Check out the Hellhound, a 375-mph 3D-printed turbojet-powered exploding drone competing for a spot in the US Army's arsenal
That's the basics of Hellhound, a loitering munition made by Cummings Aerospace based in Huntsville, Alabama. This kind of weapon features characteristics of both missiles and drones, delivering surveillance and strike in a single package.
The Hellhoud recently completed flight tests and a few demonstrations before being submitted to a top US Army drone competition. Earlier in the year, it was tested in the Army's Expeditionary Warrior Experiment 2025.
Loitering munitions are becoming more prolific and playing a role in conflicts like the war in Ukraine. As a turbojet-powered drone, the Hellhound is unlike many other loitering munitions. The top speed is nearly three times faster than the popular Switchblade made by AeroVironment.
Hellhound wrapped up flight tests earlier this year, and the S3 version of it, which Business Insider saw up close at SOF Week 2025 in Tampa, Florida, is in submission for the US Army's Low Altitude Stalking and Striking Ordnance, or LASSO, program.
LASSO requires select companies to build 135 munitions and 35 prototypes immediately. It's a new-start program, the goal of which is to give infantry brigades better stand-off weapons capabilities.
Cummings Aerospace's CEO Sheila Cummings told BI that much of how her company is thinking about the Hellhound has been with modularity, ease of manufacturing, and warfighter feedback in mind. She also said the system is affordable but wouldn't disclose a specific cost or price range.
At first glance, the Hellhound loitering munition, sitting inside its case, looks a bit like a boogie board. Weighing less than 25 pounds, the weapon is fairly lightweight and easy to pick up and carry. There are straps on the bottom that can attach it to a soldier's rucksack, something Cummings said was a key suggestion from soldiers who wanted the system to be as man-portable as possible.
The majority of a Hellhound is 3D printed. Cummings estimated that, depending on the number of printers, they could fully print a Hellhound in a few days at least and a week at most.
Any part that isn't 3D-printed is commercial off-the-shelf, an increasingly important quality for the weapons and systems that the US military acquires as it speeds up the process.
The US military has been pushing for more of its systems, especially the uncrewed weapon systems, to be suitable for production on a large scale, interchangeable capabilities and components, and supply chain flexibility.
There's a growing realization that for future wars, inexpensive, easily made weapons will be needed in mass in a protracted, large-scale conflict against a major rival like China.
A key development of the Ukraine war has been how Ukraine has created an arsenal of cheap drones for surveillance and precision strike. That's something militaries around the world are watching closely given how effective it's been.
"We're really trying to minimize the exquisite, custom products," Cummings told BI, explaining that the Hellhound's payload, too, can be interchanged with different sensors or warheads depending on what the mission requirements are simply by twisting and unlocking the nose.
A defining characteristic of the Hellhound is its turbojet engine. Cummings said it's a differentiator for the system and company as it not only reduces fuel usage but also increases speed. Cummings Aerospace advertises the Hellhound as being able to fly faster than 375 mph with a range of around 25 miles.
The turbojet engine is also a commercially available product, Cummings said. She said the munition's shape, sleek and long, also aids with aerodynamics. Cummings Aerospace has imagined Hellhound swarms in the field providing a mix of intelligence, reconnaissance, and surveillance and strike.
The focus on loitering munitions — which can, as the name suggests, loiter in an area before diving in to strike a target — comes amid efforts to give troops on the ground stand-off strike capabilities. These weapons have seen widespread use in the war in Ukraine, and Russian loitering munitions, like its Lancet drones and Iranian-made Shaheds, have been high-value targets for Kyiv's forces.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Will BigBear.ai be Able to Offset Army Contract Losses With New Wins?
