EDITORIAL: Recent grad rates are a reason to be optimistic
As education shifted to an online format, it forced a change to the way we viewed education and how we delivered education. But just like there is no denying that education was affected, that reverberation echoed down the line to graduation.
Graduation rates inevitably slipped as schools attempted to navigate the rigors of online schooling and remote education.
Austin High School was able to maintain a steady grad rate of around 83% for both of 2020 to 2021, however, that rate dropped nearly 10% in 2022 to 75.2% and like many schools, the district has been trying to build back ever since.
That's why this year's announcement that overall in the state, grad rates this were the highest ever recorded at 84.2% marks a significant moment in the continued work to increase grad rates.
AHS, for all intents and purposes, stayed for the most part level with numbers revealing not even a full percentage point slip. Sometimes staying even is an optimistic step forward.
In particular, AHS saw significant increases in three key areas within the district:
—Special Education students, up 12.3% (from 55.8% to 68.1%)
—Asian students, up 4.2% (72.5% to 76.7%)
—White students, up 0.7% (84.0% to 84.7%)
It's short-sighted to consider any problem like this 100% fixed and it should be accepted by all teachers and administrations that there is always room for improvement, but we also have to celebrate the wins when they come.
This is especially true while standing in the face of headwinds caused by the federal government threatening to dissolve the United States Department of Education, which could send cascading waves through education.
To give you an idea, numbers released by the MDE show some of the funding that's threatened:
—$256 million for students with disabilities
—$192 million for students from low-income backgrounds
—$27 million for academic enrichment
—$6 million for students in rural schools
—$38 million to support children living on military bases or Native American reservations
—$100 million for Career and Technical Education workforce development programs
Education is one thing we should never stop striving for more of and the momentum resulting from the recent graduation numbers should be a cause to continue reevaluating the steps to come and how we can improve education.
These numbers don't just represent a singular moment in time, but rather demonstrate a continued progression for years to come. It's not simply something we maintain anymore. Every year is a chance to get better.
We owe that to our students.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Legal group accuses Rutgers U. of discrimination against white students
A legal advocacy group has accused New Jersey's flagship public university — Rutgers — of discrimination for excluding white students from scholarship programs that recruit African-American, Native American and Hispanic students. The Equal Protection Project filed a civil rights complaint against Rutgers University with the US Department of Education, claiming the scholarship programs violate federal anti-discrimination laws and are unconstitutional. 5 The Equal Protection Project filed a civil rights complaint against Rutgers University with the US Department of Education. RICHARD HARBUS 'What doesn't Rutgers understand about non-discrimination? Discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin is barred under federal law, state law, and even under Rutgers' own rules. At the Equal Protection Project, we are calling on Rutgers to live up to its own set of rules — that shouldn't be controversial,' said William Jacobson, a Cornell University law professor and founder of the Equal Protection Project. 'Where were the administrators and staff whose jobs supposedly are devoted to preventing discrimination? Why was there no intervention to uphold the legally required equal access to education?' 5 'At the Equal Protection Project, we are calling on Rutgers to live up to its own set of rules — that shouldn't be controversial,' said William Jacobson. The group's Aug. 1 complaint filed with the Education Department accuses four different Rutgers programs of discrimination by excluding white students, a violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Law of 1964, as well as the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause. The Albert W. Dent Graduate Student Scholarship is designated for minority students enrolled in their final year of a healthcare management graduate program. The GEM Fellowship Program provides both financial support and internship opportunities to highly qualified, underrepresented students who wish to pursue graduate study in engineering or science. 5 The group's Aug. 1 complaint filed with the Education Department accuses four different Rutgers programs of discrimination by excluding white students. Robert Kalfus The National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering scholarships are for under-represented students identified as 'African American, American Indian, or Latino and/or first generation.' Lastly, General Motors offers an endowed scholarship at Rutgers for GM workers or their spouses and children and students of 'underrepresented minorities.' According to the complaint, Rutgers considers 'minorities' to be those who 'designate themselves as Black, non-Hispanic; American Indian or Alaska Native; Asian, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, or Hispanic.' Educational institutions that receive federal funding must comply with laws against discrimination. The US Education Department monitors compliance and investigates complaints. 5 Rutgers, in a statement on Sunday, said it will review the complaint but indicated that it has already scrapped two of the programs. RICHARD HARBUS President Trump also issued an executive order directing federal agencies to scrap funding for diversity, equity and inclusion programs. Rutgers, in a statement on Sunday, said it will review the complaint but indicated that it has already scrapped two of the programs. 'Rutgers University remains firmly committed to equal protections afforded under law and rejects discrimination in all its forms. The university will closely review the complaint, but based on preliminary information, two of the scholarships are not administered by the university and the remaining two are no longer being awarded,' the university said in a statement. 5 The group has challenged over 100 colleges and universities for 500 alleged discriminatory scholarships and programs. Robert Kalfus 'As a best practice, the university continuously reviews its websites, programs, and practices to ensure compliance with federal and state law.' The Equal Protection Project asked in the complaint that 'the Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights promptly open a formal investigation, impose such remedial relief as the law permits for the benefit of those who have been illegally excluded from Rutgers' various scholarships based on discriminatory criteria, and ensure that all ongoing and future scholarships and programming at Rutgers comports with the Constitution and federal civil rights laws.' The department has taken action against Columbia University and the City University of New York for allegedly failing to protect Jewish students from discrimination, leading to settlements. The legal advocacy group has filed similar discrimination complaints or lawsuits against the New York State Education Department; State University of New York campuses including SUNY-Albany and SUNY-Buffalo Law; and Fordham University and Alfred University. The group has challenged over 100 colleges and universities for 500 alleged discriminatory scholarships and programs. 'Unfortunately, there is a culture on many campuses that excuses racial discrimination against white students. Racial discrimination in education is wrong and unlawful, no matter who benefits or who is harmed.' Jacobson said. The US Education Department had no immediate comment.
