logo
Who are the witnesses in Sean "Diddy" Combs' trial? What to know about Cassie and other accusers expected to testify.

Who are the witnesses in Sean "Diddy" Combs' trial? What to know about Cassie and other accusers expected to testify.

CBS News13-05-2025
Sean "Diddy" Combs' sex trafficking and racketeering trial is underway with testimony in New York City.
The hip-hop mogul is accused of running a criminal enterprise since at least 2004 that manipulated women into participating in commercial sex acts with him, and sometimes male sex workers, during what prosecutors described as drug-fueled parties called "freak offs."
Combs has been jailed at the Metropolitan Detention Center Brooklyn since his arrest last September. He faces five counts from four different women, including singer and ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura.
The first week of trial is expected to include testimony from an FBI analyst who could break down the now-infamous 2016 video of Combs and Ventura in the hallway of a Los Angeles hotel, along with a male escort and Ventura, according to CBS News' Jericka Duncan.
Here's what to know about the charges and key names in the case.
Who is Cassie Ventura? Hotel video a key piece of evidence
Ventura, who performs under the name Cassie, rose to fame with the single "Me & U" on her self-titled debut album. The song landed the No. 1 spot on the Billboard Hot R&B/Hip-Hop chart in 2006.
She and Combs dated off-and-on from about 2007 to 2018.
Security video of Combs attacking Ventura in the hallway of a Los Angeles hotel in 2016 is expected to be a key piece of evidence in his trial. The video, obtained and published by CNN last year, shows Combs throw Ventura onto the floor before kicking and dragging her.
Prosecutors allege the hotel assault happened during a "freak off," but Combs' lawyers, who sought to have the video excluded from trial, argue it was a "glimpse into a complex but decade-long consensual relationship."
Ventura filed a federal lawsuit against Combs in 2023, accusing him of rape and physical abuse. The suit also said Combs paid the hotel $50,000 for the footage.
"After years in silence and darkness, I am finally ready to tell my story, and to speak up on behalf of myself and for the benefit of other women who face violence and abuse in their relationships," Ventura said in a statement to CBS News at the time. "With the expiration of New York's Adult Survivors Act fast approaching, it became clear that this was an opportunity to speak up about the trauma I have experienced and that I will be recovering from for the rest of my life."
Combs later apologized for the behavior seen on the video, but denied the allegations in the lawsuit. In a social media post that has since been removed, he said he was "f---ed up" and "hit rock bottom."
"I take full responsibility for my actions in that video," he said. "I was disgusted then when I did it. I'm disgusted now. I went and I sought out professional help. I got into going to therapy, going to rehab. I had to ask God for his mercy and grace. I'm so sorry. But I'm committed to be a better man each and every day. I'm not asking for forgiveness. I'm truly sorry."
One day after the suit was filed, a settlement was announced. While the details were not disclosed, Ventura said in a statement, "I have decided to resolve this matter amicably on terms that I have some level of control."
Who are Diddy's other accusers?
Since 2023, dozens of women and men have filed lawsuits against Combs alleging sexual and physical abuse.
Many of the accusers said they were drugged and then abused while incapacitated, and some claimed other celebrities were present or participated in the abuse.
However, the majority of those allegations are not part of the criminal case. Prosecutors have chosen to focus on allegations where there is physical evidence or witness corroboration.
The other three women involved in the trial have not been publicly named and they are expected to testify using pseudonyms. The indictment refers to them as Victim-1, Victim-2 and Victim-3.
Combs denied all of the allegations through his lawyers, who have said the women are "former long-term girlfriends, who were involved in consensual relationships."
Other high-profile names in the Sean Combs case
Prospective jurors were asked if they were familiar with a list of some 190 celebrities, including Michael B. Jordan, Kanye West and Mike Myers, though it wasn't clear how those people are related to the trial, if at all.
The judge overseeing the case is U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, a Columbia Law School graduate and former clerk for the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. President Joe Biden appointed Subramanian as a federal judge in 2022.
The prosecution team is made up of eight assistant U.S. attorneys, seven of them women. They include Maurene Ryan Comey, daughter of former FBI Director James Comey. She was one of the prosecutors in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, who was convicted of conspiring Jeffrey Epstein to recruit and sexually abuse teenage girls.
Combs' defense team is led by New York lawyer Marc Agnifilo, who along with his wife Karen Friedman Agnifilo is also defending Luigi Mangione in the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.
Also on the seven-person defense team is Atlanta attorney Brian Steel, who represented Young Thug in a trial that lasted nearly two years before the rapper pleaded guilty to gang, drug and gun charges.
Can you watch the Diddy trial live?
Per federal court rules, photos and videos from inside court are not allowed. Courtroom sketches, however, are permitted.
The highly anticipated trial is expected to last eight to 10 weeks. For the first week, court will be held from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. daily.
CBS News New York's Alice Gainer will be at the courthouse for the duration of trial and provide real-time updates.
contributed to this report.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump is turning the FBI away from investigating terrorism and corruption, sources say
Trump is turning the FBI away from investigating terrorism and corruption, sources say

