CCMA ruling allows CETA to discipline employee who misused whistleblower status
The Construction Education and Training Authority (CETA) is set to discipline a senior employee who claimed whistleblower protection, following a CCMA ruling that deemed the disclosures insincere.
Image: Picture: Bonile Bam
The Construction Education and Training Authority (CETA) has been given the go-ahead to proceed with disciplinary action against a senior employee who had claimed whistleblower protection.
This comes after the Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) found in a recent decision that the employee, who was seeking protection as a whistleblower, did not make his or her disclosures 'sincerely, honestly and in good faith and thus cannot be regarded as protected disclosures to be protected against occupational detriment'.
According to CETA, the employee had attempted to halt disciplinary proceedings by invoking the Protected Disclosure Act of 2000, 'disguising themselves as a whistleblower when they were not.'
The employee is facing a raft of serious charges, including violation of supply chain management policies leading to irregular expenditure, breach of contract management policies, leaking of confidential information, misrepresentation, fraud, and forgery – including the alleged forging of the CEO's signature.
In a statement, CETA CEO Malusi Shezi said that the 'ruling by CCMA confirms that there was never any whistleblower to start with. We welcome this ruling as very critical for applying consequences management against serious transgressions.'
Shezi said that 'what we have here is someone who sought to play victim by posing as a whistleblower and proceeded to conduct a smear campaign against the CEO and the CETA Board. The facts should be ventilated, and appropriate determination be made in due processes.'
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
CETA noted that the employee's disclosures were only made in August 2019, three months after a forensic investigation report implicating the same official was issued to the CETA board. The employee was suspended in June 2023 and is accused of violating suspension conditions by contacting the Ministry of Higher Education and Training.
'From the time I assumed office in 2021, one of my key goals has been to eliminate corrupt practices and malfeasance and bring clean governance and administration at CETA. This ruling not only vindicates us but gives us confidence to proceed with action we believe will help clean up the rot and cancer plaguing the Sector Education Training Authorities,' Shezi said.
These developments come just days after the employee, identified as Tumi, appeared on a podcast with the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (OUTA) during which she made allegations of corruption within CETA.
In her interview with OUTA CEO Wayne Duvenage, Tumi detailed her efforts to combat what she described as irregularities in CETA's procurement processes.
'I thought it was about time that I break my silence. I've been quiet for quite some time and enduring this abuse,' Tumi said in the interview. She said that when she joined SETA in March 2012, it was under administration.
Tumi stated she was 'deliberate in adhering to compliance with supply chain management best practices yet was repeatedly suspended and victimised,' highlighting what she described as systemic issues within CETA.
She further claimed that, around 2015 and 2016, she flagged procurement irregularities, resulting in her being sent on gardening leave. 'I could have prevented it, but I was not allowed to play my role, and then we, the organisation, ended up being in trouble because certain things were not done properly,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
CCMA ruling allows CETA to discipline employee who misused whistleblower status
The Construction Education and Training Authority (CETA) is set to discipline a senior employee who claimed whistleblower protection, following a CCMA ruling that deemed the disclosures insincere. Image: Picture: Bonile Bam The Construction Education and Training Authority (CETA) has been given the go-ahead to proceed with disciplinary action against a senior employee who had claimed whistleblower protection. This comes after the Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) found in a recent decision that the employee, who was seeking protection as a whistleblower, did not make his or her disclosures 'sincerely, honestly and in good faith and thus cannot be regarded as protected disclosures to be protected against occupational detriment'. According to CETA, the employee had attempted to halt disciplinary proceedings by invoking the Protected Disclosure Act of 2000, 'disguising themselves as a whistleblower when they were not.' The employee is facing a raft of serious charges, including violation of supply chain management policies leading to irregular expenditure, breach of contract management policies, leaking of confidential information, misrepresentation, fraud, and forgery – including the alleged forging of the CEO's signature. In a statement, CETA CEO Malusi Shezi said that the 'ruling by CCMA confirms that there was never any whistleblower to start with. We welcome this ruling as very critical for applying consequences management against serious transgressions.' Shezi said that 'what we have here is someone who sought to play victim by posing as a whistleblower and proceeded to conduct a smear campaign against the CEO and the CETA Board. The facts should be ventilated, and appropriate determination be made in due processes.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ CETA noted that the employee's disclosures were only made in August 2019, three months after a forensic investigation report implicating the same official was issued to the CETA board. The employee was suspended in June 2023 and is accused of violating suspension conditions by contacting the Ministry of Higher Education and Training. 'From the time I assumed office in 2021, one of my key goals has been to eliminate corrupt practices and malfeasance and bring clean governance and administration at CETA. This ruling not only vindicates us but gives us confidence to proceed with action we believe will help clean up the rot and cancer plaguing the Sector Education Training Authorities,' Shezi said. These developments come just days after the employee, identified as Tumi, appeared on a podcast with the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (OUTA) during which she made allegations of corruption within CETA. In her interview with OUTA CEO Wayne Duvenage, Tumi detailed her efforts to combat what she described as irregularities in CETA's procurement processes. 'I thought it was about time that I break my silence. I've been quiet for quite some time and enduring this abuse,' Tumi said in the interview. She said that when she joined SETA in March 2012, it was under administration. Tumi stated she was 'deliberate in adhering to compliance with supply chain management best practices yet was repeatedly suspended and victimised,' highlighting what she described as systemic issues within CETA. She further claimed that, around 2015 and 2016, she flagged procurement irregularities, resulting in her being sent on gardening leave. 'I could have prevented it, but I was not allowed to play my role, and then we, the organisation, ended up being in trouble because certain things were not done properly,' she said.
