Big pharma urges Commission to slow down on new critical medicines rules
In an effort to fulfil its 100-day pledge, the Commission is rushing to present the Act on 11 March in Strasbourg, but this has raised concerns among European pharma companies, who claim the process has bypassed proper evaluation.
The European Confederation of Pharmaceutical Entrepreneurs (EUCOPE), representing small and medium-sized pharmaceutical companies, urged the Commission "to reconsider the haste with which the act is to be drafted, in a reply to a Commission call for feedback.
The deadline for this call for stakeholder feedback fell on Thursday, the timing of which also attracted criticism.
The Act is designed to address severe shortages of essential medicines in the EU, including antibiotics, insulin, and painkillers, particularly those that are difficult to source or depend on limited manufacturers or suppliers.
"We urge the Commission to carefully consider the Critical Medicines Act's drafting timeline and to conduct a thorough impact assessment prior to its publication,' a feedback note from German pharma giant Bayer stated. Bayer is a member of the Critical Medicines Alliance, a consultation body of 250 stakeholders established in April 2024 to analyse supply chain vulnerabilities.
Impact assessments are intended to ensure evidence-based policymaking and were introduced in 2022 under the EU's Better Regulation principles.
Swiss pharma company Roche also considered the lack of an impact assessment 'a serious omission' in the analysis of the possible environmental, social, competitiveness and economic impacts of the future Act.
"The analysis of these aspects should be covered in a proper impact assessment and not rely solely on learnings from pilots, ad hoc reports and the strategic report of the CM Alliance,' Roche's statement said.
The Commission argues that the urgency of addressing medicine shortages justifies bypassing the assessment. However, industry leaders claim that the evidence gathered does not fully capture the wider impact of the proposal.
'We specifically cannot condone publication the act without a proper impact assessment,' added EUCOPE.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Danish cities drop Microsoft over concerns about Trump and US Big Tech
Two of Denmark's biggest municipalities are ending their use of Microsoft systems in the latest move by European governments away from US Big Tech companies. Henrik Appel Espersen, the chairman of Copenhagen's audit committee, told newspaper Politiken that the council is making the decision to move away from Microsoft Office programmes due to the economy and the "monopoly-like" control of the company. Plus, the foreign policy situation with US President Donald Trump has made the problem "more topical," Espersen added. The same decision was made in Aarhus, Denmark's second-biggest municipality, where, according to the newspaper, a German system has already replaced Microsoft technology. Euronews Next contacted both municipalities to independently verify local reporting. The reported moves from local governments in Denmark follows a public debate in the Netherlands that saw the Dutch parliament approve a series of motions earlier this year to build a digital cloud and reduce its dependence on US cloud technology. There are concerns from experts who previously told Euronews Next that the Trump administration could either compel tech companies to provide the US with Dutch data or force them to no longer provide cloud services to Europe, which could cause massive disruptions to public services. The debate on US Big Tech influence has been going on for some time in Denmark, based on the results of an expert panel looking into their influence. The Danish expert group on tech giants released a report in December 2024 that called for Big Tech alternatives in Europe to "be able to emerge and grow large". "No one should be forced to use the services of tech giants to get information and participate in social, cultural, and democratic communities," the report said. It also asked for an "overview" of the tech giants' influence on digital infrastructure in Denmark, saying that the public sector and education systems should not be "dependent" on the services of tech giants. "We need to fence in the tech giants," Morten Bodskov, Denmark's minister of business and industry, said in a statement at the time. "If we only use their solutions, it makes our society extremely vulnerable in a world that is changing with pressure from great powers, geopolitical tensions, and a technology race. That is why we must develop our own solutions". Euronews Next followed up with the panel of experts and the Danish government to see whether this inquiry has been started or promised but did not receive a reply at the time of publication. Another