Holdings, Inc. BBAI witnessed notable declines in demand volume on certain Army contracts in its recently reported second quarter of 2025 results. These losses had severe blow on the company's revenues and margins. However, this does not seem to be a woe for BBAI as it is actively engaging into other contracts and partnerships to offset this core capabilities, including offering AI-driven mission solutions across national security, defense autonomy, border technology, transportation and logistics, are boding well in the current scenario. The company highlighted the deployment of biometric solutions for traveler processing on more than 2,000 devices at more than 500 gates and 25 airports. Besides, the prospects seem promising for its technology solutions supporting defense autonomy, which includes ConductorOS for the Department of Defense's drone forming development efforts, alongside supply-chain management solutions (including Shipyard AI) for enhancing the industrial base for America and its these new projects, the One Big Beautiful Bill (OB3) is proving to be profitable for BBAI in the long term, given its diversified array of service portfolios. The OB3 allocates $170 billion in supplemental funding to the Department of Homeland Security and $150 billion to the Department of Defense for disruptive defense technology, accompanied by a few more billions for shipbuilding and other critical national security missions. Being engaged in offering AI-driven critical solutions, is expected to scale from this new legislative investment strategy and witness incremental revenue visibility and its partnerships with an international holding company in the United Arab Emirates and Narval Holdings in Panama, for deploying AI solutions across security and logistics, are also expected to fuel its growth, despite weaknesses across certain Army contracts. BBAI Stock's Price Performance vs. Other Market Players Shares of this Virginia-based AI-powered decision intelligence solutions provider have gained 48.9% in the past three months, significantly outperforming the Zacks Computers - IT Services industry, the Zacks Computer and Technology sector and the S&P 500 index. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Moreover, firms like Palantir Technologies Inc. PLTR and Inc. AI offer substantial competition to in the market space of offering AI-based products and services to government clients. Although the market trends are favoring these companies, they are falling behind in realizing the benefits from the robust fundamentals compared with BBAI. In the past three months, shares of Palantir have gained 43.3% while those of have tumbled 26%. Valuation Trend stock is currently trading at a discount compared with the industry peers, with a forward 12-month price-to-sales (P/S) ratio of 9.67, as evidenced by the chart below. The discounted valuation of the stock, compared with its peers, advocates for an attractive entry point for investors. That said, in the long term, the valuation could move toward a premium, given the favorable market fundamentals backing the company's revenue visibility. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Notably, Palantir and are currently trading at a forward 12-month P/S ratio of 88.04 and 4.58, respectively. EPS Trend of BBAI BBAI's bottom-line estimates for 2025 and 2026 have remained unchanged over the past 60 days at a loss per share of 41 cents and 21 cents, respectively. However, the estimated figures for 2025 and 2026 imply year-over-year growth of 62.7% and 49.2%, respectively. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research BBAI stock currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Inc. (AI) : Free Stock Analysis Report Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) : Free Stock Analysis Report Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Why the US military refuses to adopt bullpup rifles
For decades, the U.S. military has flirted with bullpup rifles — compact, futuristic-looking designs that put the action and magazine behind the trigger instead of in front of it. From the Austrian Steyr AUG to the Israeli Tavor, the sci-fi-looking FN F2000, and most recently the RM277 from the Army's Next Generation Squad Weapon program, the Pentagon has tested them all. And every time, the verdict has been the same: No thanks. So why does the military keep rejecting a rifle style that's seen service from Australia to Israel? What is a bullpup rifle? In a bullpup, the working parts, the chamber, bolt, and magazine, are located in the buttstock, behind the trigger group. This means you can run a full-length barrel in a much shorter overall package. For example, the M4 carbine is just under 30 inches long with a 14.5-inch barrel. The Israeli Tavor X95 is 26 inches with a 16.5-inch barrel. The French FAMAS is roughly the same size as the M4, but has a 19.2-inch barrel. That extra barrel length matters. Longer barrels usually mean higher muzzle velocity, better energy retention, and more reliable terminal effects from rounds like 5.56mm or 6.8mm. And in tight spaces like vehicles, helicopters, and urban combat, shaving a few inches off the gun's overall length makes a real difference. The advantages of a bullpup On paper, bullpups tick a lot of boxes for modern combat. Compactness without losing barrel length: Ideal for close quarters and vehicle crews. Better weight distribution: With the bulk of the rifle close to the shoulder, they can feel lighter and easier to hold at the ready. Suppressed use: Starting with a shorter rifle means a suppressor won't make it unwieldy. So if they look good on a spec sheet, why won't the U.S. use them? The