Chicago pastor protests Trump administration with upside-down American flag
Chicago pastor Father Michael Pfleger protested the Trump administration by hanging an upside-down American flag outside his church.
The move symbolizes a nation in distress, according to Pfleger.
He criticized recent policies, including changes to Medicaid, Medicare, education, and gun laws.
CHICAGO - A well-known Chicago pastor is publicly criticizing former President Donald Trump and his administration, calling recent policy decisions harmful to the country.
What we know
On Monday, Father Michael Pfleger of Saint Sabina's Church in Chicago took his long-standing criticism of Trump a step further by hanging the American flag upside down outside the church. The distress signal was meant to highlight what he sees as dangerous shifts in policy under the administration.
Pfleger listed several issues behind his protest.
"And declaring a takeover, an ethnic cleansing of Gaza, putting Medicaid and Medicare at risk, shutting down the Department of Education, ending DEI, banning Black history, unraveling gun laws and blaming Ukraine for a war when Russia invaded them," Pfleger said. "Giving a billionaire citizen total access to government and to American citizens confidential information. These are only the beginnings of a long list of why America is in distress."
What's next
Pfleger says he will continue to speak out against policies he believes are harmful, using his pulpit and activism to push for change.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
41 minutes ago
- The Hill
Sunday shows preview: Trump-Putin summit ends with no deal; DC resists police takeover
President Trump concluded his Friday summit in Alaska with Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin by his side as the two announced no peace deal for Ukraine. The highly anticipated face-off on American soil lasted over three hours as White House aides and long-term diplomats from Moscow led bilateral discussions at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson. National security aficionados said Trump signaled a stark turn in U.S. foreign policy as Putin was referenced as a 'friend' of the president. Trump's set to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Monday at the White House following calls to show more solidarity with the Eastern European ally. Few details about the president's closed-door meeting with Putin were disclosed, however, Trump said conversations were 'extremely productive.' Secretary of State Marco Rubio flew from Washington to the Last Frontier for Russia-U.S. talks of ending the war in Ukraine. Rubio will likely address advancements made during the summit and future objectives for the Trump administration during a Sunday appearance on ABC's 'This Week' in addition to separate interviews on both Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures' and MSNBC's 'Meet the Press.' The secretary of state said security guarantees were necessary to finalize ceasefire negotiations and may also share updates on potential conditions for the agreement to appease both Kyiv and Moscow during the segment. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff will likely hit on similar topics during his appearance on CNN's 'State of the Union' and Fox News' 'Fox News Sunday' while sharing prominent developments for peace talks after meeting with Moscow's leaders multiple times this year. Former national security adviser Jake Sullivan is likely to share insight on a strong shift from the Biden administration's approach to the conflict in Ukraine and compare the current war landscape seen under Trump during his appearance on ABC's 'This Week' and Fox News' 'Fox News Sunday.' Fiona Hill, who served as senior director for European and Russian affairs on the National Security Council during Trump's first term, will appear on CBS's 'Face the Nation.' Her comments will likely show similarities and differences between the president's attempts to coax Putin into ending the war after the Kremlin launched an invasion of Ukraine in 2014 and 2022. Hill could discuss if Putin's land grab attempts will succeed as ceasefire discussions excel and may also explain why Trump decided against secondary sanctions on Russia's trading partners amid a bipartisan push from lawmakers in Congress. As negotiations remain deadlocked overseas, the Trump administration has resumed its Washington takeover with full force. Hundreds of National Guardsmen descended on the nation's capital Monday followed by an additional deployment of soldiers from West Virginia on Saturday. The White House ordered officers with the Metropolitan Police Department to aid in local immigration enforcement efforts and crack down on crime, especially violent acts committed by youth. Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) has been a vocal critic of the president's immigration agenda and joined fellow Democratic lawmakers in condemning Trump's emergency order placing Washington under federal control. 'We haven't seen scenes like this in D.C. since the days after the current president incited an insurrection,' Van Hollen wrote in a Friday post on X, showcasing tanks outside of Union Station. 'What D.C. faces now is a president abusing his power and deploying troops under the guise of law and order. A dictator's playbook,' he added. The Maryland senator will likely expand upon his thoughts during an appearance on ABC's 'This Week.' These topics and more will be highlighted during this week's Sunday shows. Please see the full list of guests below: NewsNation's 'The Hill Sunday:' Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.); Rep. Jimmy Patronis (R-Fla.); Former US Ambassador to NATO Kay Bailey Hutchinson ABC's 'This Week:' Secretary of State Marco Rubio; Former National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan; Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.); Former CIA chief of Central Eurasia Division Robert Dannenberg CBS 'Face the Nation:' Secretary of State Marco Rubio; Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska); Rep. Jason Crow (D-Colo.); Fiona Hill, former senior director for European and Russian affairs on the National Security Council; World Central Kitchen founder Jose Andres CNN 'State of the Union:' U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff; Former Vice President Mike Pence (R) MSNBC's 'Meet the Press:' Secretary of State Marco Rubio; Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) Fox News 'Fox News Sunday:' U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff; Former National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan; Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.),
Fox News
42 minutes ago
- Fox News
Removing DEI from military schools is a ‘move towards meritocracy': Attorney
Constitutional attorney Mark Smith discusses the Department of Justice's lawsuits alleging use of DEI at military schools on 'Fox Report.'