alternative for Denmark, the Netherlands, and other states concerned about the influence of US Big Tech companies is EU-wide initiatives that are in the works. The European Commission is holding public consultations until July 3 on the future of cloud legislation in the bloc to "address Europe's gap in cloud and AI infrastructure capacity". The act will eventually address research and innovation to accelerate data centres for cloud and AI, private investment in sustainable cloud and AI capacity, and increasing the "secure processing capacity" of EU-based cloud providers. Mario Draghi's 2024 report on the state of Europe's competitiveness noted that the bloc has to "enhance technological infrastructure and reduce dependencies" on non-EU cloud service providers. On March 18, 1967, the supertanker SS Torrey Canyon struck a reef off the coast of Cornwall, United Kingdom, spilling 100,000 tonnes of crude oil into the English Channel. Beaches in southern England, the French region of Brittany, and Guernsey in the Channel Islands were submerged in thick sludge. More than 15,000 seabirds were killed, and the spill caused innumerable long-term damages to the marine environment. The Torrey Canyon disaster was the first major oil spill in European waters. It marked a turning point in the way people interacted with oceans, revealing how vulnerable marine ecosystems are to human-induced threats. To mark World Oceans Day on June 8, Euronews Tech Talks talked to two ocean experts to better comprehend the state of our oceans and the high and low-tech innovations that can help protect them. Over the past four decades, global plastic production has more than quadrupled, yet recycling has failed to keep pace, with rates remaining below 10 per cent. Simon Bernard is the CEO and co-founder of Plastic Odyssey, a project dedicated to tackling ocean plastic pollution. Bernard and a group of researchers embarked on a tour around the world aboard a research vessel to explore the best solutions for reducing plastic pollution. "The idea of a research vessel is to be a scientific platform to study, do research, and development... The vessel acts as a laboratory, so for example, the aft is dedicated to recycling with various machines used to recycle plastic, test different solutions and technologies, and train local entrepreneurs," Bernard explained to Euronews. Plastic Odyssey has been sailing for two and a half years. During the journey, the crew stops for three weeks in locations affected by plastic pollution, meets the locals, institutions, and entrepreneurs to learn about their solutions, and helps support them. "That's quite shocking to realise that there is no pristine environment anymore, because plastic pollution has impacted all the places," said Bernard. Throughout the Plastic Odyssey's journey, Bernard has met many people tackling plastic pollution and has been impressed by the cleverness of the simplest solutions. "We've visited maybe 150 factories and initiatives, and what's most interesting to us is the ingenuity and the use of low-tech solutions," he said. "We met a guy in Lebanon who made the equivalent of a food delivery app but for waste connection... and I'm thinking about Silvio in Colombia who was building houses out of plastic waste," Bernard said. While plastic pollution is a visible threat to marine ecosystems, oceans are also damaged by hazards that are much harder to detect, like chemical pollutants. Researcher Anneliese Hodge from the University of Plymouth is studying these complex pollutants, and one of her most recent studies focuses on sunscreen. The most harmful components of sunscreen are its UV filters designed to block, absorb, or reflect the sun's ultraviolet rays. "A recent estimation has suggested that approximately 10 million tonnes of UV filters are produced annually for the global market, of which an estimated 6,000 to 14,000 tonnes are released into coral reef zones alone annually," Hodge told Euronews. "So this is quite a widespread issue," she continued. Hodge explained that UV filters in sunscreen can affect marine ecosystems at a molecular, cellular, individual, and community level. For instance, sunscreen can damage the DNA of marine organisms and cause coral bleaching. Despite the need for further research into this topic, Hodge highlighted several potential solutions to reduce the threats sunscreen poses to marine environments. Among them is the encapsulation of UV filters in biodegradable capsules that activate only upon contact with the skin. In addition, Hodge cited the possibility of reducing UV filters and instead using Sun Protection Factor (SPF) boosters, specialised ingredients that could replace UV filters. She also pointed to the introduction of some regulations to make corporations reduce the UV filters or ban the use of certain products.
Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
Zelenskyy: Russia aims to take Odesa and threaten Moldova and Romania
Russia's plan in its ongoing all-out war on Ukraine is to take Odesa and continue to Moldova and Romania, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy told southeastern European leaders at a summit in the Black Sea port city on Wednesday. 'Russia's war plans target this region, Odesa. Then they are targeting the borders with Moldova and Romania. Of course, we need protection now. But above all, we need long-term guarantees that these can never happen again," he emphasised. The summit, attended by Ukraine, Romania, the Republic of Moldova, Serbia, Albania, Greece, Montenegro, Croatia and Slovenia, brought together countries, some of which have already been targeted by Moscow's hybrid warfare. Moldova's President Maia Sandu has warned of the dangers of hybrid warfare aimed at influencing the country's parliamentary elections scheduled for this fall. 'We do learn everyday by new attempts and new ways through which Russia tries to interfere with our internal political processes, democratic processes," Sandu said. "It is going to be tough, but we do want Moldovans to decide for Moldova at the parliamentary elections, and not the Kremlin." Through its actions, the Kremlin is threatening peace across the continent, while sabotaging efforts to reach a lasting peace in Ukraine, participants pointed out. 'Russia constantly rejects any constructive initiative and strives to undermine the path to peace," Romanian President Nicușor Dan, who was on his first official visit to Ukraine after winning the dramatic elections in May, said at the summit. "Russia proposes unreasonable demands, knowing that they cannot be accepted. The only language Russia understands is the language of force and we must do our utmost to help Ukraine negotiate from a position of strength.' Both Dan and Sandu have recently been targeted by disinformation campaigns on pro-Russian Telegram channels, as revealed by Euronews and Euroverify. Meanwhile, Odesa was again in the Russian forces' crosshairs in the run-up to the summit. Euronews Romania journalists have visited the Black Sea port city districts destroyed by Moscow's massive bombing in recent days. The extent of the destruction is significant: buildings in ruins, burned cars and people who no longer have a home. Every night, people are woken up by airstrikes and the long sound of sirens. The most terrifying, people say, is the noise of drones or missiles overhead. Kateryna, 32, witnessed the bombings in recent nights. The apartment she lives in, together with her mother, was hit by drones launched by the Russians. Everything was reduced to ashes. "This is the first time our home was bombed. My mother was sleeping in my room, and when the first Shahed drone came, she ran away and hid in the basement. The first strike was right in the room she ran from," Kateryna told Euronews. Earlier this week, at least two people died and 9 were injured in a missile and drone attack that also struck a maternity hospital and another medical facility, and the city's film studio and zoo. Odesa is of strategic importance to Ukraine, serving as one of the primary logistical channels for both the export and import of goods needed by the country, which has been affected by Russia's ongoing full-scale aggression. The EU is wrangling over a provision of Donald Trump's so-called "Big Beautiful Bill" for the US budget that could see European companies taxed higher than others in retaliation for certain taxes imposed on US enterprises overseas, the vice-chair of the European Parliament's tax subcommittee has told Euronews. The German European People's Party MEP Markus Ferber said the European Commission has raised the proposed legislation—already approved by the House of Representatives—in ongoing tariff negotiations with the Trump administration. 'We are concerned because within this 'One Big Beautiful Bill' there are special taxes aimed at jurisdictions that impose taxes on the US,' Ferber told Euronews. He added that jurisdictions like the EU, which have already implemented the OECD agreement establishing a global minimum tax of 15% on multinationals, are directly targeted. 'It could also affect member states that have introduced a digital services tax,' he noted. The OECD agreement, approved by 140 countries - though as yet unratified by the US - introduced a global minimum tax of 15% on the profits of multinational companies, regardless of where those profits are declared, with effect from 1 January 2024. The EU has transposed the agreement into law and applies it to multinationals operating within the Union, to the ire of the Trump administration. Meanwhile countries such as Denmark, Portugal and Poland have implemented digital services taxes targeting US tech giants, while others are in the process of creating one. The US is now looking to retaliate against taxes it deems unfair through a provision of the "Big Beautiful Bill' which would hit foreign investors with a bump in US income tax by five percent points each year, potentially taking the rate up to 20%, in addition to existing taxes. The Commission is concerned, officials said. According to Ferber, the EU executive has put this provision of the US budget bill on the negotiating table. 'But we are not sure yet that the US agreed to put it in the basket,' the MEP said. For several weeks, the EU and the US have been discussing a resolution to the trade dispute that has been ongoing since mid-March. The US impose 50% tariffs on EU steel and aluminium, 25% on cars and 10% on all EU imports. For its part, the EU has prepared countermeasures targeting around €115 billion worth of US products. These measures are either suspended until July or still awaiting approval by EU member states.
