logo
US scales back human rights report; softens criticism of some Trump partner nations

US scales back human rights report; softens criticism of some Trump partner nations

CNAa day ago
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump's administration has scaled back a key US government report on human rights worldwide, dramatically softening criticism of some countries that have been strong partners of the Republican president.
Among such nations are El Salvador and Israel, which rights groups say have extensive records of abuses.
Instead, the widely anticipated 2024 Human Rights Report of the US State Department sounded an alarm on the erosion of freedom of speech in Europe and ramped up criticism of Brazil and South Africa, with which Washington has clashed on a host of issues.
Any criticism of governments over their treatment of LGBTQI rights, which appeared in Biden administration editions of the report, appeared to have been largely omitted.
Washington referred to Russia's invasion of Ukraine mainly as the "Russia-Ukraine war".
The report's section on Israel was much shorter than last year's edition and contained no mention of the severe humanitarian crisis or death toll in Gaza.
More than 61,000 people have been killed in Gaza, the Gaza health ministry says, as a result of Israel's military assault after an attack by Palestinian militant group Hamas in October 2023.
The report was delayed for months as Trump appointees altered an earlier State Department draft dramatically to bring it in line with "America First" values, said government officials who spoke on condition of anonymity.
The report introduced new categories such as "Life" and "Liberty," and "Security of the Person".
"There were no credible reports of significant human rights abuses," the 2024 report said about El Salvador.
That stood in sharp contrast to the 2023 report that talked about "significant human rights issues" and listed them as credible reports of unlawful or arbitrary killings, torture, and harsh and life-threatening prison conditions.
Washington's two-way ties with El Salvador have strengthened since Trump took office, as his administration has deported people to El Salvador with help from President Nayib Bukele.
His country is receiving US$6 million from the United States to house the migrants in a high-security mega-prison.
Critics said the report was politically driven.
"The report demonstrates what happens when political agendas take priority over the facts," said Josh Paul, a former State Department official and director of non-government organisation A New Policy.
"The outcome is a much-abbreviated product that is more reflective of a Soviet propaganda release than of a democratic system."
State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said the report was restructured to improve readability and was no longer an expansive list of "politically biased demands and assertions".
Bruce declined to respond to specific questions about countries and did not say why a list of rights abuses in El Salvador was removed.
DIFFERING ASSESSMENTS
The Trump administration has moved away from the traditional US promotion of democracy and human rights, seeing it as interference in another country's affairs, even as it criticised countries selectively, in line with its broader policy towards a particular country.
One example is Europe, where Trump officials repeatedly weighed in on its politics to denounce what they see as suppression of right-wing leaders, including in countries such as Romania, Germany, and France, and accused European authorities of censoring views such as criticism of immigration.
For decades, the State Department's congressionally mandated Human Rights Report has been used as a blueprint of reference for global rights advocacy.
This year's report was prepared following a major department revamp that included the firing of hundreds of people, many from the agency's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, which takes the lead in writing the report.
In April, Secretary of State Marco Rubio wrote an opinion piece saying the bureau had become a platform for "left-wing activists", and vowing that the Trump administration would reorient it to focus on "Western values".
In Brazil, where the Trump administration has clashed with the government, the State Department found the human rights situation declined, after the 2023 report found no significant changes.
This year's report took aim at the courts, stating they took action undermining freedom of speech and disproportionately suppressing the speech of supporters of former President Jair Bolsonaro, among others.
Bolsonaro is on trial before the Supreme Court on charges that he conspired with allies to violently overturn his 2022 electoral loss to leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.
Trump has referred to the case as a "witch hunt" and called it grounds for a 50 per cent tariff on Brazilian goods.
In South Africa, whose government the Trump administration has accused of racial discrimination towards Afrikaners, this year's report said the human rights situation significantly worsened.
It said, "South Africa took a substantially worrying step towards land expropriation of Afrikaners and further abuses against racial minorities in the country."
In last year's report, the State Department found no significant changes in the human rights situation in South Africa.
Trump issued an executive order this year calling for the US to resettle Afrikaners.
He described them as victims of "violence against racially disfavored landowners," accusations that echoed far-right claims but which have been contested by South Africa's government.
South Africa dismissed the report's findings, and said it was flawed, inaccurate and disappointing.
"It is ironic that a report from a nation that has exited the UN Human Rights Council and therefore no longer sees itself accountable in a multilateral peer review system would seek to produce one-sided fact free reports without any due process or engagement," the government said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Putin suggests Russia and U.S. could make a deal on nuclear arms control
Putin suggests Russia and U.S. could make a deal on nuclear arms control

