Plastic pollution treaty talks stall one day before deadline
More than 100 'high ambition' countries rejected as 'unacceptable' and 'unambitious' a draft treaty text that does not limit plastic production, nor address chemicals used in plastic products.
The main sticking point at the talks, now in their third year, has been whether to cap plastic production or to focus on issues such as better design, recycling and reuse.
More than 100 'high ambition' countries have pushed for a plastics treaty to include strong, legally binding measures with a limit on plastic production, in order to address plastic at source, and many have said toxic chemicals in plastics need to be controlled.
But oil and plastic producing nations, including Saudi Arabia, Russia and Iran, the so-called 'like minded group' which has reportedly been supported by the US, as well as the chemical industry, reject production limits and instead want the treaty to focus on measures such as waste management and recycling.
At a meeting in Geneva on Wednesday, many countries rejected the latest treaty text presented by the chair, Luis Vayas Valdivieso. They said they were 'extremely concerned' or 'disappointed' by the low level of ambition it contained.
Columbia's delegate, Sebastián Rodríguez, rejected the draft text as 'completely unacceptable', while Julio Cordano, head of delegation for Chile, said it contained gaps and shortcomings which did not reflect the scale of the problem.
Panama's delegate, Juan Carlos Monterrey Gómez, also said it could not accept the draft text as a basis of negotiation and that its red lines had been 'spat on and burned'.
The negotiators had 'only 30 hours' to find a solution to end plastic pollution, not 'just a political solution' he added.
'This is not ambition, it is surrender' he said.
The UK's head of delegation, Jane Barton, said the text was the 'lowest common denominator'.
'We need an effective treaty for our people and for our planet,' she said. 'Time is running out.'
The new draft contains one mention of plastic production, in the preamble reaffirming the importance of sustainable plastic production and consumption. An article on production from a previous draft has been removed. There is no mention of chemicals. A reference to the 'full life cycle' of plastics in a previous draft has also been removed.
Kenya described the draft as a 'waste management' instrument, which had 'no democratic value' for states seeking to limit plastic, while Mexico said it represented a 'crisis in multilateralism'.
Dennis Clare, a negotiator for Micronesia, said: 'Some parties, including ours, are not even willing to engage on that text, it's a step backward.'
'It certainly seems like it was very biased toward the like-minded countries [Saudi, Russia, Iran etc]. There's problems across the board. There's no binding measures on anything. There's no obligation to contribute resources to the financial mechanism. There's no measures on production or chemicals. This text is just inadequate.'
Speaking ahead of the release of the chair's text, Juan Carlos Lozada, a member of the house of representatives of Colombia, said: 'If the production keeps growing at the rate it has grown in the last decades, we have no hope for 2050, 2060. So if the treaty doesn't have those elements, those key elements, there's no treaty. I'd rather not have a treaty if we're not going to have a very robust treaty.'
Andreas Bjelland, the head of Norway delegation and the co-chair of the high ambition coalition, also speaking before the release of the text, said: 'To keep production as part of the finalised treaty, that is important. If you look at what we agreed on in the mandate … sustainable production and sustainable consumption was explicitly mentioned. So there should be provisions to be able to work with that and develop that over time.'
Greenpeace described the new text as a 'gift to the petrochemical industry and a betrayal of humanity.'.
Graham Forbes, Greenpeace's head of delegation, said: 'By failing to address production or harmful chemicals in any way, this text glorifies the industry lie that we can recycle our way out of this crisis, ignoring the root cause: the relentless expansion of plastic production.'
The treaty talks will continue on Thursday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
Countries deadlocked on plastic production and chemicals as talks on a global treaty draw to a close
Negotiations on a global treaty to end plastic pollution are drawing to a close Thursday, as nations remain deadlocked over whether to tackle the exponential growth of plastic production. A draft of the treaty released Wednesday wouldn't limit plastic production or address chemicals used in plastic products. Instead, it's centered on proposals where there's broad agreement — such as reducing the number of problematic plastic products that often enter the environment and are difficult to recycle, promoting the redesign of plastic products so they can be recycled and reused, and improving waste management. It asks nations to make commitments to ending plastic pollution, rather than imposing global, legally-binding rules. A new draft is expected Thursday afternoon, and the talks — involving representatives from 184 countries and more than 600 organizations — are likely to conclude Friday. Andreas Bjelland Eriksen, Norway 's minister for climate and the environment, said the current text is unacceptable and the country's representatives won't leave Geneva with 'just any treaty.' Norway is helping to lead a coalition of countries called the High Ambition Coalition that want a comprehensive approach to ending plastic pollution, including reducing production. 'We are going to be flexible, but at the same time ambitious in our positions, and work with every single hour that we have left to bring this to a conclusion, a positive conclusion, because the world needs a plastics treaty now.' Eriksen said he'll stay 'cautiously optimistic' until the bitter end. Every year, the world makes more than 400 million tons of new plastic, and that could grow by about 70% by 2040 without policy changes. About 100 countries want to limit production as well as tackle cleanup and recycling. Many have said it's essential to address toxic chemicals. Powerful oil and gas-producing nations and the plastics industry oppose production limits. They want a treaty focused on better waste management and reuse. They have raised different concerns with the draft text, saying it doesn't have the scope they want to set the parameters of the treaty or precise definitions. Camila Zepeda, from Mexico 's Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources, said it doesn't seem feasible at this stage to get a limit on production. But, she said, they want to see something more in the treaty on sustainable production and consumption than the brief mention in the current preamble. Mexico and Switzerland are also leading a push for an article to address problematic plastic products, including chemicals and single-use plastics. 