France 24
5 hours ago
- France 24
EU crypto regulation hampered by national flaws
Launched in December, Markets in Crypto-Asset (MiCA) insists on service providers obtaining a licence to operate legally in the European Union. It is issued once specific criteria on anti-money laundering, prevention of terror group financing, IT security and financial soundness have been implemented. Such a framework aims to protect investors and provide credibility to a sector deemed to be poorly regulated. Once obtained, a licence grants access to the entire EU market, which encourages some companies to seek authorisation in the most "accommodating" member state. Crypto experts, speaking to AFP, do not question the integrity of regulatory authorities in, for example, Germany and the Netherlands -- two EU members which account for the majority of the roughly 30 MiCA licences issued so far. Other bloc nations, including Malta, are in the crosshairs, however, according to these same experts, who preferred to remain anonymous. They point to, for example, the Mediterranean island hastily issuing licences before the formal implementation of collective standards. Rapid approvals "From time to time we see arriving on our market, via the (MiCA) passport, products approved by some of our colleagues with, let's say, a rather quick signing off," lamented the president of the financial markets authority in France, Marie-Anne Barbat-Layani, as she addressed the country's Senate in March. Barbat-Layani noted that EU markets regulator ESMA had launched a "peer review" of an unnamed regulator that is potentially too lax. When contacted by AFP, the watchdog declined to comment. The Maltese regulator, MFSA, neither confirmed nor denied that it was involved. An official working under her, Stephane Pontoizeau, added: "There is always the risk of someone trying to find the least demanding entry point into Europe." Crypto platform OKX, which had planned to hire about 100 staff in France making the country its "anchor" in Europe, ultimately opted for Malta. Peer Gemini followed the same strategy, having targeted Ireland before changing its mind, citing the "proactive engagement" of the Maltese authorities. "Malta began welcoming applications several months earlier than other regulators, which meant that we could start the application process earlier, build the teams and infrastructure required to operate under MiCA," noted Gemini's head of Europe, Mark Jennings. Other countries have been slow to grant approvals, with France having only just issued its first MiCA licence -- to French fintech firm Deblock -- amid accusations that its process is long and complex. France, however, sees it as granting companies greater time to prepare their application, with the country implementing a transition period through to June 2026. Pontoizeau insisted the French financial regulator is "determined not to add national requirements to European rules". According to lawyer Anne Marechal, former legal director at the regulator, there have been "cut-price approvals". She told AFP that "believing one can save a few weeks and a little money" puts companies' credibility at risk with investors. Economic sovereignty Obtaining the necessary certification can also require considerable outlay, whether for a MiCA or national licence. Tangi Le Calvez, founder of the crypto investment firm GOin, has invested about one million euros on obtaining a French licence, which inspired MiCA. He believes that many players will not be able to complete all the necessary steps. Already in 2017, EU member Estonia introduced its own mandatory licences for the crypto sector, which resulted in 75 percent of industry participants ceasing operations there, according to the Cointelegraph publication. While it remains to be seen if a similar outcome will occur in the wake of MiCA, Claire Balva, strategy director at Deblock, highlighted the risk of European crypto firms being replaced by rivals from places with more flexible rules, such as the United States and Dubai. Given their financial resources, such non-European companies would have no difficulty complying with EU rules, she insisted. Should "a significant portion of cryptocurrencies held by Europeans" be hosted "on American infrastructure", this also raises "questions of economic sovereignty", added Balva.
