Earthna's Call for People-Powered Water Solutions
*The Water Crisis Needs More Than Tech — It Needs UsBy Batool GhaithDoha - Under the theme 'Building our Legacy: Sustainability, Innovation and Traditional Knowledge', the 2025 Earthna Summit highlighted the importance of trusting people over technology in the fight against water scarcity.The second Earthna Summit, held on April 22–23 in Doha, Qatar, brought together global experts, policymakers, and community leaders to explore sustainable solutions tailored for hot and arid environments. The summit emphasised the integration of ancestral wisdom with modern innovations to address pressing environmental challenges.Organized by the Earthna Center for a Sustainable Future, a non-profit policy research and advocacy center established by Qatar Foundation, the event featured expert panels, interactive discussions, and community-driven exhibitions across Doha.The session titled 'Water Scarcity: Exploring Sustainable Solutions for Resilience', focused on water as both a quantity and quality issue.Ann-Perry Witmer, a teaching associate professor, said 'our biggest challenge is assuming we already have the answers, as technology sometimes makes us feel stuck.'She emphasized the importance of respecting knowledge, regardless of whether it comes from academic institutions or traditional experience. 'If we do not respect the knowledge that exists where we are working, we cannot solve any problems.'Rajendra Singh, Chairman of Tarun Bharat Sangh, noted that the solutions to climate-induced water challenges must begin locally.'Climate change is a global problem, but the solution is not global,' he said. 'It is a local solution rooted in traditional knowledge. Traditional knowledge is time-tested success.'Singh emphasized the importance of approaching these crises with respect for ancestral wisdom, underscoring that community-based approaches offer powerful ways forward.With a parallel view, Mansour Qadir, Deputy Director of the United Nations University Institute of Water, Environment and Health, said, 'we often ignore the critical importance of indigenous knowledge and the context in which it exists.'He emphasized that water scarcity is not only about quantity but also quality and resilience. Qadir also highlighted the need to recognize the role of women in community-based solutions. 'If we actively engage women, create ownership, and appreciate their role, we can significantly improve local water supplies.'On another note, Senior Advisor Raha Hakimdava stressed the importance of understanding and appreciating water as a living element, not just a resource.'We have learned to bring water from the sea and from the air, these are innovations we should be proud of,' she said. 'But technology alone will not solve our challenges.'Hakimdavar argued for deeper awareness of where our water comes from, as modern urban societies grow detached from its sources.She added that part of the solution lies in bringing ancestral heritage and modern science together.The speakers agreed that successful water management depends on collaboration, not only across scientific disciplines and policy frameworks, but also through meaningful engagement with the communities most affected by water scarcity.*Empowering Communities: The Role of Women in Tackling Water Scarcity in MENAEngaging women in sustainable water practices is key to unlocking community-based solutions that address both climate change and daily survival needs, according to Mansour Qadir, Deputy Direction United Nations University Institute of Water Environment and Health.Sustainable water solutions are urgently needed in the Middle East and North Aftica (MENA) region due to accelerating climate change and deepening water crises.Qadir, as a leading expert on water scarcity and reuse, emphasised that the key is not only in high-tech interventions, but also in empowering the people most affected, especially women.'While technical solutions for global water scarcity exist, community-based interventions have tremendous potential, especially when women are fully engaged. Qadir told Ammon News.In many isolated or rural communities, women are the ones who walk hours each day to fetch water, he explained, making them not only key stakeholders but essential agents of change.'If we engage women at the community level and create a sense of ownership, we can tremendously improve the potential of local water supplies,' he elaborated.'The whole package of clean water access, economic empowerment, and girls' education becomes possible when we recognize and invest in the role of women,' Qadir added.Turning to the region's broader challenges, Qadir stressed