
UK borrowing jumps as US trade push in face of potential Trump tariffs
Rachel Reeves is scrambling to strike a US trade deal to revive the economy on a trip to Washington today - as figures showed UK government borrowing spiking. The Chancellor has vowed to 'defend Britain's interests' as she prepares for talks with American counterpart Scott Bessant during the three-day IMF summit.
The grim backdrop to the discussions was underlined yesterday as the IMF dramatically downgraded global growth forecasts - reducing its predictions for UK plc from 1.6 per cent to 1.1 per cent this year and from 1.5 per cent to 1.4 per cent next year. Data released this morning showed that public sector net borrowing rose to £151.9billion in the year to the end of March - with Labour's bumper pay settlements for state workers partly blamed. That was £14.6billion higher than the £137.3billion forecast by the Treasury's OBR watchdog - and the third highest level of borrowing in any financial year since records began in 1947. Only 2021 during the the Covid pandemic and 2010 amid the Credit Crunch were worse.
Borrowing rose to £16.4billion last month, above the £15.8billion analysts had pencilled in. Grant Fitzner, the ONS's chief economist, said: 'Our initial estimates suggest public sector borrowing rose almost £21billion in the financial year just ended as, despite a substantial boost in income, expenditure rose by more, largely due to inflation-related costs, including higher pay and benefit increases. At the end of the financial year, debt remained close to the annual value of the output of the economy, at levels last seen in the early 1960s.'
The respected IFS think-tank said the figures underlined the risk that Ms Reeves would not be able to meet her fiscal rules, potentially requiring more tax rises or spending cuts. Ahead of her visit to Washington, Ms Reeves said: 'The world has changed and we are in a new era of global trade. I am in no doubt that the imposition of tariffs will have a profound impact on the global economy and the economy at home.'
'This changing world is unsettling for families who are worried about the cost of living and businesses concerned about what tariffs will means for them. But our task as a Government is not to be knocked off course or to take rash action which risks undermining people's security. Instead, we must rise to meet the moment and I will always act to defend British interests as part of our plan for change. We need a world economy that provides stability and fairness for businesses wanting to invest, and trade, more trade and global partnerships between nations with shared interests, and security for working people who want to get on with their lives.'
Responding to the new IMF forecasts, she claimed 'the UK is still the fastest-growing' European country in the G7. 'The IMF have recognised that this Government is delivering reform which will drive up long-term growth in the UK, through our plan for change,' she said. 'The report also clearly shows that the world has changed, which is why I will be in Washington this week defending British interests and making the case for free and fair trade.'
As well as seeking to make progress on a US deal, Ms Reeves is also expected to discuss improving trading relations with other nations – something she has previously said the Government is keen to do. Earlier in April, she hosted India's finance minister for talks on a potential free trade agreement and trade is expected to feature heavily at a UK-EU summit in May.
Responding to the public sector finances figures, Chief Secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones said: 'Economic stability is crucial within a changing world. We will never play fast and loose with the public finances, that's why our fiscal rules are non-negotiable and why we are going through every penny of taxpayer money spent, line by line, for the first time in 17 years to tear out waste. We are laser-focused on making sure taxpayer money is delivering our Plan for Change missions to put more money in people's pockets, rebuild the NHS and strengthen our borders.'
Want more stories like this from the Daily Mail? Hit the follow button above for more of the news you need.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Belfast Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Belfast Telegraph
NI hotels join compensation action against Booking.com's ‘anti-competitive' practices
The action — involving more than 25 European countries and which could cost millions of euros — follows the judgment by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on September 19 last year, which found that the platform's parity clauses breached EU competition law. However, has previously said it is unaware of any pending legal action and suggested the case appeared to be based on 'incorrect and misleading' information. 'This is a chance for hoteliers to stand up for their rights, recover financial losses, and promote a fairer online marketplace,' said Janice Gault, Chief Executive of the Northern Ireland Hotels Federation (NIHF). 'This legal action is unprecedented, and the Federation is supporting it on behalf of its members to secure full compensation for hotels affected by anti-competitive practices. 'For over 20 years, the platform's parity clauses have posed serious challenges for the local hotel sector, leading to significant financial harm through inflated commission fees. 'This is not only about exposing unfair business conduct but also about seeking meaningful financial redress.' In 2021, unilaterally terminated corresponding compensation negotiations with the German Hotel Association (IHA) and started legal proceedings against several hundred German hotels before the Amsterdam District Court. An interim result of this (pending) process is the ruling of the European Court of Justice from September 19 2024, which confirmed findings of the German Federal Cartel Office that the platform's parity clauses breached EU competition law. This has resulted in claims for damages for hotels throughout Europe, which are now to be asserted with the class action supported by HOTREC, an umbrella group representing hotels, restaurants and cafes in Europe. The federation said that over the past 20 years, these parity clauses placed Northern Ireland hotels at a significant competitive disadvantage and that they suppressed price competition between and other online platforms, leading to inflated commissions paid by hotels. In addition, the clauses restricted hotels from offering better prices or availability on their own websites, limiting direct sales and autonomy. The federation added that use of anti-competitive parity clauses caused 'substantial financial harm to hotel businesses across Northern Ireland'. Under the general principles of European competition law, hotels in Northern Ireland are entitled to claim compensation from for the financial losses suffered. Affected hotels may also be eligible to recover a significant portion of commissions paid to in any period from 2004 to 2024, plus interest. The NIHF said they are actively working with affected hotels, guest accommodation providers and guesthouses across Northern Ireland to guide them through the next steps in joining the collective legal action against The case will be led and handled by a team of competition lawyers, litigators, and competition economists, who have already successfully achieved the ECJ's judgment last September. The legal claim will be brought before the courts in the Netherlands, with hotels having until July 31 to sign up to the damages litigation. The Irish Hotels Federation is one of dozens around Europe involved in the action. In a statement to RTÉ News last week, said it is 'not aware of any European wide legal action being taken by hotels'. It added that: 'The ECJ judgment relates specifically to questions asked by the Amsterdam District Court in relation to litigation between and some German hotels disputing the legality of price parity clauses in Germany between 2006 and 2016 — the court did not conclude that German parity price clauses were anti-competitive or had an effect on competition. The Amsterdam Court will now need to make a decision specifically on German parity clauses only.'


BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
Newscast Winter Fuel's Back, Back Again (For Most)
Today, Labour confirms 75% of pensioners will keep their winter fuel payments, reversing a widely criticised policy. Nine million pensioners in England and Wales with an annual income of £35,000 or less will now be eligible. The payment, worth up to £300 to help with energy bills during the coldest months, was paid only to those on pension credit last year. Alex and Chris discuss the chain of events that have led to this moment, and what it says about the Chancellor, Rachel Reeves. Also, a yacht carrying 12 pro-Palestinian activists, including Greta Thunberg, was intercepted by the Israeli navy while sailing toward Gaza with aid. Alex speaks to the BBC's Jeremy Bowen about what happened and the state of humanitarian aid in Gaza. You can now listen to Newscast on a smart speaker. If you want to listen, just say "Ask BBC Sounds to play Newscast'. It works on most smart speakers. You can join our Newscast online community here: New episodes released every day. If you're in the UK, for more News and Current Affairs podcasts from the BBC, listen on BBC Sounds: Newscast brings you daily analysis of the latest political news stories from the BBC. It was presented by Alex Forsyth. It was made by Jack Maclaren with Julia Webster and Adam Chowdhury. The technical producer was Hannah Montgomery and James Piper. The assistant editor is Chris Gray. The senior news editor is Sam Bonham.


Telegraph
41 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Khan accuses Reeves of ‘levelling down London'
Sir Sadiq Khan has accused Rachel Reeves of 'levelling down' London after she refused to hand over billions for infrastructure projects. The Labour Mayor of London has been battling with the Treasury for funding to pay for the extension of the Bakerloo line and the Docklands Light Railway. He also wanted the Chancellor to give him the green light to impose a tourist tax on visitors to the capital, and to provide millions extra for the Metropolitan Police. But Ms Reeves's spending review, to be unveiled on Wednesday, is not expected to include most of Sir Sadiq's demands. A source close to the Mayor said he would continue 'battling' to get more money out of the Treasury even if he fails at the spending review. They said: 'Over the past nine years as Mayor, Sadiq has fought to deliver for London – in the best interests of Londoners and the whole country. 'We know that when London does well it means the whole country does well, and that it will simply not be possible to achieve national growth ambitions without the right investment and growth in our capital. 'We must not return to the damaging, anti-London approach of the last government, which would not only harm London's vital public services, but jobs and growth across the country.' The spokesman added: 'Sadiq will always stand up for London and has been clear it would be unacceptable if there are no major infrastructure projects for London announced in the spending review and the Met doesn't get the funding it needs… 'It's also important to recognise that parts of London still have some of the highest levels of poverty anywhere in the UK. 'Sadiq will always stand up for London and has been crystal clear that the way to level up other regions is not to level down London.' Reeves's policies A source at the Treasury pointed out that in the year since the Government came to power, Ms Reeves had come out in favour of a third runway at Heathrow and the expansion of Gatwick, Luton and City airports. The Treasury has also expanded late licencing in the capital, given approval to the pedestrianisation of Oxford Street, allocated money so that HS2 will run to London Euston and provided money for free school meals. Last week, Ms Reeves announced £15 billion more to be spent on transport infrastructure outside London and the south-east, part of what was seen as a rebalancing of government priorities away from the capital Research released on Monday from IPPR North found that if the north of England had received the same per person spending as the capital in the past decade, it would have received £140 billion more – enough to build seven Elizabeth lines. Over the decade to 2022/23, each year London received £1,183 per person, while the north of England got £486 per person and the Midlands £455.