logo
Explainer: How Iran's nuclear progress triggered Israeli strike - and why it matters

Explainer: How Iran's nuclear progress triggered Israeli strike - and why it matters

Time of Indiaa day ago

Iran's nuclear facility (AP photo)
Israel on early Friday launched its "greatest military operations in history" against Iran, targeting nuclear sites and military camps. The 'preemptive strikes' by Israel resulted in killing of top military commanders and scientists in Khamenei-led Islamic Republic.
Israeli PM
Benjamin Netanyahu
called it a strike at "the heart of Iran's nuclear weaponisation program." The move sparked global concern, especially as the United States and its intelligence community maintain that Iran's nuclear program is not currently designed to build weapons, according to CNN.
However, that didn't stop Israel from acting on what it claims are growing signs of a serious threat in the Middle East region.
Iran has repeatedly insisted that its nuclear efforts are only for peaceful purposes specifically for generating energy and powering its economy.
Yet, the fact that Iran is enriching uranium to high levels and limiting international inspections has deepened global suspicion. Critics say Iran may be positioning itself to be just a step away from building a bomb if it decides to.
The roots of Iran's nuclear program
Iran's nuclear journey actually began with help from the United States in 1957, when the two countries were allies and the Shah ruled Iran. Back then, the focus was peaceful energy use. But everything changed after the 1979 Islamic Revolution, which replaced the monarchy with a theocratic regime.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
เทรดทองCFDsกับโบรกเกอร์ที่เชื่อถือได้| เปิดบัญชีวันนี้
IC Markets
สมัคร
Undo
Uncle Sam withdrew its support, and tensions around Iran's nuclear ambitions have grown ever since.
Iran is a signatory of the UN's Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), under which it has pledged not to develop nuclear weapons. Still, concerns have persisted for decades.
The key issue is uranium enrichment—something Iran says it needs for energy but which also brings it much closer to weapons capability.
What is uranium enrichment and why does it matter?
Uranium enrichment is a process that increases the concentration of uranium-235, the part of uranium that can be used for nuclear energy or weapons.
Naturally, uranium is mostly made up of uranium-238, which isn't useful for either. Only a small fraction—about 0.7%—is uranium-235, and that needs to be increased to be usable.
To enrich uranium, it's first converted into gas and then spun at high speeds in machines called centrifuges. Iran has thousands of these centrifuges, including highly advanced models. The more sophisticated the centrifuge, the faster the uranium can be enriched.
For civilian use in nuclear power plants, uranium is typically enriched to around 3-5%. For a nuclear bomb, it needs to reach about 90%.
Iran has already enriched uranium to 60% purity. That's not yet bomb-grade, but it's alarmingly close. The UN's nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), recently reported that Iran has stockpiled over 400 kilograms of uranium enriched to that level. According to nuclear experts, that's enough to make up to nine bombs if further enriched.
From diplomacy to deadlock
Iran's uranium enrichment has long been the center of global negotiations. In 2015, Iran reached a deal with six major world powers—including the US—to limit its nuclear program. In return, it received relief from international sanctions.
Under the deal, Iran agreed to cap enrichment at 3.67%, reduce its stockpile, and limit the number of centrifuges it used.
But in 2018, US President
Donald Trump
withdrew the US from the deal and reimposed sanctions, saying the agreement was flawed.
Iran responded by breaking the deal's limits—enriching more uranium, increasing purity levels, and using more advanced centrifuges. It also removed IAEA surveillance cameras from key facilities. Efforts by the Biden administration to revive the deal failed in 2022.
In 2023, inspectors found particles enriched up to 83.7% purity at an Iranian facility—dangerously close to the 90% threshold for weapons. And in recent months, US intelligence has assessed that Iran's "breakout time"—the time needed to produce enough weapons-grade material for a bomb—has shrunk to just one or two weeks.
Where Israel's strike stands in the broader conflict?
Israel's operation targeted what it believes are critical parts of Iran's nuclear program. One of the most significant strikes was on the Natanz facility, a central site for uranium enrichment.
N
atanz is located about 250 kilometers south of Tehran and is believed to be the hub for developing and assembling centrifuges. Videos and satellite images showed fire and destruction in the area after the Israeli strike.
The IAEA said three other key nuclear sites—Fordow, Isfahan, and Bushehr—were not affected. However, Iranian media reported that six nuclear scientists were killed, which would mark a major blow to the human capital behind Iran's nuclear progress.
Iran has long prepared for the possibility of military strikes on its nuclear sites. Many facilities are buried deep underground or fortified in ways that make them hard to destroy completely.
Military analysts say that while Israel may have disrupted Iran's progress, it likely hasn't ended the nuclear threat altogether.
Violation of non-proliferation obligation
The IAEA has now taken a stronger stance than in previous years. For the first time in nearly two decades, it passed a resolution declaring that Iran is in violation of its non-proliferation obligations. Iran, in turn, has promised to escalate its nuclear activity in response.
In a public statement shared on social media, the Israeli military released a declassified assessment claiming Iran is dangerously close to building a bomb. It said Iran has decentralized its enrichment activities, hidden its centrifuges in underground sites, and continues to produce enriched uranium at a fast pace.
First Video Of Iran's Natanz Nuclear Site After Israeli Strike; Facility In Flames | Tehran Thunders
According to the Israeli Defence Forces, the world has tried diplomacy, but Israel now believes it has no choice but to act in self-defence.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Indian embassy issues fresh advisory for citizens in Israel amid Iran conflict: ‘Stay vigilant'
Indian embassy issues fresh advisory for citizens in Israel amid Iran conflict: ‘Stay vigilant'

