Adnodd launches new strategy and Innovation to transform education in Wales
Independent Group leader Cllr Huw Murphy, along with Cllr Anji Tinley, Cllr Jamie Adams, Cllr Iwan Ward and Cllr Vanessa Thomas, have made a successful call for an Extraordinary Meeting of Council calling for a vote of no confidence in Councillor Paul Miller to remain as Deputy Leader & Cabinet Member.
Expanding on his reasons for the call, Cllr Murphy said: 'Councillor Miller on April 28 at a Cabinet meeting moved an amendment with regards to Welsh Education Strategic Plan (WESP) to request officers collect data from parents of children electing a Welsh medium education when the Schools Admission Code does not provide for the collection of such data.
'At this meeting Cllr Miller commented with regards to parental choice for Ysgol Caer Elen: '…all of them that I know who send their children to Caer Ellen honestly couldn't give a toss whether it was Welsh or English'.
'Comments such as this in 2025 are unacceptable and serve to create a perception of bias when it comes to the delivery of Welsh medium education, something that generations have striven for, namely equality and fairness.
'For a Deputy Leader of Council to make such comments and then refuse to retract when he has had ample opportunity to do so makes his position untenable both as Deputy Leader and Cabinet Member.
'This decision was successfully called in on May 14 by the Schools O&S Scrutiny Committee when officers again made clear that the collection of data requested by Cllr Miller was not within the scope of the Schools Admission Code and to pursue this course also has budgetary implications for the Authority.
'Cllr Miller following the Schools O&S Meeting made a public statement to reaffirm his position and accused the Welsh Language Commissioner (WLC) of an 'extraordinary political intervention' when he had no basis to make such a claim. The remit of the WLC allows her to pass expert opinion on matters such as Welsh education and language.
'Cabinet re-convened on May 21 and heard a proposal by Cllr Miller to now collect data on all languages and additional information and was again informed the Schools Admission Code did not provide for the collection of such data. Cllr Miller offered no apology with regards to his comments towards the WLC and again looked to blame others for the publicity that has arisen from this matter.
'Throughout the recent debate on WESP, Cllr Miller has ignored the views and advice of the Schools O&S Committee, Senior Officers, the Welsh Language Commissioner and even Mr Mark Drakeford his own Minister for the Welsh Language.
'Politicians at every level must demonstrate the capacity to acknowledge their mistakes, including errors in judgment, as we are all inherently human. In such situations, it is crucial for public trust that they engage in self-reflection, offer apologies when warranted, and adjust their political stance accordingly.
'Cllr Miller, however, has failed to apologise or recognise that others, such as senior officers and the WLC, may possess greater expertise on the matter at hand. Instead, he has chosen to deflect responsibility and blame others for the public scrutiny surrounding this issue.
'This has led to a request for a council meeting to propose a motion of no confidence in Cllr Miller's ability to continue serving as Deputy Leader and Cabinet Member.'
Responding, Cllr Miller has previously said: 'It must be the case it is at least possible some parents are choosing Welsh medium schools other than because of the medium of Welsh. It's currently unknown; surely it's right the council seeks to understand the impact of other forces.'
He said Cllr Murphy was 'trying to make something out of nothing,' in 'a naked attempt to create outrage, trying to paint some in this council as anti-Welsh,' adding: 'Cllr Murphy should be deeply ashamed of his actions [after the first meeting] in trying to create artificial division in the county of Pembrokeshire.'
The extraordinary meeting is to take place on the afternoon of June 2.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Pembrokeshire Herald
3 hours ago
- Pembrokeshire Herald
Davies hits out at junk food ad ban
WELSH CONSERVATIVE Senedd Member Andrew RT Davies has criticised a move by the Vale of Glamorgan Council to ban unhealthy food advertising, calling it 'silly' and a distraction from core responsibilities. The Vale is expected to approve restrictions on so-called 'junk food' adverts in public spaces, in line with growing public health campaigns against obesity. Davies, who represents South Wales Central, said: 'It's about time town hall bosses stop treating residents like children. People know that too many sweets and burgers can be bad for you, but council tax paying adults can make decisions about their lifestyles themselves without being parented by the politicians they pay for. 'At the end of the day, lots of places in the Vale are visited by tourists who fancy an ice cream or a cone of chips, and with the tourism tax already coming down the tracks in Wales, traders need to be able to advertise their snacks. The Vale Council should focus on keeping council tax low and delivering essential services rather than these silly distractions.' Thinks idea is bonkers: Andrew RT Davies MS Public health arguments Supporters of advertising restrictions argue that reducing the visibility of high-fat, high-salt and high-sugar foods is an important step in tackling poor diets and obesity, particularly among children. Wales has some of the highest rates of obesity in the UK, with Public Health Wales warning that one in four children is overweight or obese by the time they start school. The Welsh Government has already signalled its intention to curb junk food promotions, mirroring measures in Scotland and parts of England. Local authorities are being encouraged to take action in their own areas. Could Pembrokeshire follow suit? Locals and tourists queue up for a tasty fish and chip supper in Tenby (Image: File) Pembrokeshire County Council has not announced any plans to introduce a ban on unhealthy food advertising. However, with other councils in Wales moving in this direction, campaigners will be watching to see if the authority considers similar measures. Traders in Pembrokeshire's coastal towns rely heavily on the sale of ice creams, chips and fast food to tourists during the summer months, meaning any restrictions could prove controversial. The debate highlights the growing tension between public health initiatives and concerns over local economies, with councils under pressure to balance both.