dealbreakers The first problem is ergonomics. Bullpups require a different manual of arms. The magazine sits behind the pistol grip, often under the shooter's armpit or mixed up in body armor. Speed reloads and malfunction drills are harder, especially for troops who've spent years training on the M4/M16 family. Next is trigger feel. With the trigger up front and the firing mechanism in the rear, bullpups rely on a long mechanical linkage to connect the two. That linkage adds friction and flex, resulting in heavier, spongier pulls that aren't ideal for precision shooting. Left-handed shooting is another hurdle. Many bullpups eject to the right by default, which means lefties risk brass in the face unless the rifle is reconfigured, something you can't do mid-fight. Then there's modularity. The M4 has plenty of rail space for optics, lasers, lights, and grips. Bullpups have a shorter fore-end, which means less real estate for accessories without crowding the muzzle or ejection port. Top Stories This Week News Airman arrested for death that prompted Air Force-wide safety review of Sig M18 Airman arrested for death that prompted Air Force-wide safety review of Sig M18 By Jeff Schogol News Soldiers who stopped Fort Stewart gunman recognized as 'the best among us in the Army' Soldiers who stopped Fort Stewart gunman recognized as 'the best among us in the Army' By Patty Nieberg Culture Laura Loomer unites vets from both sides of aisle after Medal of Honor rant Laura Loomer unites vets from both sides of aisle after Medal of Honor rant By Matt White Finally, logistics and doctrine. Adopting bullpups would mean rewriting training manuals, changing qualification standards, redesigning load carriage systems, and retraining hundreds of thousands of troops across every service branch. Unless a bullpup offers overwhelming advantages, that level of disruption just isn't likely to be seen as being worth it. The U.S. has tried In 1985, the Pentagon put the Steyr AUG through its paces. What they found were all of the above shortcomings and decided not to purchase them, but that didn't stop U.S. Customs and Border Protection from adopting the rifle from 1988 to 2007 before replacing them with AR-style rifles. The Belgian FN F2000, tested by U.S. special operations, offered fully ambidextrous, forward-ejecting operation in a compact package. But its spongy trigger, bulky profile, and incompatibility with existing accessories killed its chances. Most recently, the General Dynamics RM277 was proposed as part of the Army's Next Generation Squad Weapon program. It is a suppressed, polymer-cased 6.8mm bullpup that, despite impressive ballistics, lost to SIG Sauer's then-XM7, an AR-style rifle that felt more familiar to soldiers and fit better into existing logistics. Other countries made it work… sort of Israel fields the Tavor for infantry and urban ops, but many troops still carry M4s depending on the mission. The country is currently looking to replace the Tavor with a home-built AR-style weapon. France ditched the FAMAS for the HK416. The UK stuck with the SA80 but spent decades and millions fixing its flaws. They're also currently looking for a replacement, and none of the candidates are bullpups. Austria and Australia have stuck with the Steyr AUG, but they operate on a smaller scale and with different mission profiles than the U.S. The bottom line Bullpups aren't bad rifles. In some environments, they're excellent. But they don't offer enough benefit to make the U.S. military scrap its entire small arms ecosystem. They're harder to reload, have less modularity, and often deliver a worse trigger feel. And in a force this large, familiarity and interoperability matter as much as performance. For now, the Army's next standard rifle, the M7, sticks with the AR-style layout. Bullpups will keep showing up in gun shop display cases and in the hands of foreign forces, but for the U.S. military writ large, they remain too weird to issue. We dive into this in more depth in this week's YouTube video, which you can check out here.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
BigBear.ai Stock Plummets on Uncertainty About Government Contracts
Key Takeaways lowered its revenue guidance and withdrew its adjusted EBITDA outlook on government contract uncertainty. The artificial intelligence data analytics company said it would be affected by changes in the Army's data architecture. posted a bigger loss and lower revenue than expected in the second (BBAI) shares lost a quarter of their value Tuesday, a day after the artificial intelligence data analytics firm slashed its revenue outlook and withdrew its profit forecast on uncertainty about government contracts. The company now anticipates full-year revenue in the range of $125 million to $140 million, down from its earlier estimate of $160 million to $180 million. Its previous guidance for adjusted EBITDA had been "in the negative single digit millions." CEO Kevin McAleenan said while is optimistic about future investments and growth opportunities, "we have also seen disruptions in federal contracts from efficiency efforts this quarter, most notably in programs that support the U.S. Army, as they seek to consolidate and modernize their data architecture." Along with questions about Army contracts, the company expects increased spending in the second half of the year. In the second quarter, posted a loss of $0.71 per share, about 12 times more than analysts from Visible Alpha were looking for. Revenue slumped 18% year-over-year to $32.5 million, also well short of forecasts. Shares of had entered Tuesday up nearly 60% this year. Read the original article on Investopedia