logo
China pharma projects disrupted by Sino-US tensions

China pharma projects disrupted by Sino-US tensions

SHANGHAI: Drug research and development firms in China including WuXi AppTec and WuXi Biologics are changing project plans, stockpiling supplies and discussing testing locally, said sources with knowledge of the matter, as they seek to mitigate the impact of US-China trade tensions.
China's sprawling pharmaceutical research and manufacturing sector serves global drug giants such as Pfizer and AstraZeneca with a low-cost development model that often uses imported clinical samples, equipment, chemicals and other materials to conduct work.
Fears of delay in access to US supply chains and raised import tariffs are spurring biotech and pharmaceutical companies to avoid, pause or consider delaying the start of projects, according to three sources.
They are also discussing testing US clinical samples in the US, instead of sending them to China for further research, a move that could increase costs, and requesting additional supplies for backup, three other sources said.
The six sources who spoke to Reuters are director or executive-level employees involved in various aspects of the industry in China including research and development, manufacturing and supply chains.
All but two agreed to speak only on condition of anonymity because of concerns about effects on fundraising plans or they were not authorised to speak to media. The developments have not been reported previously.
US and Chinese officials said last week they had agreed on a framework to put a May trade truce back on track and remove China's export restrictions on rare earths, but offered little sign of a durable resolution to longstanding trade differences that have affected products ranging from semiconductors and jet engines to medical equipment and pharmaceuticals.
"What kind of long-term policy it could be, you know, what kind of tariff would it be in half a year, in one year... nobody knows. And that's the problem. That's what makes everybody worry and nervous," said Chen Gong, co-founder of NeuExcell Therapeutics, a biotech with its main operations in Suzhou.
He said the US-China trade tensions had made him more cautious about investing in a clinical trial and the company would delay its start if it did not have sufficient funding.
Reliance on US imports has come into particular focus as trade tensions escalate. In 2024, the US exported diagnostic and laboratory reagents to China valued at about US$1.4 billion and prepared culture media for the development or maintenance of microorganisms worth about US$125 million, U.N. Comtrade data showed.
In a sign of the importance of some of the imports and the damaging effect disruption could have on China's healthcare industry, some US-made goods including diagnostic reagents from Germany's Siemens Healthineers were exempted from raised Chinese tariffs, that company said in May.
China raised its tariffs on US imports to as much as 125 per cent though it has since reduced that to 10 per cent while it works out a more permanent trade deal.
HIGHER COSTS, DELAYS
WuXi AppTec and a Chinese biotechnology firm that was its research client agreed in May to switch US-made reagents they had been using for a Hepatitis B virus pre-clinical research project into non-U.S. versions due partly to concerns about higher costs from tariffs, a source at the client company said.
The project had been temporarily paused during the discussions, which began prior to May, the source said.
WuXi AppTec said it makes "every effort to avoid disruptions or delays in the delivery of services to customers."
Since April, at least 17 Chinese biotech and pharmaceutical clients have contacted Chinese cell culture media manufacturer JS Biosciences asking it to keep locally-made backup raw materials for production because they were concerned about cost increases or the inability to access foreign supplies, the firm's CEO Luo Shun said.
"If they have a product made by us, and we rely on the foreign raw material supply and that raw material will increase in price or is never going to come, obviously it will impact their manufacturing of those life-saving drugs. So obviously, that's their primary concern," Luo said.
Another Chinese drug research and development firm decided not to provide a quotation to a foreign pharmaceutical company interested in hiring it for protein drug manufacturing, due to delays in obtaining necessary US-made culture medium from a US subsidiary of Japan's Fujifilm, a source at the Chinese firm said.
The potential client would likely not have accepted waiting on imports of new supplies into China, which would typically take two to four months, the source said.
A Fujifilm Holdings America Corporation spokesperson said Fujifilm Biosciences, one of its life science business units, has made significant investments to build a robust global manufacturing network so that it could navigate any challenges or disruptions, without elaborating on its supply issue involving China.
STOCKPILING, US TESTING
After China announced a large rise in tariffs for US imports in April, WuXi Biologics placed a bigger-than-normal order for reagents made in the US with a supplier because it was not sure how long that policy action would continue, said a source at the supplier.
WuXi Biologics did not respond to requests for comment.
Concerns about the potential for US export restrictions led China's Innovent Biologics and multinational BeOne Medicines to discuss with Massachusetts-headquartered Thermo Fisher Scientific the prospect of not sending US clinical samples to China, said a source at the US company.
Testing US samples in-country instead of in China would be more expensive, the source said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russia warns US against 'military intervention' in Iran-Israel war
Russia warns US against 'military intervention' in Iran-Israel war

New Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Russia warns US against 'military intervention' in Iran-Israel war

MOSCOW: Russia on Thursday warned the United States not to take military action against Iran, amid speculation over whether Washington would enter the war alongside Israel. Israel launched an unprecedented wave of strikes at Iran last week, to which Tehran responded with missile and drone attacks. Moscow is one of Iran's most important allies, with the two deepening military cooperation and inking a strategic partnership agreement just months ago. But the Kremlin has not provided military support to Iran in the face of Israeli air strikes, and President Vladimir Putin is pitching himself as a possible mediator even as he condemns Israel. "We would like to particularly warn Washington against military intervention in the situation," Russian foreign ministry's spokeswoman Maria Zakharova told reporters. US President Donald Trump had said Wednesday he was considering join Israel's strikes on Iran. "I may do it, I may not do it," he said. He also rejected Russia's offer to broker peace, saying he told Putin to resolve the Ukraine conflict first. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Thursday that it was not up to Trump to reject Putin's offer. "These services can be accepted by countries that are currently directly involved in the conflict," he said. Zakharova warned any US military action "would be an extremely dangerous step with truly unpredictable negative consequences". Moscow issued its warning after Putin spoke with his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping, with the pair blasting Israel. Putin and Xi "strongly condemn Israel's actions," the Kremlin said after the call. Putin aide Yuri Ushakov told reporters that Moscow and Beijing believed the end to the hostilities "should be achieved exclusively by political and diplomatic means". Russia has for years been a key actor in the Middle East, managing to maintain warm relations with all major players in the region. But the fall of key ally Bashar al-Assad in Syria last year, and Israel's war in Gaza -- which Putin has repeatedly raised concerns about -- have threatened to dent that position. Despite their close military ties, Putin said Iran had not requested military help in the week since Israel launched its attacks. "Our Iranian friends have not asked us about this," Putin said in response to a question from an AFP reporter at a late-night televised press conference in Saint Petersburg. He also pointed out that the treaty signed in January was not a mutual defence pact and did not oblige either side to provide arms or assistance. Asked what steps Russia would take if Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was assassinated, Putin said: "I don't even want to discuss such a possibility." His spokesman said later Thursday that Russia would be prepared to send humanitarian aid, if requested to by Tehran. In their phone call, Xi told Putin that a ceasefire was "top priority" and also criticised Israel. "Promoting a ceasefire and cessation of hostilities is the top priority. Armed force is not the correct way to resolve international disputes," Xi said, according to China's state news agency Xinhua. "Parties to the conflict, especially Israel, should cease hostilities as soon as possible to prevent a cyclical escalation and resolutely avoid the spillover of the war," he added. Last week, Putin held phone calls with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, offering himself as a peacemaker. The Kremlin said that Xi had spoken "in favour of such mediation, since he believes that it could serve to de-escalate the current situation", Ushakov said. But Western leaders, including Trump and France's Emmanuel Macron have pushed back against the idea of Putin trying to mediate the conflict amid his own Ukraine offensive. "He actually offered to help mediate, I said: 'do me a favour, mediate your own'," Trump told reporters on Wednesday about Putin's efforts.

The Economics and Management School of Wuhan University has been Re-accredited by EQUIS for the Highest Five-year Period
The Economics and Management School of Wuhan University has been Re-accredited by EQUIS for the Highest Five-year Period

Malay Mail

time2 hours ago

  • Malay Mail

The Economics and Management School of Wuhan University has been Re-accredited by EQUIS for the Highest Five-year Period

