
Cabinet ministers urge Starmer to recognise Palestine
I deplore Israel's attacks on healthcare workers as well as other innocent civilians trying to access healthcare or vital aid. These actions go well beyond legitimate self-defence and undermine the prospects for peace. I sincerely hope that the international community can come together, as the foreign secretary has been driving towards, to make sure that we see an end of this war but also that we recognise the state of Palestine while there is a state of Palestine left to recognise.
Streeting isn't the only member of the Cabinet understood to have pushed the issue in meetings. As reported by the Guardian, Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood and Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn have also brought it up. The Health Secretary's intervention follows that of nearly 60 Labour MPs, who sent a letter to Foreign Secretary David Lammy at the start of the month after Israeli defence minister Israel Katz proposed plans to force Gaza's into a camp in Rafah. While Israeli human rights lawyer Michael Sfard described the move was 'about population transfer to the southern tip of Gaza in preparation for deportation outside the strip', the MP group wrote: 'Though an accurate description, we believe there is a clearer one. The ethnic cleansing of Gaza.'
Of course, it's not just Labour politicians who have been vocal on the Middle East. As Mr S wrote in May, more than a dozen senior Tory MPs and peers broke ranks to write to Starmer to urge the PM to immediately recognise Palestine as a state. The seven MPs and six House of Lords grandees have signed a letter that insists 'recognising Palestine would affirm our nation's commitment to upholding the principles of justice, self-determination and equal rights'. The letter was signed by several Tory moderates – including MPs Kit Malthouse, Simon Hoare and father of the house Sir Edward Leigh alongside peers such as Nicholas Soames and Hugo Swire. Mr S was rather interested to note that there were some more surprising signatories, however, with right-wing Conservative MP Sir John Hayes backing the call.
Starmer hadn't changed the UK's stance after the Tory group or the Labour backbenchers reached out – but will he be swayed by his own Cabinet ministers? Stay tuned…

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BreakingNews.ie
28 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Starmer to raise Gaza ceasefire and UK steel tariffs in Trump meeting
Keir Starmer is expected to raise the prospect of reviving ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas and the future of tariffs on British steel as he meets Donald Trump in Scotland. The British Prime Minister will travel to Ayrshire, where the US president is staying at his Turnberry golf resort, for wide-ranging discussions on trade and the Middle East as international alarm grows over starvation in Gaza. Advertisement The two leaders have built a rapport on the world stage despite their differing political backgrounds, with Mr Trump praising Starmer for doing a 'very good job' in office ahead of their talks on Monday. But humanitarian conditions in Gaza and uncertainty over US import taxes on key British goods in America threaten to complicate their bilateral meeting. The US president has been playing golf at his Turnberry resort in Scotland (PA) Peace talks in the Middle East came to a standstill last week after Washington and Israel recalled negotiating teams from Qatar, with White House special envoy Steve Witkoff blaming Hamas for a 'lack of desire' to reach an agreement. Since then, Israel has promised military pauses in three populated areas of Gaza to allow designated UN convoys of aid to reach desperate Palestinians. Advertisement But the UK, which is joining efforts to airdrop aid into the enclave and evacuate children in need of medical assistance, has said that access to supplies must be 'urgently' widened. In his talks with Mr Trump, Starmer will 'welcome the President's administration working with partners in Qatar and Egypt to bring about a ceasefire in Gaza', Number 10 said. 'He will discuss further with him what more can be done to secure the ceasefire urgently, bring an end to the unspeakable suffering and starvation in Gaza and free the hostages who have been held so cruelly for so long.' The leaders will also talk 'one-on-one about advancing implementation of the landmark Economic Prosperity Deal so that Brits and Americans can benefit from boosted trade links between their two countries', it said. Advertisement The agreement signed at the G7 summit last month slashed trade barriers on goods from both countries. But tariffs for the steel industry, which is of key economic importance to the UK, were left to stand at 25 per cent rather than falling to zero as originally agreed. Concerns had previously been raised that the sector could face a levy of up to 50 per cent – the US's global rate – unless a further agreement was made by July 9th, when Mr Trump said he would start implementing import taxes on America's trading partners. But that deadline has been and gone without any concrete update on the status of UK steel. Advertisement Downing Street said that both sides are working 'at pace' to 'go further to deliver benefits to working people on both sides of the Atlantic' and to give UK industry 'the security it needs'. The two leaders are also expected to discuss the war in Ukraine, which Number 10 said would include 'applying pressure' on