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump is turning the FBI away from investigating terrorism and corruption, sources say

The FBI was once known for taking down gangsters like Bonnie and Clyde. But in recent years, its targets have been more like the Boston Marathon bombers. After the Sept. 11 attacks, then-Director Robert Mueller reorganized the bureau around national security and intelligence, with the top priority stopping another terrorist attack on American soil. Now the Trump administration is changing that, as Trump-appointed FBI Director Kash Patel is moving to reorder the agency's priorities with little input from Congress or the public. Patel, who often refers to FBI agents as 'cops' — a label they tend to shy away from — is taking steps to get the bureau more involved in investigating violent crime, even as he is carrying out a plan to dramatically slash the workforce. Current and former FBI officials tell MSNBC the changes are coming at the expense of the FBI's role protecting the U.S. from terrorists, hackers and spies — as well as its traditional missions of fighting white-collar fraud, public corruption and child sex crimes. If more agents are working on violent crime cases as their total number is being reduced, these officials say, there won't be the manpower left to devote the same level of resources to national security and other threats. Multiple current and former FBI officials say they have already seen that happening over the past several months, as agents have been diverted to immigration enforcement and veterans with years of experience have left the bureau.' 'This is putting the nation in jeopardy — they seem to be making national security threats secondary,' said Rob D'Amico, a retired FBI agent and MSNBC national security and law enforcement contributor. 'They are effectively making the FBI a national police force,' said one senior agent, who declined to be named for fear of retaliation. 'Who will address the missions the FBI has focused on for decades? There is no other entity that does them.' Last week, top FBI official Jodi Cohen informed the heads of more than 50 FBI field offices that Patel plans to equip FBI agents with Tasers; that all agents are expected to spend time investigating violent crime; and that the bureau will begin allowing other federal law enforcement agents to join the FBI after an abbreviated training, whether or not they have a college degree, one current and four former officials briefed on the call told MSNBC. In addition, the FBI plans to cut around 15% of its workforce — 5,800 people from a total of around 37,000, the FBI field office leaders were told, according to the sources. (The bureau employs around 13,700 special agents, according to the Department of Justice.) Coming at a time when FBI agents have been ordered to devote time to immigration enforcement, and when dozens have been required to patrol the streets of Washington, D.C., each night as part of the attempted federal takeover of that city's police force, news of the changes is sparking alarm among current and former senior bureau officials, the sources said. They say the national security threats facing the U.S. are more acute than ever, from Chinese espionage to lone-wolf terrorism to ransomware attacks that could take down critical infrastructure. They worry that fraud and corruption will bloom as the FBI cuts back on investigating it. The Justice Department also slashed its public integrity section and stopped pursuing certain kinds of corruption cases. Speaking on condition of anonymity because they fear retaliation, current and former FBI officials say that Patel and his deputy, Dan Bongino, don't understand the FBI's mission and are making decisions based on Trump's political agenda. 'You have the top two decision-makers, both with limited exposure to the law enforcement and legal system, solely making long-impacting decisions based on social and political rhetoric, conspiracy theories rooted in 'deep state' cleansing, and lack of understanding of the true implications of the decisions which they will soon walk away from and leave for others to clean up,' one former senior agent said. The FBI declined to comment. Patel has said the FBI remains committed to its national security mission, but he has made no secret of his desire to steer the bureau more intensively into combating violent crime. After spending years denouncing the FBI as a corrupt tool of a 'deep state' plot to frame Trump, Patel now says it's important 'to let good cops be cops.' He has overseen changes to the FBI website elevating 'crush violent crime' above other traditional priorities though on the same level as "defend the homeland." Violent street crime historically has been the purview of state and local police, while the FBI has focused first on national security threats such as espionage and terrorism, as well as civil rights, white collar crime, public corruption and organized crime. The bureau also specializes in battling child sexual exploitation and other specific crimes that demand its expertise, such as kidnapping, serial killers and bank robberies. An FBI webpage devoted to some of the bureau's most famous cases is a compendium of notable moments in American history — very few of them violent street crimes. From the 1955 murder of Emmett Till to the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill to mortgage fraud in the 2007 housing crisis, the FBI is often called upon to deal with complex cases of national import. For years after 9/11, Justice Department documents listed the FBI's top priorities in this order: terrorism, espionage, cyberattacks, public corruption, civil rights, transnational criminal organizations, white collar crime — and then violent crime. While Trump has portrayed crime as out of control in many parts of the country, the FBI's own data shows that violent crime rates nationally aresignificantly lower than they were two decades ago. A spike in violent crime during the Covid pandemic has abated, the data shows. While some FBI agents are former police officers, many more joined the bureau after earning degrees in law and accounting. A bachelor's degree has been required to become an FBI agent. In Washington, D.C., some FBI agents are frustrated over being ordered to go out at night on anticrime foot patrols, something they are not trained for, current and former officials said. FBI agents, for example, are armed with pistols but not equipped with less-lethal options, such as Tasers. The plan to change that that sources have described is sparking concern, because it suggests leadership believes more FBI agents should be policing the streets like beat cops. 'Morale is low and people are stressed,' one FBI official in Washington said in a text, adding that a senior colleague reported that 'people are coming into her office in tears talking about how they are really uncomfortable with these orders and their supervisors are at a loss to help them.' Subscribe to the Project 47 newsletter to receive weekly updates on and expert insight into the key issues and figures defining Trump's second term. This article was originally published on

