
US golden share in US Steel could scare off investors, lawyers say
WASHINGTON :An unusual move by the Trump administration to give itself a golden share in U.S. Steel as part of a deal to approve Nippon Steel's takeover of the well-known U.S. company could drive away foreign investors, national security lawyers said on Monday.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick announced on Saturday, "President Trump has secured a perpetual Golden Share as part of Nippon Steel's acquisition of U.S. Steel," listing a raft of corporate decisions that the Trump administration would now have veto power over.
Shares of U.S. Steel rose 5 per cent on Monday to hit $54.85 a share, approaching Nippon Steel's $55 per share offer price, as investors bet the Japanese firm's fraught $14.9-billion bid for the struggling company would soon reach the finish line.
But the Trump administration's move to include the golden share in the national security agreement was an unusual choice, and would make foreign investors wary, according to Joshua Gruenspecht, a national security lawyer with Wilson Sonsini.
"It leads to the question of, 'Am I going to get what I bought? Do I actually get control of this asset?'" he said.
Nippon Steel declined to comment. U.S. Steel, the White House, Commerce and the Treasury Department, which leads the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. that scrutinizes foreign investments for national security risks, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
'RISKY AND UNPRECEDENTED'
The Trump administration gave a green light to the merger on Friday via an executive order and a signed agreement to assuage national security concerns, capping off a tumultuous 18-month effort.
But questions had swirled about the golden share President Donald Trump had suggested gave the American people a 51 per cent stake in the struggling U.S. firm as part of the acquisition.
In his Saturday post, Lutnick said the share would prevent the companies from reducing or delaying $14 billion in promised investments, transferring production or jobs outside the United States, or closing or idling plants before certain time frames, without the president's consent.
The share also gives the government a veto over a potential relocation of U.S. Steel's headquarters from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, a transfer of jobs overseas, a name change, as well as other protections relating to "employee salaries, anti-dumping pricing, raw materials and sourcing outside the U.S., acquisitions, and more," Lutnick added.
That power is conferred via a single share of preferred stock, called Class G for "gold," and is bolstered by a board member directly appointed by the president, a U.S. official said, confirming a report by the New York Times.
Lawyers consulted by Reuters said it was not outside the norm for CFIUS to require in an NSA that certain board members be approved by the committee. But to have one with a fiduciary duty to the president appeared to be a new approach.
"A golden share approach is both risky and unprecedented," said Jim Secreto, a former Treasury and Commerce official, adding that the United States would cry foul if Beijing required something similar to approve a U.S. company's investment in a Chinese firm. "Trump's dealmaking introduces uncertainty for global investors and sets a precedent that could complicate future cross-border deals."
Even before Trump got involved, the companies had offered significant authority to the U.S. government. In a national security agreement term sheet proposed to the CFIUS in September 2024 and obtained by Reuters, Nippon Steel pledged that a majority of U.S. Steel's board members would be American, and that three of them - known as the "independent U.S. Directors" - would be approved by CFIUS.
"U.S. Steel may reduce Production Capacity if and only if it is approved by a majority of the Independent U.S. Directors," the term sheet stated, adding that core U.S. managers will be U.S. citizens.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
.jpg%3Fitok%3DVgKTbgBb&w=3840&q=100)

CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Money Talks - When to get the best exchange rates for foreign currencies
Money Talks Play If the US dollar weakens against the Singdollar, should you buy it even if you're not traveling to the US anytime soon? And what happens if the rate drops drastically? In this week's Money Talks episode, Khoon Goh, head of Asia research for ANZ gives a run down the basics of currency exchange.


CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
US news consumers are turning to podcaster Joe Rogan and away from traditional sources, report shows
Prominent podcasters like Joe Rogan are playing a bigger role in news dissemination in the United States, as are AI chatbots, contributing to the further erosion of traditional media, according to a report released on Tuesday. In the week following the January 2025 U.S. presidential inauguration, more Americans said they got their news from social and video networks than from TV and news websites and apps - the first time that shift has occurred, the report said. Traditional U.S. news media increasingly risks being eclipsed by online personalities and creators, the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism said in its annual Digital News Report, which is based on an online survey of almost 100,000 people in 48 markets, including the United States. The trend is particularly acute among young Americans. Over half of people under age 35 in the U.S. are relying on social media and video networks as their main source for news, the report found. Across the countries that the report surveyed, 44 per cent of people aged 18 to 24 said these networks are their main source of news. One-fifth of a sampled group of Americans came across news or commentary from podcaster Rogan in the week following the presidential inauguration, the report found, while 14 per cent of respondents said they had come across former Fox News anchor Tucker Carlson discussing or commenting on news during that period. Carlson now generates content across multiple social media and video networks. Top creators during that period also included Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens and Ben Shapiro on the political right, and Brian Tyler Cohen and David Pakman on the left. The vast majority of the most followed commentators who discuss politics are men, the report found. 'These are not just big numbers in themselves,' wrote Nic Newman, Senior Research Associate at the Oxford, UK-based Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. 'These creators are also attracting audiences that traditional media struggle to reach. Some of the most popular personalities over-index with young men, with right-leaning audiences, and with those that have low levels of trust in mainstream media outlets, seeing them as biased or part of a liberal elite.' Despite their popularity, online influencers and personalities are seen as the biggest sources of false or misleading information worldwide, along with politicians, the report found. In the United States, politicians are considered the biggest sources of false or misleading information. Over 70 per cent of Americans say they remain concerned about their ability to tell what is true from what is false when it comes to news online, a similar proportion to last year. That compared to 58 per cent across all of the surveyed markets. AI is another emerging theme in news consumption, particularly for young people. Of respondents under age 25, 15 per cent rely on AI chatbots and interfaces for news each week, compared to 7 per cent of respondents overall, the report found. ChatGPT was the most mentioned AI service for news, followed by Google's Gemini and Meta AI. The trend is raising concerns about a potential loss of search referral traffic to publisher websites and apps, the report found, as chatbots eliminate the need for users to click on a story link. Text remains the most preferred way for people worldwide to consume news, although around a third say they prefer to watch the news online and 15 per cent say they prefer to listen. Younger people are much more likely to prefer watching or listening to the news. Social media platform X, formerly Twitter, is also becoming a more popular source of news in the United States, particularly among right-leaning users and young men, with 23 per cent of sampled Americans consuming news there - up 8 per centage points from last year. Rival networks like Threads, Bluesky and Mastodon are struggling to gain traction globally, with reach of 2 per cent or less for news. Levels of trust in news across markets are currently stable at 40 per cent, and unchanged for the last three years, the report found. The Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism is funded by the Thomson Reuters Foundation, the philanthropic arm of Thomson Reuters.


CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Money Talks Podcast: When to get the best exchange rates for foreign currencies
If the US dollar weakens against the Singdollar, should you buy it even if you're not traveling to the US anytime soon? And what happens if the rate drops drastically? In this week's Money Talks episode, Khoon Goh, head of Asia research for ANZ gives a run down the basics of currency exchange. Here is an excerpt from the conversation: Andrea Heng, host: One of our guests in a previous Money Talks episode told us that when he saw the Japanese yen dropping, he immediately went and changed a large sum of money and kept it in his multi-currency app. What are the pros and cons of doing this? Khoon Goh, head of Asia research for ANZ: It makes sense to look at a very favourable rate, particularly if a trip is coming up, and you know you're going to utilise that. So it makes sense to convert ... But the downside is that potentially that rate could get even better. Secondly, in terms of these multi-currency wallets, bear in mind you're not actually earning any interest when you convert into it. If you still retain your Sing dollars in your savings account, at least you're earning something, not much, but at least something. So there is that opportunity cost of lost interest that has to be borne. It's not going to be a large amount obviously, but it's really around the potential for the rates getting better. So if you're converting, say, the whole amount, then you're missing out on any potential better rates. But on the other hand, it could also revert, and therefore in my mind, let's not have any regrets, because whatever rate that you are changing is obviously a rate that you're happy with, and you're going to spend that amount anyway. Andrea: But that's the thing, right? I've always often wondered, when do you know it's a good time to change? Is it when everyone goes: 'Hey, the US dollar has come down. I think better change now.' Or is there something that we can refer to as a gauge? Khoon: There's a lot of things that affect currency movements, but if you're already committed, or you've already made a decision to travel or go on a holiday to a certain destination, then even a two to five per cent currency move is not going to be material.