Trump-Musk bromance is over. What does it tell about male friendships?
Jai and Veeru they are not.
Donald Trump and Elon Musk's BFF act has turned out to be more star-crossed than Starlinked. Like the Sholay duo, Trump and Musk had once thumbed their noses at the world and said 'Tere liye le lenge sab se dushmani (I'll take on the world for you),' as they took on their liberal foes everywhere.
Their fallout should have been a clash of titans. Instead, as they trade insults on social media, it feels like we are watching petulant teenage Ninja Turtles.
'Such ingratitude,' complained Musk, who had spent almost $300 million on the US election that brought Trump back to the White House. 'Very disappointed in Elon,' retorted Trump. The mother of one of Musk's children offered Trump breakup advice.
So is it all about money? Trump thinks Musk is upset because he cut EV subsidies that affect Musk's bottom line. Musk says Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill is a 'disgusting abomination' that would add billions to the federal deficit, making a mockery of DOGE or the Department of Government Efficiency's attempts to slash spending.
Either way, the Big Beautiful Bromance seems over. The X-factor in the Trump presidency is now an ex-factor jokes one meme. But they might patch up overnight as well. Trump seems to have neither permanent friends nor enemies. He befriends, unfriends and re-friends at will. But then again, we live in a world of social media where the word 'friend' itself has been rendered meaningless.
While the implications of the Odd Couple fallout are being analysed in detail, it is fascinating what this says about what has happened to our idea of friendship. Especially male friendships. True friendship requires vulnerability, something men are never encouraged to show. In the landmark Hindi film Dosti (1964) about the friendship between two physically handicapped boys, the vulnerability is visible. But mostly it's hidden. Our greatest films about male friendship are about tough guys with soft centres like Veeru and Jai.
True friendship is supposed to stand the test of time, whether it's 3 Idiots (2009) or Dil Chahta Hai (2001). These are friends who are thrown together by circumstance, bond over ideals, drift apart and come back together. But the litmus test of true friendship is betrayal and forgiveness because, to paraphrase another Hindi film, zindagi na milegi dobara. 'Think of me at my best,' James Steerforth tells David Copperfield in Charles Dickens' novel right before he runs off with Copperfield's childhood sweetheart.
At the heart of these great friendship stories lie weighty questions like E M Forster wondering, 'If I had to choose between betraying my country and betraying my friend, I hope I should have the guts to betray my country.' Dante, he says, placed Brutus and Cassius in the lowest rungs of Hell because they betrayed their friend Julius Caesar rather than Rome.
So et tu, Elon? Not really, because Trump and Musk's model of friendship is reflective of the times we live in. They MAGA-ed it up for the cameras, even sharing AI-generated videos of themselves grooving to Stayin' Alive. We all know Instagram couples who need to 'perform' their relationships in the public eye to show how they are made-for-each-other. Then they break up, delete their old posts, and begin anew with someone else as if the past never existed. Jai and Veeru friendship was for the long haul. The Trump-Musk friendship is for a generation with a short attention span.
Many had probably forgotten that in 2016, Musk had said Trump didn't 'have the sort of character that reflects well on the United States.' In January 2022, Trump called Musk one of the world's 'great geniuses' comparable to Thomas Edison. By July, he called him a 'bulls*** artist'. But none of that mattered when, in February this year, Musk tweeted 'I love @realDonaldTrump as much as a straight man can love another man.' The BBC said Trump sounded like a 'spurned lover' as he talked about the fallout. Musk responded on X with one word: Whatever. Even a Balaji soap opera relationship does not have so many twists and turns.
When the richest person in the world and the most powerful person break up publicly and messily, the internet brings out the popcorn. One meme had Narendra Modi offering to mediate just as Trump claimed he mediated between India and Pakistan. It would all be funnier if both their coming together and breaking apart didn't have consequences for the rest of the world.
But was this ever really friendship or just a relationship of convenience, more dostana than dosti?
Roy is a novelist and the author of Don't Let Him Know
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's military move: Was it in response to Los Angeles riots or a long-planned strategy against Democrates and Kamala Harris?
