Women over 65 still at risk from cancer from HPV and should be offered cervical screening
Despite it being a preventable disease, there were about 660,000 cases of cervical cancer and 350,000 deaths from it worldwide in 2022, according to the World Health Organization (WHO).
HPV is responsible for about 95% of cervical cancer, which occurs when abnormal cells develop in the lining of the cervix and grow, eventually forming a tumour.
WHO's global strategy on cervical cancer states that by 2030, all countries should vaccinate 90% of girls with the HPV vaccine by 15, screen 70% of women and treat 90% of those with cervical disease. Modelling suggests this would prevent 62m deaths and a cumulative 74m new cases of cervical cancer by 2120.
Screening programmes vary from country to country, but most guidelines recommend stopping cervical screening after the age of 65 if previous test results have been normal.
Yet global cases of cervical cancer among people over 65 have been rising: in 2022, worldwide there were 157,182 new cases and 124,269 deaths from the disease among women aged 65 or older.
In the UK, while screening and vaccination rates are higher than many other countries, they have been falling in recent years. Cervical cancer leads to approximately 685 deaths a year in England alone.
Now a large-scale observational study published in Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Medicine has found that older women are more likely to have HPV infections and to have abnormal cells in test results than younger women.
Researchers in China analysed cervical cancer screening data for more than 2 million women between 2017 and 2023. Of the 2 million, 17,420 were aged 65 and above; the remainder were younger.
The study found greater prevalence of high-risk HPV infections and abnormal cells among women aged 65 and over than in younger women. Nearly 14% of those 65 and over tested positive for high-risk HPV infection types, compared with 8% of those who were younger.
Older women were also more likely to be infected with several different types of HPV and have abnormalities picked up on screening.
While acknowledging limitations to the study, the findings indicate that 'women [aged 65 and above] are a high-risk group for cervical cancer incidence and mortality, necessitating urgent attention from countries worldwide', the authors conclude.
'Most guidelines suggest stopping screening for those with adequate primary screening and no high-risk factors, particularly for women under 65,' they say. 'However, the situation differs for those over 65, who may not have been vaccinated or thoroughly screened. With increasing life expectancy, the risk of cervical cancer in this demographic is significantly heightened.'
Responding to the findings, Athena Lamnisos, chief executive of the Eve Appeal cancer charity, said among people over 65, 'there is a largely unvaccinated population who, if under-screened or if they have never attended screening, may well still be at high risk of cervical cancer'.
'We would look to the National Screening Committee to examine the findings and see if there would be benefits in reviewing screening age.'
Maxine Lenza, health information manager at Cancer Research UK, said: 'Recent improvements to the test in the UK means it's an extremely effective way of preventing cervical cancer and saving lives, so those over the age of 65 and up to date with their cervical screening will have a very low risk of developing the disease. However, women over 65 who have never had cervical screening can request a test with their GP practice.'
An NHS spokesperson said: 'The NHS cervical screening programme in England follows expert recommendations on age and frequency of screening by the UK National Screening Committee, which are based on regular reviews of the best evidence globally.
'Women with an HPV-positive screening result at the age of 65 are invited for additional screening to monitor their ongoing risk and we would encourage all women to attend appointments when invited to ensure they have the best protection against cervical cancer.'
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'The screening age brackets are based on robust scientific evidence and an expert recommendation from the UK National Screening Committee, however any women who are worried about their symptoms can speak to their GP who will decide the best course of action.