Hindustan Times

time27 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Indian embassy issues fresh advisory for citizens in Israel amid Iran conflict: ‘Stay vigilant'

As tensions between Iran and Israel continue to escalate, the Indian embassy in Tel Aviv on Sunday issued a fresh advisory for its nationals, asking them to avoid any unnecessary movement and adhere to the defined safety protocols in the country. The Embassy said that it was continuously monitoring the situation in the Middle East region closely, and was in constant touch with the Israeli administration. Follow Iran Israel war live updates "The Embassy of India in Tel Aviv is in touch with members of the Indian community in Israel, including caregivers, workers, students, businessmen and tourist groups. All necessary measures are being taken to ensure their safety and well-being," the advisory read. It further added, "As you know, National Emergency announced by the Govt. of Israel is in place. Airspace is closed. All Indian nationals are once again advised to stay vigilant, strictly avoid any unnecessary movement, and adhere to the safety protocols as advised by the Israeli authorities and home front command." The Indian mission said that its helplines are functional round the clock to provide any assistance regarding the current situation. Meanwhile, Iran launched a wave of fresh strikes on Israel, with explosions being reported in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem as exchange of fire between the two nations continued. Israel also struck central Tehran earlier in the day, local media reported.

‘CM Omar has not delivered': AAP's lone J&K MLA withdraws support to NC govt
‘CM Omar has not delivered': AAP's lone J&K MLA withdraws support to NC govt

Indian Express

time28 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

‘CM Omar has not delivered': AAP's lone J&K MLA withdraws support to NC govt

The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP)'s lone MLA in Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), Mehraj Malik, has withdrawn his support to the National Conference-led government in the Union Territory (UT), citing its 'failure' to serve the public over the last nine months it has been in office. Late on Saturday, the 37-year-old firebrand AAP legislator took to social media to announce his withdrawal of support. 'I, Mehraj Malik, MLA from Doda, hereby withdraw my support to the NC in the government coalition. This decision has been taken in the best interest of my people of J&K, whose trust and welfare will always be my top priority,' he said in a post on X. Malik, in another post on X, accused Chief Minister Omar Abdullah and his government of allegedly failing to deliver, pointing out that 'genuine public service required commitment not justification'. '(AAP national convener and former Delhi CM Arvind) Kejriwal ji resigned after 49 days (in 2013) when he couldn't serve the people the way he wanted. Omar Abdullah ji has been in power for over nine months, yet hasn't delivered anything – not because he can't, but because he won't. Public service demands intent, not excuses,' Malik said. His withdrawal of support to the Omar-led government, however, does not pose any threat to it, given that the government already has the support of 52 MLAs – seven more than the majority mark – in the 90-member J&K Assembly. A challenge for the government now would be managing the outspoken AAP leader on the floor of the Assembly, from where he has frequently taken on both the J&K government and the BJP-led Centre. During the Budget Session earlier this year, Malik had been highly critical of the Opposition BJP and the ex-CM Mehbooba Mufti-led Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), accusing them of alleged 'rampant corruption' and causing the downgrade of the erstwhile J&K state to a UT. However, he may now have to ensure a working relationship with the BJP and the PDP in case his seat in the House is shifted from the Treasury side to the Opposition benches. During the last Budget Session, he was allegedly beaten outside the Assembly over his purported remarks against former CM and late PDP leader Mufti Mohammad Sayeed, and for mocking a protest by the BJP members against the NC-led government. Trouble erupted when Malik was talking to some media persons, and some PDP leaders caught hold of him for his 'derogatory remarks', leading to an altercation. Just a day earlier, the AAP legislator was involved in another altercation with the same PDP leaders within the Assembly complex. The BJP legislators, who were protesting nearby, and were already angry with Malik for describing their protests as 'jamawara (crowd)', also joined in. Malik has faced issues outside the Assembly, too. In May, he was booked by the police after a doctor at the Doda Government Medical College Hospital accused him of alleged criminal intimidation and gender abuse. He was booked under sections 356 (criminal intimidation), 79 (word, gesture or act intended to insult modesty of a woman), 351 (intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Malik had previously been critical of the functioning of hospitals in Doda, even raising the issue in the House. This was however not the first time Malik's name figured in an FIR. In his affidavit for the 2024 Assembly elections, Malik declared half a dozen FIRs registered against him for offences ranging from criminal intimidation and house trespass to promoting enmity between groups. In the Assembly elections, Malik, a postgraduate from Jammu University, became a first-time MLA when he scored the AAP's maiden victory in J&K by defeating the BJP's Gajay Singh Rana in the Doda constituency by 4,538 votes. The AAP had fought its debut election in J&K last year, winning one of the seven seats it contested with a vote share of 0.52%. Prior to the Assembly polls, Malik had won in the 2020 District Development Council elections from Doda's Kahara seat, contesting as an Independent. He then unsuccessfully contested the Udhampur Lok Sabha constituency last year, again as an Independent. Locals who know Malik say that the rows he has been involved in over the years have played a key role in his rise in politics. Malik joined the AAP in 2013 – a year after he finished his postgraduation – and soon drew attention by flagging local problems such as lack of drinking water and electricity at medical facilities and poor education infrastructure. He was appointed the co-chairman of the AAP's state coordination committee in 2022. He also gained support in the aftermath of the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019, when he took to the streets with local issues. Last year, he had also spearheaded a protest against the eviction drive in Jammu's Bathindi.

