorb the hit or raise prices. A Reuters analysis notes that US households will bear the brunt, with inflation projected to climb from 2.5% in 2024 to 2.8% in 2025, potentially nearing 4% by December.
Small retailers, unable to shoulder the costs, are already warning of price hikes between 14% and 35%.
On X posts, sentiment echoes this concern, with users lamenting rising costs for everyday goods like clothing and electronics.
For consumers, this means tighter budgets and fewer choices, unless businesses get creative. Adapt Supply Chains Fast
The tariff squeeze is forcing companies to rethink their supply chains. The OECD highlights how higher import costs and policy uncertainty are dampening corporate investment and consumer confidence.
Some firms are exploring domestic manufacturing to bypass tariffs, but this shift isn't cheap, retooling factories could cost billions.
Others are diversifying suppliers, looking to countries like Vietnam or India to sidestep the worst of the levies.
However, the same Reuters report warns that prolonged trade barriers could disrupt global supply chains further, potentially costing the US economy more than the tariff revenue gained.
Businesses that act swiftly to localise or diversify stand a better chance of keeping costs down and staying competitive. Seize Opportunities Amid Chaos
While tariffs spell trouble, they also open doors for savvy players. The OECD suggests that technology, particularly AI, could boost US productivity, offering a silver lining.
Companies investing in automation or robotics might offset tariff-driven costs and gain a market share edge. For instance, firms that streamline operations or negotiate better supplier terms could keep prices stable, winning over cost-conscious shoppers.
The challenge is balancing short-term pain with long-term gains, something not all businesses can afford.
As X posts reflect, some consumers are already praising brands that hold prices steady, hinting at loyalty rewards for those who adapt effectively. Navigate Tariffs or Sink Trying
The OECD's warning is clear: US tariffs are a double-edged sword, slashing growth while fuelling inflation. With global GDP growth trimmed to 2.9% for 2025, the stakes are high for businesses and consumers alike.
The path forward demands ingenuity, whether through smarter supply chains, tech investments, or price-stabilising strategies.
As the US navigates this economic minefield on 04 June 2025, one thing is certain: those who adapt will thrive, while those who don't risk being left behind.
The global economy is watching, and the US must choose its next steps wisely, or pay a steeper price than any tariff could impose.
Originally published on IBTimes UK

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Germany faces two more years of recession if US trade war escalates: central bank
Germany faces two more years of recession if US trade war escalates: central bank

Local Germany

time14 hours ago

  • Local Germany

Germany faces two more years of recession if US trade war escalates: central bank

If US President Donald Trump's tariffs were implemented in full from July and the EU retaliated, then German output would decline 0.5 percent this year and 0.2 percent in 2026, the Bundesbank forecast. This would be due to a "marked decline in exports and significant uncertainty weighing on investment", it said. There would be a return to growth in 2027, with a rebound of one percent, it said. The eurozone's traditional growth engine has already contracted for the past two years due to a manufacturing slump and surging energy prices after Russia invaded Ukraine, but hopes had been high for a modest recovery from this year. When Trump unveiled his "Liberation Day" tariffs in early April, he threatened to hit the European Union with a 20-percent levy over its hefty surplus in goods traded with the United States. He then paused those higher rates until July to allow for talks to try to reach a deal. More recently he said he would slap the EU with a 50-percent tariff rate as negotiations stalled -- but has also delayed that measure. The bloc still faces a "baseline" 10-percent tariff rate on all its exports to the United States, as well as higher levies on some specific sectors. Advertisement Risk to German exports Trump's tariff blitz stands to hit export power Germany hard, as the United States was Germany's top trading partner in 2024, receiving huge quantities of its cars, pharmaceuticals and machinery. Germany's federal employment agency predicted that, in the event that 25-percent tariffs were imposed, it would cost the country about 90,000 jobs in a year, the Sueddeutsche Zeitung daily reported. "The erratic trade policy of the United States is putting pressure on the German labour market," agency chief Andrea Nahles told the newspaper. "The problem is this lack of predictability, which is causing us massive damage. It is preventing companies from investing, hiring and training people." Advertisement As well as a worst-case scenario, the Bundesbank also released "baseline" growth projections. This envisages US trade policy having a more moderate impact on Germany as new Chancellor Friedrich Merz's planned spending surge on infrastructure and defence helps support the economy. Under these forecasts, the economy would stagnate this year before expanding 0.7 percent in 2026 and then 1.2 percent in 2027. The German government and many economic institutes have already slashed their growth forecasts for this year to zero, citing the uncertainty triggered by Trump's trade war.