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Judge blocks Trump administration guidance against DEI programs at schools and colleges
AP — A federal judge on Thursday struck down two Trump administration actions aimed at eliminating diversity, equity and inclusion programs at the nation's schools and universities. In her ruling, U.S. District Judge Stephanie Gallagher in Maryland found that the Education Department violated the law when it threatened to cut federal funding from educational institutions that continued with DEI initiatives. The guidance has been on hold since April when three federal judges blocked various portions of the Education Department's anti-DEI measures. The ruling Thursday followed a motion for summary judgment from the American Federation of Teachers and the American Sociological Association, which challenged the government's actions in a February lawsuit. The case centers on two Education Department memos ordering schools and universities to end all 'race-based decision-making' or face penalties up to a total loss of federal funding. It's part of a campaign to end practices the Trump administration frames as discrimination against white and Asian American students. The new ruling orders the department to scrap the guidance because it runs afoul of procedural requirements, though Gallagher wrote that she took no view on whether the policies were 'good or bad, prudent or foolish, fair or unfair.' Gallagher, who was appointed by President Donald Trump, rejected the government's argument that the memos simply served to remind schools that discrimination is illegal. 'It initiated a sea change in how the Department of Education regulates educational practices and classroom conduct, causing millions of educators to reasonably fear that their lawful, and even beneficial, speech might cause them or their schools to be punished,' Gallagher wrote. Democracy Forward, a legal advocacy firm representing the plaintiffs, called it an important victory over the administration's attack on DEI. 'Threatening teachers and sowing chaos in schools throughout America is part of the administration's war on education, and today the people won,' said Skye Perryman, the group's president and CEO. A statement from the Education Department on Thursday said it was disappointed in the ruling but that 'judicial action enjoining or setting aside this guidance has not stopped our ability to enforce Title VI protections for students at an unprecedented level.' The conflict started with a Feb. 14 memo declaring that any consideration of race in admissions, financial aid, hiring or other aspects of academic and student life would be considered a violation of federal civil rights law. The memo dramatically expanded the government's interpretation of a 2023 Supreme Court decision barring colleges from considering race in admissions decisions. The government argued the ruling applied not only to admissions but across all of education, forbidding 'race-based preferences' of any kind. 'Educational institutions have toxically indoctrinated students with the false premise that the United States is built upon 'systemic and structural racism' and advanced discriminatory policies and practices,' wrote Craig Trainor, the acting assistant secretary of the department's Office for Civil Rights. A further memo in April asked state education agencies to certify they were not using 'illegal DEI practices.' Violators risked losing federal money and being prosecuted under the False Claims Act, it said. In total, the guidance amounted to a full-scale reframing of the government's approach to civil rights in education. It took aim at policies that were created to address longstanding racial disparities, saying those practices were their own form of discrimination. The memos drew a wave of backlash from states and education groups that called it illegal government censorship. In its lawsuit, the American Federation of Teachers said the government was imposing 'unclear and highly subjective' limits on schools across the country. It said teachers and professors had to 'choose between chilling their constitutionally protected speech and association or risk losing federal funds and being subject to prosecution.'