'We are on the final stretch, but we remain hopeful and we remain committed to making sure that we're putting back in the text some provisions that will allow us to to strengthen it, to deliver, and to have an impact," she said. "That's what we want at the end.' It's the sixth time nations are meeting and the 10th day of negotiations. Talks last year in South Korea were supposed to be the final round, but they adjourned in December at an impasse over cutting production and agreed to meet again. Some in attendance wondered whether the outcome in Geneva will be the same. Sivendra Michael, Fiji's permanent secretary for environment and climate change, emphatically rejected the idea of another meeting. It is costly, unfair, and tedious to travel so far to continuously restate positions, he said Thursday. He said he firmly believed this meeting should conclude with a formal treaty that will be acceptable to all. However, Hiwot Hailu, chief of staff for the Environmental Protection Authority of Ethiopia, said Ethiopia supports meeting again if nations can't reach agreement on important articles for financing the accord and addressing the full lifecycle of plastics, including production, design and disposal. It would be better to not have a treaty, rather than a weak one, Hailu said. Jessika Roswall, the European commissioner for the environment, said the treaty must cover the full lifecycle of plastics and be able to evolve over time with science. 'A weak, static agreement serves no one,' she said in a statement. 'The next few hours will show whether we can rise to the moment.' ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Why an African group wants to replace the traditional world map
The African Union is championing a drive to replace the 16th-century Mercator world map, arguing it inaccurately depicts Africa 's true scale. The Mercator projection distorts continent sizes, inflating areas near the poles while shrinking Africa and South America. The 'Correct The Map' campaign, supported by the AU and advocacy groups, urges organisations to adopt the 2018 Equal Earth projection, which aims to reflect countries' true sizes. The campaign seeks to influence media, education, and policy, with plans to promote the Equal Earth projection as the main standard in classrooms and global institutions. While some organisations like Google Maps (on desktop) and the World Bank are phasing out Mercator, the campaign is pushing for wider adoption by bodies such as the United Nations.
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
Countries race for late breakthrough in deadlocked plastic pollution talks
GENEVA, Aug 14 (Reuters) - Talks to create the world's first legally binding treaty to tackle plastic pollution are at risk of ending without a deal as countries race to find a potential compromise on the final day of negotiations in Geneva. Talks headed into their final hours on Thursday after countries who want an ambitious plastics treaty threw out the text proposed on Wednesday. States pushing for a comprehensive treaty, including Panama, Kenya, France and Britain, shared frustration that key articles on the full life cycle of plastic pollution from the production of polymers to the disposal of waste, as well as the harm to health, had been removed entirely from the text. Oil-producing nations are against curbs on the production of virgin plastics derived from petroleum, coal, and gas, while others want it to be limited and to have stricter controls over plastic products and hazardous chemicals. "It's proving unlikely all countries will be able to bridge their differences," said Zaynab Sadan of the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), adding that agreement was as far away as it had ever been in nearly three years of talks. Panama described the new draft text as "repulsive" and called for a complete rewrite. Saudi Arabia, which is resisting major curbs, said nothing could be agreed until the treaty's scope is clearly defined. More than 1,000 delegates have gathered in Geneva for the sixth round of talks, after a meeting of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-5) in South Korea late last year ended without a deal. The OECD warns that without intervention, plastic production will triple by 2060, further choking oceans, harming health, and exacerbating climate change. "It will be very important to spend every single hour of the last day of negotiation finding a good text that can deliver on the promise to end plastic pollution," said Giulia Carlini, a Senior Attorney for the Environmental Health Program of the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL). Norwegian Minister of Climate and Environment Andreas Bjelland Eriksen, co-chair of the High Ambition Countries group, told Reuters that all parties need to compromise. "We are willing to discuss all articles, three, six, for example, to be able to create the package that can be good enough for everyone," he said, pointing to potential openness to re-discussing restrictions on chemicals and production. "We're optimistic ... We think this can be really good for our industry, society, and for the environment," Ross Eisenberg, president of America's Plastic Makers, which is part of the American Chemistry Council, told Reuters. The Council, which supports a deal without limits on plastic production, warned that the U.S. might not ratify a treaty containing provisions to ban chemicals or restrict plastic production. However, Colombian lawmaker Juan Carlos Loazada urged that no deal would be better than a watered down deal. Some 300 businesses, including Unilever (ULVR.L), opens new tab, have pressed for an ambitious treaty that harmonizes rules globally. "If we don't get that degree of harmonization, we risk further fragmentation ... and higher costs," Ed Shepherd, Senior Global Sustainability Manager at Unilever, told Reuters.
