logo
Top DOJ official plans to meet with Ghislaine Maxwell about Epstein case as House panel pursues subpoena

Top DOJ official plans to meet with Ghislaine Maxwell about Epstein case as House panel pursues subpoena

CBS News2 days ago
Washington — Todd Blanche, the second-highest ranking official at the Justice Department, said Tuesday that he plans to meet with Ghislaine Maxwell "in the coming days" about the case involving convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
"Justice demands courage. For the first time, the Department of Justice is reaching out to Ghislaine Maxwell to ask: what do you know?" Blanche wrote on social media. He added that he contacted Maxwell's lawyers at the direction of Attorney General Pam Bondi. "I intend to meet with her soon. No one is above the law — and no lead is off-limits," Blanche wrote.
On Capitol Hill, a subcommittee of the House Oversight and Reform Committee approved a motion from GOP Rep. Tim Burchett of Tennessee that directs the committee's chairman to subpoena Maxwell to appear for a deposition, a signal of lawmakers' interest in speaking to Epstein's former partner.
Blanche, who was President Trump's private defense attorney before joining the Justice Department, said that the department and the FBI continue to stand by a memo released earlier this month that concluded Epstein did not have a "client list" and confirmed that he died by suicide. The memo, which detailed the findings of a review of Epstein's case, also said there was no "credible evidence" that the disgraced financier blackmailed prominent people.
The Justice Department and FBI also said they would not release any additional information about Epstein's case, and noted that the review did not uncover evidence that would prompt an investigation into uncharged third parties.
"President Trump has told us to release all credible evidence," Blanche said in a second statement shared by Bondi. "If Ghislane Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say."
The deputy attorney general said the Justice Department in prior administrations had not asked about her willingness to meet with the government, and he anticipates "meeting with Ms. Maxwell in the coming days."
David Oscar Markus, Maxwell's lawyer, said in a statement, "I can confirm that we are in discussions with the government and that Ghislaine will always testify truthfully. We are grateful to President Trump for his commitment to uncovering the truth in this case."
Maxwell was an associate of Epstein's and convicted in 2021 for her role in helping Epstein recruit, groom and abuse underage girls. She is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence. Her lawyers have asked the Supreme Court to take up an appeal of her conviction.
Blanche's outreach to Maxwell's lawyers comes after the Justice Department asked a federal court in New York on Friday to unseal transcripts from grand jury proceedings involving Epstein. He was indicted in 2019 on one count of sex trafficking of minors and one count of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of minors.
Federal prosecutors alleged that Epstein sexually exploited and abused dozens of underage girls from 2002 through 2005, and worked with others who set up sexual encounters with victims at Epstein's residences in Manhattan and Palm Beach, Florida.
He died by suicide while in federal custody before his trial. Epstein had been arrested in Florida in 2006 and pleaded guilty to two state prostitution charges in 2008.
In addition to asking the court to release the grand jury transcripts related to Epstein's indictment, the Justice Department also asked it to make public grand jury transcripts associated with Maxwell's case.
Whether the transcripts become public will be up to the judges overseeing the cases, though the records will likely be heavily redacted to shield information related to victims. If the Justice Department's requests are granted by the court, the material is unlikely to be available immediately, and it could be weeks or months before it is unsealed.
Federal rules typically require matters before a grand jury to be kept secret.
The president and his administration have been dealing with backlash from Mr. Trump's allies that arose after the Justice Department released the memo about Epstein.
Some top administration officials, such as Vice President JD Vance and FBI Director Kash Patel, suggested before Mr. Trump's reelection that Democrats were deliberately concealing information about Epstein and his purported list of clients. But now, with the Justice Department under Mr. Trump's control, some of his allies are skeptical of its claim that there is nothing left to disclose.
Mr. Trump has tried to downplay the focus on Epstein and lashed out at some of his supporters, calling them "weaklings" who have been fooled by Democrats. He referred to claims about Epstein as the "Jeffrey Epstein Hoax."
Epstein and Mr. Trump moved in the same social circles in New York and Florida from the late 1980s to the early 2000s. They were friends for years, until they had a falling out around 2004. Mr. Trump has previously acknowledged he crossed paths with Epstein in Palm Beach, but said in 2019 following Epstein's arrest that they haven't spoken in 15 years.
Last week, the president lashed out at a story in the Wall Street Journal that chronicled the pair's relationship, which the president has said ended before Epstein's first arrest in 2006. The Journal reported that Mr. Trump had signed a "bawdy" letter to Epstein in the early 2000s to mark his 50th birthday that said, in part, "may every day be another wonderful secret." CBS News has not independently seen or verified the letter.
Mr. Trump called the letter "fake" and filed a defamation lawsuit against the Journal's publisher, parent company News Corporation, its leader Rupert Murdoch and the reporters who wrote the Epstein story. Mr. Trump is seeking at least $20 billion in damages.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Three former DOJ officials sue to challenge their Trump-era firings
Three former DOJ officials sue to challenge their Trump-era firings