President Donald Trump has signaled that the military deployment in Los Angeles may just be the beginning, hinting at similar actions across other Democrat-led cities as protests intensify over his immigration crackdown. Speaking from the Oval Office on Tuesday, Trump defended the deployment of 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles, where demonstrators have clashed with law enforcement in recent days. 'This is the first—perhaps of many,' Trump said. 'If we didn't hit this hard, you'd see the same thing erupt across the country. But let me be clear: If others try this, they'll be met with equal or greater force.' Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Indonesia: New Container Houses (Prices May Surprise You) Container House | Search ads Search Now Undo The president added that his administration would not tolerate violent protests targeting ICE operations and vowed strict enforcement of deportation policies. Notably, Trump had floated the idea of using military force in Democrat-led cities during his 2024 campaign, proposing federal intervention to combat unrest or gang violence. 'In cities where there's been a total breakdown of law and order, I won't hesitate to send in federal assets, including the National Guard, until safety is restored,' he said at the time. Live Events According to The New York Times , nearly 5,000 troops are already present in the Los Angeles area. Reuters reported that 700 Marines were in a staging area in Seal Beach, about 30 miles south of the city, awaiting specific deployment orders. As of Tuesday, 2,100 National Guard members had been activated in the region—more than half the planned total. Both Marines and National Guard personnel are restricted from making arrests and are tasked solely with protecting federal facilities and personnel. Trump's remarks and actions have sparked fears of broader federal crackdowns in Democrat-controlled cities across the U.S., raising questions about the political motivations behind the military mobilization.
News18
25 minutes ago
- News18
'Went Too Far': Elon Musk Regrets His Social Media Posts Against Donald Trump
Last Updated: Elon Musk admitted he "went too far" with his recent social media posts targeting US President Donald Trump. Posting on X, Musk expressed regret over his remarks made last week. Elon Musk on Wednesday expressed regret over some of his social media posts against US President Donald Trump last week, and said his posts 'went too far". 'I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far," Musk wrote on X. Trump and Musk began exchanging insults last week on social media, with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO describing the President's sweeping tax and spending bill as a 'disgusting abomination". On Saturday, Trump said his relationship with Musk was over and that there would be 'serious consequences" if the world's richest man decided to fund US Democrats running against Republicans who vote for the tax and spending bill. Musk bankrolled a large part of Trump's 2024 presidential campaign. Trump named Musk to head an effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash spending. About the Author
Economic Times
25 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump vs Musk: How a political feud threatens to send NASA into the ‘biggest crisis' in its history
$22 billion at stake Live Events NASA caught in political crossfire Human spaceflight, too, is on edge Artemis and Mars ambitions in jeopardy The SLS vs Starship debate Global partnerships fray Earth loses out DAVINCI+ and VERITAS (Venus missions) Landsat Next, critical for climate change monitoring EnVision, a joint mission with ESA Mars Sample Return, a flagship programme in partnership with ESA Existing missions like Juno, Mars Odyssey, New Horizons, and MAVEN, which could face premature shutdowns A legacy at risk (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The spectacle of President Donald Trump 's public feud with billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk has now spilled into one of America's most strategic and fragile domains: space. What began as a war of words over a contentious spending bill has become a flashpoint threatening to unravel decades of US leadership in space science and the centre of the dispute is the White House's proposed federal budget, which seeks to radically reshape NASA's priorities. If passed, it could place over 40 current and future missions at risk, many involving climate science and planetary exploration, while funnelling resources into a narrowly defined vision: putting American boots back on the Moon, and eventually, on fuel to the fire, Trump has openly threatened to cancel federal contracts with Musk's SpaceX, a company now central to NASA's operations. That threat risks not only logistical disruptions, like resupplying the International Space Station ISS ), but also casts long shadows over future crewed missions that depend on SpaceX's Starship rocket.'The astonishing exchanges, snap decisions and U-turns we've witnessed in the last week undermine the very foundations that we build our ambitions on,' said Dr Simeon Barber, space scientist at the Open University, as quoted by the BBC. 