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Putin suggests Russia and U.S. could make a deal on nuclear arms control

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox FILE PHOTO: FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump and Russia's President Vladimir Putin talk during the family photo session at the APEC Summit in Danang, Vietnam November 11, 2017. REUTERS/Jorge Silva/File Photo/File Photo MOSCOW - Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Thursday that the U.S. administration was making "sincere efforts" to resolve the conflict in Ukraine and suggested Moscow and Washington could reach a deal on nuclear arms control. Speaking at a Kremlin meeting with Russia's most senior military and civilian officials, Putin said that he was informing them of the state of play in negotiations on Ukraine with the United States, and bilateral talks with Kyiv. "I would like to tell you about the stage we are at with the current American administration, which, as everyone knows, is making, in my opinion, quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the fighting, end the crisis, and reach agreements of interest to all parties involved in this conflict," Putin said. Putin said the discussions with the United States were aimed at creating "the long–term conditions of peace between our countries, in Europe, and in the world as a whole, if we reach agreements in the field of strategic offensive arms control in the next stages." Putin is due to hold a summit with U.S. President Donald Trump in Alaska on Friday. Russia and the United States have by far the biggest arsenals of nuclear weapons in the world. The last remaining pillar of nuclear arms control between the two countries is the New Strategic Arms Reduction (New START) treaty, which is due to expire on February 5, 2026. REUTERS

Trump ally Erik Prince plans to keep forces in Haiti for 10 years to fight gangs and collect taxes
Trump ally Erik Prince plans to keep forces in Haiti for 10 years to fight gangs and collect taxes

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Trump ally Erik Prince plans to keep forces in Haiti for 10 years to fight gangs and collect taxes