'It is vital that we increase the number of women accepting their invitation for cervical cancer screening within the existing age bracket. As part of our 10-year health plan, those who are eligible will be offered convenient human papillomavirus self-sampling kits – breaking down barriers to healthcare as we shift from treatment to prevention.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Exclusive: Watchdog upholds nearly 100% of complaints about special educational needs in England
Why you can trust Sky News A watchdog is upholding 96% of the complaints it investigates about the provision of special educational needs in England, according to figures shared exclusively with Sky News. The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is the last port of call for families who have exhausted the complaints process at their local council when they cannot get the right support for their children. Amerdeep Somal, who heads the organisation, told Sky News the number of complaints they are receiving about Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) has also risen almost 250% in the last five years. She said: "Some of those children will never reach their full potential. Often children lose years of their education and their development - sometimes at pivotal stages. "We're seeing complaints about not doing assessments for Education Health and Care Plans, not doing reviews in good time, support specified in the plan not being put into place in schools - and also poor communication so parents don't know what is happening. "There's been a huge surge in demand for plans. That means more complaints. That means more resources. More children need to be assessed, and that means more specialist input in schools. And that hasn't been keeping pace with the demands. "The situation can't continue as it is at the moment - we need radical and urgent reform." In Sefton, 15-year-old Jacob is one of the children who has fallen through the cracks. He has needs, including autism and ADHD, and has not had a consistent school place for four years. His mum, Geraldine Pollock, says schools keep saying they cannot meet his needs, sometimes even after enrolling him. Currently, he has been out of school for over nine months, and Geraldine spends her days trying to teach him at home to the best of her ability. "Absolutely horrific - that is the only word that I can use to describe it. I never, ever envisaged that, as a family, we would be put in this situation," she said. Geraldine says she almost lost her job because she had no option but to care for Jacob herself, and is still only able to work part-time. As soon as Jacob started at his latest school, she asked them to tell her upfront if they would not be able to meet his needs. "I thought, we cannot go back to the dark place that we've been in," she said. "They reassured me they had put everything in place - and they actually hadn't." "When I think of it now, I think 'How I could I be so naive?' I never once thought you would literally be left on your own," she added. David Moorhead is another special needs parent in Sefton, Merseyside, who helps run a group called Voice of the Families, which has come together to push for more help for their children. What started as an informal group for local parents to support each other has now ballooned to more than 500 families. David says he was "gobsmacked" by the number of parents just in his area who all feel their children have been failed. "Parents have left jobs, left careers just to be with their child. One mother had to cancel her own operation because there was no one to look after her child. "Going out for a family meal, going on holiday - these aren't realities because your child needs a lot of attention, a lot support in order for them to flourish. "They just push you off a cliff and you fall - and when you ask for help, it just doesn't come." Sefton Council said in a statement: "We are working with the Voice of the Families group - we have listened to them and understand their concerns and will continue to feed their experiences into our improvements as a service so we can better support families on this journey. "The demand for SEND support and the challenges in the system are seen across the country and we are working hard to meet the growing need for SEND support in Sefton. We have, and will continue to, pursue every avenue to expand our specialist SEND provision to meet the demand in our borough." The Department for Education said it accepts the SEND system needs to be reformed, and is currently consulting on what shape that will take. The government plans to publish a White Paper in the autumn setting out the reforms, and says it recognises the 'immense need' in the sector.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Weight-loss drugs are RUINING the nation's dinner parties, furious hosts warn
Weight-loss drugs are ruining the nation's dinner parties, according to a survey of frustrated hosts. An estimated 1.5 million Britons are now using wonder drugs such as Ozempic, Mounjaro or Wegovy. But new research suggests it is taking its toll on the nation's traditional dinner parties - and hosts are understandably not happy. Nearly three in ten (29 per cent) Brits who have recently thrown a soiree say they have been annoyed at having cooked a delicious meal, only for guests to push food around their plate. A resounding six in then believe the correct etiquette is to call ahead or text, to let people know if you are taking weight-loss drugs, so hosts can amend the menu accordingly. The survey, of 2,000 frequent dinner party hosts and attendees, found lighter options, such as a small prawn cocktail (21 per cent) melon and prosciutto (15 per cent), fish soup (13 per cent) or a small fillet steak with some simple greens (18 per cent) are the most suitable Ozempic dinner party options. While 14 per cent of hosts say a sorbet makes a good choice of pudding, and to start, rather than filling appetisers, some crudités and dips (14 per cent) Of those who are on the drugs, as many as 80 per cent agree, they now find the social side of eating and drinking uncomfortable. Nearly half (47 per cent) say that they have ruined their enjoyment of dinner parties entirely. Almost a quarter (22 per cent) have offended a host by being unable to eat the food they'd prepared, while one in ten have even hidden food in a napkin at someone's house to avoid embarrassment. And it's not just food that's spoiled, with 18 per cent saying that they can no longer enjoy nice wine or cocktails. Jion Horsley, from trends and insights agency Perspectus Global, which carried out the survey, said: 'Weight-loss drugs may be the cure for obesity that we've been looking for, for decades.' 'But we're still in the early days of their use and they will have ripple effects which we won't be aware of yet. 'The fact that their use can make social eating difficult is just one unforeseen effect. 'This research proves that shared meals may become more awkward until we work past the social difficulties, adapt our menus and the etiquette surrounding the subject'.