The Hill
7 hours ago
- The Hill
White House officials defend Trump's firing of BLS chief
White House officials on Sunday defended President Trump's decision to fire the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) following a weak jobs report, a move that has sparked broad criticism. 'The president wants his own people there so that when we see the numbers, they're more transparent and more reliable,' Kevin Hassett, chair of the National Economic Council, said on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' Hassett said in another interview on 'Fox News Sunday' that the BLS commissioner has a responsibility to explain major revisions such as the one seen in Friday's jobs report, which showed 258,000 fewer jobs for prior months than initially reported. 'The big downward revision is something of a puzzle. I don't think it was explained very well. And I think that markets might be as much unsettled by the fact that the data are so noisy,' Hassett said. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, one of Trump's top tariff negotiators, said in an interview that aired on CBS's 'Face the Nation' Sunday that the president has 'real concerns' about the jobs numbers reported by the Labor Department. 'Even last year during the campaign, there were enormous swings in the jobs numbers, and so sounds to me like the president has real concerns. You know, not just based on today's, but everything we saw last year,' Greer said in the interview taped on Friday. 'You want to be able to have somewhat reliable numbers,' he added. 'There are always revisions, but sometimes you see these revisions go in really extreme ways. And it's, you know, the president is the president. He can choose who works in the executive branch.' Trump on Friday directed his team to fire BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer after the latest jobs report showed the country only adding 73,000 jobs in July, and major revisions for jobs added in May and June. The move prompted immediate outcry from Democrats and a handful of Republicans, with some calling for an investigation. McEntarfer was nominated by former President Biden and overwhelmingly confirmed by the GOP-led Senate early last year in an 86-8 vote. Trump's advisers underscored the president's concerns about revisions to the labor data while defending McEntarfer's firing. Hassett noted that jobs data reported by the government has seen major swings since the COVID-19 pandemic. 'What we've seen over the last few years is massive revisions to the jobs numbers. In fact, they were extremely reliable, the kind of numbers that you want to guide policy decisions and markets, through COVID. And then when COVID happened, because response rates went down a lot, then revision rates skyrocketed. So the typical monthly revision often was bigger than the number itself,' Hassett said on NBC. Trump, in axing the BLS chief, claimed without evidence that McEntarfer 'faked the Jobs Numbers' before the 2024 election in order to boost former Vice President Kamala Harris's White House bid, citing labor statistics revisions during the Biden administration that boosted job numbers ahead of the election. The president accused her of manipulating data to make him and Republicans look bad, writing on Truth Social on Friday, 'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes.' McEntarfer reacted to Trump's firing of her in a social media post over the weekend, saying it was the 'honor of my life' to serve in the role and hailing the 'vital and important work' carried out by civil servants at the agency.
New York Times
17 hours ago
- New York Times
Experts Raise Concerns Over Trump's White House Ballroom Renovation Plans
Experts on historic preservation are raising concerns over the feasibility of President Trump's plans to complete large-scale renovations to the White House by the end of his term, and whether the project can be done while respecting the historic nature of the building. Mr. Trump unveiled plans on Thursday to construct a $200 million, 90,000-square-foot state ballroom off the East Wing to be completed 'long before' the end of his term in 2029. The project would be one of the largest renovations to the iconic building in decades. Mr. Trump has been on a winning streak this summer, emerging victorious in a series of Supreme Court rulings, signing a massive bill to carry out his domestic policy agenda and winning concessions from some of America's top trading partners. Now, by checking off a long-sought item on his list of pet projects, Mr. Trump is showing that he apparently feels emboldened to continue flexing his presidential power. The White House, the Supreme Court building, the Capitol and all their 'related buildings and grounds' are exempt from the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, which requires federal agencies to assess and mitigate adverse effects to historic properties and seek consultation through a formal review process. Instead, the White House has its own committee that provides advice on the 'preservation and the interpretation of the museum character' of the building. The Committee for the Preservation of the White House — chaired by the director of the National Park Service — is made up of several federal officials and a number of members appointed by the president. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