the urgency of innovative action in one of the world's most water-stressed areas, including Jordan.He emphasized the need for both large-scale infrastructure and smaller, community-driven interventions that reflect the country's specific environmental realities.'Countries like Jordan face worsening water scarcity. We are seeing a mix of large-scale solutions like desalination and wastewater reuse,' he said.Yet beyond the high-tech solutions, Qadir stressed the vitality of smaller, locally adapted and community-based techniques such as micro-catchment and rainwater harvesting systems.'These are applicable in those areas where the rainfall is so small, such as in the case of Jordan, where the water that drops through rainfall just goes back to the environment if we do not capture it,' he explained.Qarir noted that establishing small-scale rainwater harvesting systems, communities could collect that water for purposes such as growing shrubs for fodder and providing water for livestock, practical steps that could make a real difference in rural areas.He also highlighted the growing interest in weather modification technologies like cloud seeding, which several countries in the MENA region are currently exploring and investing in.However, Qadir emphasised that there is no set or blanket application of all these technologies which could be used across the region.'One may work in one place, another in a different place. That's why it's so important to have collective action—not only from policymakers and professionals but from community leaders and, more importantly, the active members of the community,' he continued.'Women must be part of this collective response. Their role is critical and must not be overlooked,' Qadir stated.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Ammon
an hour ago
- Ammon
Gov't: Jordan, Egypt united in stance on regional issues
Ammon News - Minister of Government Communication and Government Spokesperson Mohammad Momani said Thursday that Jordan and Egypt share nearly identical positions on key regional issues, foremost the Palestinian cause. In an interview with the Middle East News Agency (MENA), Momani stressed that Jordan rejects any attempts by the extreme Israeli right to undermine the Palestinian people's right to self-determination or to pursue policies of displacement and starvation. He noted that the recurrent challenges and threats arising from the situation in Gaza and the West Bank directly affect both Jordanian and Egyptian sovereignty, underscoring that Amman and Cairo's positions have consistently been firm and aligned. Momani highlighted that relations between Jordan and Egypt constitute a central pillar of regional stability, with coordination taking place at the highest levels. He pointed to the distinguished ties between His Majesty King Abdullah II and President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, rooted in mutual respect and trust, which have shaped joint efforts to safeguard Arab and regional security since Jordan's support for the Egyptian people during the June 30th Revolution. He said that Jordan and Egypt share a balanced approach in their policies, seeking to strengthen Arab solidarity and support the Palestinian people in their pursuit of legitimate rights. He expressed Jordan's full support for Egypt's efforts to halt the aggression on Gaza and facilitate the delivery of humanitarian aid, as well as its pivotal role, alongside Qatar and the United States, in negotiations aimed at achieving a permanent ceasefire in the Strip. On bilateral cooperation, Momani referred to the recent meeting of the Jordanian-Egyptian Joint Higher Committee in Amman, which provides an institutional framework for advancing joint projects in energy, gas, trade, and transportation. He noted that cooperation is expanding across various sectors, including electricity interconnection, mutual investments, and medical collaboration currently under discussion by the competent authorities in both countries.
Ammon
an hour ago
- Ammon
Netanyahu: "We are on verge of ending Gaza war
Ammon News - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in an interview with Sky News Australia that Israel is on the verge of ending the war on Gaza and seven fronts including Iran. Netanyahu stressed that Israel will continue to control the Strip even if Hamas agrees to a ceasefire. He added that the war could end today if Hamas laid down its weapons and released the remaining hostages, stressing that Israel's primary goal is to release all hostages and disarm the movement. "When that happens we will have plenty of opportunities to expand the peace agreements," Netanyahu stated.
