Catchment coordinators appointed to farming for water project
As part of the 'Better Farming for Water' campaign, Teagasc has appointed six catchment coordinators to lead a multi-actor approach to improve water quality in eight of Ireland's most important rivers.
The catchment coordinators will work in each of the selected catchments to put in place a comprehensive plan to improve water quality.
Stakeholders include farmers, Teagasc, private agricultural consultants, industry representatives, the Local Authority Waters Programme (LAWPRO), and community groups.
Local authorities are also involved, along with the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (DAFM), and the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage (DHLGH)
The six Teagasc appointments and catchments include the following:
Fiona Doolan – Boyne;
Philip Murphy – Blackwater;
Claire Mooney – Suir;
Neilus Nunan – Slaney;
Oisín Coakley – Lee and Bandon;
Ciaran Sheelan – Nore and Barrow.
The Better Farming for Water campaign includes eight actions, which involve better nutrient, farmyard and land management, and provides a 'structured' and 'relatable' approach for farmers to effectively engage with improving water quality.
The eight actions of the campaign aim to:
Reduce purchased nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) surplus per hectare;
Ensure soil fertility is optimal for lime, P and potassium (K);
Ensure application of fertiliser and organic manure at appropriate times and conditions;
Have sufficient slurry and soiled water storage capacity;
Manage and minimise nutrient loss from farmyards and roadways;
Fence off watercourses to prevent bovine access;
Promote targeted use of mitigation actions such as riparian margins, buffer strips and sediment traps to mitigate nutrient and sediment loss to water;
Maintain over-winter green cover to reduce nutrient leaching from tillage soils.
Head of the Teagasc water quality knowledge transfer department, Noel Meehan said: To succeed in improving water quality in the eight selected catchments, all stakeholders will be required to play their part in a collective effort of planning and actions.
'Key to realising improvements is the careful targeting of the right measure in the right place alongside high levels of implementation at farm level.
'We have a great opportunity to use the Better Farming for Water campaign to support farmers in the implementation of water protection measures and to have a period of sustained water quality improvement.'
There is variation in the objectives set out for each catchment, but the overall goal is to improve nutrient status.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Agriland
a day ago
- Agriland
Cow flow and avoiding congestion on roadways during breeding
As the breeding season progresses and oestrus activity hopefully begins to settle down, farmers should look at cow flow and congestion points on roadways. Things are still quite hectic in farmyards at this time of the year due to cows getting handled and served, grass quality proving hard to manage, and many farmers trying to wrap up their first-cut silage. However, having good roadways and ensuring good cow flow in and out of paddocks and to the parlour is crucial for keeping lameness issues at bay, along with high levels of grass utilisation, cow performance, and farm efficiency. Having good cow flow through the grazing infrastructure does make for easier grassland management, as the grazing rotation is easier to implement, leading to a better utilisation of grass, reduced costs, and more milk solids produced. A lot of dairy farms have insufficient roadways in place, which hinders cow flow and affects the herd's movement between paddocks and the milking parlour. As cows are now into their peak milk production and farmers are looking to hold that peak, it is important to have roadways in good condition to limit lameness and maximise production. Around the breeding season, when there is more mounting activity, jumping and mounting on tight and poor condition roadways can lead to lameness or injury which can affect milk production but also impact the cow's chances of going back in-calf. Cow flow A Teagasc study on farm roadway featured 55 farms with herd sizes ranging from 30 to 760 cows. with the participating farms selected based on herd size and geographical location. A roadway quality metric was developed to evaluate the condition of farm roadway, based on the following three variable assessed on each section: Roadway width; Surface condition score (ranging from one, which was inadequate for animal movement, to five, which was optimal); The presence of a congestion point on a roadway. All of this information was compiled to use as an estimate of mean cow flow on each farm, defined as cows moved per minute (CPM). The information gathered can be used to emphasise the importance of farm roadway infrastructure for efficient farm management and animal welfare. The on-farm survey results were as follows: Herd size (cows) <100 100-149 150-199 200-249 >250 Number of herds 11 18 8 5 13 Sample size of roadways (m) 130 260 124 87 292 Length of sections examined (m) 87 129 114 157 185 Mean roadway width (m) 2.97 2.94 3.3 3.6 3.89 Range roadway width (m) 1.7-6 1.2-5 1.8-7.7 2.5-5.3 1.9-10 Roadway width relative to herd size 0.76 0.7 0.69 0.74 0.62 Mean surface condition score 2.46 2.75 2.81 2.64 3.06 Public crossings 10 20 20 4 41 Mean total farm CPM 35.6 36.6 41 43.7 55.4 Results In total, 893 roadway sections on the selected 55 farms were assessed, with many roadway widths being suboptimal for the number of cows on the farm. The study outlined a standard width of 3.5m for a 50-cow herd, with another 0.5m allowed for every additional 50 cows thereafter. The results showed that, on average, roadways were 70% of the recommended width relative to the herd, with only 4% of the roadways being an optimal width for the herd size. Roadway width and surface condition were found to significantly affect the CPM rate, and the common denominator was better cow flow when roadways width and surface were of a good standard. Measured CPM with varying roadway width and surface, with a surface condition index (SCI) ranging from one to five, were as follows: Width (m) SCI 1 SCI 2 SCI 3 SCI 4 SCI 5 1 12.4 13.8 15.2 16.6 21.3 1.5 13.4 15.6 21.5 25.1 32.1 2 14.4 17.4 27.8 33.6 42.9 2.5 15.5 21.2 34 42.2 53.6 3 16.5 25 40.3 50.7 64.4 3.5 17.5 28.8 46.6 59.3 75.2 4 18.5 32.6 52.8 67.8 86 4.5 19.6 36.4 59.1 76.3 96.8 5 20.6 40.2 65.4 84.9 107.6 Public road crossings had a significant negative impact on cow flow, as it was found to reduce CPM by 32.7% on average, whereas congestion points did not have a major impact. The study found that only 14.2% of farm roadways were in an optimal surface condition to allow for sufficient cow movement, with 24.4% being completely inadequate. A number of factors affected surface conditions, including roadway width, congestion points, and the presence of a grass verge. Overall, the study found that roadway infrastructure has not adapted to meet increased herd demands on dairy farms across the country. This is not surprising as since many herds increased in size since the abolishment of quotas in 2015, grazing infrastructure, paddock sizes, and even water troughs did not increase in the same vein. According to the study, it is important that farmers re-assess such factors. It is essential for a farmer to ensure that their roadways are of adequate width, with a good surface condition and fewer congestion points to allow for increased cow throughput. This is particularly important to consider in the coming days and weeks as, more than likely, stock bulls are going to be let out to mop up any repeats or cows yet to be served, and if roadways and cow flow is poor, injuries and costs may sky-rocket.
