Rayner: Time spent online and immigration having ‘profound impact' on society
The Deputy Prime Minister told Cabinet colleagues that immigration and increasing time spent online are having a 'profound impact on society'.
She also cited economic insecurity, the rapid pace of deindustrialisation and declining trust in institutions as she gave an update on her work on social cohesion and a coming plan for neighbourhoods.
Sir Keir Starmer recalled the 'horrific attacks' in Southport and said the country will never forget the 'unimaginable tragedy' as he closed his last Cabinet meeting before the summer recess.
'(Ms Rayner) said it was incumbent on the Government to acknowledge the real concerns people have and to deliver improvements to people's lives and their communities,' the Prime Minister's official spokesman said.
Disorder erupted across the country last July and August, sparked by misinformation spreading on social media in the wake of the Southport stabbings.
The Deputy Prime Minister said that 17 of the 18 places that saw the worst disorder rank at the top of the most deprived and that 'while Britain was a successful multi-ethnic, multi-faith country, the Government had to show it had a plan to address people's concerns and provide opportunities for everyone to flourish'.
Asked whether Ms Rayner sees a link between immigration and the violence seen during the disorder, No 10 said: 'I think she sees a link between concerns that people have about where the Government is acting on their behalf and acting in their interests, and a range of factors.
'High levels of immigration over the last 10 years, including illegal immigration, but also, importantly, the cost of living, economic security, the rapid pace of technological change and deindustrialisation and changes in the economy, these are all factors that have had an impact on our social fabric and social cohesion.'
There is no specific timetable in place for the plan for neighbourhoods, which will hand out £1.5 billion to invest in 75 areas over the next decade.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Rape victim commended for 'extraordinary courage' in convicting attacker
A rape victim has been commended for her "extraordinary courage" in securing the conviction of her attacker. Andrew Grinham, 48, of Felixstowe, was sentenced to 13 years in prison, with a five-year extended licence period, after being found guilty of two counts of rape and three counts of assault causing actual bodily harm. He was convicted following an eight-day trial at Ipswich Crown Court on May 29 and sentenced on July 22. Detective Constable Jennifer Botting, the officer in charge of the case, said: "Grinham carried out horrific abuse to his victim, causing long-lasting effects that have impacted her life and those around her. Andrew Grinham has been locked up (Image: Suffolk police) "I want to commend her for the extraordinary courage she has shown in coming forward and seeing this case through to the end. "We hope today's outcome brings some measure of justice and reassurance – not only to the victim in this case, but to others who may be suffering in silence." The offences took place over several years. Grinham was also given a three-year concurrent sentence for the assault offences. He is now subject to an indefinite sexual harm prevention order and an indefinite restraining order, and has been placed on the sex offenders register for life. DC Botting also thanked her colleague, Detective Constable James Lait. She said: "I would also like to thank DC James Lait, who was the initial officer in charge of the case before I took on the investigation. "His team progressed enquiries over a prolonged period to ensure we were able to reach the right outcome for the victim. "Suffolk Constabulary remains committed to supporting survivors and bringing perpetrators to justice, no matter how long it takes." Victims of rape or sexual assault can contact the Suffolk Independent Sexual Advisory Service at 0330 223 0099 or The Ferns Centre for support.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Controversy over how to use frozen Russian assets to help Ukraine
The £38m superyacht Phi should be earning her owner about £563,000 a week, hosting ultra-rich holidaymakers on trips around the sparkling Mediterranean. Instead, she is stuck at a dingy mooring in Canary Wharf, shrouded in scaffolding, her smart blue paintwork peeling and her electrics failing. And that is where, for the foreseeable future, she will stay, after the Supreme Court last week dismissed an appeal against the vessel's continued detention. More than three years after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the judgment raised a question: what is the future of Russian assets frozen by the British state? In March 2022, Phi was in the UK having the finishing touches put to her plush interiors, which include an 'infinite' wine cellar, fluted leather wall panelling, an outdoor cinema and a freshwater swimming pool. Then Russia invaded Ukraine and the British government launched an aggressive round of sanctions against the Russian state and individuals connected to it. Since then, it