When should I buy life insurance and is it worth it?
The thought of passing away and leaving loved ones behind is one that nobody wants to have. However it is important to consider what may happen to your family and finances if you were no longer here – and that's where life insurance comes in.
The topic of life insurance can often be overlooked or avoided which leaves people confused about it or perhaps don't see a point in figuring it out. Here we spoke with finance experts to explain what exactly life insurance is, when should people get it and the big question – is it really worth it?
What is life insurance?
'Life insurance is a financial product that gives your family or loved ones a cash pay-out if you die while covered,' says Ian Cooper, commercial director and product expert at SunLife.
'Life insurance broadly comes into two main types,' managing director partner at independent financial advisors Hoxton Wealth, Chris Ball explains. 'There is term life insurance and whole-of life insurance.'
'Term insurance covers you for a fixed period of time, let's say 25 years,' Cooper explains. 'It pays out if you die during your policy period. The pay-outs on this type of policy are usually quite large, to cover things like an outstanding mortgage. But if you live longer than the period of cover, you won't get anything back.
'Whole-of-life cover, or 'over 50s' life insurance as it's often called, is only available to people over 49. Simply put, it covers you until you die – no matter how long you live. Because it promises to pay out, the pay-outs are typically smaller than term insurance, to put towards things like outstanding bills or funeral costs.
'One key difference between the two types is that not everyone is eligible for term insurance, and you usually need to answer medical questions in order to qualify. Most over 50s plans, on the other hand, guarantee to accept anyone within the age range, regardless of health.'
When should people start looking at getting life insurance?
'I would say as soon as possible,' Ball says. 'Many people may think life insurance isn't applicable to them or that they don't need it.
'However the areas that a lot of people miss out with life insurance is things that could happen like total permanent disability for example – being in a car crash and not being able to work again. That's the type of life insurance that we kick in at those points to cover you. I always advise clients to make sure that they seriously consider it and not just people with children or a spouse. It's for people of all ages that need an income – which is pretty much everyone,' he says.
Cooper echoes this as he explains that while there is no fixed age at which you should take out life insurance, most people decide to when they get a mortgage or have children. 'But it's important to review your cover needs regularly, to ensure it's covering what you need,' he says.
What are the benefits of getting life insurance?
'Both term life insurance and whole-of-life insurance are designed to help your loved ones at a really difficult time,' Cooper says. 'Whether it's paying off the mortgage, or having the spare funds to put towards outstanding bills or funeral costs – it's knowing that you're giving them one less thing to worry about.
'Customers tell us one of the main benefits for them when they take out a guaranteed over 50 plan is the peace of mind it gives them. Because their pay-out is guaranteed after one or two years, they know their loved ones will have something to help them financially when the time comes,' he adds.
'You also get protection and stability with life insurance,' Ball says.
'Of course it's great accumulating wealth and saving into your ISA or your general investment account and pensions. But what if you can't work, let's say for a period of six to 12 months, because you had a heart attack or a chronic disease. Ultimately people would just end up rinsing their savings if they haven't invested in life insurance.
'Hopefully it is the biggest waste of money that you spend but it does give peace of mind. Most people insure their cars, phones and homes – but not a lot of people insure themselves – but you are the most important thing,' he says.
Is life insurance worth getting?
'When people ask me this, I suggest thinking about what financial help your loved ones might need if they were to die suddenly – not something we want to think about, I know,' Cooper says.
'For example, if they were faced with a £4,000 funeral bill, could they afford to pay it? If not, it could add a lot of stress at an already difficult time, so a life insurance pay-out could be a big help. If you already have plenty of money in savings or have funds from other sources lined up, you may not need life insurance. It's totally up to you. But having a financial safety net in place for our loved ones can be hugely reassuring for everyone.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
19 minutes ago
- BBC News
Spurs close in on Frank appointment as new boss
Tottenham are closing in on appointing Brentford manager Thomas Frank as their new head coach by the between the clubs are ongoing, but have progressed positively amid a growing expectation Frank could even be confirmed in the next 48 hours as Ange Postecoglou's are understood to be amicable and there is a will from all parties to conclude the agreement Sport understands that recently appointed Spurs chief executive Vinai Venkatesham, who only started work last Monday, has been involved in the process of appointing Frank, alongside chairman Daniel are entitled to compensation for the 51-year-old Frank, who joined them from Brondby in 2018, with sources indicating it will cost Tottenham £10m to release him from his current amount could rise based upon how many members of staff the Dane decides to bring with him.