August 14 - The prominent Donald Trump supporter and private security executive Erik Prince says he plans to keep his forces in Haiti for 10 years under an arrangement that will eventually give his firm a role in the country's tax-collection system. In an interview with Reuters, Prince said his company, Vectus Global, had reached a 10-year agreement with the Haitian government to fight the country's criminal gangs and set up a tax collection system. After the security situation is stabilized, the firm would be involved in designing and implementing a program to tax goods imported across Haiti's border with the Dominican Republic, he said. He said he expected to wrestle control of major roads and territories from the gangs in about a year. 'One key measure of success for me will be when you can drive from Port-au-Prince to Cap Haitian in a thin-skinned vehicle and not be stopped by gangs,' Prince said in the interview. Prince would not comment about how much the Haitian government would pay Vectus Global, nor how much tax he expects to collect in Haiti. The new president of the transitional council, Laurent Saint-Cyr, who was inaugurated on August 7 as part of a planned rotation of council leaders, did not respond to requests for comment. Haiti's former council president and prime minister also did not respond to requests for comment. Vectus began operating in Haiti in March, deploying mainly drones in coordination with a task force led by the prime minister, but the long-term engagement and the involvement in tax collection have not been previously reported. A person familiar with the company's operations in Haiti told Reuters that Vectus would intensify its fight against the criminal gangs that control large swathes of Haiti in the coming weeks, deploying several hundred fighters from the United States, Europe and El Salvador who are trained as snipers and specialists in intelligence and communications, as well as helicopters and boats. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Jalan Bukit Merah fire: PMD battery could have started fatal blaze, says SCDF Singapore askST: What to do in the event of a fire at home? Singapore 4 housebreaking suspects taken to Bukit Timah crime scene under police escort Asia AirAsia flight from KL to Incheon lands at the wrong airport in South Korea Singapore Reformative training for teen who cheated man of $47k Rolex watch on former stepdad's instructions Opinion Could telco consolidation spell the end of attractive mobile plans? Asia Strong India-Singapore ties key to economic growth amid 'volatile landscape': DPM Gan Singapore From quiet introvert to self-confident student: How this vulnerable, shy teen gets help to develop and discover her strength Prince, a former U.S. Navy Seal, founded the Blackwater military security firm in 1997. He sold the company in 2010 after Blackwater employees were convicted of unlawfully killing 14 unarmed civilians while escorting a U.S. embassy convoy in Baghdad's Nisour Square. The men were pardoned by Trump during his first term in the White House. EXPANDING ROLE Since Trump's return to the White House, Prince has advised Ecuador on how to fight criminal gangs and struck a deal with the Democratic Republic of Congo to help secure and tax its mineral wealth. 'It's hard to imagine them operating without the consent of the Trump administration,' said Romain Le Cour Grandmaison, head of the Haiti program at Geneva-based Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime. When asked for comment about Le Cour Grandmaison's assertion, a State Department spokesperson said it has not hired Prince or his company for any work in Haiti. A senior White House official said: "The U.S. government has no involvement with the private military contractor hired by the Haitian government. We are not funding this contract or exercising any oversight.' It's unclear whether Prince's contract would be affected by the change of leadership in Haiti earlier this month. In an August 7 televised address, Saint-Cyr said he welcomed more international support to fight the gangs. 'I am inviting all the international partners to increase their support, send more soldiers, provide more training," he said. "Help us with a more robust international force.' The crisis in Haiti has worsened in recent years, as armed gangs gained territory and attacked hospitals, police stations and prisons, taking control of strategic transport routes and extorting funds from the population. Rights groups accuse the gangs of massacres, rapes, kidnappings and arson. About half the population is food-insecure and over 8,000 people in displacement camps face famine-level hunger. Haiti used to collect half of its tax revenue at the border with the Dominican Republic, but gang control of key transport routes has crippled trade and cut off state income, a report commissioned last year by Haiti's government and several multilateral organizations found. This has undermined the government's ability to respond to the crisis or deliver basic services, the report said. The Dominican Republic is a key source of grains, flour, milk, water and other food staples for Haiti, according to customs data. Haiti also relies on imports from the Dominican Republic for textiles, consumer goods, and medical supplies. Security contractors working in Haiti have faced challenges operating in a country with entrenched links between the gangs, local police and some factions of the government. Earlier this year, a team from American security firm Studebaker Defense abandoned their mission in Haiti after two of their members were abducted, likely due to corrupt police officials, the New York Times reported. Mounir Mahmalat, who serves as a country coordinator of the World Bank's Fragility, Conflict and Violence Group, said that it was virtually impossible to ensure the safe transport of goods or the security of people working in Port-au-Prince. Other security firms working in Haiti have raised questions about how Vectus would hold onto cleared gang territory as well as the wisdom of channelling resources to private security firms instead of the country's own security forces. "Resorting to private military companies cannot be seen as a solution to insecurity in Haiti,' said Gedeon Jean, head of Haiti's Center for Human Rights Analysis and Research. 'The use of private companies has often resulted in human rights violations.' While a private force could help police restore security, Jean warned against large spending on a foreign company while Haiti's own security forces lack funds and equipment. REUTERS

Explainer-Can Trump take long-term control of Washington's police?
Explainer-Can Trump take long-term control of Washington's police?

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Explainer-Can Trump take long-term control of Washington's police?