has frozen £25bn of Russian-owned assets – including Phi. According to the judgment there is no evidence that her owner, Russian businessman Sergei Naumenko, has any connection to Vladimir Putin. He has not been sanctioned and internet searches reveal almost nothing about his life and business interests. The value of the Phi is dwarfed by that of other frozen Russian sovereign assets: held in Belgium, they are worth about £160bn. Nevertheless, former transport secretary Grant Shapps said detaining the yacht had 'turned an icon of Russia's power and wealth into a clear and stark warning to Putin and his cronies'. The Supreme Court's judgment, which also covered a case brought by the oil tycoon Eugene Shvidler, offered a more solid rationale: 'The very considerable income that Mr Naumenko claims that he could earn by chartering out the Phi to other wealthy people is likely to make its way to Russia,' it said. 'In this way it would be used to contribute to the Russian economy' – thus funding the Kremlin's war with Ukraine. Tom Keatinge, director of the Centre for Finance and Security at the Royal United Services Industry think tank, says this is typical of the government's approach to sanctions. In 2022, the focus was on taking headline-grabbing 'trophy' assets from big-name oligarchs. Now, this 'has shifted to a focus on how to seize for the benefit of Ukraine'. To an extent, this is working. The frozen funds have accrued interest, so even if the government can't use the assets directly, it can at least spend the interest they earn to benefit Ukraine. In June, the UK used £70m of interest payments received on frozen Russian funds to supply Ukraine with 350 missiles. UK government ministers have also stated an aim to direct the £2.5bn proceeds from Roman Abramovich's sale of Chelsea Football Club n 2022 to Ukraine. A government payment of £2.26bn into the Extraordinary Revenue Acceleration scheme, an international loan scheme designed to help Ukraine fund its war, will be repaid using profits from sanctioned Russian assets. However, physical assets, such as buildings and superyachts, are harder to manage. Phi is 'a mess', says Guy Booth, the vessel's captain. 'The paint on her hull is peeling off because it's been constantly rubbing on the fenders in exactly the same place for three years. The technical spaces are a mess, and 40% of our onboard machinery is inoperable.' Although the government's Office for Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) has issued a special licence to allow maintenance of Phi, Booth says insurers won't provide cover, so he cannot take engineers on board. The Department for Transport has engaged with the insurance industry over the matter. So far, the government's options regarding tangible assets, such as Abramovich's £150m, 15-bedroom mansion on Kensington Palace Gardens, have been limited. Selling them off would be regarded as expropriation, which the government is eager not to be accused of, in order not to frighten off other international investors. Another option might be to ask oligarchs to voluntarily give up their assets. In June 2023, the government offered a route for sanctioned individuals who say they support Ukraine to 'donate their frozen funds for Ukrainian reconstruction'. However there was no offer of sanctions relief in return for such a donation. In his Mansion House speech in June, the foreign secretary, David Lammy, announced that London would host a Countering Illicit Finance Summit, which will bring countries together to work on an international solution. 'I think there could be potential in creating new laws to look at taking that from freezing to seizing, but it would need very careful balancing with property rights,' says Ben Cowdock, senior investigations lead at the Transparency International charity. 'At the moment, every country is doing something a little bit different.' In the meantime, Phi waits for the courts to decide her fate. Naumenko intends to take his case to the European Court of Human Rights, says Booth, although there is concern that she might not last if the wheels of justice turn slowly. To restore her to her former glory – with a new coat of paint, plus the electrical work and carpentry that should have been addressed during regular maintenance stops – would cost up to £8m, says Booth. There have, he adds, been a series of small fires on board, which present a risk to the residents and businesses around her mooring. Each time, 'we assemble on the quay and then we assess whether we're going to enter the ship and combat the fire, as we would if we were at sea, or whether it's better just to let it burn, and let the City of London firefighters deal with it'. A Department for Transport spokesperson welcomed Tuesday's ruling, saying: 'This decision reinforces the UK government's determination to disrupt Russia's economic war machine and return peace to Ukraine.' Photograph by Sophia Evans/The Observer
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Four illegal workers found at restaurant near Darlington in immigration probe
