Suspended Road Accident Fund boss tight-lipped over allegations of interference
Road Accident Fund CEO has been place on a special leave amid an ongoing investigation.
Image: Sapa
ALLEGATIONS of possible interference by executives and staff in an investigation into a controversial R79 million lease deal led to the suspension of Road Accident Fund's chief executive officer Collins Letsoalo, says the fund.
Letsoalo, whose term expires in August, will still receive his salary and other benefits.
The Special Investigations Unit (SIU) is currently investigating the RAF for alleged corruption and maladministration.
Letsoalo has been implicated in several allegations of financial mismanagement and corruption, primarily centered around a controversial R79 million lease deal for the RAF's office in Johannesburg.
The SIU preliminary report alleges that Letsoalo interfered with the procurement processes by overturning the bid committee's decision to favour property management company Mowana Properties, which ultimately secured the contract.
The allegations were extended beyond the lease to include irregularities in other RAF contracts such as a R19m cleaning and security contract that was irregularly extended over six years, as well as R313m backlog project that was unlawfully awarded with inflated costs.
Transport Deputy Minister Mkhuleko Hlengwa said the decision against Letsoalo was taken by the RAF board during a meeting.
Hlengwa announced the suspension during a Standing Committee on Public Accounts meeting on Wednesday, where the RAF was expected to give an update on the SIU investigation.
Hlengwa said this was a precautionary measure and did not constitute disciplinary action.
He said the board exercised its fiduciary duties in terms of the Road Accident Fund Act, 56 of 1996, the Public Finance Management Act, 1 of 1999, and in alignment with the principles of good governance as set out in King IV.
Hlengwa added that the decisions did not imply any prejudgement or adverse finding against Letsoalo.
'The special leave arrangement will remain in place until the conclusion of the relevant investigations by the SIU, or such earlier date as the board may determine. The board will review the situation on a monthly basis and communicate the updates,' said Hlongwa.
He said that during this period, Phathutshdzu Lukhwareni will serve as acting CEO to ensure operational continuity.
Hlengwa added that, as the shareholder, the Department of Transport Ministry supports the decision that the RAF board has taken and believes it was in the collective interests of the investigation, particularly as it is in the final stages.
Scopa is in possession of the SIU's preliminary report.
He said the Transport Ministry has not been briefed by the SIU on matters related to the investigation.
'We do not have the opportunity to engage the SIU either and therefore we do not have the benefits of the committee's perspective on matters related to the investigation, " said Hlengwa.
RAF board chairperson, Zanele Francois, said alleged interference by executives and staff was the reason the board believes Letsoalo must be placed on special leave.
'The board is taking this very seriously, which is why we believe Mr Letsoalo must be distanced from the process while it runs its course,' she said.
'We felt it was necessary to give him time off to address personal conflicts related to this process, to reflect on his role, and to ensure the organisation is not brought into disrepute. The board also needs to show its support for parliamentary oversight structures,' she said, adding that the board was in communication with the SIU and would meet the unit in June as part of the ongoing investigation.
Cape Times
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
6 hours ago
- The Citizen
‘War on Leaks' programme: SIU reveals R2.2bn budget balloons to over R4bn
The SIU has uncovered irregular contract extensions and procurement irregularities in its investigation into the water and sanitation department. The Special Investigating Unit (SIU) has revealed that the budget for the War on Leaks programme has increased to more than double the initial plan, and the number is still rising. The SIU appeared before the Standing Committee on Public Accounts on Wednesday, where it provided an update on its investigations into the Department of Water and Sanitation. According to the SIU, the department is riddled with: Contracts that balloon from the initial budget Irregular appointments of service providers Contractors who fail to perform contractual duties Irregular contract extensions Procurement irregularities Possible fraudulent claims Overpriced goods and services Payment for work never performed Manipulation of the payment system for overpayment and incorrect VAT charges Officials in the water sector who certified and commissioned work that was not performed Irregular expenditure In April last year, President Cyril Ramaphosa signed Proclamation 164 of 2024, authorising the SIU to investigate allegations of serious maladministration in the department and to recover any financial losses suffered by the state or the department. ALSO READ: SIU is not done with NLC yet, as more corruption allegations emerge The scope of the investigation covers any unlawful or improper conduct by department officials or employees, as well as applicable suppliers or service providers, or any other person or entity that has caused or may cause serious harm to the public's interests. 