HelloFresh to pay $7.5M in California subscription case—how to claim settlement
HelloFresh to pay $7.5M in California subscription case—how to claim settlement

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

HelloFresh to pay $7.5M in California subscription case—how to claim settlement

Meal kit delivery company HelloFresh has agreed to pay $7.5 million to settle allegations of what prosecutors called "deceptive subscription practices" in California. The settlement was announced Monday by district attorneys in both Los Angeles and Santa Clara counties, which jointly filed the lawsuit that led to the settlement. The plaintiff argues that HelloFresh's policies violated the state's Automatic Renewal Law by "deceptively enrolling consumers into auto-renewing subscription plans without proper disclosure or consent," according to a statement from Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman's office. "No company, no matter how big or well-known, is exempt from California's consumer protection laws," Hochman said. "We will aggressively pursue enforcement when businesses take advantage of consumers by failing to clearly disclose subscription terms, obtain proper consent, or provide a fair way to cancel. Consumers have a right to know what they're signing up for, and they deserve better. Digital deception is still deception under the law." HelloFresh admitted no liability in the settlement. What were the allegations leveled against HelloFresh in California? Prosecutors alleged HelloFresh placed customers into ongoing subscriptions without proper notice or authorization. The Santa Clara District Attorney's Office also accused the company of making it difficult for customers to cancel subscriptions. "The meal kit delivery company, the largest in the U.S., also failed to disclose the material terms and conditions of advertised free meals, surprise gifts, and free shipping offers, among other false and misleading advertising allegations," Santa Clara D.A.'s officials said in a written statement. "These actions are violations of California's Automatic Renewal Law and False Advertising Law." The civil complaint alleged that HelloFresh failed to clearly disclose subscription terms prior to collecting payment; was unable to obtain customers' affirmative consent before charging their credit or debit cards; failed to provide post-transaction acknowledgments of subscriptions; and failed to offer an easy mechanism to cancel subscriptions. 'Misleading automatic renewal subscriptions and false advertising practices don't sell products – they sell deception,' according to Santa Clara County D.A. Jeff Rosen. 'Stop means stop.' HelloFresh denies wrongdoing HelloFresh representatives told CBS News that the company's policies were fair. "We take our commitment to customer transparency very seriously, and our subscription model and cancellation policies have been consistently clear to customers throughout the whole customer journey," according to a statement from the company. "While we deny any wrongdoing, we have cooperated fully with the coalition of California District Attorneys and have entered into a settlement agreement with them to resolve the matter amicably." Where will the settlement money go? Of the $7.5 million settlement, $6.38 million will be divided between the prosecuting agencies in the form of civil penalties, according to the L.A. County D.A.'s Office. $1 million of the settlement will be paid as restitution to eligible California consumers, officials added. $120,000 will be used to cover investigative costs. HelloFresh makes up roughly 75% of the meal kit delivery market in the U.S., officials said. The case was investigated by the California Automatic Renewal Task Force, or CART, Hochman said. The program was started in 2015 to address consumer complaints about improper subscription practices and comprises prosecutors from Los Angeles, Santa Clara, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz, and San Diego counties, as well as the city of Santa Monica. Who is eligible for restitution from Hello Fresh? According to the settlement, eligible consumers are those who: Were enrolled in automatic renewal product subscriptions between Jan. 1, 2019, and Aug. 18, 2025. Were charged for the first shipment without their knowledge or consent. Canceled their automatic renewal subscription after the first shipment. Never received a refund from HelloFresh. These individuals will receive notices from the third-party administrator detailing how to submit a claim. This article originally appeared on Palm Springs Desert Sun: HelloFresh to pay $7.5M in California subscription settlement Solve the daily Crossword

