Ministers ‘believe' Palestine recognition is compliant with international law
Some 38 members of the House of Lords, including some of the UK's most eminent lawyers, have written to Attorney General Lord Hermer about the Prime Minister's announcement.
As first reported by the Times newspaper, the peers warned Sir Keir Starmer's pledge to recognise Palestine may breach international law as the territory may not meet the criteria for statehood under the Montevideo Convention, a treaty signed in 1933.
Asked whether recognising Palestine is compliant with international law, Mr Thomas told Times Radio: 'Yes, we believe it is.
Gareth Thomas said recognition of another state 'is a political judgment' (David Parry Media Assignments/PA)
'In the end, recognition of another state is a political judgment and over 140 countries have already recognised Palestine, and we're determined to do so in September if Israel does not end the violence in Gaza, agree to a ceasefire and agree to a lasting route towards a two-state solution, and to no annexation in the West Bank.'
In their letter to Lord Hermer, the peers said Palestine 'does not meet the international law criteria for recognition of a state, namely, defined territory, a permanent population, an effective government and the capacity to enter into relations with other states'.
There is no certainty over the borders of Palestine, they said, and no single government as Hamas and Fatah are enemies.
Mr Thomas told Times Radio there is a 'clear population' in Palestine and 'we have made clear that we think you would recognise the state of Palestine, and that state of Palestine would be based on the 1967 borders'.
Sir Keir Starmer told his Cabinet this week that the UK will recognise the state of Palestine unless the Israeli government takes steps to end the 'appalling situation' in Gaza (Toby Melville/PA)
In their letter, seen by the PA news agency, the peers added: 'You have said that a selective, 'pick and mix' approach to international law will lead to its disintegration, and that the criteria set out in international law should not be manipulated for reasons of political expedience.
'Accordingly, we expect you to demonstrate this commitment by explaining to the public and to the Government that recognition of Palestine would be contrary to the principles governing recognition of states in international law.'
Lord Hermer has previously insisted a commitment to international law 'goes absolutely to the heart' of the Government's approach to foreign policy.
Among the respected lawyers to have signed the letter are Lord Pannick – who represented the previous government at the Supreme Court over its Rwanda scheme – as well as KCs Lord Verdirame and Lord Faulks.
Sir Keir announced earlier this week that the UK could take the step of recognising Palestine in September ahead of a gathering at the UN.
The UK will only refrain from doing so if Israel allows more aid into Gaza, stops annexing land in the West Bank, agrees to a ceasefire, and signs up to a long-term peace process over the next two month, the PM said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Should we be preparing for World War Three? Shock poll reveals 86% of Brits don't have enough supplies to last ONE DAY in a crisis as government urges citizens to stockpile tinned food, batteries and torches
The Government has urged Brits to stock up on basic supplies as a shock poll has revealed 86 per cent of us don't have enough to last us even one day in a crisis. Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden has advised people to stockpile tinned food, batteries and torches in case of an emergency. However, the poll by Savanta found only 14 per cent of Brits have enough supplies in their homes to get them through just one day of a crisis. It also found 48 per cent of Brits do not have reserves of bottled water to use in the event of a power cut that cuts off gas and water supply. Just 24 per cent of us have an FM radio, only 55 per cent own a torch and 66 per cent have enough non-perishable food to last three days. Whilst giving The Mirror's political editor a tour of The National Situation Centre - the government's top-secret crisis control room - Mr McFadden said there needs to be a 'more candid' conversation about the potential risks Britain is facing. 'It's sensible to have a couple of torches, a battery or a wind-up radio, perhaps some spare batteries, a couple of bottles of water. 'We saw what happened to Spain and Portugal earlier this year, when power went out for about 24 hours. 'If something like that happens it does make sense to have that kind of thing at home.' He said this advice was 'proportionate' and reassured people that they do not need to start constructing nuclear bunkers in their gardens. The National Situation Centre, also known as SitCen, was set up in 2021 after the Covid pandemic highlighted how under-prepared the UK is for coping in an emergency situation. It was modelled on the Situation Room inside the White House, where President Donald Trump was recently pictured conducting talks over Iran. SitCen was built in a classified location near Cobra - where the Prime Minister holds emergency meetings. Inside, analysts pour over data and make meticulous calculations to help ministers respond to a range of potential crises - from future pandemics to terror attacks. This autumn, SitCen will be used as a hub for a drill which will prepare the country for another pandemic. It will see a trial for emergency alerts sent to people's phones warning them of a risk to human life - the second time the technology has been tested. Millions of Brits will receive the practice alert at around 3pm on September 7. Mr McFadden said 'hopefully' we will never find ourselves in a situation where they would need to deploy a real emergency alert, but it is 'useful to have' just in case.