'War on Leaks' The War on Leaks Artisan Training programme was launched by then-president Jacob Zuma in 2015 with the aim of training 15,000 youths to reduce water losses through leaks. The project was signed in 2015 by then Water and Sanitation Minister Nomvula Mokonyane for Rand Water to curb about R7 billion in water leaks across the country. During Phase one of the project, 3 000 pupils were trained during 2015/2016, during Phase two, 5,000 pupils were trained during 2016/2017, while in Phase three, 7,000 pupils were set to be trained during 2017/2018. The second phase of the War on Leaks project was launched by Mokonyane in Durban in February 2017. ALSO READ: SIU authorised to probe water department's 'war on leaks' project The approved budget for the programme was R2.2 billion. However, the SIU identified that R4.7 billion had been paid out so far, the SIU told the committee on Wednesday. The SIU said this number continues to increase due to its forensic account quantification process. Rand Water received R1.7 billion, which includes R40 million in unexplained and unsubstantiated contingency fees. This investigation is ongoing. SIU on Rooiwal Wastewater Treatment Works Rooiwal made headlines in 2023 after a cholera outbreak which killed 23 people at Hammanskraal, with controversial businessman Edwin Sodi's R295-million tender contract to upgrade the plant's infrastructure being scrutinised. At the time, the department found that 'the failure of the Rooiwal Wastewater Treatment Works to meet the desirable final effluent quality for discharge to the Apies River, which in turn flows into the Leeukraal Dam', played a critical role in the Hammanskraal water crisis. ALSO READ: SIU investigates two municipalities for 'serious maladministration' over street light deals The SIU has since been investigating the refurbishment and upgrade project, of which only 60% of the first phase was completed before it was abandoned in 2020. In this project, the SIU identified 65 role players for high-level profiling, including officials, private individuals and entities. Nine officials were flagged for further lifestyle audits due to assets purchased and indications that they were living beyond their means. The SIU said that 27 officials were also flagged for further lifestyle audits due to assets purchased or living beyond their means, as well as suspicious transactions. Since 2012, the department's cash and assets yet to be recovered amount to R264.1 million, while the actual cash or assets recovered amount to R569.1 million. The department's contracts or administrative decisions that were set aside or deemed invalid amount to R1.1 billion. The SIU prevented a potential loss of R717 million. From 2008, the SIU has received 14 proclamations relating to the water and sanitation sector. Investigations into nine of these proclamations have been finalised, while five are active. READ NEXT: Rooiwal tender award: Tshwane officials absolved in Edwin Sodi's company progression
IOL News
13 hours ago
- IOL News
SIU investigates Housing Development Agency projects
The Housing Development Agency is facing a Special Investigating Unit probe into widespread corruption in several projects across the country. Image: Nokuthula Mbatha / Independent Newspapers The Special Investigating Unit (SIU) is probing widespread corruption in several projects across the country funded by the Housing Development Agency (HDA). According to the proclamation signed by President Cyril Ramaphosa, the SIU investigation will focus on serious maladministration in the HDA's affairs in projects for provincial Human Settlements departments in the Eastern Cape, Free State, Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal, Mpumalanga, North West, Northern Cape, and the Western Cape. This includes the identification, acquisition, holding, development, and release of state, communal, and privately owned land for residential and community purposes by the agency, in its name, or for and on behalf of the provincial departments or by the departments in their name. The unit will also investigate whether the contracts were awarded in a manner that was not fair, competitive, transparent, equitable, or cost-effective and contrary to applicable legislation, manuals, guidelines, practice notes, circulars or instructions issued by the National Treasury or the relevant provincial Treasuries applicable to the HDA and the departments. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ The SIU is tasked with uncovering any related unauthorised, irregular, fruitless, or wasteful expenditure incurred by the HDA and the departments, or losses suffered by the agency, departments, or the state concerning the allegations. In addition, the probe will look into any irregular, improper, or unlawful conduct by the applicable service providers of the HDA and the departments or any other person or entity, relating to the allegations. Ramaphosa gave the SIU the green light to investigate serious maladministration in connection with the agency's affairs and the departments, improper or unlawful conduct by employees, unlawful expenditure of public money and other offences referred to in the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act committed in connection with the affairs of both the HDA and the departments. The investigation will also tackle unlawful or improper conduct by any person, which has caused or may cause serious harm to the interests of the public or any category thereof, which took place between April 2016 and last month or which took place before or after the date of the proclamation but is relevant to, connected with, incidental or ancillary to the matters mentioned or involve the same persons, entities or contracts investigated under the proclamation's authority.