BBC News
19 minutes ago
- BBC News
Uttoxeter coffee shop could shut over high rates, owner says
High business rates could lead to a coffee shop closure, its owner Ingleton, who has runs Fueled Coffee in Uttoxeter for four years, said his business rates had more than doubled."We charge £3.40 for a coffee and I don't think they realise how many coffees I have to sell to get that covered before I start with the wage, rent, electric bills," he said he wanted more support from East Staffordshire Borough Council. The council said the government in recent tax years had set the Retail, Hospitality and Leisure (RHL) relief at 75% of the business rates bill, but the level of relief had been reduced to 40%. He said he previously paid £3,243 in business rates charges but his bill for 2025/26 increased to £7,784."I can't carry on with these high [business] rates," he told BBC Radio Stoke. "Sometimes I feel sick, I cant sleep, I just want to stay indoors and its not motivational at all."The council say it's for small businesses, this is their chance to stand up and say its wrong."Mr Ingleton said he was passionate about the community and his business but found the current business rates were affecting his mental health. A council spokesman said the increase in business rates was due to government providing RHL businesses with a relief on their business rates charges over the last few years."In 2023/24 and 2024/25 tax years the RHL relief was set by the government at 75% of the business rates bill," they said."However for the 2025/26 tax year the level of relief has been reduced by the government to 40%." Follow BBC Stoke & Staffordshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
What would a Tory spending review look like? With Badenoch, nobody knows
It would be an exaggeration to claim the nation eagerly awaits the invention of 'Badenomics' but Conservatives are certainly impatient with Kemi Badenoch 's apparent inability to create a narrative on the economy, land blows on a weakened Labour government, or compete with Nigel Farage's Reform UK on a key electoral issue. This week's Labour announcements on winter fuel payments and the spending review offer some prime opportunities to 'punch through'. What is the problem? It's hardly confined to today's Conservatives; every political party that has been in power and badly loses an election finds it difficult to get a hearing. Policies the party are most closely identified with are the ones recently and decisively rejected by voters. How far should a heavily defeated team try to claim that they were right all along and that the electorate made the wrong decision? This might be termed the 'blame the voters' approach; while some buyer's remorse may have set in, it's rather futile to attack the electorate. Alternatively, a party can admit mistakes as a means of resetting voter appeal, but that means upsetting former colleagues and handing your enemies an easy win. What are the Conservatives doing about it? Making speeches, for now, rather than policy… and trying to plot a path to redemption. Last week, perhaps in response to internal concerns, shadow chancellor Mel Stride came as close as possible to apologising for the Liz Truss mini-Budget without actually saying 'sorry'. 'Contrition' is the preferred term. Truss has proved to be a potent political weapon, but for the Labour Party, scarcely a day goes by without Keir Starmer or Rachel Reeves making a scathing reference to that disaster. Stride was critical of it at the time, having left the government and as chair of the Treasury select committee; his apology-adjacent speech won't stop Labour deploying Agent Truss (and she keeps popping up, unhelpfully) but it might blunt the attacks somewhat. What are the Tories saying about the rest of their record? Still fairly proud of it. Badenoch says the Tories made 'a lot of good things happen', such as reforms to social security, plus 'near full employment' and raising school standards. 'But people remember the most recent period … and I think the most recent period was the most difficult,' she concedes. So it is Rishi Suank's fault for 'talking right, governing left' as she has put it. So Badenoch is sorry-not-sorry? The Tory mistakes she points to, such as on Brexit and net zero, actually come from the right, not the centre, and don't necessarily chime with public opinion. A passionate and now obdurate Eurosceptic, she seems to want more Brexit at a time when the voters have concluded it was a flop; as the years go on, she'll need to say if she would reverse Starmer's 'Brexit reset' that builds closer, easier relations with the EU. She will also be asked if she would scrap planning reforms that boost growth, stop skilled migration, bring back zero-hours contracts, reduce VAT on private school fees, and so on. She will also need to eat many of her own words as a minister on climate change and green growth, now she's a 'net zero sceptic'. She may hope to win back some Reform voters by tacking to the right, but she can never out-Farage Farage. Indeed, she's ridiculed him for promising economic fantasies, so how can she now embrace them and return to Boris Johnson-era cakeism? Where are the Tories with winter fuel payments for pensioners? They are demanding an apology from Labour. But Labour's present policy is identical to Badenoch's – restore the payment for all now, but try to means-test it later – so she is disarmed, and cannot even claim credit for forcing the U-turn, which was obviously down to Labour panic after local election losses. And what do the Tories say about the spending review? Badenoch's line is that there would not be a black hole in public finances if they'd won the last election, and taxes would be lower. The latter part is true, but equally a hypothetical Tory government would now be imposing an even more painful squeeze on social security and public services, to the point where the numbers would simply not be credible, leading to strikes. Voters sensed this unreality last July, and as time passes the Tories will have to come up with credible plans of their own rather than relying on Jeremy Hunt's pre-election claims. Anything else? Plenty. Stride may be doing his best, but Badenoch seems more interested in 'culture wars' than macroeconomics, which is a problem. Her shadow frontbench team is surprisingly lacking in talent and Labour ministers, despite their relative inexperience, mostly run rings around their opponents. Can the Conservatives forge the 'Right Approach' again? In truth, the Tories are on a long march back to the centre and sooner or later will have to accept climate change and exorcise the ghosts of Truss and Johnson. They need to show themselves trustworthy and realistic, and willing to compromise with their lost voters. These are the kinds of radical, symbolic 'unthinkable' things Tony Blair had to do to make Labour electable in the 1990s, and Starmer did afresh in recent years. Only then will voters lend their ears. Badenoch isn't the leader for that task.