Leader Live
14 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Anger as far-right Israeli minister prays at flashpoint holy site in Jerusalem
With Israel already facing global criticism over famine-like conditions in the besieged Gaza Strip, the visit by Itamar Ben-Gvir to the hillside compound threatened to further set back efforts by international mediators to halt Israel's nearly two-year military offensive in the territory. The area, which Jews call the Temple Mount, is the holiest site in Judaism and was home to the ancient biblical temples. Muslims call the site the Noble Sanctuary, and today it is home to the Al Aqsa Mosque, the third-holiest site in Islam. Visits are considered a provocation across the Muslim world and openly praying violates a longstanding status quo at the site. Under the status quo, Jews have been allowed to tour the site but are barred from praying, with Israeli police and troops providing security. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said after Mr Ben-Gvir's visit that Israel would not change the norms governing the holy site. Mr Ben-Gvir made the stop after Hamas released videos showing two emaciated Israeli hostages. The videos caused in uproar in Israel and raised pressure on the government to reach a deal to bring home from Gaza the remaining hostages who were captured on October 7 2023, in the attack that triggered the war. During his visit to the hilltop compound, Mr Ben-Gvir called for Israel to annex the Gaza Strip and encourage Palestinians to leave, reviving rhetoric that has complicated negotiations to end the war. He condemned the video that Hamas released on Saturday of 24-year-old hostage Evyatar David, showing him looking skeletal and hollow-eyed in a dimly lit Gaza tunnel. The minister called it an attempt to pressure Israel. Mr Ben-Gvir's previous visits to the site have been explosive and prompted threats from Palestinian militant groups. Clashes between Israeli security forces and Palestinian demonstrators in and around the site fuelled an 11-day war with Hamas in 2021. His Sunday visit was swiftly condemned as an incitement by Palestinian leaders as well as Jordan and Saudi Arabia. Sufian Qudah, spokesman for the foreign ministry in neighboring Jordan, which serves as the custodian of the Al Aqsa Mosque, condemned what he called 'provocative incursions by the extremist minister' and implored Israel to prevent escalation.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Times letters: ‘Working class' internships for civil service
Sir, Your editorial rightly ridicules the plan for civil service internships to be restricted to 'working-class students' to make Whitehall more representative ('Normal People', Aug 2). We seem to be going full circle through ideological, inverted snobbery. More than 40 years ago, when applying to join the army, I was asked by every prospective regiment what my father did for a living (it was assumed my mother did not work). Later, when I applied to leading firms of surveyors, I faced the same question, but at least usually about both parents. It was wrong then and is even more so now, as society has moved on. In my professional career I have recruited graduates, interns, placement students and apprentices for more than 30 years. I have always selected the best people for the job, regardless of perceived 'class' or any other characteristic such as ethnicity, gender, religion or sexual orientation. That should be the case in every walk of life. Diversity has been proven to produce more successful teams, and should emerge naturally from a genuinely open recruitment process. Our government can do better than taking us back to the 1980s. Richard Petty East Molesey, Surrey