Agriland
a day ago
- Agriland
LAWPRO highlights nature-based solutions to protect water quality
The Local Authority Waters Programme (LAWPRO) recently held a two-day national conference on nature-based solutions at Dundalk Institute of Technology (DkIT). Over 175 delegates attended the conference titled: Nature-based Solutions Conference- To Protect and Restore Urban, Rural, Coastal, and Riverine Environments. Delegates were welcomed by DKIT president, Dr. Diarmuid O'Callaghan, before the conference was formally opened by Minister of State for Nature, Heritage and Biodiversity, Christopher O'Sullivan. The event was of particular interest to those wanting to understand and incorporate nature-based solutions into urban, rural, and coastal environments. Nature-based solutions use natural systems such as soil, plants and landscape features to manage climate risks and environmental challenges. According to DkIT, these methods reduce flooding and drought impacts, improve water quality and support biodiversity. Minister of State O'Sullivan said: 'Nature-based solutions have a large role to play in protecting water quality by helping to create climate resilience and improving biodiversity. We need more solutions to environmental issues that work with nature rather than trying to control it. 'The International Union for Conservation of Nature estimate that one third of climate mitigation needed to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement, can be provided by nature-based solutions.' 'This conference will bring together experts who can share their experience and ideas for how to integrate and mainstream nature-based solutions into water management practice,' the minister added. LAWPRO The LAWPRO event was the second national nature-based solutions conference, and focused on technologies and strategies suitable to use in Ireland. Day one featured a number of expert presentations and panels, focused on the use and impact of nature-based solutions in a variety of settings including urban, rural, riverine, coastal and the private sector. The second day focused on nature-based solutions in action and offered a series of practical masterclass workshops to attendees covering urban solutions, river restoration and coastal restoration. The regional coordinator with LAWPRO, Dr. Fran Igoe said: 'Although the application of nature-based solutions is something new to many people in Ireland, our ancestors have been using these techniques for centuries. 'This conference allowed participants to explore how we can expand and mainstream such approaches to meet today's environmental challenges,' Igoe added.
Agriland
2 days ago
- Agriland
Scorecards for ACRES 2025 payments sent to advisors
Scorecards for lands for results-based payments under the Agri-Climate Rural Environment Scheme (ACRES) have been sent out to ACRES advisors this week. The department has also provided an updated version of the ACRES scorecard guidance document, which provides information to advisors on the way in which the lands concerned should be surveyed, and on the completion of the relevant scorecards. Advisors are being reminded that, for the scores submitted to be deemed valid and used in the determination of ACRES payments for 2025, they must be submitted by an approved ACRES advisor who has completed mandatory in-field scorecard training in 2025. Courses to provide this training are currently being provided, the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine said. There is also a specific introductory, basic scorecard training course being provided for those advisors who did not attend a mandatory ACRES scorecard training course in 2024 (for example, where an ACRES advisor has only been approved as such since summer 2024). When completing the Scrub/Woodland scorecard on the AgriSnap photo app, advisors should only select either section A1-S (Scrub) or A1-W (Woodland), depending on the habitat type present. Advisors should also ensure that only the relevant section is completed. Entering information in both sections A1-S (Scrub) and A1-W (Woodland) will result in an inaccurate score and subsequently a delay in payments to farmers. All scorecards – both Co-operation Project (CP) results-based scorecards and scorecards for general actions – for each holding must be submitted within 14 days of initiating the first scorecard. The last day for submission of all scorecards to the department is August 31 each year, according to the specifications of the ACRES programme. Once an ACRES scorecard has been submitted in full, it will not be possible to make further changes to the scorecard and it cannot subsequently be amended. Advisors are being told that it is therefore essential that they are 'fully satisfied' that scorecards are correct at the time of submission.