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Protesters hold a banner near the White House, as U.S. President Donald Trump announced he is placing the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department under direct federal control and deploying National Guard troops to Washington, D.C, in Washington D.C., U.S., August 11, 2025. REUTERS/Ken Cedeno U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday said he will seek long-term federal control of Washington's police force to crack down on crime in the nation's capital. But Trump can expect a flurry of lawsuits if he tries to do so without Congress's approval. Here is why. WHO CONTROLS DC LAW ENFORCEMENT? The Democratic mayor of Washington, Muriel Bowser, has authority over the city's Metropolitan Police Department. But a federal law from 1973 known as the Home Rule Act allows the president to take control of the MPD for 30 days during an emergency. Trump invoked this provision of the Home Rule Act on Monday, saying in an executive order that there is a "crime emergency" in the city. Bowser has pushed back on Trump's claims of unchecked violence, highlighting that violent crime hit its lowest level in more than three decades last year, according to city data. CAN TRUMP EXTEND HIS CONTROL OF MPD FOR LONGER THAN 30 DAYS? Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Jalan Bukit Merah fire: PMD battery could have started fatal blaze, says SCDF Singapore askST: What to do in the event of a fire at home? Singapore 4 housebreaking suspects taken to Bukit Timah crime scene under police escort Asia AirAsia flight from KL to Incheon lands at the wrong airport in South Korea Singapore Reformative training for teen who cheated man of $47k Rolex watch on former stepdad's instructions Opinion Could telco consolidation spell the end of attractive mobile plans? Asia Strong India-Singapore ties key to economic growth amid 'volatile landscape': DPM Gan Singapore From quiet introvert to self-confident student: How this vulnerable, shy teen gets help to develop and discover her strength Trump on Wednesday suggested that he could extend the 30-day federal takeover without congressional approval. 'If it's a national emergency, we can do it without Congress, but we expect to be before Congress very quickly,' Trump said. But legal experts said the law is clear: A presidential takeover is limited to 30 days, unless Congress votes to extend it through a joint resolution. Any legislation to extend Trump's control over the police department would likely fail in the Senate where Democrats can use procedural rules to block most bills. CAN TRUMP 'FEDERALIZE' DC MORE BROADLY? Trump has repeatedly threatened to put DC under full federal control, but that appears very unlikely. The Home Rule Act delegated the day-to-day work of municipal government to the mayor's office and a city council. To exert full federal control of D.C., Trump would need Congress to repeal that law. Such a repeal would require 60 votes in the U.S. Senate, where Trump's Republican Party has a 53-47 advantage. Democrats have been supportive of home rule for DC and are not expected to cross party lines to endorse Trump's vision. WHAT ABOUT THE NATIONAL GUARD AND FEDERAL AGENTS? Trump has broad control over the D.C. National Guard's 2,700 soldiers and airmen. They report directly to the president, unlike counterparts in other states and territories. Trump said on Monday he was deploying 800 National Guard troops to Washington. Trump in recent months has also directed federal law enforcement agencies such as the FBI to increase the police presence in Washington. Trump has broad authority to reallocate federal agency personnel. CAN TRUMP'S ACTIONS IN DC SERVE AS A MODEL FOR OTHER CITIES? Trump has said the federalization of Washington's police force could serve as a model for other U.S. cities. He has previously said he would expand his efforts to other Democratic-run cities such as Chicago that he claims have failed to address crime. But Washington is unique because of the district's legal status and the Home Rule Act provision allowing for a presidential MPD takeover. There is no similar legal authority Trump can cite to take over police departments in other cities. The Tenth Amendment vests in states a police power to provide for the health, safety, and welfare of state citizens. Trump could decide to send the National Guard or other military to support law enforcement in other cities, as he did when he sent 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles to quell protests and support federal immigration enforcement actions. Unlike the D.C. National Guard, which reports directly to the president, each states' National Guard serves as a militia force that answers to their governors except when called into federal service. Trump's decision to take control of the California National Guard was a break from a longstanding tradition against using the military to police civilians within the country. California has sued the Trump administration, alleging the president improperly called the National Guard into service and violated a 19th-century law that generally prevents the military from engaging in domestic law enforcement. The president said the National Guard presence was justified because protests and acts of violence in Los Angeles were "a form of rebellion" that necessitated a military response. A judge heard testimony this week in California's lawsuit, which ultimately seeks a ruling that would return its National Guard troops to state control and a declaration that Trump's action was illegal. REUTERS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store