Eyewitness News
a day ago
- Eyewitness News
South African law is failing gig workers
Gig work using digital platforms has exploded over the past decade. South Africa has been fertile ground for Uber, Checkers 60Sixty and Takealot. Sustained unemployment alongside high levels of urbanisation and wealth inequality has created a large population of people desperate for work. They have access to phones and the internet and they can provide middle- and upper-class households with cheap labour. But legislation falls short in protecting these workers. The number of workers in the gig economy is uncertain. A 2020 estimate puts it at 30,000 full-time workers, but growing about 10% a year. Most gig workers in the country are in e-hailing services, such as Uber and Bolt. These have a combined 60,000 drivers on their system but not all the registered drivers are actually working for these companies at present and many drivers would be registered on both systems. These services promote themselves as opportunities for independence, allowing drivers to set their own hours or earn additional income as a 'side hustle'. But it also leaves them vulnerable to exploitation and with little recourse to legal remedies. In South African law, gig workers are classified as 'independent contractors'. Operating companies, such as Uber, Bolt and Pingo (responsible for administering 60Sixty drivers), benefit by keeping workers in a permanent state of uncertainty. There is little downside for these companies to onboard as many drivers as possible, and leaving the drivers to compete for limited work. Gig workers are responsible for their own expenses. For drivers, this means covering the cost of fuel, maintenance and insurance. This eats into their already meagre monthly earnings, resulting in many gig workers earning well below the minimum monthly wage. Platform work drives down wages. Globally, in comparison to their employed counterparts, independent gig workers earn 64% less for doing the same job, according to the International Labour Organisation. Under current legislation, gig workers are also not entitled to paid leave or sick leave; they receive no medical aid or retirement fund contributions; and they can be dismissed arbitrarily without recourse to the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) or labour courts. Most digital platforms reserve the right to deactivate a user's account for reasons that would not qualify as fair dismissal under South African labour law. UBER SA VS NUPSAW AND OTHERS In 2016, seven Uber drivers approached the CCMA to argue they were unfairly dismissed when Uber deactivated their accounts. Although the drivers were categorised as independent contractors, union NUPSAW argued that the nature of the agreement between them and Uber SA was more like that of full-time employees. Applying the 'realities of relationship' test, the CCMA found in the drivers' favour. It held that the relationship between Uber SA and the drivers was closer to a full-time employment relationship than to an independent contractor one. Had the decision remained, this would have fundamentally changed the way platform services operated in South Africa. However, the decision was appealed to the Labour Court, which found fundamental issues with the CCMA's decision. The biggest of which was the CCMA's refusal to attach Uber BV (Uber SA's parent company) to the proceedings. In its argument, Uber SA held that if there was any contractual relationship, it existed between the drivers and Uber BV, not Uber SA. Uber SA was simply responsible for onboarding and driver training, whereas Uber BV managed drivers on the Uber app and issued payments. As they were not party to the proceedings in the Labour Court, it refrained from answering whether there was an employment relationship between Uber BV and the drivers. For their legal status to change, another matter would need to be brought to court, which would likely result in a years-long fight ending at the Constitutional Court. LESSONS FROM ABROAD While local attempts to address the challenges faced by gig workers have been unsuccessful, movements in other countries have changed the legal status of gig workers for the better. Unlike South Africa, the UK recognises three distinct categories of workers: employees, independent contractors, and dependent contractors. In Uber BV and Others v Aslam and Others, Uber drivers in London won a substantial victory. The courts ruled that drivers are classified as dependent contractors any time they are logged on the app. The Supreme Court found that Uber falsely misrepresented the employment relationship to shield itself from responsibility for its drivers. As a result, drivers are entitled to paid leave as well as protection from arbitrary dismissals. France has taken steps to strengthen the rights of gig workers. In 2021, the French Parliament passed a bill forcing employment platforms to cover the insurance for accidents at work. It also entitled gig workers to form unions and engage in collective bargaining. Short of determined, legislative intervention to address these challenges, the task will fall on the drivers themselves to fight in court. Workers, who are already exploited, will face a legal battle against billion-dollar multinational corporations. While they may have the moral and legal standing for such a fight, they are unlikely to have the resources. Nick Fabré is a writer at the People's Legal Centre. Views expressed are not necessarily those of GroundUp. This article first appeared on GroundUp. Read the original article here.