NATO likely to hike defense spending despite economic woes – DW – 06/05/2025
NATO likely to hike defense spending despite economic woes – DW – 06/05/2025

DW

timea day ago

  • DW

NATO likely to hike defense spending despite economic woes – DW – 06/05/2025

The military alliance looks set to satisfy US President Donald Trump's demands to commit to a massive increase in defense spending. Some creative counting proposed by NATO head Mark Rutte could soften the financial blow. A NATO defense ministers' meeting in Brussels on Thursday showed "broad support" for signing off a historic hike in defense spending at a crunch summit later this month. This was their response to the growing threat from Russia and a "more dangerous world" in general, the military alliance's Secretary General Mark Rutte told reporters. "I will propose an overall investment plan that would total 5% of gross domestic product in defense investment," Rutte announced, following months of pressure from US President Donald Trump for allies to more than double the present target. Current NATO guidelines encourage states to spend 2% of their economic output on their militaries. But not all of the alliance's members meet this target, raising questions of how they will reach an even higher spending goal. Splitting the bill In response, NATO chief Rutte has specified a division of the new spending goal that could allow Trump to claim a headline figure, while giving the other 31 nations room to maneuver their national budgets. Thus, of the 5%, 3.5% of national GDP could be allotted to "core defence spending", while the remaining 1.5% could be diverted to "defense- and security-related investment like infrastructure and industry," he said. Allied defense ministers gathered at the NATO headquarters in Brussels Image: Dursun Aydemir/Anadolu/picture alliance Trump has long criticized NATO allies for relying on the US' large military might as a strategy to defend the European continent. In 2023, more than two thirds of the 32 NATO countries' collective $1.3 trillion (€1.14 trillion) military spending came from Washington, according to data compiled by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). On Thursday, US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth drove home the message to the rest of the alliance once again. "Every shoulder has to be to the plough. Every country has to contribute at that level of 5% as a recognition of the nature of threat," he said. Leaders of the world's most powerful defense alliance are set to gather in three weeks in the Dutch city The Hague. Topping the agenda will be discussions on the ongoing war in Ukraine, and Russia's resulting massive rearmament drive. It seems likely that NATO members will officially commit to the 5% goal at these upcoming talks. Giving in to pressure Under US pressure, and with Europeans alarmed by Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, NATO military spending has already burgeoned in recent years. Most countries now meet the 2% threshold, which was agreed upon 11 years ago. But around one third of the alliance still doesn't, including Portugal, Italy, Canada, Belgium, and Spain. Most NATO states had indicated willingness to spend more, but the 5% goal was considered far-fetched when Trump floated the idea earlier this year. Almost half a year on, the message seems to be resonating with many in the alliance. Earlier this week, 14 NATO states, including the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and the five Nordic states, published a joint statement in which they said they were "moving towards reaching at least 5% of GDP on defense and defense-related investments." Specter of war: Are Europeans really ready to rearm? To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Last month, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadepuhl also indicated Germany could get on board with the goal. Several NATO countries, including Poland, Estonia and Lithuania, have already committed to spending 5% or more in the future. All are former Soviet states, and two of them share a border with Russia. Since taking office in January, the "America-first" president has strained the NATO alliance with threats not to help defend alliance members that didn't meet spending targets should they be attacked. His designs on the semi-autonomous Danish territory Greenland have also alienated allies, as have his attempts at bilateral talks to find an end to Russia's war in Ukraine, which sidelined European partners and left Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy largely marginalized. Questions remain There are still many open questions to be answered, one of them being the timeline. On Thursday, Estonian Defense Minister Hanno Pevkur spoke of committing to reaching 5% within five years. "We don't have time for ten years, we don't even have time for seven years, to be honest," he said. But the official focus at this week's meeting was on working out what exact capabilities NATO would need and may currently be missing to defend itself if a member of the alliance were attacked. After the talks, Rutte spoke of the need to upgrade air defense systems and long-range missiles, among other things. German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said Germany might need as many as 50,000 – 60,000 more troops in its standing forces to meet defense needs in the coming years. Increased spending amid economic downturn While consensus appears to be forming, it is also clear that increasing military spending to 5% of GDP would be an enormous strain on public finances, particularly as Europe's two major economies, Germany and France, face tough times. Paris and Berlin are touting increased defense spending as a chance to fuel economic growth in Europe, but there is a risk of public backlash. In April in Rome, the opposition Five Star Movement led a protest against an EU drive to rearm the bloc — a move supported by the government of far-right Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni — reportedly drawing tens of thousands of people. According to Cullen Hendrix, an expert from the Peterson Institute for International Economics, a US think tank, a 5% spending target would essentially put NATO countries on "war footing." US secretary of State Pete Hegseth was in Brussels for the last NATO gathering before next month's summit Image: Bob Reijnders/Middle East Images/AFP/Getty Images "In 2023, just nine countries spent 5% of GDP or more on defense: Algeria, Armenia, Israel, Lebanon, Oman, Russia, Saudi Arabia, and South Sudan," Hendrix wrote in February. "Most are, or were, at war. Five of these are authoritarian petro-states, unencumbered by competitive elections or the need to tax their populaces to fund this military largesse." There is also a risk that increased spending will make Europe less safe, Hendrix warned. "Increasing military spending to this extent would likely catalyze an arms race with those near-peer competitors." On Thursday in Brussels, Rutte argued there was little choice but to spend significantly more on defense, pointing to recent comments by the German Chief of Defense Carsten Breuer, who posited that Russia would be ready to mount an attack on NATO states by 2029. "We live in a more dangerous world," Rutte said. "We are safe today, but if we don't do this, we are not safe in the foreseeable future." Edited by: Maren Sass