Former US Attorney Catherine Hanaway appointed as Missouri's next attorney general
Former US Attorney Catherine Hanaway appointed as Missouri's next attorney general

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Former US Attorney Catherine Hanaway appointed as Missouri's next attorney general

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — Former U.S. Attorney Catherine Hanaway was appointed Tuesday as Missouri's next attorney general, vowing a tough-on-crime approach as her predecessor leaves for a job with the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Republican Gov. Mike Kehoe announced Hanaway's appointment just a day after Attorney General Andrew Bailey said he was stepping down to join President Donald Trump's administration as the FBI's co-deputy director. The change in Missouri's top law enforcement job will take effect Sept. 8. 'Fighting crime is — and will remain — job one for this office' Hanaway said. Hanaway has deep roots in Missouri politics and extensive ties as a private practice attorney to corporate clients that will cause her to recuse from some cases as attorney general. Hanaway first won election to the Missouri House in 1998 and led the GOP takeover of the chamber in the 2002 elections as the state began a gradual transition from a political tossup to a GOP stronghold. She served as Missouri's first and only woman House speaker before losing a bid for secretary of state in 2004. She was appointed the next year by President George W. Bush as U.S. attorney for the eastern district of Missouri, which she held until 2009. She lost a Republican primary for governor in 2016. As a partner at the Husch Blackwell law firm, Hanaway has represented global chemical manufacturer Bayer in lobbying for legislation that would provide a legal shield against mounting claims that it failed to warn customers that its popular Roundup weedkiller can allegedly cause cancer. Husch Blackwell also represents Invenergy, which is attempting to use eminent domain to acquire land for a high-voltage transmission line to carry wind-generated power from Kansas across Missouri and Illinois to an electric grid in Indiana. Bailey has opposed the project, and Hanaway said she will recuse herself as the attorney general's office continues a civil investigation into it. Bailey, a staunch Trump supporter, has served as attorney general since January 2023 and won election last November to a full four-year term. Hanaway said she intends to serve the remainder of Bailey's term and seek election herself in 2028. Bailey brought an aggressive approach to the attorney general's office. He pursued numerous legal challenges against Democratic President Joe Biden's administration on policies ranging from student loan forgiveness to environmental rules, immigration actions and transgender rights measures. He also pursued conservative causes in his home state, threatening legal action against private gyms over bathroom policies, demanding that public schools ban drag shows and defending the state's anti-abortion regulations in the face of a voter-approved constitutional amendment establishing a right to abortion. Hanaway praised Bailey but placed a greater emphasis on criminal cases than civil litigation while talking to reporters Tuesday. Missouri's attorney general job has become a quick stepping stone for aspiring politicians. Less than a year after winning election as attorney general in 2016, Republican Josh Hawley launched a challenge to Democratic U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill. After Hawley won election to the Senate in 2018, Republican Gov. Mike Parson appointed state Treasurer Eric Schmitt to serve the remainder of Hawley's term. Schmitt won election to his own term as attorney general in 2020, but then quickly announced he was running to replace retiring U.S. Sen. Roy Blunt in the 2022 elections. After Schmitt won the Senate race, Parson appointed Bailey — an Army veteran serving as the governor's general counsel — to fill the remainder of Schmitt's term. David A. Lieb, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store