Israel-Iran conflict: How close is Tehran to building a nuclear weapon?
Israel-Iran conflict: How close is Tehran to building a nuclear weapon?

First Post

time29 minutes ago

  • First Post

Israel-Iran conflict: How close is Tehran to building a nuclear weapon?

Israel has said it launched Operation Rising Lion to deal a blow to Iran's nuclear ambitions. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has claimed that the strikes are essential to 'roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival' and that Tehran could build a nuclear weapon within a few months. But how close is Iran to doing so? read more Iran currently does not have a nuclera weapon. Israel on Friday launched airstrikes on Iran. Tel Aviv started conducted 'Operation Rising Lion' in order to deal a blow to Iran's nuclear ambitions. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has claimed that the operation was essential to 'roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival'. 'If not stopped, Iran could produce a nuclear weapon in a very short time', Netanyahu claimed. 'It could be a year. It could be within a few months.' But how close is Iran to building a nuclear bomb? STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Let's take a closer look: What do we know? Iran does not currently possess a nuclear weapon. It officially suspended its nuclear bomb program in 2003. The US and other western intelligence agencies have repeatedly said so – and have added that Iran does not seem on the pathway to making a nuclear bomb. US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard earlier this year told Congress that the US 'continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader [Ayatollah Ali] Khamenei has not authorised the nuclear weapons programme that he suspended in 2003'. However, how far away it is from being able to develop one is a different ballgame. Under the 2015 nuclear deal, Iran committed to keeping its uranium enrichment levels at 3.67 per cent or under. This was way under the 90 per cent purity threshold required for uranium in order for Iran to actually produce a nuclear bomb. US President Donald Trump shows a signed presidential memorandum withdrawing the United States from the Iranian nuclear deal on May 8, 2018. (Photo: AP) The deal also left Iran around 300 kilos of uranium – just enough to keep its civilian power stations going. However, in 2018, US president Donald Trump pulled out of the deal. The results of the deal have been catastrophic. Iran has now enriching 408 kilos of uranium up to 60 per cent purity – still far short of the 90 per cent needed. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, if Iran manages to refine the uranium to 90 per cent, it could make around 9 or 10 nuclear bombs, as per the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). In May, the IAEA sounded the alarm on Iran's growing uranium pile. The watchdog in a report said Iran is now 'the only non-nuclear-weapon state to produce such material.' 'While safeguarded enrichment activities are not forbidden in and of themselves, the fact that Iran is the only non-nuclear-weapon state in the world that is producing and accumulating uranium enriched to 60 per cent remains a matter of serious concern,' it said. However, the IAEA added that it had 'no credible indications of an ongoing, undeclared structured nuclear programme'. What do experts say? They say that though Iran does not have a nuclear bomb , it could do so fairly quickly if it chooses to. The Council on Foreign Relations, a US based think-tank, has claimed Iran could make a nuclear bomb within a couple of weeks. The IAEA chief Rafael Grossi, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), asked about Iran's nuclear programme, said in May, 'Dates are always arbitrary. But they are not far. It would be, you know, a matter of months, not years.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Critics point out that Israel has been saying that Iran is close to building a nuclear bomb for decades – which as of yet has still not come to pass. Kelsey Davenport, director for non-proliferation policy at the US-based Arms Control Association, told BBC that Netanyahu 'did not present any clear or compelling evidence that Iran was on the brink of weaponizing'. 'Iran has been at a near-zero breakout for months,' she added. 'Similarly, the assessment that Iran could develop a crude nuclear weapon within a few months is not new.' 'If Netanyahu was purely motivated by Iran's proliferation risk, Israel would likely have shared that intelligence with the United States and the initial attack would likely have targeted all of Iran's key nuclear facilities,' she added. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Supreme leader of Iran, had ordered the nuclear programme suspended in 2003. AFP File They also say that Netanyahu is either trying to scupper any chances of a peace process between US and Iran or trying to save his own government – maybe even both. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Bibi's been speaking about [attacking Iran] for 40 years,' as a former senior aide Netanyahu told the Economist. Just nine countries have nuclear weapons – the US, Russia, France, China, the United Kingdom, India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea. Ironically, Israel is the only country in West Asia to actually have a nuclear weapon – even though it has never confirmed that it actually does. Experts put Israeli stockpile anywhere between 75 and 400 nuclear warheads. With input from agencies

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store