Japan's ispace fails second lunar landing mission – DW – 06/06/2025
Japan's ispace fails second lunar landing mission – DW – 06/06/2025

DW

time2 days ago

  • DW

Japan's ispace fails second lunar landing mission – DW – 06/06/2025

Japanese startup failed to land its unmanned Resilience craft on the moon. The mission was aborted as it was likely the craft had crashed after losing contact. Japan'sprivate moon mission was aborted on Friday after it was presumed that the unmanned Resilience spacecraft had crashed. Tokyo-based startup ispace had launched the mission in hopes of becoming the first private company outside the United States to achieve a controlled lunar landing. Lunar lander crashed into moon The Resilience spacecraft had begun its final descent, successfully firing its main engine "as planned to begin deceleration," ispace said. Mission control reported that the craft's position was "nearly vertical," but contact was then lost. ispace stated that the spacecraft had likely failed to decelerate sufficiently to reach the speed required for a soft lunar landing. "Based on the currently available data... it is currently assumed that the lander likely performed a hard landing. It is unlikely that communication with the lander will be restored, so it has been decided to conclude the mission," ispace said in a statement. Before signing off, the livestream announcers said, "never quit the lunar quest." A new time: Clocks on the moon To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Less than two minutes before the scheduled landing, the once-celebratory gathering of 500 ispace employees, shareholders, sponsors, and government officials fell into stunned silence as contact with the spacecraft was lost. ispace had also organized a public viewing event. Image: Manami Yamada/REUTERS "Expectations for ispace will not waver," Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba posted on X. Second failed attempt Two years ago, another lunar missionby the company had also ended in a crash. CEO Takeshi Hakamada told reporters he took the second failed attempt "seriously" and intended to use the outcome to inform future missions. He said they had a "strong will to move on, although we have to carefully analyze what happened." Resilience carried a four-wheeled rover built by ispace's Luxembourg subsidiary, along with five external payloads valued at a total of $16 million. The planned landing site was Mare Frigoris, a plain about 900 km (560 miles) from the moon's north pole. Lunar landings remain challenging due to the moon's rugged terrain. To date, only five nations have successfully achieved soft lunar landings: Russia, US, China, India and Japan. Private companies have recently entered the race to the moon, and ispace would have been the third such company to achieve it. The mission wanted to collect two lunar soil samples and sell them to NASA for $5,000 (€4373). In January, Resilience shared a SpaceX rocket launch with Firefly's Blue Ghost lander, which touched down successfully in March. A moon landing attempt by US-based company Intuitive Machines failed in March this year. IDEFIX rover and JAXA's mission to the moons of Mars To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Edited by: Louis Oelofse

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store