Times
4 hours ago
- Times
Times letters: Long-term fixes for the failures of the NHS
Sir, While there is much to like in the ten-year plan for the NHS ('NHS app to give patients a 'doctor in your pocket'', news; 'Sacred Cow', leading article, Jul 4) nobody will be convinced by it without the government providing specific annual milestones for internal project management, and by which the public can judge whether after ten years the plan is likely to have been achieved. If the government is itself convinced that the plan is a good one, it will already have worked out what it needs to achieve in the next 12 months to make sure the plan is on track, and of course in each year thereafter. Maybe the government should consider publishing what the milestones are so it can show the public real progress is being made. If it doesn't, one can only assume that it is not confident that it will achieve its milestones (or worse, hasn't yet decided what they are). Alistair Groom East Martin, Hampshire Sir, The prime minister talks about the NHS app as a 'doctor in your pocket' and the 168-page heath plan makes many references to using AI to answer clinical questions. This seems replete with risk. When an NHS AI gives poor advice, who is liable? In its principles for AI policy document, the BMA strongly advises that 'clear lines of legal liability must be established'. The NHS plan makes no mention of who is to blame when these systems make mistakes. Does the health secretary have an answer for this — or I should I ask Dr Google? Dr Tom Riddington London SE12 Sir, The NHS app will not be 'an indispensable part of life' for me or my wife, both in our seventies, or for others like us, who do not have smartphones. In a world that puts diversity and inclusiveness at a premium, we are finding ourselves more and more excluded from things that others take for granted. John Orton Bristol Sir, My husband's cancer treatment has involved three hospitals and many departments within those hospitals. I endorse what Wes Streeting says about the need for medical data to be easily accessible ('We will end 8am scramble for a GP', Jul 4). Staff do not have all my husband's information in one place and it has been exhausting having continually to explain the side-effects, treatment and what my husband needs at every appointment, including emergency admissions. We are still reasonably articulate but we wonder what happens to those who are not able to fight their corner. The staff themselves have been wonderful and I am sure the situation is as frustrating for them as it is for us. Cynthia Blades Chichester, West Sussex Sir, How can the government claim its health plan will 'prevent sickness' when a proposal to warn people of the health risks of alcohol, the second biggest cause of death and disability among working-age people, are watered down after 'a furious response from the industry' (news, Jul 2)? Who is running this country? The elected government or the unelected drinks industry? Glyn Sloman Holt, Norfolk Sir, A more efficient, technologically adept NHS, less hospital-based and where information is more easily accessed is an essential part of the solution to our problems. But it must be combined with people taking greater responsibility for their health, including diet, exercise and cutting down on smoking and drinking. Tony Hunter Former chief executive, Social Care Institute for Excellence, Woodford, Essex Sir, Your reference to Rachel Reeves ('Tears on front bench were a personal matter', Jul 3) highlights how uncomfortable the British still are with public displays of emotion. Crying isn't a sign of weakness, but the physical manifestation of emotional turmoil. We should all learn to be more understanding. Following the death of our eldest child in 2016 I frequently cried in public. This often resulted in fellow passengers — exclusively men — changing seats without saying a word or pedestrians crossing the road to avoid me. If you really want to make your fellow man uncomfortable, crying while using a public urinal at the local supermarket will clear the room quicker than you can say Jack Robinson. Richard Houghton Great Missenden, Bucks Sir, The correspondence from your readers on Sir Keir Starmer's leadership (letters, Jul 3) is all focused on finger pointing. Not a single constructive suggestion is made. We live in an age where the sheer volume and speed of events both nationally and internationally comes dangerously close to making conventional governance impossible. This is the perfect Petri dish for the incubation of demagoguery and dictatorships. We should be more prepared to support our elected leaders. Nicholas Oppenheim London SW6 Sir, I am one of those consultants who has left the NHS to work exclusively in the private sector (letters, Jul 3 & 4). At the age of 62 I fear what this government may do to my pension and have, therefore, taken it early. It also means I can continue to strive to practise medicine to the highest standards and not have to engage in what I perceive as the NHS drive to reduce everything to the lowest common denominator. My wife, a GP of 35 years, and I