'Space science and exploration rely upon long-term planning and cooperation between government, companies and academic institutions.'At the heart of the storm are nearly $22 billion in government contracts awarded to SpaceX, spanning NASA's Commercial Crew Program, ISS cargo missions, and the Artemis Moon programme. The feud escalated on June 5, 2025, when Trump publicly threatened to scrap all government contracts with Musk's responded with a dramatic (later-deleted) post on X:'In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.'He later backed down, replying to a user urging restraint:'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.'Even before this drama unfolded, NASA was staring down an existential challenge. The proposed budget includes a 25% overall cut, with science and Earth observation missions absorbing the brunt. Programmes that track climate change, explore the solar system, and enable global partnerships, some decades in the making, are now Dreier, chief of space policy at the Planetary Society, called it 'the biggest crisis ever to face the US space programme.' That's no exaggeration: while the budget proposes a $100 million boost for Mars-related initiatives, almost everything else is on the chopping block.'President Trump is repurposing NASA to land astronauts on the Moon before the Chinese, and eventually to plant a US flag on Mars,' said Dr Adam Baker, a space analyst at Cranfield University, reported BBC. 'Everything else is secondary.'SpaceX's Crew Dragon is currently NASA's only certified spacecraft capable of carrying astronauts to and from the ISS. Under a $5 billion contract, it ended NASA's reliance on Russia's Soyuz after the Space Shuttle's Crew Dragon is supporting the Crew-10 mission, while Axiom Space prepares a fourth private astronaut mission. Boeing's Starliner remains uncertified and unproven for long-term operational SpaceX, human spaceflight missions could face serious setbacks, Dreier warned:'The potential cancellation of these contracts would delay or completely halt US-led missions to the ISS.'NASA's Artemis III mission, aiming to land astronauts on the Moon in 2027, relies on SpaceX's Starship as its lunar lander. So far, the company has received over $15 billion in NASA contracts for Falcon 9 and Starship Starship's recent test flights have ended in failure, and if the partnership collapses, it could derail timelines and leave the door open for rivals, particularly China, to lead in lunar long-touted goal of sending astronauts to Mars, once aligned with Musk's vision, now appears politically volatile. This focus comes at the cost of near-term science and Earth-based officials have justified the cuts as a streamlining effort. NASA's Space Launch System (SLS), with a staggering $4.1 billion launch cost, has long been criticised for overruns and delays. The budget proposes sidelining SLS in favour of cheaper, reusable the private sector may not offer the stability required. Starship's repeated failures and Blue Origin's early-stage development raise questions.'The worry is that NASA may be jumping out of the frying pan into the fire,' Dr Barber said. 'If SpaceX or Blue Origin run into trouble, Congress will have to foot the bill anyway.'NASA is not just a national agency; it's a cornerstone of international space cooperation. Two major joint missions with the European Space Agency, Mars Sample Return and the Rosalind Franklin rover, are in jeopardy due to US budget cuts.'These missions are more than science, they're signals of trust and cooperation,' said Prof Sir Martin Sweeting of Surrey Satellite Technology has signalled plans to build more autonomous space capabilities, reflecting a future where it cannot depend on US some of the worst-hit programmes are the ones that help protect our own planet. Earth observation satellites, critical for tracking wildfires, droughts, and sea level rise, are at risk of 40 active or planned missions are now in danger, including:As per NASA's muted official response came via spokesperson Bethany Stevens:'NASA will continue to execute upon the President's vision for the future of space. We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the President's objectives in space are met.'But former Deputy Administrator Lori Garver was more direct:'A rogue CEO threatening to decommission spacecraft, putting astronauts' lives at risk, is untenable.'This isn't just about rockets or rivalries. It's about a legacy of American leadership in space that now faces erosion due to political volatility and personal per Reuters, if Congress approves the budget, or allows it to take effect by default, the damage could be irreversible. NASA's 18,000-strong workforce faces uncertainty, and global trust in US-led space efforts may erode for years to Dreier puts it: 'Once space missions are turned off, it is hard, if not impossible, to start them up again.'