Vladimir Putin to end the invasion, before travelling on together for a private engagement in Aberdeen. It comes after Mr Trump announced he had agreed 'the biggest deal ever made' between the US and the European Union after meeting Ursula von der Leyen for high-stakes talks at Turnberry on Sunday. After a day playing golf, the US leader met the President of the EU Commission to hammer out the broad terms of an agreement that will subject the bloc to 15 per cent tariffs on most of its goods entering America. Advertisement This is lower than a 30 per cent levy previously threatened by the US president. The agreement will include 'zero for zero' tariffs on a number of products including aircraft, some agricultural goods and certain chemicals, as well as EU purchases of US energy worth 750 billion dollars (€638 billion) over three years. Speaking to journalists on Sunday about his meeting with, Mr Trump said: 'We're meeting about a lot of things. We have our trade deal and it's been a great deal. 'It's good for us. It's good for them and good for us. I think the UK is very happy, they've been trying for 12 years to get it and they got it, and it's a great trade deal for both, works out very well. 'We'll be discussing that. I think we're going to be discussing a lot about Israel. 'They're very much involved in terms of wanting something to happen. 'He's doing a very good job, by the way.' Mr Trump's private trip to the UK comes ahead of a planned state visit in September.


Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Mental health crisis is overblown, say public
The mental health crisis is overblown and people often exaggerate their problems, according to a poll of public beliefs. More than half (56 per cent) of the public believe mental health conditions are exaggerated, while three quarters (76 per cent) think some people mistake life's normal ups and downs for mental illness, according to the survey of more than 2,000 adults by Electoral Calculus. With the Government facing a backbench rebellion over its efforts to restrict welfare benefits, the survey also suggests that ministers – rather than their backbenchers – may have better judged the pulse of the nation. The poll showed more than half of voters (52 per cent) believed that it was too easy for people to claim benefits for mental health illnesses, against 35 per cent who thought it was too hard and 13 per cent who believed it was about right. Last month, Sir Keir Starmer was forced to back down on controversial plans to slash disability and sickness benefits after more than 120 of his MPs threatened to vote against the proposals. Although the public believe benefits are too readily available, they are evenly divided on whether it is too easy or too hard to prove a mental illness in the UK. Some 44 per cent said it was too easy, while 43 per cent said it was too hard. However, Tory and Reform supporters were more likely to believe it was too easy to be diagnosed as suffering from a mental health condition, with 74 per cent of Conservative voters and 55 per cent from Nigel Farage's party saying it was the case. It comes as the head of the Government's workplace review said that employees who have 'I hate my boss syndrome' should not be signed off sick with a mental health condition. Sir Charlie Mayfield said he was concerned some problems are being 'over-medicalised' when they could be solved in the office. The former John Lewis chairman has been appointed by Liz Kendall, the work and pensions secretary, to come up with plans to stop workers leaving their jobs because of poor health. His report is due this autumn. One in five people of working age have a health condition that affects their job and there are 2.8 million people inactive due to ill health – up from 2.1 million since before the Covid pandemic, although the numbers had been rising for several years. Sir Charlie told The Sunday Times: 'The last thing I wish to do is trivialise [mental health conditions] but I agree that things do get over-medicalised.' Half of those polled (49 per cent) agreed that society spends too much time talking about minor mental illnesses. This rose to 77 per cent of Conservatives and 62 per cent of Reform supporters compared with just 35 per cent of Labour voters. Three quarters (74 per cent) said that social media often led to people thinking they had a mental illness when they did not. However, despite the scepticism about 'over medicalisation' of mental ill health, the public believe by five to one majority (68 per cent to 14 per cent) that there were not enough services available to meet the needs of people suffering from mental health problems. Eight in 10 people believed that mental illness had been stigmatised for too long and that it was healthy for people to talk about it more. Seven in 10 also felt that people with serious mental illness are losing out because of the attention given to the growing numbers of people saying they have less serious mental illness. Martin Baxter, the chief executive of Electoral Calculus, said: 'The public shows strong support for tackling stigma and being open about mental health, yet many worry that everyday challenges are being labelled as mental illness, risking the needs of those with serious conditions being overlooked. 'Mental health policy looks set to become a key political battleground, and these findings suggest that politicians will need to tread carefully as they respond to growing public scepticism and a system that most feel isn't working.'


Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Macron forgets that Hamas does not want peace
The palpable sense of relief following the announcement that Israel has established humanitarian corridors to facilitate the flow of aid to Gaza will be short-lived so long as Hamas terrorists do everything in their power to block efforts to implement a lasting ceasefire. Amidst the welter of controversy surrounding the Gaza crisis, one central fact seems to have been completely overlooked in the rush to blame the miserable plight of Palestinian civilians on Israel. It was Hamas, not Israel, that was ultimately responsible for the collapse of the Trump administration's latest efforts to arrange a lasting ceasefire in the enclave. It is hopefully a point US President Donald Trump makes abundantly clear to Sir Keir Starmer when the two leaders meet in Scotland. Downing Street says Starmer will use the meeting to press Trump to do more to end the war in Gaza, a move that is no doubt prompted by the mounting pressure the Prime Minister is under from naive and ill-informed Labour backbenchers to recognise a Palestinian state. Hopefully, the American president will provide Starmer with a reality check on the challenges facing anyone seeking to bring peace to Gaza, the most prominent being the absolute insistence of Hamas's terrorist leadership that it must remain in control of the enclave for any lasting cessation of hostilities to occur. Allowing Hamas to retain any vestige of influence in Gaza is, understandably, anathema to Israel after the horrors it suffered during the October 7 attacks in 2023, which resulted in the cold-blooded massacre of 1,200 people – including women and children – at the hands of deranged Islamist fanatics. No sane government in the world would allow such an organisation to remain intact after the trauma its citizens have suffered. It is for this reason that, since the start of the conflict, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has refused to waver from his insistence that, for there to be lasting peace in Gaza, Hamas's terrorist infrastructure – including the political leaders who helped to mastermind the October 7 attacks – must be completely eradicated from the enclave before any serious consideration can be given to peace. Netanyahu has stuck to this bottom line through numerous iterations of US-sponsored ceasefire talks, starting with the Biden administration and continuing through to the current attempts by Trump to end hostilities and free the remaining Israeli hostages still held captive by Hamas terrorists. At the same time Hamas has been equally insistent in demanding the right to remain in Gaza, claiming that it represents the enclave's legitimate government, even though it clings to power by torturing and murdering any Palestinians who are brave or foolhardy enough to voice their opposition to the terrorist organisation's brutal regime. The Trump administration's deepening frustration with the negotiating tactics of Hamas, together with its backers in Qatar and Iran, was clearly evident in comments made by Steve Witkoff, Trump's Special Envoy to the Middle East, after he withdrew from last week's ceasefire talks in Qatar claiming that they had collapsed because Hamas was behaving in a 'selfish way.' 'While the mediators have made a great effort, Hamas does not appear to be coordinated or acting in good faith. We will now consider alternative options to bring the hostages home and try to create a more stable environment for the people of Gaza,' Witkoff said in a statement issued when he abandoned the talks. For the fundamental truth of the Gaza tragedy, one that the legions of anti-Israel protesters across the globe wilfully ignore, is that Hamas does not want peace. The architects of this Islamist death cult seek martyrdom, and now that it has run out of fighters to sacrifice in its increasingly futile war against Israel's superior military might, Hamas is using Palestinian civilians effectively as human shields in its quest to survive the conflict. It has done this by trying to seize control of vital aid supplies and establishing a black market whereby only known Hamas sympathisers are provided with the basic necessities for life. As for the rest, they are left to starve, thereby providing the UN's sprawling network of aid agencies, which have an undistinguished history of collaborating with Hamas, with the ammunition they need to accuse Israel of genocide. In such circumstances it is almost obscene that prominent Western leaders such as French President Emmanuel Macron should seek to salve their conscience by making grandstanding declarations about their intention to recognise a Palestinian state, even though a significant proportion of this supposed entity happens to be run by Islamist fanatics. Trump, by contrast, has a far more realistic take on Hamas's mindset, one it is hoped the president will share forcefully with Starmer if our prime minister is to be prevented from following Macron's morally bankrupt gesture. As Trump commented after the collapse of the latest Doha ceasefire talks, 'Hamas didn't really want to make a deal. I think they want to die, and it's very, very bad.'