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
CETA insider exposes corruption as Minister was dealt Presidential rebuke
A whistleblower at the Construction Education and Training Authority Sector Education and Training Authority (SETA) has blown the lid on corruption in the supply chain at the authority. Image: Pixabay A whistleblower at the Construction Education and Training Authority (CETA) Sector Education and Training Authority (SETA) has blown the lid on corruption in the supply chain at the authority. In an interview with Wayne Duvenage, CEO of civil action organisation, Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse, procurement professional Tumi details her efforts to combat irregularities, including the manipulation of tenders and the appointment of non-compliant service providers. 'I thought it was about time that I break my silence. I've been quiet for quite some time and enduring this abuse,' said Tumi. She said, when she joined the SETA in March 2012, it was under administration. Tumi discussed how she was deliberate in adhering to compliance with supply chain management best practices yet was repeatedly suspended and victimised. Tumi highlighted what she believes are systemic issues within CETA, alleging that corrupt practices persisted. A Duja Forensic Report into CETA's affairs was conducted around about the time that the authority was under administration, which was in February 2020 for an initial period of 12 months – was subsequently extended to February 2022. A Higher Education and Training Parliamentary Committee meeting, held in mid-May, was briefed on the outcomes of the report, and members lambasted the department for failing to action the findings of the probe for more than a year. During the briefing from CETA and the Department of Higher Education and Training, members 'were alarmed' by findings in the report. It found, among other things, that there was R738 million in discretionary grants awarded without accounting authority oversight, excessive salaries paid to executives, and the accreditation of non-compliant training providers. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ The Duja Report, which was commissioned at a cost of R18.9 million, revealed serious breaches in financial management, including that payroll costs had tripled over a three-year period due to unjustified salary structure adjustments and performance bonuses awarded without objective performance criteria. Transactions involving property to the value of R43.7 million had to be reversed following departmental intervention. Tumi alleged that, around 2015 and 2016, she highlighted that there were irregularities in procurement, which resulted in her being sent on gardening leave. 'I could have prevented it, but I was not allowed to play my role, and then we, the organisation, ended up being in trouble because certain things were not done properly,' she said. In 2021, she was again put on suspension for alleged wrongdoings and said that she was also asked to disqualify a bidder for no apparent reason. 'I told them, guys, are you kidding me? I told you, I advised you in that meeting, and I told you that there is no reason to disqualify this particular bidder, and you cannot find a reason that is not in line with the specification.' Following this, Tumi alleged that the entire supply management chain team was suspended. She also alleged that there were instances where the executive committee pushed tenders through without due process. Tumi called for urgent action from the Minister of Higher Education and Training, Dr Nobuhle Nkabane, and President Cyril Ramaphosa to address such abuse of power and protect whistleblowers. Nkabane on Friday had to issue a public apology for her behaviour in front of the same Parliamentary Committee last week after being lambasted by President Cyril Ramaphosa. She had met with the committee to, ostensibly, explain why she appointed certain people as chairmen of 21 SETAs and then subsequently withdrawn those appointments. The Minister faced accusations of lacking transparency in withdrawing the appointments, failing to provide a detailed explanation, and ensuring the process wasn't influenced by state capture or political dominance. Nkabane was also accused of ignoring Members of Parliament's concerns and insisting that the appointment withdrawal was not flawed. One member suggested no-one would believe her. Ramaphosa indirectly stated that the Minister had damaged the process and Parliament's reputation due to a viral video clip. He emphasised that all Ministers and senior officials must be conscious of their conduct during proceedings. IOL