Ammon
6 hours ago
- Ammon
Keeping the Transatlantic Relationship Alive
Ammon News - WASHINGTON, DC – By Jim O'Brien- The confusion sewn by the Alaska summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, and the follow-up summit between Trump and European leaders, including Ukraine, has more than justified the decision taken by NATO's non-US members to increase defense spending and intensify security cooperation. This commitment made it possible for European and Ukrainian leaders to propose that they buy tens of billions of US military equipment as part of a sustainable plan for peace in Europe, and Ukraine. This is the right approach, perhaps the only one, not only for promoting European and Ukrainian defense, but also for rebuilding transatlantic cooperation in a variety of sectors, from AI to tariffs. Defense may be the simplest sector for the US and Europe to align, for multiple reasons. For starters, all the joint (transatlantic) work done since NATO's Wales Summit in 2014 has already established a solid foundation. Second, there is broad agreement on the need for Europe to do more. Europe and non-US NATO members now plan to spend 5% of GDP on defense by 2032, and European officials have said that Europe will spend 3%, on average, by 2028. Following the launch of a €150 billion ($175 billion) EU fund that has already solicited bids, EU defense investment is scheduled to be ten times what it was. Nor is this just a headline created to appease the Trump administration in the short term. NATO leaders had already committed (at the NATO Summit in July 2024) to fund regional defense plans, and the estimated cost for those was approximately 3.5% of GDP. The Trump administration has highlighted the European commitments and agreed to treat spending on crucial military infrastructure as counting toward the 5% target. Although some countries will have difficulty meeting the higher targets, at least in the near term, the continent's military capabilities will be much stronger than would have been the case. Third, the money will be spent on meeting the most crucial military needs. Under the 2024 plan, NATO will determine how to prioritize military capabilities, implying that the US still has a say in the matter. This approach should address the long-held US concern that European defense initiatives result in redundancies or divert funds from more pressing needs. Fourth, this approach also allows US companies to participate in and benefit from European defense procurement, giving the US a stake in Europe's re-arming effort. Donald Trump touted European spending on US arms following his July meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, and one senior European official estimates that 40% of early EU defense spending will go to US firms. Much of this is already directed toward capabilities that only the US can provide, such as advanced air defense. To be sure, difficult decisions lie ahead. Above all, European leaders will have to determine how far they should go in creating alternatives to US equipment. These decisions will not be made all at once, and continued tensions with the Trump administration will increase the likelihood of Europe moving away from US-made weapons systems where it can. Another challenge for European leaders will be to allocate the new money pouring into the sector. Every European leader will lobby for domestic companies. But here, too, Europeans' initial moves have been promising. The EU is focused on creating effective capabilities, and key member states have called attention to what Ukraine most needs and can produce on its own. This emphasis on Ukraine sets a clear, urgent objective and allows spending to proceed without ensuring that every state gets some funding. Still, it will be important to understand how much investment can be directed to Ukraine without duplication or bidding up scarce resources. Looking ahead, a small, informal group of European leaders should identify urgent investment projects and participants. Any such group will be a hot ticket for European leaders, so its work should be discreet. It will need to include the countries with the largest industrial capacities, while also being sufficiently representative. Focusing on the largest defense and industrial capabilities and frontline states may be the best way to start. Europe's decision to keep the US involved in its defense industrial strategy did not come easily. In the first months of the second Trump administration, some in Europe questioned whether cooperation with the US was even possible. But by recognizing that America and Europe each have something to contribute to shared transatlantic security interests, European leaders are setting an example of how transatlantic cooperation can recover even during a destructive period. These structural considerations matter, because successful cooperation on defense can provide a model for other areas. Economic growth over the next generation is likely to come from industries such as AI, life sciences, and new energy technologies. China has a leading position in many of these sectors, and it will seek to shape global habits and standards for its own benefit. Europe, the US, Canada, and the Indo-Pacific will respond more effectively together than they would separately. As a group, their size is comparable to China, and they can draw on shared habits of cooperation in aligning supply chains, investment, and standards. A focus on aligning Europe and the US may seem premature, given the extent to which disagreements on trade and investment are impeding cooperation. These tensions will continue unless Trump stops treating Europe as only a competitor. We cannot know when or if tensions will ease, but I believe they can and must – even if only after this administration ends. In any case, we should be ready for any opportunities that arise. The early steps on defense cooperation show that recognition of shared interests, open communication about the best path forward, and a willingness to let one another's companies compete on fair terms can be a basis for a renewed relationship, at least in discrete areas. To prepare for that possibility, European leaders should identify strategically important sectors and make clear what conditions would allow them to keep the US as a long-term, reliable partner, and then to hold the US to its own commitments. Step by step, the partnership that underpinned peace and prosperity for previous generations can do the same for the next one. Jim O'Brien was US Assistant Secretary of State for Europe and Eurasian Affairs during the Biden administration.