IOL News
14 hours ago
- IOL News
Court orders RAF to honour R1. 4 million payment to undocumented Malawian immigrant injured in car crash
The Western Cape High Court has dismissed an application by the Road Accident Fund (RAF) to rescind a judgment mandating the payment of over R1.4 million to a Malawian man who has been in the country illegally. Image: Pexels The Western Cape High Court has dismissed an application by the Road Accident Fund (RAF) to rescind a judgment mandating a payment of over R1.4 million to an undocumented Malawian man. Charles Jeka Chipofya has been living in the country since 1994 and has been married to a South African woman since 2008. They have two children. Despite his long-term residence, his attempts to obtain citizenship through marriage were thwarted due to evident abuse of the system by some African nationals. The Road Accident Fund found itself at the centre of controversy after Chipofya was involved in a severe car accident in Plettenberg Bay in September 2016. He filed a claim with the RAF, culminating in a proposed settlement of over R1.4 million in November 2022. In January 2023, a draft order was presented to the court on mutual consent between the parties, and RAF was ordered to pay Chipofya over R1.4 million. However, two years later, RAF reneged and wanted the court to rescind the order claiming that when it was made, it was unaware that Chipofya was an illegal immigrant. RAF said that when Chipofya submitted a copy of a passport, it referred to him as Charles Chipeta and not as Charles Jeka Chipofya, and this was suspicious. In response to this suspicion, RAF investigated to ascertain the circumstances surrounding his dual identity and it came to light that Chipofya owns two passports, one naming him as Charles Jeka Chipofya and the other as Charles Chipeta. RAF stated that when Chipofya was confronted about having two passports, he tried to attribute the discrepancy to a data capture error. However, in RAF's view, his explanation was unlikely, as it is improbable that such an error could occur. Subsequent to that, RAF said investigations revealed that one of the passports did not exist at the time of the accident. Additionally, the movement system record revealed that the visa on the other passport expired in December 2012. Moreover, there were no records showing that Chipofya left the country using the old passport or that he entered the country with a new passport after December 2012. In RAF's view, this could imply that Chipofya was either not present in the country on the date of the accident or was potentially in the country illegally. RAF argued that the order was erroneously granted and had the court been made aware that Chipofya was an illegal immigrant, the court would not have granted the order. Furthermore, RAF contended that the Immigration Act prohibits illegal immigrants from being in the country and extending claims of damages to illegal immigrants will create an enormous burden on the State. In response, Chipofya's legal representative argued that RAF had prior knowledge of his nationality and legal status before reaching a settlement agreement. Moreover, it was argued that Chipofya never misrepresented his status in the country and the settlement agreement was not based on the assumed existence of his legal status in the country. Judge James Dumisani Lekhuleni who presided over the matter, sided with Chipofya, and noted RAF had reduced the claim amount specifically because Chipofya was an illegal immigrant at the time of the offer, a fact that had been openly discussed during negotiations. "This conclusion is fortified by the fact that RAF's legal representatives advised Chipofya's attorneys that his claim would be reduced because he was an illegal immigrant. This averment was not disputed by the RAF or RAF's counsel," he said. In addition, he said Chipofya's medical reports and some of his documents, showed that he didn't have a valid visa and despite this, RAF settled his claim and consented to have the draft order endorsed in court. Regarding the different names, the judge said Chipofya provided a plausible explanation regarding the names and when RAF made the offer, it was aware of the discrepancies. Judge Lekhuleni emphasised that RAF is legally bound under the RAF Act to provide compensation for losses arising from road accidents, asserting that the Act does not discriminate based on a claimant's immigration status. "In my opinion, the current legislative framework of the RAF Act does not support the fund's position to exclude illegal immigrants from the application of RAF. "Eligibility for the RAF fund is not contingent upon a person's legal status within this country. An individual's legal standing does not influence their eligibility for RAF benefits. Simply put, it is not the person's immigration status in the country that makes a person legible to the RAF benefits," he said. RAF's application was dismissed. [email protected] IOL News Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.
