Man charged over grossly offensive communication on TikTok about ‘slicing Irish babies'
Beniamin Petre of no fixed abode was charged that on May 24th at an unknown location in Dublin that he published 'a grossly offensive communication on TikTok social media about slicing Irish babies, kids and you,' with intent to cause harm, contrary to Section 4(1) and (3) of the Harassment, Harmful Communications and Related Offences Act 2020.
He was further charged that on the same date at an unknown location in Dublin he used or engaged in threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour with intent to provoke a breach of the peace, or hatred towards the people of Ireland, contrary to Section 6A of the Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act 1994.
Detective Garda Mark Russell said he arrested the 50-year old defendant on May 28th at Rathmiles, Abbeyleix, Co. Laois and conveyed him to Abbeyleix Garda Station where he was detained.
READ MORE
He said when charged and cautioned his reply to first charge was, 'I can't say anything, as you are not listening Mark.'
In reply to the second cautioned charge he replied: 'I have nothing to say.'
Det. Russell said that he was seeking directions from the Director of Public Prosecutions and that there may be further charges.
Defending solicitor Josephine Fitzpatrick said that her client was not seeking bail and was consenting to be remanded in custody.
Judge Andrew Cody remanded Mr Petre in custody to appear again at Portlaoise District Court on Thursday June 5th by video link.
He also marked on the detention order that the defendant receive an urgent medical assessment while in custody.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
25 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Cork creamery effluent discharge being investigated amid major fish kill
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has begun an investigation into effluent discharges by a creamery into a tributary of the Blackwater river in North Cork but says the discharge is not related to the deaths of thousands of fish in the river. The EPA confirmed last night it is 'conducting a Compliance Investigation into issues at North Cork Creameries related to the quality of effluent discharges into the River Allow', which flows downstream from Kanturk town into the Blackwater. 'Based on the investigation to date, there is no causal link between the site's emissions and the tragic loss of fish life further downstream in the River Blackwater,' said the EPA which has been liaising with Inland Fisheries Ireland (IFI) in the wake of the fish kill. According to IFI, some 8,000 to 10,000 fish comprising primarily brown trout but including juvenile salmon and dace have died over an 18km stretch of the Blackwater, beginning some 12km upstream of Mallow and extending 6km downstream of the town. READ MORE But local angling groups have estimated that more than 40,000 fish have died over the past eight days and that the dead fish have been found over a 30km stretch of the river from Clonmeen, near Banteer, all the way down to Killavullen, which is downstream of Mallow. The EPA said North Cork Creameries, which is a farmer-owned co-operative, is taking actions to reduce inputs to its waste water treatment plant and to restore compliance with its licence. The EPA said it is not currently considering an order to shut down milk-processing operations at the site but said the site-visit reports by its staff will be available on its online Licence Enforcement Access Portal. The confirmation by the EPA it is investigating North Cork Creameries comes as a leading figure in angling on the Blackwater warned the fish kill could result in the river taking up to ten years or more to replenish its fish stocks. Mallow Trout Anglers chairman John Ruby showing Minister of State Timmy Dooley the impact of the fish kill on the river Blackwater. Photograph: Mallow Trout Anglers Chairman of Killavullen Angling Club Conor Arnold said the large fish kill is going to have repercussions for years in terms of angling on the Blackwater which supports up to 1,000 trout and salmon anglers. 'It's very hard to put an exact number of fish that died but we applied a bit of logic to the number of fish we were taking out and we are definitely in the tens of thousands – it's definitely over 40,000 from what we can estimate – it's phenomenal – the river is dying before our eyes. 'Brown trout are indigenous to the river and while it's hard to estimate, such is the scale of the fish kill, I would estimate it will take eight to ten years for the stock to replenish while it will also have a huge impact on salmon as two to three generations of salmon have been wiped out. 'It's going to seriously damage one of the primary salmon and trout fisheries in Europe.'
