logo
Zero ships from China are bound for California's top ports. Officials haven't seen that since the pandemic

Zero ships from China are bound for California's top ports. Officials haven't seen that since the pandemic

CNN10-05-2025

On Friday morning, West Coast port officials told CNN about a startling sight: Not a single cargo vessel had left China with goods for the two major West Coast ports in the past 12 hours. That hasn't happened since the pandemic.
Six days ago, 41 vessels were scheduled to depart China for the San Pedro Bay Complex, which encompasses both the Port of Los Angeles and Port of Long Beach in California. On Friday, it was zero.
President Donald Trump's trade war imposed massive tariffs on most Chinese imports last month. That's led to fewer ships at sea carrying less cargo to America's ports. For many businesses, it is now too expensive to do business with China, one of America's most important trading partners.
Officials are concerned not just about the lack of vessels leaving China, but the speed at which that number dropped.
'That's cause for alarm,' said Mario Cordero, the CEO of the Port of Long Beach. 'We are now seeing numbers in excess of what we witnessed in the pandemic' for cancellations and fewer vessel arrivals.
The busiest ports in the country are experiencing steep declines in cargo. The Port of Long Beach is seeing a 35-40% drop compared to normal cargo volume. The Port of Los Angeles had a 31% drop in volume this week, and the Port of New York and Jersey says it's also bracing for a slowdown. On Wednesday, the Port of Seattle said it had zero container ships in the port, another anomaly that hasn't happened since the pandemic.
'That's because just nothing is being shipped over,' port commissioner Ryan Calkins told CNN's Kaitlan Collins.
US and Chinese trade representatives are set to meet in Geneva this weekend for their first face to face meeting in an attempt to deescalate the trade war. Most goods shipping from China to the United States have a 145% tariff, while most US exports to China are being hit with a 125% tariff. On Friday, President Donald Trump suggested lowering the tariff rate with China to 80%, but said the final terms would be up to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.
For consumers, who are facing higher prices or shortages of certain items, Cordero says a deal can't come soon enough.
'If things don't change quickly, I'm talking about the uncertainty that we're seeing, then we may be seeing empty products on the shelves. This is now going to be felt by the consumer in the coming 30 days,' said Cordero.
Upwards of 63% of the cargo that flows into the Port of Long Beach is from China — the largest share of any US port. But that number is down from 72% in 2016 as retailers shift away from China over simmering trade tensions.
Even so, China still represents a major source of imports into the United States. Maersk, the second largest shipping line in the world, told CNN the cargo volume between the United States and China has fallen by 30-40% compared to normal.
'If we don't start to see a de-escalation of the situation with China, if we don't start to see more of those trade deals, then we could be in a situation where some of these effects get more entrenched and are more adverse,' said Maersk CEO Vincent Clerc.
–CNN's Maisie Linford contributed to this report

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk Backtracks on Trump, Says Posts 'Went Too Far'
Musk Backtracks on Trump, Says Posts 'Went Too Far'

Bloomberg

time15 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Musk Backtracks on Trump, Says Posts 'Went Too Far'

Elon Musk, who served as a close adviser and confidant to President Donald Trump until a bitter public falling out last week in a series of social-media posts, issued his strongest sign of contrition yet over how he handled the rupture. "I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week," he said on his social-media platform, X. "They went too far." The dispute, which was triggered by Musk's opposition to the tax-cut bill Trump is pushing through Congress — posed a threat to Musk's wealth when the president raised the prospect of retaliating by cutting off his government contracts. That would have battered SpaceX, his rocket company, and Tesla Inc.'s stock price tumbled last Thursday, before recovering most of the loss. Bloomberg Anchor Tom Mackenzie joins Caroline Hepker and Valerie Tytel with the details. (Source: Bloomberg)

Teaching AI isn't enough—we need to teach wisdom, too
Teaching AI isn't enough—we need to teach wisdom, too

Fast Company

time37 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

Teaching AI isn't enough—we need to teach wisdom, too

Artificial intelligence is shaking the intellectual, emotional, and economic foundations of the world. A glance at mainstream or social media confirms that the world ahead will look nothing like the one we're leaving behind. Technological disruption is nothing new. From bronze smelting in Benin and steel forging in Japan to Themistocles's naval buildup in ancient Greece, history shows that transformative technologies spark societal shifts and national urgency. Today's urgency is AI. The White House's recent executive order (EO) on AI education echoes past anxieties—this time, about China's rapid advancement. You may have missed this EO amid the recent flood of them. But it's a pivotal moment. Though well-intentioned, the EO lacks the depth needed for a truly informed AI educational policy. The EO defines its mission as providing 'opportunities to cultivate the skills and understanding necessary to use and create the next generation of AI technology.' It outlines three imperatives: 'Expose our students to AI at an early age.' Train teachers to 'effectively incorporate AI into their teaching methods.' Promote AI literacy to 'develop an AI-ready workforce.' These steps are necessary. AI is a profound shift, one that exposes long-standing deficiencies in our educational system—particularly our neglect of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Still, the EO falls short in three key areas. Speaking as president and CEO of the Center of Science and Industry, a board member of the National Academies, and a lifelong STEM advocate, I say this: You cannot teach AI without also teaching critical thinking, ethics, and wisdom. Our national conversation must expand beyond technical training. As AI (and eventually artificial general intelligence) integrates into every part of life, we face a stark choice: Do we become passive consumers of knowledge, or do we intentionally cultivate wisdom? Technical proficiency alone turns us into carbon versions of AI. Instead, we need a cultural shift—one that champions critical thinking, ethical reasoning, and curiosity in classrooms, workplaces, and homes. The goal isn't just to understand AI, but to navigate the world it creates. Techno-optimism must be balanced with rigorous intellectual and moral interrogation—or the 'doomers' may be right. Though the EO doesn't address the human-AI relationship, I'll give it the benefit of the doubt—it's not a full policy, but a starting point. I hope future policy goes further, confronting AI's risks and outlining how education and society should respond—both philosophically and practically. For what it's worth, my ideal AI curriculum would include more than practical skills. It would explore: Martin Heidegger's insights on how technology shapes experience Nick Bostrom's ' paper clip ' thought experiment Shoshana Zuboff's critique of surveillance capitalism Soon, AI won't need to be taught—it will be omnipresent. In the 1990s, we trained students to use a mouse and browse the web. But intuitive design soon made that obsolete. The same is happening with AI—only faster. Rather than focus on today's tools, AI education should teach how to understand technology's evolution. Computer scientist Alan Kay once said, 'Technology is anything that was invented after you were born.' Maintaining global leadership requires more than technical prowess—it demands cultural vision. After Sputnik, America feared falling behind in the space race. In the 1990s, it was Japan. Now, it's China. But the true question is: Which nation will use AI to become the better society? French philosopher and diplomat Alexis de Tocqueville once said, 'America is great because it is good. If America ceases to be good, America will cease to be great.' That quote echoes as I reflect on the EO and our future. To lead in AI, we must prioritize wisdom over raw intelligence. That greatness won't come from executive orders—but from the strength of our social order.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store