UK ‘agreed to drop' Apple data demand in privacy row, US chief says
She posted: 'As a result, the UK agreed to drop its mandate for Apple to provide a 'back door' that would have enabled access to the protected encrypted data of American citizens and encroached on our civil liberties.'
Over the past few months, I've been working closely with our partners in the UK, alongside @POTUS and @VP, to ensure Americans' private data remains private and our Constitutional rights and civil liberties are protected.
As a result, the UK has agreed to drop its mandate for…
— DNI Tulsi Gabbard (@DNIGabbard) August 19, 2025
Earlier this year, it was reported the Government had issued a notice under the Investigatory Powers Act 2016, asking Apple for the ability to access data from Apple users.
This was said to include encrypted data protected by the tech giant's advanced data protection (ADP) tool, an opt-in tool within Apple's iCloud service which only an account holder can access, and is currently out of the reach of even Apple.
The iPhone-maker subsequently said it was withdrawing the tool from the UK and brought legal action against the Home Office.
Reacting to Ms Gabbard's statement, Conservative MP David Davis said: 'The Government's decision to drop its demands for a backdoor to Apple's encryption are to be welcomed.
'Such a backdoor would only serve to weaken the protection given by encryption to all of us from malicious actors.'
The Government's decision to drop its demands for a backdoor to Apple's encryption are to be welcomed.
Such a backdoor would only serve to weaken the protection given by encryption to all of us from malicious actors.https://t.co/JVUOnoKvCs
— David Davis MP (@DavidDavisMP) August 19, 2025
The Government's approach was widely criticised by online privacy campaigners and experts when reports of the request first appeared.
However, some online safety charities, as well as police and security services around the world, have long warned of the dangers of end-to-end encrypted services, arguing that they allow offenders such as terrorists and child abusers to hide more easily.
On Tuesday, a UK Government spokesperson said: 'We do not comment on operational matters, including confirming or denying the existence of such notices.
'We have long had joint security and intelligence arrangements with the US to tackle the most serious threats such as terrorism and child sexual abuse, including the role played by fast-moving technology in enabling those threats.'
They added the agreements have 'long contained' safeguards to protect privacy and sovereignty, including for UK and US citizens.
Apple has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
STV News
10 minutes ago
- STV News
Fishing leaders call for immediate halt to wind farm expansion ‘stampede'
Fishing leaders in Scotland have described wind farm expansion as a 'stampede' and a 'gamble' as they demanded an immediate stop to further offshore consents. The Scottish Fishermen's Federation (SFF) said Scottish Government plans to install up to 40GW of offshore wind capacity by 2040 are 'far too high'. It said achieving the target will cause irreversible damage to the marine environment and displace fishing fleets from grounds they have worked for generations. The call is included in the SFF's official responses to two major Government consultations, the updated Offshore Wind Policy Statement and the draft Sectoral Marine Plan for Offshore Wind Energy. The Government outlines that offshore wind could ensure Scotland meets its net zero target by 2030 and provide scores of green jobs as part of the just transition away from dependency on oil and gas. Last month, First Minister John Swinney visited Scotland's newest wind farm – Neart na Gaoithe (NnG) off the coast of Fife. During his visit he said offshore wind is 'one of Scotland's greatest modern success stories'. He said: 'Driving economic growth and tackling the climate emergency are two of my Government's priorities, and NnG is a shining example of how these priorities can work hand-in-hand to reshape Scotland's future for the better.' The UK Government has also expressed support for the expansion of Scotland's wind farms. It announced in March that the Port of Cromarty Firth in the Highlands will be a major hub for the UK's world-leading floating offshore wind industry, and it awarded more than £55 million for its expansion. Elspeth Macdonald, chief executive of the SFF – which is Scotland's biggest fishing industry body – said: 'This isn't a plan – it's a stampede. The Government is charging ahead without the faintest idea how to protect the people and places that will be trampled in the rush. 'We've been telling them for years these plans will seriously damage our industry, but they haven't listened. Now their own assessments show the harm that will be done to fishing, and the environment on which it depends. 'Until they can prove our industry and our seas will be safeguarded, the only responsible choice is to slam on the brakes.' The SFF said current mitigation measures are almost non-existent and there is no credible plan to compensate fishing businesses for the losses they will face. It also says the Government's updated Offshore Wind Policy Statement published in June made repeated references to economic benefits but failed to mention the climate crisis. Ms Macdonald added: 'Fishing is one of Scotland's original green industries. The Scottish fleet has been putting healthy, renewable and sustainable food on plates for generations. 