fear there will be no one left to look after us in our old age. Simon Marsh Consultant surgeon, Ipswich, Suffolk Sir, It is baffling why Fraser Nelson's article on the welfare trap and the easy solution he outlines is not being adopted by Labour ('How Liz Kendall can stop this national sickness', comment, Jun 28). Allowing — indeed almost encouraging — the young to game the system as it stands exacerbates any underlying mental health problems. There is a mass of evidence to suggest that employment is good for mental health. Meanwhile, there is a desperate need for people to work in the building trade if we are to get anywhere close to Labour's target of building 1.5 million houses over the life of this parliament. Instead of signing people off sick, give them an incentive to train as plumbers, electricians or any other of the skills required by housebuilders. Reversing the national insurance rise for people under 25 to encourage employers to take them on would provide a further incentive. Andrew ScottSalisbury, Wilts Sir, Emma Duncan's thoughtful piece on entitlement (comment, Jul 4) omits the stark difference between the political and the personal. I can agree politically that the welfare costs are out of control but personally I do not want the personal independence payment taken away from my granddaughter. In the same way, while it is obvious that paying ransoms encourages kidnapping, you would pay anything for the release of a family member in such a situation. Gillian Fogg Surbiton Sir, Orcas have been known for their interaction with humans for many years ('Killer whales come bearing gifts', Jul 4). A pod of them, known as 'the killers of Eden', operated in Twofold Bay, southeast Australia, for about 90 years from 1840. They helped baleen whale hunters by finding the whales, herding them into the bay and alerting the whalers to their presence. In return, the whalers would share the whales' tongues and lips with the orcas. Nicky Gill Richmond, Surrey Sir, My late father always assumed that gratitude had prompted a gift of food from an injured buzzard that he had nursed back to health. Shortly after its release back into the wild the buzzard reappeared carrying a dead mouse, placing it carefully on my father's shoulder. My mother was always most grateful that the gift to the family wasn't delivered to her. Caroline Tayler Nutley, East Sussex Sir, I have been following the tennis at Wimbledon and wonder whether the authorities could bring in a limit on the number of times a server bounces the ball before serving. It is an unnecessary and irritating habit. Just get on with the game. Diana Barrington Holt Lambourn, Berks Sir, I would happily have taken sandwiches to work had there been a staff room or somewhere suitable in the locality to eat them (letters, Jul 3 & 4). In the 1950s bank managers were required to live above their branches. The only facility for staff at my branch was a single lavatory. Later generations have no idea of the hardships undergone by those who lived through the Second World War and its aftermath. The country was bankrupt. 'Export or die' was the slogan, so there were no cars for the home market and most things were in short supply. Strict building controls were imposed to ensure priority was given to the war-damaged in the 1960s did matters improve. Robert Spratt Upton St Leonards, Glos Sir, The 'canard that bankers in the past worked only from 10am to 3pm' was nailed by Jerome K Jerome in Three Men in a Boat (1889), in which he describes how 'George goes to sleep at a bank from ten to four each day, except Saturdays, when they wake him up and put him outside at two'. Dr John Burscough Brigg, N Lincs Sir, I was amused by Deborah Ross's article about celebrities' rosé wines (Times2, Jul 3). Rosé was once a pleasant summery wine with an attractive light red colour and the ability not to give one a thumping headache on a hot day, all for a reasonable cost and without being pretentious. Suddenly it has morphed into an overhyped weedy looking light pink concoction barely distinguishable from cheap white and puffed by celebrities pushing their own particular labels. Where are the robust Côtes de Provence of yesterday? Martin J Eames Caterham, Surrey Sir, Why are we obsessed with keeping British art in this country, raising huge sums to do so (Richard Morrison, Times2, Jul 4)? If people want to buy it, be proud of that, don't stop them. Our art is hugely undervalued abroad. Let the world see it. The more it leaves this country, the better for Britain. Anthony Jennings London WC1 Sir, If it is possible to decommission the royal train because the royal family no longer use it (letters, Jul 3 & 4) is it not also possible to decommission the titles still used by the King's youngest son on the basis that he (and his wife) are no longer of any discernible use to the people of this country? Rob Green Braintree, Essex Sir, I notice with some amusement, and indeed amazement, that there were two letters to the editor on the same day from Hartley Wintney in Hampshire (Jul 3). Is this a record? Sophia Bennett Hartley Wintney, Hants Write to letters@