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Heather Humphreys races ahead in FG nomination battle as Ministers and TDs endorse her
Heather Humphreys appears certain to become Fine Gael's new candidate for the presidential election, having secured the support of the majority of the party's parliamentary party. Almost 40 ministers, TDs and senators had declared their support for the former minister within hours of her announcing her intention to seek the Fine Gael nomination on Tuesday. MEP Seán Kelly , who also announced his intention to become the Fine Gael presidential candidate on Tuesday, had secured the backing of at least six politicians, which left him 14 short of the nominations he requires. Including Fine Gael politicians who are understood to be backing Ms Humphreys but have not yet declared, it does not now seem possible for Mr Kelly to attract the 20 nominations required. READ MORE The parliamentary party members publicly backing Ms Humphreys so far include ministers Peter Burke, Helen McEntee and Patrick O'Donovan and junior ministers Neale Richmond, Hildegarde Naughton, Colm Brophy, John Cummins and Emer Higgins. Also among her backers were TDs Emer Currie, John Paul O'Shea, David Maxwell, Jerry Buttimer, Paula Butterly, Grace Boland, Frank Feighan, Naoise O'Muirí, Catherine Callaghan, Alan Dillon, Keira Keogh, Maeve O'Connell, Pete Roche, James Geoghegan, Colm Burke, John Clendennan and Micheal Carrigy and Barry Ward. Senators Seán Kyne, Maria Byrne, Nikki Bradley, Joe O'Reilly, Mark Duffy, Gareth Scahill, PJ Murphy, Cathal Byrne, Manus Boyle, Linda Nelson Murray and Noel O'Donovan also supported her. Mr Kelly has the support of TDs Michael Murphy, Joe Cooney, Brian Brennan and Noel McCarthy, and senators Garret Ahearn and Michael Kennelly. [ In Heather Humphreys, Fine Gael faithful think they've found their first president Opens in new window ] Setting out her campaign on Tuesday morning, Ms Humphreys said that she has 'never felt as good about taking on a challenge.' 'We're living in an increasingly divisive world, and I believe that the President can be a unifying force in this country that really brings people together and throughout my political career, I have always sought to break down barriers and reach out that hand of friendship,' she said.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘My cousin won't end his marriage and formalise his relationship with his lover of 15 years'
Question My cousin has been living in a kind of 'Irish divorce' of olden times in that he is not living with his wife, but they still do family events together. They go to graduations, weddings, funerals and so on together, but in effect they have not been a couple for almost 20 years. He met a gorgeous woman while we were on holidays in the west of Ireland about 15 years ago and has been in a relationship with her since. My cousin is always organising trips (including me) so that he can spend time with this woman, and I know he is helping her financially. He has met most of her family, and at this stage I know many of them as well and we are an accepted part of the community in her part of the country. As a woman I can identify with his paramour, as I too have had the experience of not being loved enough. My cousin simply won't end the marriage to his wife and formalise his relationship. I ended my own long-term relationship, of 10 years, when my partner had an affair and did not fight to keep us together. I did not have any children as my relationship was not secure enough, and I think that my cousin has inflicted the same situation on his lover but does not take responsibility for this. Recently my cousin has been diagnosed with prostate cancer and, while the prognosis seems good, I am worried that if something happens to him, his lover will be left with nothing – no financial support or position. I know she is becoming hopeless that she will have no access to him if he gets sick, but I feel that what he is doing (or rather not doing) is really wrong. I want to tackle him on this, but am worried that I am being overdramatic. READ MORE Answer Your sense of justice is heightened because of what you feel complicit in – that your cousin is 'having his cake and eating it'. He has many of the benefits of married life and also a lover with no strings attached. This is, no doubt, not the whole story, and he too suffers from having a divided life, but your question about whether you should tackle him is central to your relationship with him. It sounds as though you have a long and trusting relationship with your cousin, and it would seem that it can withstand some challenge or difficulty. How would you feel if your cousin questioned some part of your life? Would you allow it as part of his friendship and care of you? You write very clearly of the wrong you see happening, and the urge to speak must be ever-present, so what stops you? What is it you fear? You have been through a serious break-up and so you know the pain of separation and abandonment. Is the memory of this playing a role in your trying to keep the peace and the friendship intact? If fear is a factor in your communication with your cousin, then perhaps it is also present in the communication between him and his lover. She too seems to be stuck in a type of limbo, hoping for some morsel of recognition or commitment. However, she is an adult with family and community around her, so she may not need your assistance, and you cannot assume anything without her asking for support. [ 'I don't love my husband. I care for him and don't wish him ill health, but I'm struggling' Opens in new window ] The risk you take in engaging your cousin in an honest and direct conversation is that he will cut off all contact with you, but this is a man who has managed not to cut off contact with anyone, so perhaps this is not as risky as you might think. Also, you have a history of staying in uncomfortable situations (10 years in a dying relationship) too long, and this pattern needs to be changed urgently. Ultimately, you can express your concerns at your cousin's behaviour, but the only part you get to decide is whether you continue to support him (emotionally) or not. Your principles and values are telling you to take a stand, and now you get to find out how real or flimsy these are for you. Perhaps you can demand for yourself what you wish your cousin's lover might require for herself: respect and loyalty. These characteristics are the cornerstone of all friendships, and good relationships, and if they are non-existent, the relationship is not robust and might need to be let go of. By your actions of speaking up and challenging, you might show your cousin's lover that it is okay to require dignity and respect, and your cousin might be jolted into seeing the effect of his behaviour and take steps to remedy it. To send your question to Trish Murphy, fill in the form below, click here or email tellmeaboutit@