'But we're being shoved aside for projects that feel like a last gamble for a Government to revive an ailing Scottish economy.' Fishing leaders say the cumulative impact of existing and emerging marine conservation policies, renewable energy projects alongside fishing being expected to offset environmental impacts of offshore wind developments, is leaving the industry at 'breaking point'. Ms Macdonald said: 'The Scottish Government's approach is picking winners and losers, and fishing seems to lose every time. 'We need ministers to step up and support our industry with positive action. 'Renewable food cannot be the price to be paid for renewable energy. Betting the house – and Scotland's fishing industry – on offshore wind that is far from 'clean' and where all the evidence points to both known and not yet fully known environmental damage is a very high-risk strategy.' The Scottish Government has been approached for comment. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
STV News
10 minutes ago
- STV News
Construction begins on ‘landmark' windfarm that will power 335,000 homes
Construction work has begun on a 'landmark' wind farm in the south of Scotland that will generate enough electricity to power about 335,000 homes. The Sanquhar II Community Wind Farm will become the UK's fourth largest onshore wind farm when it becomes operational in August 2026, according to developers CWP Energy. The 44-turbine farm, which is being built in Dumfries and Galloway and East Ayrshire, is set to deliver more than £800 million in local investment over its 40-year operational life. It is also set to generate hundreds of jobs during the building phase, with the company saying 'almost 50%' of the workforce will be sourced locally. The development was paused in 2023 over 'tax decisions' by the previous UK Government, but the company said it was made possible last month by the current UK Government dropping its plans for 'zonal energy pricing'. Rod Wood, director of CWP Energy, said: 'Onshore wind is one of the cheapest forms of home-grown electricity, delivering consumers and businesses excellent value for money. 'We're delighted that after nearly 10 years of careful planning, ground has been broken and the construction of Sanquhar II is now under way. 'The project brings with it an investment of an immediate £400 million into the Scottish economy, creating long-term jobs, and paying local authority rates, taxes and community benefits. 'We're grateful to the Scottish Government for backing Sanquhar II and to the UK Government for creating confidence in the renewables sector.' PA Media Hundreds of jobs are set to be created during the construction phase of the project (CWP Energy/PA) James Ian Robinson, senior sales director UK & Ireland at Vestas, which is providing the project's EnVentus platforms and V162 turbines, described it as an 'important step' towards greater UK energy security. 'Construction is now under way on what will become the UK's fourth largest onshore wind project, and we're honoured to contribute to this landmark development. 'Sanquhar II marks another important step toward greater energy security through home-grown power generation in the UK. 'We thank CWP Energy for their trust, having placed the order in Q1 this year, and look forward to continuing our collaboration in driving the energy transition forward.' CWP Energy said the farm, which has been nearly 10 years in the planning, will offset some 540,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide every year. Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said he welcomed the development, which he said 'demonstrates Scotland's vital role in delivering the UK Government's clean power mission'. He went on: 'Reformed national pricing will ensure the benefits of clean power are felt by communities and consumers in every part of the country, while giving businesses the stability and certainty they need to continue investing to upgrade our infrastructure to boost our national energy security, helping to create thousands of skilled jobs, and boosting the economy.' Huw Jones, chairman of Jones Bros Civil Engineering UK, set out the positive impact the construction phase of the development will have on the local economy. 'Currently on site, we are averaging 100 personnel per day, with the expectation for this to rise to 200,' he said. 'We are utilising local contractors and suppliers where we can, and almost 50% of our workforce are from the local area, with many others utilising the accommodation facilities within the surrounding towns and villages.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
The Herald Scotland
10 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Within the UK, we get what we need and deserve - no more, no less
