&w=3840&q=100)
Can't seal locked premises during PMLA searches: ED tells Madras HC
Additional Solicitor General S V Raju made the submission when the petitions filed by film producer Akash Bhaskaran and businessman Vikram Ravindran came up for hearing before a division bench comprising Justices M S Ramesh and V Lakshminarayanan on Wednesday.
In their petitions, Akash and Vikram challenged the action of ED in conducting the search at their residence and office and sealing the same.
When the case came up, the bench questioned the power of ED to seal the premises.
Raju submitted that the central prove agency has no power to seal the premises. However, it has powers under section 17 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) to break open the lock. But, the ED did not want to escalate the situation, he added.
He also informed the bench that the ED was instructed to withdraw the notice pasted on the premises of the petitioners and to return all the seized material.
Following this, the bench reserved orders on the interim applications and posted after four weeks, the hearing on the main petitions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
5 hours ago
- The Print
800 sanitation workers detained at midnight in Chennai after 13-day protest
For the 13th consecutive day, hundreds of sanitation workers employed under the National Urban Livelihoods Mission (NULM) protested in front of Ripon Building, demanding a rollback of the GCC's decision to privatise solid waste management services in Zones 5 and 6. Around 800 sanitation workers, opposing the civic body's move to privatise waste management in two zones, were forcibly removed around midnight and taken away by buses within 45 minutes. Chennai: Chennai police on Wednesday night detained sanitation workers who had been protesting for 13 consecutive days outside the Greater Chennai Corporation's Ripon Building, following a Madras High Court order to clear the protest site. The workers claimed that the move threatened their job security, livelihoods, and exposed them to exploitation by private agencies. Earlier, the GCC had announced plans to outsource waste management in Royapuram (Zone 5) and Thiru-Vi-Ka Nagar (Zone 6) from August 1. These were among the last remaining zones under direct GCC control, with 10 out of Chennai's 15 zones already managed by private contractors such as Spain-based Urbaser-Sumeet and Andhra Pradesh-based Ramky Enviro Engineers Ltd (REEL). The workers condemned the outsourcing, demanded permanent employment, and insisted that sanitation work continue under the NULM scheme. Tensions began on July 31, when GCC officials informed NULM workers they would need to coordinate with private firms. The situation escalated on August 1 when morning-shift workers reported for duty but were denied entry. Many, including several with over a decade of service, boycotted work and joined the demonstrations. The protest was supported and led by trade unions such as the All India Central Council of Trade Unions (AICCTU), AITUC, Left Trade Union Congress (LTUC), and Labour Progressive Union (LPU). It also gained backing from political parties, including CPI, CPI(M), DMDK, TVK, PMK, TNBSP, and other regional parties. On Wednesday, the Madras High Court ordered the Tamil Nadu government to take action against the striking workers. Later that evening, Municipal Administration Minister K.N. Nehru held talks with protest representatives, but no resolution was reached. Police detained the protesting sanitation workers around midnight. Officers deployed at the GCC headquarters rounded up the protesters, escorted them to buses, and cleared the area. In a post on X, Senior BJP leader Tamilisai Soundararajan wrote, 'Now watching how the sanitary workers on agitation for the past 13 days are brutally evacuated from that area…and forcefully arrested and taken in 14 buses approximately arrested…the reason for this evacuation the Government says that it is because of court order.. during my visit itself I told these type of brutal evacuation should not @mkstalin'. She further added, 'Should meet them and speak to them positively, and the evacuation should be more decently and warmly. It is disheartening to see fainted women were taken in ambulance…Total mismanagement by @arivalayam DMK government…more painful to know that Honorable TN CM instead of meeting the agitating sanitary workers demanding adequate 'coolie.'..TN CM watching Coolingly the movie' coolie'.. Very Unfortunate situation in Tamilnadu.' (ANI) This report is auto-generated from ANI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content. Also read: Trash piles up across Chennai areas as sanitation workers protest privatisation move
Indian Express
9 hours ago
- Indian Express
Delhi court discharges journalist Rajeev Sharma, 2 others in money laundering case
A Delhi court last month discharged journalist Rajeev Sharma from an offence lodged by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in 2021 for money laundering stemming from alleged spying for Chinese intelligence and having classified documents related to national security. This was after recording that the ED's prosecution was without jurisdiction in the absence of a scheduled offence. Discharging the three accused in the ED case: Sharma, Chinese national Qing Shi and another Sher Singh alias Raj Bohara, the court observed in its order from July 16 and made public on August 11 that the scheduled offence is the 'very foundation on which a money laundering charge rests' and if the foundation fails, 'the superstructure must collapse'. Sharma was first booked in an FIR in 2020, registered under the Official Secrets Act at the special cell of the Delhi Police, for allegedly maintaining links with Chinese intelligence officers and transmitting sensitive information relating to national security and foreign affairs through electronic means. It was also alleged that he received funds via hawala