CBS News

time28 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Three former DOJ officials sue to challenge their Trump-era firings

Three fired Justice Department officials filed a lawsuit against Attorney General Pam Bondi on Thursday, after they were part of a wave of terminations from the agency earlier this summer. The plaintiffs in Thursday's suit include Michael Gordon, a longtime federal prosecutor who also handled January 6 cases. He was fired last month while handling a high-level fraud case against a Florida man accused of fleecing children with special needs out of millions of dollars. The lawsuit says the firing "came as a particular shock" to Gordon because he was picked to help lead that case, and he was "personally congratulated" by officials. Also joining the suit: Joseph Tirrell, the department's former top ethics official, and Patty Hartman, a public affairs specialist who oversaw press releases about Jan. 6 cases and helped maintain the content of an online Justice Department database on Capital siege cases. In their lawsuit, the three officials say they were told of their firings in one-page memos signed by Bondi that didn't offer any specific reason for the termination. The memos cited Article II of the U.S. Constitution, which lays out the powers of the president. The suit argues Bondi and the Justice Department did not follow the normal procedures that govern how and when civil servants can be fired. They ask a judge to order the Trump administration to "immediately reinstate" them as Justice Department employees, and award back pay as needed. "The Attorney General does not have absolute authority to simply remove DOJ employees. Specifically, there are crucial guardrails that protect employees from arbitrary or unlawful termination," the lawsuit reads. On Tirell's termination, the suit also says he is owed protections as a member of the Senior Executive Service — a category of senior-level government employees who aren't appointed by the president — and as a Navy veteran. "Specifically, it is a Prohibited Personnel Practice to 'knowingly take, recommend, or approve any personnel action if the taking of such action would violate a veterans' preference requirement,'" the suit read, referring to federal rules that give former members of the military certain preferences in government jobs. Normally, the suit says, the plaintiffs would be able to go to a federal agency called the Merit Systems Protection Board to appeal their firings. But the MSPB has been hobbled by President Trump's decision to fire a board member, making any filing there "futile," the plaintiffs say. Dozens of Justice Department staffers have been fired, CBS News has previously reported. The firings include prosecutors and officials who worked on the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot, as well as people linked to the criminal investigations into Mr. Trump. Within weeks of Mr. Trump's inauguration, top officials directed the FBI to put together a list of agents who worked on Jan. 6 cases — a sweeping dragnet since the Capitol riot investigation was the largest in Justice Department history, ensnaring over 1,000 defendants. Meanwhile, Bondi set up a "weaponization working group" tasked with reviewing the two federal criminal prosecutions of Mr. Trump. After her firing, Hartman blasted the Justice Department in an interview with CBS News. "There used to be a line, used to be a very distinct separation between the White House and the Department of Justice, because one should not interfere with the work of the other," Hartman told CBS News. "That line is very definitely gone." CBS News has reached out to the Justice Department for comment on the lawsuit.