The GERS figures, which are published by the Scottish Government, were pretty dire. They measure the amount of public money spent in Scotland against the taxation that is raised here. The difference, this year, is £26.2 billion which is a remarkable 11.7 per cent of GDP. As part of the exercise, the GERS deficit is rapidly translated, without the help of AI, into the per capita variation between public expenditure in Scotland and England, which now runs at £2669, up by £358 in a year. That number is, understandably, trumpeted by those who favour the constitutional status quo. If there was ever another referendum, it would frighten all but the most dedicated horses. Read More: It is a pity however that the GERS figures have been reduced to political cudgels without greater understanding of what they represent. First, it needs to be understood that, within a United Kingdom, it makes perfectly good sense that Scotland enjoys these advantages, which were embedded long before devolution or independence became significant terms in the political vocabulary. Higher public expenditure in Scotland was based on two main factors – our heavily disproportionate geography vis-à-vis population and our levels of urban poverty, exacerbated by the decline of heavy industry in post-war years. In other words, the distribution was broadly founded on fairness and need rather than any political or constitutional fix. The Barnett formula brought order to that principle but certainly did not invent it. This point is reinforced by the pattern of public spending in England. The figure of £2669 is misleading since it is a comparison with a figure generic to the whole of England, within which there are actually large divergences. The poorer areas 'up north' are not far off Scottish levels of per capita spending while those in the effete south-east are significantly lower. In other words, the Scottish funding 'bonus' is based on needs rather than munificence and it is on these grounds it should be defended and argued for. If Scotland does well out of Barnett, which it does, it is because of our history and geography rather than a political decision either to buy us off or, as Nationalists would have it, sell us short. Within the UK, we get what we need and deserve. No more, no less. At that point, Nationalists resort to a hypothetical argument rather than the actual one. On the basis of no evidence, they assert that the need for this relative largesse – or simple fairness, as I would have it - would disappear if all the economic levers were in their hands. I do not believe that to be true and have no wish for my children or grand-children to be on the receiving end of finding out. But let's park that argument, as the SNP seems to have done, for another decade. Recall instead the grounds for the Barnett formula in the first place – scattered geography and the consequences of industrial history, leading to a higher level of poverty and need. Logically, within that context, these are the areas of Scottish life which should have been prioritised, in the interests of 'levelling up' before the term was fashionable. The 'differential' money should really be ringfenced for post-industrial communities that have never recovered from the loss of their raisons d'etre, and also for the Scottish periphery where per capita costs of delivery are inevitably greater. If that principle had been maintained, we would see very different outcomes today and the myth of the poor and the peripheral being subsidy supplicants rather than entitled priorities would evaporate. But where has Scotland's 'extra' money, via the Barnett formula, actually gone? Is it to the periphery, which continues to shed population at an alarming rate? Is it to the depressed industrial communities and opportunities for their new generations? Or, in fact, has the bonus enshrined in the Barnett formula simply become one big funding trough which serves disproportionately the interests of the better-off? At this point, I revert to the National Records of Scotland which reported on our shifting demographics. The headline figure is that the Scottish population has reached new heights of over 5.5 million, due to net immigration more than making up for the excess of deaths over births. In some parts of Scotland, however, the figures give very little sign of encouragement that anything is being levelled up. Where I live in the Western Isles, for example, the under-16 population is down by13 per cent in a decade and the working age population is down by 10 per cent. The implications of this are not difficult to discern. There are not enough people to do the jobs on which an ageing population depends. So more people leave and the trend continues. There is very little sign of population growth in old industrial areas either. North Ayrshire's young population, for example, is down by ten per cent and working age numbers by 5.7 per cent. And be warned- what the most peripheral and poorest parts of Scotland face today in terms of not having enough people to support the services on which an ageing population depends is coming for others which still regard themselves as secure from demographic trends. Money is not the answer to everything but it rarely does any harm. So let's not apologise or be excessively grateful for the 'extra' £2669 each of us gets a year through the Barnett formula. But let us not forget either why we get it – which is off the backs of places which represented the original case for that extra money but are still left behind when it comes to addressing poverty, disadvantage and population loss. Brian Wilson is a former Labour Party politician. He was MP for Cunninghame North from 1987 until 2005 and served as a Minister of State from 1997 to 2003