channels and Western Union. He was arrested in this case in September 2020. According to the police, subsequent probe had revealed that some payments were routed through shell companies which were operated by Chinese nationals, namely Cheng Zhang and Qing Shi. These companies were then allegedly used to deliver hawala funds to Sharma through Raj Bohara alias Sher Singh. The accused, while seeking their discharge from the ED case, had argued that no offence of money laundering is present in the predicate offence and since the Official Secrets Act offences are not scheduled under the PMLA and the only Indian Penal Code (IPC) charge in the predicate FIR is Section 120B (criminal conspiracy), there is no ground to proceed with the prosecution complaint filed under the PMLA. The special PMLA court also recorded that the 'existence of a Scheduled Offence must be real and demonstrable on the basis of the prosecution's case' and it 'cannot be the product of speculative or inferential reasoning'. Relying on the judicial precedent set by the Supreme Court, Additional Sessions Judge Aparna Swami of Patiala House Court reasoned that it is 'abundantly clear that a prosecution under PMLA is not maintainable where the alleged predicate offence is not one of the offences enumerated in the schedule to the PMLA'. 'The commission of a scheduled offence is the very foundation on which a money laundering charge rests. If the foundation fails, the superstructure (herein PMLA case) must collapse. In practical terms, this means that if the only invoked offences in the predicate FIR/ chargesheet are outside the Schedule, the Enforcement Directorate has no jurisdiction to proceed under the PMLA.' The ED had argued that, although the police in the predicate offence did not explicitly charge the accused persons with IPC Section 411 (dishonestly obtaining or retaining stolen property), which is also a scheduled offence to prosecute under PMLA, the factual allegation implicitly makes out such an offence. The argument, however, did not cut teeth with the court, as it observed, '…the arguments of the ED essentially ask the court to look beyond the formal chargesheet and infer that a property offence (theft/ receiving of stolen property) was inherently involved in the accused's act of espionage…This the submissions to be misconceived in law and unsupported by facts on record.' 'The suggestion of a Section 411 IPC offence arises solely from the ED's own conjecture during arguments; however, the same was not part of the case originally made by the investigating authorities…An offence under the Official Secrets Act does not inherently involve theft of information,' the court added. 'The Enforcement Directorate's attempt to retroactively read a section 411 IPC offence into the facts of the present case is not legally tenable…It is beyond the mandate of a PMLA court to enlarge the scope of predicate case by adding new offences on a factual hypothesis.' Discharging the three, the court held that their 'PMLA prosecution is devoid of legal foundation' as the predicate offences under Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Official Secrets Act and Section 120B of the IPC are not Scheduled Offences under the PMLA, adding that 'no amount of inventive argument can make good this fundamental deficiency'.
Hans India
11 hours ago
- Hans India
Gunmen fire several rounds at YouTuber Elvish Yadav's Gurugram home
Gurugram: Unidentified attackers opened fire outside the residence of controversial YouTuber Elvish Yadav in Haryana's Gurugram early Sunday morning, triggering panic in the upscale locality. Police said the firing took place between 5.30 and 6 a.m. when three bike-borne assailants sprayed more than two dozen bullets at Yadav's house before fleeing. The bullets struck the ground and the first floors of the residence. Bigg Boss OTT winner Yadav, who lives on the second and third floors, was not present during the attack. His caretaker and some family members were inside at the time, but no one was injured. "Today, on 17.08.2025, at around 5:30/6:00 a.m., some unknown persons fired at a house under the jurisdiction of Police Station Sector-56, Gurugram. No person has been shot in this incident," Gurugram Police said in a statement. Additionally, the attackers are absconding. Police teams rushed to the spot, gathered forensic evidence, and began scanning CCTV footage from nearby areas. Officials said legal action is being initiated, and further investigation will proceed once Yadav's family registers a formal complaint. Relatives of the YouTuber said he had not received any threats before the incident. Yadav is currently outside Haryana for work. According to the investigation so far, the attack was carried out by three individuals riding a motorcycle. Multiple police teams are stationed at the site to track down the assailants. Yadav has been surrounded by controversies since he was arrested over allegations of using snake venom as a recreational drug at parties he allegedly organised. The YouTuber, who was later released on bail, was named along with other accused in an FIR lodged at Sector 49 police station in Noida on November 3, 2023, following a complaint by animal rights NGO People for Animals (PFA). Based on the FIR filed by the Gautam Buddha Nagar Police, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) also launched a parallel probe against the influencer under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and questioned him on various matters, including details of rave parties, the supply of snake venom, and its sources. Earlier in the month, the Supreme Court stayed the trial court proceedings against the YouTuber. As per the computerised case status reflected on the apex court's website, Elvish's SLP is tentatively listed for hearing on September 23. Senior advocate Mukta Gupta, instructed by advocates Raman Yadav and Aman Jha, represented Elvish before the Supreme Court.