Lawyers from both sides of the aisle decry Trump attacks on judges at California conference
Lawyers from both sides of the aisle decry Trump attacks on judges at California conference

San Francisco Chronicle​

timean hour ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Lawyers from both sides of the aisle decry Trump attacks on judges at California conference

It's time for the legal community to speak up about the increasing threats to judges across the country, a diverse pair of legal scholars said Thursday at the conference of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. 'Lawyers have to stand up to this, stand up for judicial independence," said Paul Clement, who has argued for conservative causes and was the Justice Department's solicitor general under President George W. Bush. Erwin Chemerinsky, the law school dean at UC Berkeley who has argued cases in the Supreme Court in favor of racial diversity and other liberal causes, cited Republican calls to impeach judges who have ruled against President Donald Trump. 'Being a judge now is more important than it's ever been in American history,' Chemerinsky told the audience of hundreds of lawyers and judges at the court's conference in Monterey. 'This is a time when we need judicial courage. We need the lawyers to be courageous too.' And in a reference to Trump's apparent disregard of judges' orders to stop sending immigrants, some of them with legal status, to prisons in Latin America, Chemerinsky said, 'If any president can violate court orders, can lock any of us up, the word for that is dictatorship.' Clement, as a Justice Department lawyer, argued before the Supreme Court, unsuccessfully, to try to overturn President Barack Obama's national health insurance law, the Affordable Care Act, and in defense of a law banning federal benefits for same-sex married couples. As a private attorney, he was on the winning side of last year's ruling allowing judges to decide the meaning of contested federal regulations, overturning a 1984 decision that required courts to accept an agency's interpretation when the meaning of a law was unclear. 'I'm a big believer in executive power,' Clement told the conference. But 'if you have an administration that is trying to push the limits … you're in a period of extraordinary tension.' He criticized Trump's Justice Department for prosecuting a federal judge in Wisconsin who directed an undocumented immigrant to the back door of her courtroom when federal immigration agents were looking for him, and for recent statements by Attorney General Pam Bondi denouncing 'unelected' federal judges who have frustrated the administration's program. It's time to 'turn down the volume,' Clement said. They spoke three days after the latest Republican proposal to break up the 9th Circuit, the nation's largest federal appeals court. The court hears appeals of federal cases from California, eight other Western states and the territories of Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands. Its rulings are binding on federal judges in all of those states, including conservative dominions such as Idaho and Montana, and it has a 16-13 majority of judges appointed by Democratic presidents. The legislation by two Idaho Republicans, Sens. Mike Crapo and Jim Risch, would leave California, Hawaii and Guam in the 9th Circuit and create a new 12th Circuit court for the other states. It is the 60th such bill introduced since 1985, and would appear to have little chance of overcoming a Democratic filibuster in the Senate. The measure, Risch said in a statement, 'would split and modernize the 9th Circuit, allowing for more manageable caseloads and justice that aligns with the values of Idaho.'

Resilient Trump Lifted by Improved View of the Economy, WSJ Poll Finds
Resilient Trump Lifted by Improved View of the Economy, WSJ Poll Finds

Wall Street Journal

timean hour ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Resilient Trump Lifted by Improved View of the Economy, WSJ Poll Finds

Buoyed by voters' improving views of the economy, President Trump's political standing is showing notable resilience, a new Wall Street Journal poll finds, despite the unpopularity of the GOP's big tax-and-spending law, dissatisfaction with Trump's tariff plan and high suspicion that the government is hiding important information about its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The set of turbulent recent events, which also has included the administration's aggressive deportation program and the U.S. bombing of Iran's nuclear sites, has failed either to dent or improve the public's overall view of the president. Some 46% approve of his job performance—unchanged from April—with 52% disapproving.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store