A restaurant near Darlington could be stripped of its license after four illegal workers were found by immigration officers. The Oak Tree, in Middleton-St-George, was slapped with a £90,000 fine earlier this year for employing two people who did not have the right to work. It followed an immigration visit on December 18 where a total of four illegal workers were identified, one of whom 'tried to run from the kitchen' when officers arrived. Three of the four did not hold the right to work, while the other was working in breach of conditions. The Home Office has now applied to strip the Yarm Road restaurant of its license. The venue, which was taken over by owner Ersim Aydi in June 2024, has still not paid the fine, and bailiffs have now been sent in. Ms Aydin, who is now due to leave her role, apologised to anyone who she had caused distress, saying it was 'never my intention' and that she 'really, really tried'. She claimed that two workers have since started the process with the Home Office and are not illegally working, although this has not been confirmed. Operator Punch Pubs said it takes matters like this 'extremely seriously' and is seeking advice 'to ensure the appropriate action is taken'. Illegal working and minimum wage concerns The probe found two of the workers were found to have entered the UK illegally via small boats. Worker A, who tried to run into the garden when officers arrived, had been working in the kitchen for roughly two weeks, seven hours each day for six days a week. He was paid £300 in cash per week, which raised concerns as this would equate to £7.14 per hour, more than £4 less than the national minimum wage (£11.44 at the time). The premises licence review report said low wages appeared to be supplemented by free food and accommodation. The Oak Tree Ms Aydin told officers she was 'aware that he was not allowed to work in the UK' and Worker A said right to work checks had not been conducted. Worker B, who was found making bread in the kitchen, 'attempted to walk away" when officers arrived and "consistently denied working'. He claimed he arrived at the restaurant the day before to see a friend and have tea - but the manager said he was on a work trial with a view to hiring him. He was found working in breach of his work restrictions, as his claim for protection was refused. An appeal is ongoing. Worker C, who was seen answering the phone and serving a table, confirmed she had been working there for around three weeks. She claimed she did not have scheduled shifts, and is asked to work during busy periods. She said she was not paid and gets free food and accommodation. She said her employer helped her with 'the papers' and that she was aware of her not holding the right to work. Worker C was allowed entry to the UK in September 2024 as a visitor and has never held the right to work in the UK. Worker D, who was seen leaving one of the rooms above the restaurant, claimed he first came ten days ago for an interview. He said he is a chef and a baker but does not work there, claiming he left his passport in London. Officers found it in his bedroom, alongside a fake passport. His last valid leave expired in March 2023, and there were no outstanding applications at the time, meaning he had no right to work. Ms Aydin, who employs the staff, told officers: 'I don't normally ask for ID, I do ask if they're ok to work and nine out of ten I go with what they say.' This was branded 'problematic'. Although one of the workers claimed he did not work there, he was considered a worker at the site as he had an interview ten days before. 'We take matters like this extremely seriously' In response, Ms Aydin said: 'To Darlington Council, the brewery, the community: I am so sorry if I've ever caused distress. That was never my intention. I tried to belong. 'I took over a pub not to take anything away but to build something for everyone. If I failed, then I carry that failure with pain. Because I tried. I really, really tried. 'I gave all of myself to the pub and the people in it. I never treated anyone like an employee or a customer - I treated them like family. Like human beings. 'I gave everything I could, whether it was time, support, a meal, a kind word. I just wanted people to feel like they mattered. 'To everyone who supported me, I thank you from the bottom of my heart.' A Punch Pubs & Co spokesperson: 'The Oak Tree Inn forms a part of our Leased and Tenanted estate. It is operated under the terms of a tenancy agreement, meaning the Publican runs their own pub business with complete autonomy. Read more: Post Office confirms branch closing date - as bosses explore takeover interest Darlington hair salon forced to pay another former staff member thousands 'Milestone of justice' for Jack Woodley's mum as teen's killers unmasked They are responsible for the day-to-day operation, including upholding the licensing objectives. That said, we take matters like this extremely seriously. 'We have been made aware of the application for a premises license review and are currently seeking advice to ensure the appropriate action is taken. 'The Oak Tree pub is an important part of the Punch estate, and we will do everything we can to protect its long-term future.'