Edinburgh Reporter
4 hours ago
- Edinburgh Reporter
Former council leader Cammy Day represents Edinburgh at international event
Sending former council leader Cammy Day to represent Edinburgh to an international delegation earlier this month 'made perfect sense, ' according to the city's leader. Along with fellow Labour councillor James Dalgleish and other city figures, Cllr Day met with 26 visiting councillors from Kaohsiung, Taiwan in Edinburgh. The news came at the city's Policy and Sustainability Committee on Tuesday, where council leader Jane Meagher said she put his name forward due to her being unable to attend. Cllr Day resigned his role as council leader in December last year over allegations he had sent sexual messages to Ukrainian refugees living in the Capital. He was also suspended by the Labour Party, but recently was readmitted to the party and their council group after he was cleared of any criminal behaviour by police in May. SNP councillor Kate Campbell raised questions over why Cllr Day was in attendance, given the 'widespread acknowledgement' that he had carried out inappropriate behaviour. Councillor Meagher said: 'I wasn't available for this, and it seemed to me to be a matter of common sense to include Councillor Day given his historical involvement and knowledge of our friendship agreement with [Kaohsiung]. 'For that reason, it made perfect sense for him to be there, to help smooth the path between Cllr Dalgleish and the delegation, which I gather was extremely powerful and helpful. 'It made perfect sense not to exclude somebody who had done a considerable amount of work in developing this friendship agreement with Taiwan.' Cllr Campbell had also asked about two Edinburgh University representatives in the delegation who had been unable to attend at the last minute due to ill health. She said that she did not doubt that they were unwell, but asked whether a policy of notifying city partners of what councillors may be present at an event would be wise. Council officer Chris Adams, who covers international relationships, said that the two representatives had been unwell, but that he did not have any more information about them. Cllr Meagher added: 'As far as Edinburgh University attendance is concerned, I don't think we can draw any conclusions around their motives for not being able to attend. 'If we think about global politics, it might be that you draw conclusions related to that, rather than to any individuals who might be present.' A large portion of Edinburgh University's student body is from China, which does not recognise Taiwan as an independent country. Mr Adams said Cllr Dalgleish was in attendance at the meeting in his civic duty as a Bailie, a representative of the Lord Provost. And standing in for the Lord Provost, who was unable to attend, was another Bailie, James Douglas. He said the university attendees had been set to discuss the research connections between Edinburgh University and universities in Asia. He also said James McVeigh from Festivals Edinburgh was also in attendance, and that much of the conversation in the meeting was around how Edinburgh handles the festivals. Cllr Meagher said she understood that the discussions were 'extremely powerful and helpful'. Edinburgh has a range of sister city and friendship agreements with cities around the globe, including Krakow, Dunedin, Kyiv and San Diego. By Joseph Sullivan Local Democracy Reporter Like this: Like Related
New Statesman
4 hours ago
- New Statesman
The Epping ruling deepens Labour's immigration nightmare
Photo byThere is one clear political winner from the Epping asylum hotel ruling: Nigel Farage. True, the technical victor, as so often in English life, may be the Town and Country Planning Order (the owners of the Bell Hotel failed to apply for new planning permission). But that's not something Farage felt obliged to mention, hailing 'a great victory for the parents and concerned residents of Epping'. That's a message that will resonate with an electorate increasingly wondering whether to gamble on the Reform leader (Farage's party has led every opinion poll since May). It was the Bell Hotel that became an emblem of a dysfunctional model after one migrant living there was charged with sexual assault (a second asylum seeker was arrested last week). Confronted by the case between Epping council and the hotel's owners, Home Office lawyers sought to intervene, warning that any injunction could 'substantially interfere' with the department's statutory duty to house asylum seekers and risked 'acting as an impetus for further violent protests'. But the judge, who acknowledged that recent arrests 'form a basis for the local concern', ruled that Somani Hotels, which owns the Bell Hotel, 'sidestepped the public scrutiny and explanation which would otherwise have taken place if an application for planning permission or for a certificate of lawful use had been made'. The Home Office is barred from appealing and now has less than a month to find alternative accommodation for the hotel's residents. But this practical challenge could be far outweighed by the potential unravelling of the asylum hotel model. Farage has vowed that the 12 councils controlled by Reform will explore similar legal action to Epping, and shadow home secretary Chris Philp has said he would welcome other local authorities doing the same (Labour accuses the Tories of 'rank hypocrisy', noting that Philp was the first immigration minister to move asylum seekers into the Bell Hotel and that Robert Jenrick was the second). Labour knows just how politically toxic the asylum hotel policy – emblematic of the UK's profligate outsourced state – is. Aides speak with authentic outrage of the 'absolute wreck' of a system they inherited as the Conservatives' doomed Rwanda deportation scheme saw processing ground to a halt. The number of asylum seekers accommodated has fallen from a peak of 56,042 in 400 hotels in September 2023 to 32,345 in 210 hotels (with costs falling from £3bn to £2.1bn), and the government intends to end their use entirely by the time of the next election in 2029. But even before yesterday's ruling, some in Labour were warning that far faster action was required. Last month, one influential MP told me that the government should 'requisition Duchy of Lancaster land and build temporary Nightingale accommodation' (along the lines of the hospitals constructed during the Covid-19 pandemic). That same MP now blames a 'vacuum of leadership' for leaving the courts to rule on what voters see as a 'moral and political matter'. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe For Labour, the painful irony of the ruling is that it comes just as the government is trying to tell a better story on immigration. Last month, ministers agreed a 'one in, one out' asylum deal with France that they hope will deter Channel crossings and only today announced a new agreement with Iraq to return illegal migrants. Instead, Labour is left to rue the slow breakdown of a system that it did not design but must now own. This piece first appeared in the Morning Call newsletter; receive it every morning by subscribing on Substack here [See also: Zarah Sultana reveals a fault line in Your Party] Related
