Khajaguda case: Telangana HC directs petitioners to identify grabbed land
A division bench of the Telangana High Court on Monday directed the petitioners to submit a detailed representation identifying the exact location of government land allegedly encroached by private parties. The matter was adjourned for two weeks.
The PIL was filed by MLAs Janampalli Anirudh Reddy, Yennam Srinivas Reddy, Dr Bhukya Murali Naik and Dr Kuchkulla Rajesh Reddy, challenging a 1995 order by the Rangareddy district revenue officer that rectified survey number errors related to Poramboke land in Khajaguda village.
The petitioners allege that 27 acres and 18 guntas in Survey No. 27 were unlawfully transferred to private persons, Sikendar Khan and Salabat Khan, and later sold to members of Beverly Hills Owners Welfare Society.
They claim high-rise towers and a ready-mix plant near Oakridge School were approved in violation of the Telangana Land Revenue Act, the Records of Rights Act, 1973, and environmental norms.
The court directed them to submit a comprehensive representation with specifics before the next hearing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
8 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Justice Madhavi Devi highlights gaps between women-centric laws, social realities
HYDERABAD: Justice T Madhavi Devi of the Telangana High Court on Saturday spoke on the development of women-centric legislation in India, from the pre-Independence period to the present. She addressed a workshop on Women Empowerment: A Constitutional Obligation, organised by Nyayavadi Parishad, Telangana, in association with Ramakrishna Math, Hyderabad. Justice Madhavi Devi, who was the Chief Guest, outlined key legal reforms aimed at protecting women's rights. She referred to the regulation of Sati, the Child Marriage Restraint Act, the Dowry Prohibition Act, the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, the Supreme Court's Visakha guidelines on sexual harassment at the workplace, and the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, which grants daughters equal inheritance rights. She observed that, despite these laws, women continue to face social and legal challenges. Swami Bodhamayananda, Adhyaksha of Ramakrishna Math, who was the Guest of Honour, spoke of Swami Vivekananda's views on women's empowerment as vital to national progress. He said true empowerment lies in transforming the mind and character, and that it goes beyond laws, requiring inner strength and moral development. Over 150 women advocates from across the state attended the workshop. Participants said the event provided a useful forum to discuss constitutional values and ongoing efforts to promote women's rights. Nisha Singh, an advocate from Karimnagar, said, 'Several laws have been enacted for women, but they have not fully achieved their purpose. True empowerment will come only through human transformation.'
Hans India
a day ago
- Hans India
HC sets aside GO 126 allotting 3.7 acres for International Arbitration Centre
Hyderabad: The Telangana High Court division bench of Justices Kunuru Lakshman and Kalasikam Sujana on Friday 'set aside' GO 126, dated December 26-2021, allotting 3.7-acre prime land worth crores, located in Plot no.27, Survey no. 83/1, Raidurg village, Serilingampally mandal, RR district to the International Arbitration and Mediation Centre, Hyderabad. Though the court upheld GO 76 dated November 12 sanctioning Rs. 3 crore to meet the day-to-day expenditure of the centre and GO 6, dated March 17, 2022 wherein the Chief Secretary directed all departments and public sector undertakings to refer all its disputes above 3 crore to the IAMC for arbitration. The bench passed orders setting aside GO allotting 3.7 acres to IAMC, while adjudicating two PILs. The first PIL was filed by Koti Raghuntha Rao, party-in-person; the other was filed by A Venkatarami Reddy, a retired employee. The bench concluded the IAMC--which has been functioning since 2021--performance is abysmal. It expressed deep concern regarding its performance in future. As on January 29 this year the IAMC took up only 15 cases of which 11 were conducted pro-bono; only 57 mediation cases were conducted; of them 17 were conducted pro-bono. The bench cautioned the government to examine incurring of costs by referring cases to IAMC; directed the government to alter its policy of referring cases to IAMC, if costs prove a burden to the exchequer. The bench opined that it is the policy decision of the government to extend financial assistance to a new institution like IAMC at initial stage, but as time goes by, IAMC has to sustain itself financially. But going by its performance for the last five years, the bench stated that its sustenance is difficult in the long run. The bench referred to setting up of 'ICADR' (International Centre for Alternative Dispute Resolution) centre formed by the Government of India in 1995 to promote arbitration, but due to its abysmal performance, despite financial support, ICADR could not deliver results. The court hoped the IAMC does not go the ICADR way. Both PILs were closed.
Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
‘Unduly hasty': Telangana High Court cancels BRS government's free land allotment to IAMC
Underlining that bona fide intentions do not justify illegal means, the Telangana High Court on Friday struck down the state government's allotment of 3.7 acres of land to the International Arbitration and Media Centre (IAMC) set up by former Chief Justice of India (CJI) N V Ramana. 'It is axiomatic that in order to achieve a bona fide end, the means must also justify the end. This Court is of the opinion that bona fide ends cannot be achieved by questionable means, especially when the State is involved. This Court has not been able to get any answer from the State why on a request by the allottee to the Hon'ble Minister for Urban Development, the Government granted the allotment with remarkable speed and without considering all aspects of the matter,' the court said. The IAMC was established in 2021 in Hyderabad to promote alternative dispute resolution. As a sitting CJI, Justice Ramana authored the trust deed for setting up the 'charitable public trust'. Former Supreme Court judges R V Raveendran and L Nageswara Rao were named as life trustees, while a Telangana state minister and the Telangana High Court Chief Justice were named as ex-officio trustees. A bench of Justices K Lakshman and K Sujana criticised the government for the arbitrary allotment of land with 'undue haste'. 'We would also like to point out that the conduct of the government in allotting the land was unduly hasty. It is noteworthy that possession certificate was issued in favour of the IAMC even before formulating and communicating the terms of allotment. Such hasty decisions do not bode well and often result in exercise of power contrary to the procedure. Discretionary exercise of power shall not only be fair and transparent, but also should be seen to be fair and transparent,' the court said. The land, allotted free of cost by the Bharat Rashtra Samiti government, is in Serilingampally, a revenue sub-division that also houses tech corridors, including HITEC City and Gachibowli. However, the current Congress government also defended the allotment. Chief Minister Revanth Reddy is on the three-member board of trustees. The court cancelled the land allotment on the grounds that the IAMC was not eligible for free allotment of land as a 'private body'. The court held that the allotment was contrary to the rules of the Telangana Urban Areas Development Act, 1975, which provides that government land can only be disposed by way of sale or exchange or lease or public auction. The court said that the rules provide that allotment in favour of a private body can only be made if such a body is registered under the Companies Act. It then noted that, as on the date of allotment, the IAMC was not registered as a company. The court also held that, as per a 2012 government land allotment policy, land can be allotted only on market value, with free allotment contemplated only for state government departments and below poverty line families. While the IAMC argued that it was a 'public charitable trust,' the petitioners challenging the allotment argued that the body was making profits and earning remuneration. 'A private body like the IAMC can only be done for a public purpose and after collecting the applicable market value,' the high court said. Apurva Vishwanath is the National Legal Editor of The Indian Express in New Delhi. She graduated with a B.A., LL. B (Hons) from Dr Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow. She joined the newspaper in 2019 and in her current role, oversees the newspapers coverage of legal issues. She also closely tracks judicial appointments. Prior to her role at the Indian Express, she has worked with ThePrint and Mint. ... Read More