Caption: This figure displays the EQUIS Five-Year Accreditation Certificate first awarded to the School of Economics and Management, Wuhan University. WUHAN, CHINA - Media OutReach Newswire - 19 June 2025 - Recently, the European Foundation for Management Development (EFMD) released a formal letter informing that the Economics and Management School (EMS) of Wuhan University (WHU) has successfully gained the five-year re-accreditation of EQUIS (EFMD Quality Improvement System). This is the first time that the EMS has been accredited by EQUIS' highest honor, a five-year period, following its first accreditation in March this year, an EQUIS peer review team, led by Professor Peter Møllgaard (President, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark), conducted a three-day comprehensive on-site evaluation at WHU. The panel included Professor Caitlin Byrne (Pro Vice Chancellor, Griffith University, Australia), Professor Wei Gu (Dean, School of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing), and Mr. Jacques Delplancq (Former Deputy General Manager, IBM France). The practice of EMS was thoroughly inspected through in-depth exchanges with Huang Taiyan (Secretary, Party Committee, WHU), Zhu Deyou (Vice President, WHU), Yuan Yufeng (Vice President, WHU), heads of relevant departments, and representatives of faculty members, students, alumni, corporate partners, accreditation is known for its rigorous evaluation process and excellent quality requirements. Since initiating its international accreditation journey in 2010, EMS has successively earned three top-notch accreditations: AMBA, EQUIS, and #TheEconomicsandManagementSchoolofWuhanUniversity The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.

Antimony shortage after China's export curbs leaves battery makers sweating
Antimony shortage after China's export curbs leaves battery makers sweating

New Straits Times

time3 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Antimony shortage after China's export curbs leaves battery makers sweating

When China restricts exports of a key mineral, sometimes the pain is sudden and even crippling — enough to spur a major outcry almost immediately. Other times, it takes longer to be felt. For the world's makers of lead-acid batteries, China's restrictions on critical mineral antimony that were put in place late last year have become a major headache — one that their customers also now have as sky-high procurement costs are passed on. "We consider it a national emergency," said Steve Christensen, executive director at the United States-based Responsible Battery Coalition, whose members include battery maker Clarios, Honda and FedEx. He noted the key role batteries played in industry and civilian life, how antimony was used in military equipment, as well as the surge in spot prices. Antimony now costs more than US$60,000 per tonne, having more than quadrupled over the past year. "There are no quick solutions... We were completely caught off guard collectively, as an industry," he said. China likely produced 60 per cent of all antimony supply in 2024, according to the US Geological Survey. Much of antimony mined in other countries is also sent to China for processing. Beijing added the mineral to its export control list last September, requiring companies to gain licences for each overseas antimony deal. It then followed up in December with an outright ban on shipments to the US — an action seen as retaliatory after Washington further restricted exports of advanced semiconductors to Chinese companies. China's global exports of antimony are now just a third of levels seen this time last year. Christensen said US companies were hugely reliant on China for their supply of antimony and buyers were increasingly having to procure from an emerging "grey market", where sellers that had stocked up on the material were charging extremely high prices. China's restrictions on antimony precede its controls on rare earths and rare earth magnets that were imposed in response to US President Donald Trump's tariffs and do not appear to have been discussed in last week's efforts to stabilise a truce in trade tensions between the two countries. Last week's talks between China and the US also did not include any agreement on specialised rare earths such as samarium needed for military applications. Lead-acid batteries, commonly found in petrol-engine vehicles, are mostly used to start the engine and to power low-voltage instruments. They are also used as sources of backup power in various industries and to store excess energy generated by solar and wind systems. Antimony is also essential to military equipment such as night vision goggles, navigation systems and ammunition. Overall antimony demand is some 230,000 to 240,000 tonnes a year with lead-acid batteries accounting for about a third of that, according to consultancy Project Blue. While many battery makers may have access to antimony-lead alloy from recycled materials, Project Blue estimates they collectively need around 10,000 tonnes a year of higher purity antimony to top up the alloy to reach the right battery properties. Securing that additional portion could be challenging. Project Blue director Nils Backeberg said there was enough antimony outside China to satisfy non-Chinese demand but buyers needed to compete with Chinese purchasers such as the country's huge solar industry, and China's smelters were able to offer better terms. "With antimony prices at nearly five times normal market conditions, the cost becomes a factor and with supply limited on the Western market, a shortage is being felt," he said. For now, it seems that battery makers' antimony woes have not yet led to cuts in output. One source at an Indian battery maker said antimony represented only a small cost of a battery and price increases were being passed onto customers, but any more price rises could spell trouble. "If the price does increase further, everyone (in the industry) will be vulnerable," said the source. In a sign that profits are being affected, India's Exide Industries blamed high prices for antimony when it logged smaller-than-expected income for its fourth quarter. Christensen said policymakers should treat the issue as one of national security, arguing that Western countries had become "overly reliant on a single geopolitical adversary for minerals foundational to both national defence and civilian life".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store